
planning-with-files
Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Use taskplan.md, findings.md, and progress.md to maintain persistent context. Use for multi-step tasks, research, or work spanning many tool calls.
- Installs
- 76
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill planning-with-files- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads planning-with-files automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Planning with Files - Manus-Style File-Based Planning
Work like Manus (the $2B AI agent Meta acquired): Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."
Core Principle
Context Window = RAM (volatile, limited)
Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited)
→ Anything important gets written to disk.
The 3-File Pattern
For every complex task, create THREE files in your project directory:
task_plan.md → Track phases and progress
findings.md → Store research and findings
progress.md → Session log and test results
Templates are available at: .claude/templates/planning/
When to Use This Pattern
Use for:
- Multi-step tasks (3+ steps)
- Research tasks
- Building/creating projects
- Tasks spanning many tool calls
- Anything requiring organization
Skip for:
- Simple questions
- Single-file edits
- Quick lookups
Critical Timing Rules
These rules simulate hooks to ensure proper workflow:
📌 At Task Start (SessionStart)
MUST create all three files FIRST before any other work:
- Create
task_plan.mdusing the template - Create
findings.mdusing the template - Create
progress.mdusing the template - Fill in the Goal section in task_plan.md
Why: Without planning files, you'll forget goals after 50+ tool calls.
📌 Before Major Decisions (PreToolUse)
MUST re-read task_plan.md before:
- Writing or editing files
- Executing commands
- Making architectural decisions
- Implementing features
How: Use the Read tool to refresh the plan in your context.
Why: This keeps goals fresh in your attention window (Manus's "attention manipulation").
📌 After File Operations (PostToolUse)
MUST update status immediately after:
- Writing files
- Editing files
- Completing a task phase
How: Edit task_plan.md to update phase status:
- **Status:** pending → in_progress → complete
Why: Tracks progress and prevents losing track of what's done.
📌 Before Task End (Stop)
MUST verify completion:
- Check all phases marked as
complete - Review deliverables section
- Ensure no errors left unresolved
Why: Prevents premature completion with missing work.
The 6 Critical Rules
1. Create Plan First
Never start a complex task without task_plan.md. Non-negotiable.
## Goal
[One sentence describing the end state]
## Current Phase
Phase 1
## Phases
### Phase 1: Requirements & Discovery
- [ ] Understand user intent
- [ ] Identify constraints
- **Status:** in_progress
2. The 2-Action Rule
"After every 2 view/browser/search operations, IMMEDIATELY save key findings to findings.md."
This prevents visual/multimodal information from being lost.
## Visual/Browser Findings
- Screenshot shows login form with email and password fields
- API documentation indicates JSON response format
3. Read Before Decide
Before major decisions, read the plan file. This keeps goals in your attention window.
# Before implementing a feature:
Read tool → task_plan.md
# Now proceed with implementation
4. Update After Act
After completing any phase:
- Mark phase status:
pending→in_progress→complete - Log any errors encountered
- Note files created/modified
## Errors Encountered
| Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| ----------------- | ------- | ---------------------- |
| FileNotFoundError | 1 | Created default config |
5. Log ALL Errors
Every error goes in the plan file. This builds knowledge and prevents repetition.
6. Never Repeat Failures
if action_failed:
next_action != same_action
Track what you tried. Mutate the approach.
The 3-Strike Error Protocol
ATTEMPT 1: Diagnose & Fix
→ Read error carefully
→ Identify root cause
→ Apply targeted fix
ATTEMPT 2: Alternative Approach
→ Same error? Try different method
→ Different tool? Different library?
→ NEVER repeat exact same failing action
ATTEMPT 3: Broader Rethink
→ Question assumptions
→ Search for solutions
→ Consider updating the plan
AFTER 3 FAILURES: Escalate to User
→ Explain what you tried
→ Share the specific error
→ Ask for guidance
File Purposes
| File | Purpose | When to Update |
|---|---|---|
task_plan.md | Phases, progress, decisions | After each phase |
findings.md | Research, discoveries | After ANY discovery |
progress.md | Session log, test results | Throughout session |
Read vs Write Decision Matrix
| Situation | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Just wrote a file | DON'T read | Content still in context |
| Viewed image/PDF | Write findings NOW | Multimodal → text before lost |
| Browser returned data | Write to file | Screenshots don't persist |
| Starting new phase | Read plan/findings | Re-orient if context stale |
| Error occurred | Read relevant file | Need current state to fix |
| Resuming after gap | Read all planning files | Recover state |
The 5-Question Reboot Test
If you can answer these, your context management is solid:
| Question | Answer Source |
|---|---|
| Where am I? | Current phase in task_plan.md |
| Where am I going? | Remaining phases |
| What's the goal? | Goal statement in plan |
| What have I learned? | findings.md |
| What have I done? | progress.md |
Template Structure
task_plan.md Template
# Task Plan: [Brief Description]
## Goal
[One sentence describing the end state]
## Current Phase
Phase 1
## Phases
### Phase 1: Requirements & Discovery
- [ ] Understand user intent
- [ ] Identify constraints and requirements
- [ ] Document findings in findings.md
- **Status:** in_progress
### Phase 2: Planning & Structure
- [ ] Define technical approach
- [ ] Create project structure if needed
- [ ] Document decisions with rationale
- **Status:** pending
### Phase 3: Implementation
- [ ] Execute the plan step by step
- [ ] Write code to files before executing
- [ ] Test incrementally
- **Status:** pending
### Phase 4: Testing & Verification
- [ ] Verify all requirements met
- [ ] Document test results in progress.md
- [ ] Fix any issues found
- **Status:** pending
### Phase 5: Delivery
- [ ] Review all output files
- [ ] Ensure deliverables are complete
- [ ] Deliver to user
- **Status:** pending
## Key Questions
1. [Question to answer]
2. [Question to answer]
## Decisions Made
| Decision | Rationale |
| -------- | --------- |
| | |
## Errors Encountered
| Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| ----- | ------- | ---------- |
| | 1 | |
findings.md Template
# Findings & Decisions
## Requirements
_Add requirements captured from user request here._
## Research Findings
_Document key discoveries during exploration here._
## Technical Decisions
_Record decisions made with rationale._
| Decision | Rationale |
| -------- | --------- |
| | |
## Issues Encountered
_Document errors and how they were resolved._
| Issue | Resolution |
| ----- | ---------- |
| | |
## Resources
_Add URLs, file paths, and API references here._
## Visual/Browser Findings
_CRITICAL: Update after every 2 view/browser operations._
progress.md Template
# Progress Log
## Session: [DATE]
### Phase 1: [Title]
- **Status:** in_progress
- **Started:** [timestamp]
- Actions taken:
- Files created/modified:
## Test Results
| Test | Input | Expected | Actual | Status |
| ---- | ----- | -------- | ------ | ------ |
| | | | | |
## Error Log
| Timestamp | Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| --------- | ----- | ------- | ---------- |
| | | 1 | |
## 5-Question Reboot Check
| Question | Answer |
| -------------------- | ---------------- |
| Where am I? | Phase X |
| Where am I going? | Remaining phases |
| What's the goal? | [goal statement] |
| What have I learned? | See findings.md |
| What have I done? | See above |
Iron Laws
- ALWAYS create
task_plan.md,findings.md, andprogress.mdbefore starting any complex task — filesystem memory survives context resets, working memory does not. - ALWAYS re-read
task_plan.mdbefore making major decisions — context windows are volatile, files persist indefinitely. - NEVER retry a failed action with identical inputs — log the failure in the plan file, diagnose the root cause, and mutate the approach.
- ALWAYS write multimodal findings (screenshots, browser data) to
findings.mdimmediately after capture — visual context cannot be retrieved once it leaves the attention window. - NEVER mark a task complete without verifying all phases are
completeand all deliverables are present in the progress file.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using session task tools for persistence | In-memory task tracking is volatile; lost on context reset | Create task_plan.md file on disk — survives resets |
| Stating goals once and forgetting them | Context fills; goals drift without anchoring | Re-read plan file before every major decision |
| Hiding errors and retrying silently | Silent retries repeat the same failure endlessly | Log every error to plan file with attempt count |
| Stuffing all research into context | Context window fills; earlier content gets lost | Store large content and discoveries in findings.md |
| Starting execution without a plan | Undefined scope leads to wasted work and missed steps | Create all three planning files FIRST before any action |
The Manus Principles
| Principle | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Filesystem as memory | Store in files, not context |
| Attention manipulation | Re-read plan before decisions |
| Error persistence | Log failures in plan file |
| Goal tracking | Checkboxes show progress |
| Completion verification | Check all phases before stopping |
Remember: The more context you gather upfront and write to disk, the better your execution will be. Files are your persistent memory.
FAQ
What does the planning-with-files skill do?
Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Use taskplan.md, findings.md, and progress.md to maintain persistent context. Use for multi-step tasks, research, or work spanning many tool calls.
How do I install planning-with-files?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill planning-with-files in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/planning-with-files/ (personal) or .claude/skills/planning-with-files/ (project).
Which AI agents can use planning-with-files?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is planning-with-files safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains planning-with-files?
It is published by oimiragieo in oimiragieo/agent-studio. It has 76 recorded installs.
More from oimiragieo/agent-studio
pyqt6-ui-development-rules
oimiragieo/agent-studio
PyQt6 desktop GUI development rules -- signal/slot architecture, QSS theming, QThread concurrency, layout management, and cross-platform rendering. Enforces MVC separation and responsive UI patterns.
filesystem
oimiragieo/agent-studio
File system operations guidance - read, write, search, and manage files using Claude Code's built-in tools.
chrome-browser
oimiragieo/agent-studio
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
slack-notifications
oimiragieo/agent-studio
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
context-compressor
oimiragieo/agent-studio
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
nodejs-expert
oimiragieo/agent-studio
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.