MCPInstall

pm-win-loss-analysis

Run a Pragmatic Institute Win/Loss analysis — understand why recent evaluators did or did not buy and the steps they took in their buying process. Use when a PM says "why did we win/lose", "win-loss", "why do deals slip", "churn reasons", "why did they pick the competitor", or "interview a lost prospect". Enforces the rule that win/loss is run by an objective party not involved in the sale, and evaluates the buying PROCESS, not the salespeople. Produces a Win/Loss Interview Guide and a Win/Loss Findings Report as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.

Installs
40
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/julianoczkowski/product-manager --skill pm-win-loss-analysis
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads pm-win-loss-analysis automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Win/Loss Analysis (Framework: Market → Win/Loss Analysis)

Rule: Win/loss should be done by someone not involved in that sales effort. You are evaluating the buying process, not the salespeople. Build a champion in sales leadership to get access, and reassure everyone you're studying how the market buys. Ideally the product team owns win/loss. See ../pm-copilot/references/framework.md.

Ranking scales (use verbatim)

  • Perception / quality (most questions): rank 1–6, where 1 = Poor, 6 = Excellent, NA = Not Applicable. (Site-visit value: 1 = Low, 6 = High.)
  • Price / value: rank 1–5, where 1 = Lower, 3 = On Par, 5 = Higher, plus "No Response."
  • Conclusion perception: rank 1–6, 1 = Poor, 6 = Excellent.

The interview guide — 8 sections (~49 questions)

1. Customer Information — Company name, address, and a contacts table (Name / Title / Phone / Email).

2. Engagement Background — Did you know of us before initial contact? (Y/N) If so, how? Prior perception of company / products & services / support (1–6). How was initial contact made? (Unsolicited RFI / Unsolicited RFP / Cold Call / Channel Lead / Web). Who made contact, and when?

3. Marketing — Which informational tools did you use? (corporate & product brochures, website, white papers, analyst reports, trade magazines, technical papers…). Rate corporate literature / product literature / website (1–6) with comments.

4. Site Visits — Did you visit customer/reference sites? (Y/N) How many live-product sites? Which sites, and rate each. Overall value of the site visits (1–6).

5. RFI/RFP Process — Was the proposal well written? Presented well visually? Did it reflect understanding of your requirements? Meet functional / implementation / support requirements? What would have made it more compelling? (each 1–6 + comments)

6. Buying Decision — What were you using before? Extent of each contact's involvement (made final decision / voted / recommended). Who else was involved (Name / Title / Role)? What were you originally looking for, and what were your selection criteria? Did our sales team understand your needs? How did you build the vendor list? Final ranking of vendors (1st/2nd/3rd)? Did you use an outside consultant? Key factors that compelled the choice. Where were we strongest / weakest? Was there a clear point where we were winning or losing? Most important criteria in choosing the winner. Winner's major strengths over the loser. Expected business benefits. What would it have taken to change the outcome?

7. Price/Value — Price/value of products vs. other vendors (1–5). Price/value of services (1–5). What feature from another vendor should we add?

8. Conclusion — Current perception of company / products / services / support (1–6). Would you consider doing business with us in the future? (Y/N + why). Would you recommend us to others? (Y/N + why). General comments.

Interview the user (batch questions)

  1. Are these wins, losses, or both — and which deals/accounts?
  2. Who will conduct the interviews? (must be someone not on that sales effort — confirm objectivity)
  3. What do you already know about each deal (competitors, criteria, outcome)?
  4. Do you want the full guide, or a short version focused on a few key questions?

Artifact templates

Win/Loss Interview Guide

# Win/Loss Interview Guide — <company / deal>

**Company:** <company>  ·  **Feature / Product:** <name>
**Author (interviewer — objective, not on the sale):** <author>  ·  **Date created:** <date>
**Scales:** perception 1–6 (1=Poor, 6=Excellent, NA) · price/value 1–5 (1=Lower, 3=On Par, 5=Higher)

## 1. Customer Information
| Contact | Title | Phone | Email |
| :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- |

## 2. Engagement Background
- Did you know of us before initial contact? (Y/N) — how?
- Prior perception: company ___ / products & services ___ / support ___ (1–6)
- How/when was initial contact made? By whom?

## 3. Marketing   ## 4. Site Visits   ## 5. RFI/RFP Process
<questions per section above, each with rating + comments>

## 6. Buying Decision
- Selection criteria; who was involved; vendor ranking; where we were strongest/weakest;
  what would have changed the outcome.

## 7. Price/Value      ## 8. Conclusion
- Price/value ratings; future consideration (Y/N); would recommend (Y/N); general comments.

Win/Loss Findings Report (after interviews)

# Win/Loss Findings — <segment / period>

**Company:** <company>  ·  **Feature / Product:** <name>
**Author:** <author>  ·  **Date created:** <date>
**Interviews:** <n wins, n losses>  ·  **Conducted by:** <objective party>

## Why we won / why we lost (patterns)
<themes across interviews, with counts>

## The buying process (steps evaluators took)
<stages, decision-makers, criteria, tools used>

## Competitor strengths & our gaps
| Competitor | Where they beat us | Evidence (# interviews) |
| :-- | :-- | ---: |

## What would have changed the outcome
<the single biggest levers, quoted>

## Recommendations
- Product / positioning / sales-enablement actions, prioritized.

Deliver the artifact

Follow ../pm-copilot/references/artifact-output.md: ask Markdown or .docx, write the .md, convert to .docx on request via your environment's native document-creation capability. Then offer the next stage: feed the patterns into pm-market-problems validation or sharpen your pm-positioning.

FAQ

What does the pm-win-loss-analysis skill do?

Run a Pragmatic Institute Win/Loss analysis — understand why recent evaluators did or did not buy and the steps they took in their buying process. Use when a PM says "why did we win/lose", "win-loss", "why do deals slip", "churn reasons", "why did they pick the competitor", or "interview a lost prospect". Enforces the rule that win/loss is run by an objective party not involved in the sale, and evaluates the buying PROCESS, not the salespeople. Produces a Win/Loss Interview Guide and a Win/Loss Findings Report as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.

How do I install pm-win-loss-analysis?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/julianoczkowski/product-manager --skill pm-win-loss-analysis in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/pm-win-loss-analysis/ (personal) or .claude/skills/pm-win-loss-analysis/ (project).

Which AI agents can use pm-win-loss-analysis?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is pm-win-loss-analysis safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains pm-win-loss-analysis?

It is published by julianoczkowski in julianoczkowski/product-manager. It has 40 recorded installs.

More from julianoczkowski/product-manager

View all →

pm-market-problems

julianoczkowski/product-manager

Run Pragmatic Institute market discovery and validate real market problems before anything gets built. Use when a PM says "I want to build a feature", "do market research", "talk to customers", "discovery", "validate this idea", "is this problem real", "NIHITO", or "who should I interview". Enforces the outside-in rule: build only for problems that are urgent, pervasive, and that the market will pay to solve. Produces a Market Discovery Document and a Market Problems Table as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.

Docs & Writing41 installs

pm-opportunity-scoring

julianoczkowski/product-manager

Score and rank product opportunities objectively with the Pragmatic Institute Opportunity Scoring model — across distinctive competency fit, competitive landscape, investment level, and impact to buyers/users. Use when the PM asks which idea to pursue, "score these opportunities", prioritize projects/bets, or compare options objectively instead of by opinion. Produces an Opportunity Scorecard as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.

Docs & Writing41 installs

pm-copilot

julianoczkowski/product-manager

Product-management copilot based on the Pragmatic Institute Framework (Foundations, Focus, Build). Use this as the entry point whenever a product manager wants to work through building a product or feature the market-driven way — e.g. "I want to build a feature", "help me plan this product", "where do I start", "I have an idea for X". It figures out where the PM is in the Pragmatic journey, guides them through the right stages (market research, personas, positioning, strategy, requirements, roadmap, launch), and produces a client-ready artifact (Markdown or Word .docx) at every stage. Also use it to explain the Pragmatic Framework or choose which PM artifact to create.

Docs & Writing41 installs

pm-distinctive-competence

julianoczkowski/product-manager

Articulate your organization's Distinctive Competencies the Pragmatic Institute way — the unique abilities to deliver value that are valued, different, and provable. Use when a PM says "what makes us different", "our moat", "unique strengths", "why us", "competitive advantage", or "distinctive competence". Strategy = intersect market problems with what only you can do. Produces a Distinctive Competencies worksheet as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.

Docs & Writing40 installs

pm-positioning

julianoczkowski/product-manager

Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.

40 installs

pm-requirements

julianoczkowski/product-manager

Write market-driven, prioritized product requirements (a Market Requirements Document / MRD) the Pragmatic Institute way. Use when the PM asks for "requirements", "an MRD", "what should we build", "prioritize features", "market requirements", or wants development to stop saying "requirements aren't specific enough". Articulates each requirement as a persona's problem, prioritizes with Market Evidence × Impact, and groups them for delivery. Produces a Market Requirements Document as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.

Docs & Writing40 installs

Popular docs & writing skills

View category →

grill-with-docs

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

Docs & Writing1.2M installs

lark-markdown

open.feishu.cn

飞书 Markdown:查看、创建、上传、编辑和比较飞书中的原生 Markdown 文件。当用户要操作飞书 Markdown 文件,或比较其远端版本及本地草稿时使用。纯本地 Markdown 文件操作不触发本 skill。不负责将 Markdown 导入为飞书在线文档,也不负责文件搜索、权限、评论、移动、删除等云空间管理操作。

Docs & Writing778.7K installs

writing-beats

mattpocock/skills

Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.

Docs & Writing490.7K installs

writing-shape

mattpocock/skills

Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.

Docs & Writing490.2K installs

writing-fragments

mattpocock/skills

Writing, explore: mine raw fragments, no structure yet.

Docs & Writing489.6K installs

writing-for-agents

mattpocock/skills

Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.

Docs & Writing479.3K installs