
training-report
Produce a professional training/workshop report as a .docx file. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "training report", "workshop report", "compte rendu", "compte rendu de formation", "formation report", "debriefing a workshop", "write up a training session", "résumé de formation", or any request to document a training session, workshop, or onboarding event with individual participant feedback and recommendations. Also trigger when the user says things like "I just ran a workshop and need to write it up", "help me summarize what happened in my training session", or "I need to report back to management about a session I ran". Always use this skill — for short or long sessions, across any discipline (technical, soft skills, creative, compliance, onboarding, etc.) — whenever a structured written deliverable about a training event is needed.
- Installs
- 4.3K
- Last 24h
- +95
- Trending rank
- #2058
- Security
- Pass
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills --skill training-report- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads training-report automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
Security audits
Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Training Report
Iterate the full report in Markdown first. Generate the .docx last, once, when the content is final. The .md is the canonical artifact; the .docx is a terminal derivative.
Discipline-agnostic: coding workshop, leadership seminar, safety training, onboarding, creative workshop — all apply equally.
Voice mode: this conversation may be conducted by voice. Transcription can introduce homophones, missing punctuation, or ambiguous proper nouns (names, company names, tool names). If any answer is unclear after transcription, ask a short clarifying question before moving on — do not guess.
Reference files
Load these files at the steps indicated. Do not load them all upfront.
| File | Load at |
|---|---|
references/tone-of-voice.md | Step 1 (after language + audience confirmed) |
references/markdown-draft.md | Step 5 (before writing the draft) |
references/docx-generation.md | Step 6 (before generating the .docx) |
Step 0 — Check dependencies
Before asking the user anything, verify skill availability.
docx skill (required for Step 6)
- If found: note it; load it at Step 6
- If not found: warn the user — it is required to generate the final Word document and can be installed from Anthropic's official skill library. Offer to proceed with the Markdown draft in the meantime.
Humanizer skill (recommended)
- After Step 1, look for a humanizer skill matching the chosen language
- If found: load it and apply it during the humanization pass in Step 5
- If not found: tell the user once, then fall back to inline humanization rules (Step 5b). Suggest installing a humanizer skill for the chosen language.
Step 1 — Language & audience
Ask:
- "In what language should I write the report? (French / English / other)"
- "Who is the primary reader? (executive / HR / direct management / external client / internal archive)"
Then load references/tone-of-voice.md and apply its guidance throughout.
Step 2 — Template
Ask:
"Do you have a Word (.docx) template for this report? (company header/footer, logo, branded fonts, color scheme)"
- Yes → ask them to upload it; use it as the base at Step 6 (unpack/inject/repack)
- No → proceed with a clean document; ask for a brand color before defaulting to blue
#2E75B6
Step 3 — Interview
Conduct a structured interview in batches. Wait for answers before moving on. Extract what the user already told you from the conversation before asking.
Batch A — Session metadata
- Trainer name and role
- Date, location, company/team name
- Duration
- Total number of participants
- Confirm or refine: who is the document for?
Batch B — Session context
- Stated goal of the training
- Subject, topic, tool, or material used as practical support
- Any rules or constraints set at the start
- Materials, accounts, licenses, or equipment provided to participants
Batch C — Starting levels
- Distribution of familiarity across the group (any beginners? any experts?)
- Notable outliers at either end
Batch D — Session walkthrough
Walk through the session step by step. For each step:
- Objective
- What participants actually did
- Materials, tools, or exercises involved
- First exposure to this concept or not
- How it landed; any difficulties
Probe until complete: "What happened next?", "Did anything go differently than planned?", "Were there any pivots?"
Batch E — Deliverables
Ask: "Did participants produce anything during the session?"
Probe for:
- Documents, files, diagrams, prototypes, or any output created during exercises
- Collaborative work produced as a group
- Individual work produced autonomously
- Anything left incomplete or started but not finished
These may appear in the Annexes and/or be referenced in the Session Walkthrough.
Batch F — General observations
- Overall energy and engagement of the group
- Any incidents, surprises, or notable moments
- Schedule: did it hold, or were sections cut/extended?
- Logistical issues (room, materials, setup)
General Observations is optional. If the trainer has nothing notable to add beyond the walkthrough, skip this section entirely.
Batch G — Individual feedback
Ask: "Do you have specific observations for any individual participant?"
For each named participant, extract:
- Role or background
- Starting level
- Behavior/engagement (positive and negative)
- Notable evolution, breakthrough, or resistance
- How they ended the session
Individual Feedback is optional. Only write it if the trainer explicitly provides meaningful observations. Do not prompt for feedback on every participant.
Be diplomatic. Describe behaviors, not character. Name problems factually; do not editorialize. When writing for an external client about a team you don't know, consider whether naming individuals is appropriate at all.
See references/tone-of-voice.md — Diplomatic framing section.
Batch H — Recommendations & next steps
Ask: "What would you recommend to the direction/client to build on this session?"
Probe for:
- Resources and access to provide (licenses, books, platforms, communities)
- Practices to anchor in daily work
- What to pace carefully — basics before advanced material
- Follow-up sessions (refresher, coaching, Q&A after a few weeks)
- Assessment and validation (quiz, practical challenge, peer review, checklist)
- Knowledge-sharing rituals (Slack/Teams channel, recurring meeting, Loom demos, buddy system, monthly show-and-tell)
- Management involvement (protect practice time, 1:1 check-ins, celebrate wins)
- External resources (books, courses, certifications) for self-driven participants
- Specific warnings or caveats for management
Batch I — Annexes
Ask: "Do you have any annexes to attach to the report?"
Annexes can include:
- Photos from the session
- Satisfaction survey results (NPS, ratings, verbatim comments)
- Slides or handouts distributed during the session
- Work produced by participants (exercises, prototypes, documents, diagrams)
- Reference documents used during the session
- Any other supporting material
For each annex:
- Image → attempt auto-embed at Step 6
- File (PDF, slides, spreadsheet) → reference in the Annexes section; do not embed
- Survey data → synthesize in Step 4, then include as a dedicated section in the doc
- Participant deliverable → reference in the relevant Walkthrough step AND in Annexes
Batch J — Closing & contact
Ask: "May I include a closing note thanking the team for the invitation, and your contact details for future collaboration? (email + phone)"
If yes: collect name, email, phone. The closing is written in the document language, personal in tone, brief. See references/markdown-draft.md — Closing paragraph section.
Step 4 — Feedback synthesis (if survey data provided)
Produce a synthesis in the conversation before drafting:
- Overall score / NPS
- Rating distribution
- Top 3 positive themes
- Top 3 areas for improvement
- Any outlier responses
Ask the user to confirm before it enters the document.
Step 4b — Confirm outline
Here's what I'll draft:
1. Context
2. Starting Levels
3. Session Walkthrough (N steps)
4. General Observations [optional — include if trainer provided content]
5. Participant Satisfaction [only if survey data provided]
6. Individual Feedback [optional — include if trainer provided feedback]
7. Recommendations & Next Steps
8. Annexes [only if annexes provided]
[Closing + contact]
Language: [language] | Audience: [target] | Template: [yes/no]
Ask: "Anything to adjust before I start the draft?"
Step 5 — Markdown draft
Load references/markdown-draft.md before writing. It contains the full section-by- section writing guide, Markdown limitations, HTML table workarounds, and closing paragraph guidance.
Humanization pass
Before presenting the draft, apply the humanizer skill (loaded in Step 0). If no humanizer skill is available, apply these rules inline:
- Cut all AI throat-clearing openers and sentence starters
- Cut adjective doublets — pick the more precise word
- Replace passive voice with active wherever natural
- Replace vague praise or criticism with specific behaviors or facts
- Short sentences over long ones
- Adapt to the document language (see
references/tone-of-voice.md)
Do not present an un-humanized draft.
Iteration loop
Present the draft inline in the conversation. Let the user lead. Update the .md file for every change. One canonical file, no versions. Only move to Step 6 when the user explicitly confirms the content is final.
Step 6 — Final .docx generation
Load references/docx-generation.md and the docx skill before starting.
This step runs once. It is terminal: if the user requests changes after the .docx is generated, update the .md and regenerate from scratch.
Deliver both files. If the environment supports inline file delivery (e.g. present_files on Claude.ai), use it. Otherwise, print the absolute paths to both files.
Pitfalls
- Don't fabricate details — only document what the trainer explicitly provided
- Don't editorialize in General Observations — factual only
- Don't write Individual Feedback unless explicitly provided — and stay diplomatic
- Don't pad recommendations — 6 sharp ones beat 12 vague ones
- Always include a Pacing recommendation in the Next Steps
- This skill is not developer-specific — adapt vocabulary to the discipline
- Never generate the .docx mid-conversation — Markdown is the draft stage
- Never skip an annex or image — embed, reference, or placeholder
FAQ
What does the training-report skill do?
Produce a professional training/workshop report as a .docx file. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "training report", "workshop report", "compte rendu", "compte rendu de formation", "formation report", "debriefing a workshop", "write up a training session", "résumé de formation", or any request to document a training session, workshop, or onboarding event with individual participant feedback and recommendations. Also trigger when the user says things like "I just ran a workshop and need to write it up", "help me summarize what happened in my training session", or "I need to report back to management about a session I ran". Always use this skill — for short or long sessions, across any discipline (technical, soft skills, creative, compliance, onboarding, etc.) — whenever a structured written deliverable about a training event is needed.
How do I install training-report?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills --skill training-report in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/training-report/ (personal) or .claude/skills/training-report/ (project).
Which AI agents can use training-report?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is training-report safe to install?
Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed; ZeroLeaks passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.
Who maintains training-report?
It is published by samber in samber/cc-skills. It has 4,340 recorded installs.
More from samber/cc-skills
copywriting-hooks
samber/cc-skills
Writes opening hooks and post titles for long-form articles in EN or FR — blog posts, Substack/Medium/dev.to, LinkedIn long-form, newsletters, essays. Trigger whenever the user asks for a hook, opening, lede, intro, first sentence/paragraph, opener, accroche, attaque, phrase d'accroche, or première phrase — including punching up a flat intro or draft opening — or for a post title, titre d'article, or headline. Do NOT trigger for social posts (LinkedIn feed, Twitter/X, TikTok, Bluesky), READMEs, taglines, email subjects, ad copy, landing-page headlines, press releases, SEO meta, or body rewrites. Do NOT use for end-of-article CTAs — use samber/cc-skills@copywriting-cta instead.
linkedin-ghostwriting
samber/cc-skills
B2B LinkedIn ghostwriting — hooks, post structures, and copywriting frameworks for conversion-focused posts. Use when the user wants to write LinkedIn content, create ghostwritten posts, ghostwrite for a founder or executive, or develop a B2B social strategy. Apply when the user shares a story, result, or insight and wants it turned into a post. Do NOT use for newsletter or Substack issues — use samber/cc-skills@substack-ghostwriting instead.
copywriting-tone-of-voice-creator
samber/cc-skills
Builds a brand tone of voice guide (TONE.md) — voice attributes with do's/don'ts, NN/g positioning, tone modulation matrix, lexicon, channel rules — for downstream content skills to consume. Also ports an existing TONE.md to a new channel (blog → LinkedIn, web → Twitter/X, in-product UI). Covers B2B SaaS, B2C/D2C, NGO, public sector, consulting, industrial, product-led, personal, and volunteering brands. Apply when the user wants to define or refresh a brand voice, port it to a new channel, or set up a content factory. Not for writing individual posts, articles, emails, or UI strings — use the dedicated writing skills. Not for SOUL.md, PROSE.md (samber/cc-skills@copywriting-prose-creator), or DESIGN.md.
frontend-design-deslop
samber/cc-skills
Designs distinctive, non-generic UI — typography, OKLCH color, design tokens (DESIGN.md), layout, components, motion, dark mode, accessibility — for landing pages, SaaS apps, dashboards, ecommerce, decks, docs, portfolios, avoiding the AI-slop / Claude-esque default look. Use whenever building or styling any web frontend, app, dashboard, landing page, deck, or artifact, or when the user says "make it not look like AI", "de-slopify", "deslop", "less generic", "give it character", "design a UI for X", "design an app", "update DESIGN.md", or complains the output looks like every other AI site. Trigger even on a bare "build a UI for X" with no aesthetic named. Not for writing marketing copy.
humaniseur-fr
samber/cc-skills
Remove AI-writing patterns from French text and inject voice and personality. Use when editing, reviewing, or rewriting French content that reads like ChatGPT or Claude output. Detects and fixes 38 patterns: AI vocabulary (crucial, essentiel, notamment, dans le paysage), anglicisms from English-first models (faire du sens, adresser un problème), formulaic openings (À l'ère de, Dans un monde où), participle clauses in -ant, em dash overuse, decorative emojis, mixed guillemets and apostrophes, uniform sentence length. Trigger on humaniser, déslopifier, nettoyer le texte IA, enlever le slop, make it sound human. Do NOT use for English text — use samber/cc-skills@humanizer-en-asd-ste100 instead.
deep-research
samber/cc-skills
Deep research on any topic — broad parallel web searches, multi-source validation, confidence tracking, and a cited Markdown report. Use whenever the deliverable is a thorough sourced report rather than a quick answer: 'research ', 'deep dive on X', 'analyze the landscape', 'competitive analysis', 'compare these options', 'who are the players in Z', 'literature review', 'background on Y', 'what papers exist on X', 'product teardown', 'regulatory overview', 'funding landscape', 'what trends are emerging in X', 'patent landscape', 'community health', or any request requiring scanning many sources and producing a cited written analysis. Covers 11 research types: market (TAM/SAM, segments, pricing, trends), domain (industry structure, ecosystem, regulatory overview), technical (architecture, tooling, benchmarks, technology evaluation), competitive (competitor teardown, positioning, win/loss), product (feature analysis, reviews, teardowns, roadmap signals), academic (literature surve
Popular docs & writing skills
grill-with-docs
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
lark-markdown
open.feishu.cn
飞书 Markdown:查看、创建、上传、编辑和比较飞书中的原生 Markdown 文件。当用户要操作飞书 Markdown 文件,或比较其远端版本及本地草稿时使用。纯本地 Markdown 文件操作不触发本 skill。不负责将 Markdown 导入为飞书在线文档,也不负责文件搜索、权限、评论、移动、删除等云空间管理操作。
writing-beats
mattpocock/skills
Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
writing-shape
mattpocock/skills
Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.
writing-fragments
mattpocock/skills
Writing, explore: mine raw fragments, no structure yet.
writing-for-agents
mattpocock/skills
Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.