MCPInstall

customer-discovery

Systematically validate your business hypotheses before building anything. Master Steve Blank's Customer Development methodology that became the foundation of Lean Startup and YC's approach. Use when: Starting a new venture to avoid building something nobody wants; Before writing a line of code to validate problem-solution fit; Pivoting decisions to systematically test new directions; Early-stage fundraising to prove market validation; Product roadmap planning to prioritiz...

Installs
287
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill customer-discovery
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads customer-discovery automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Customer Discovery

Systematically validate your business hypotheses before building anything. Master Steve Blank's Customer Development methodology that became the foundation of Lean Startup and YC's approach.

When to Use This Skill

  • Starting a new venture to avoid building something nobody wants
  • Before writing a line of code to validate problem-solution fit
  • Pivoting decisions to systematically test new directions
  • Early-stage fundraising to prove market validation
  • Product roadmap planning to prioritize based on validated customer needs
  • Entering new markets to understand unfamiliar customer segments

Methodology Foundation

AspectDetails
SourceSteve Blank - "The Four Steps to the Epiphany" (2005)
Core Principle"No business plan survives first contact with customers. Get out of the building."
Why This MattersStartups fail because they build products nobody wants. Customer Discovery replaces guessing with systematic learning before you run out of money.

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Structures content frameworksFinal messaging
Suggests persuasion techniquesBrand voice
Creates draft variationsVersion selection
Identifies optimization opportunitiesPublication timing
Analyzes competitor approachesStrategic direction

What This Skill Does

  1. Documents business hypotheses - Turns assumptions into testable statements
  2. Designs validation experiments - Creates tests that can prove you wrong
  3. Structures customer conversations - Gets real insights, not false positives
  4. Evaluates problem-solution fit - Determines if you should proceed, pivot, or stop
  5. Creates learning roadmap - Prioritizes what to validate first
  6. Tracks validation progress - Maintains evidence-based decision making

How to Use

Start Customer Discovery for a New Idea

I'm starting customer discovery for [business idea].
Help me document my hypotheses and design validation experiments.
Use Steve Blank's Customer Development methodology.

Evaluate Customer Discovery Progress

Here's what I've learned from [X] customer interviews: [summary]
Evaluate my progress against Customer Discovery criteria.
Should I proceed, pivot, or go back to more interviews?

Design a Validation Experiment

I need to validate this hypothesis: [hypothesis]
Design a Customer Discovery experiment to test it.
What would prove it true? What would prove it false?

Instructions

When helping with Customer Discovery, follow Steve Blank's systematic approach:

Step 1: Document Your Business Model Hypotheses

## Business Model Canvas Hypotheses

Before talking to customers, document what you BELIEVE to be true.
These are GUESSES until validated.

### Customer Hypotheses
| # | Hypothesis | Confidence | Evidence |
|---|------------|------------|----------|
| C1 | Our target customer is [WHO] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| C2 | They have this problem: [WHAT] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| C3 | The problem is severe because [WHY] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| C4 | They currently solve it by [HOW] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |

### Value Proposition Hypotheses
| # | Hypothesis | Confidence | Evidence |
|---|------------|------------|----------|
| V1 | Our solution provides [BENEFIT] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| V2 | Customers care about [FEATURE/OUTCOME] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| V3 | We're differentiated by [UNIQUE VALUE] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |

### Channel Hypotheses
| # | Hypothesis | Confidence | Evidence |
|---|------------|------------|----------|
| H1 | We can reach customers through [CHANNEL] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| H2 | Customer acquisition will cost [ESTIMATE] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |

### Revenue Hypotheses
| # | Hypothesis | Confidence | Evidence |
|---|------------|------------|----------|
| R1 | Customers will pay [PRICE] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| R2 | Revenue model: [TYPE] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |
| R3 | Lifetime value: [ESTIMATE] | Low/Med/High | [None yet] |

Critical Rule: You don't have a business until these hypotheses are validated with real evidence from real customers.


Step 2: Prioritize What to Validate First

## Hypothesis Prioritization Matrix

Prioritize by RISK and IMPACT:

| Hypothesis | If WRONG, Impact | Current Confidence | Priority |
|------------|------------------|-------------------|----------|
| [H1] | Fatal/Major/Minor | Low/Med/High | P1/P2/P3 |
| [H2] | Fatal/Major/Minor | Low/Med/High | P1/P2/P3 |

### Priority Rules:
- P1: Fatal if wrong + Low confidence → Validate FIRST
- P2: Major if wrong + Low/Med confidence → Validate SOON
- P3: Minor if wrong OR High confidence → Validate LATER

### Your P1 Hypotheses (Validate These First):
1. ________________________________
2. ________________________________
3. ________________________________

These are your "leap of faith" assumptions.

Step 3: Design Validation Experiments

## Experiment Design Template

### Hypothesis Being Tested:
"We believe [CUSTOMER SEGMENT] has [PROBLEM] and would [BEHAVIOR]."

### Experiment Type:
- [ ] Customer Interviews (Problem Discovery)
- [ ] Solution Interviews (Solution Validation)
- [ ] Landing Page Test (Demand Validation)
- [ ] Concierge MVP (Solution Validation)
- [ ] Smoke Test (Demand Validation)

### Success Criteria:
**Validated if:** [Specific, measurable outcome]
**Invalidated if:** [Specific, measurable outcome]

Example:
- Validated: 8+ of 10 customers describe this exact problem unprompted
- Invalidated: Fewer than 5 of 10 mention this problem

### Sample Size:
- Minimum: [Number] customers
- Target segment: [Description]

### Data to Collect:
1.
2.
3.

### Timeline:
- Start: [Date]
- End: [Date]
- Go/No-Go Decision: [Date]

Step 4: Conduct Customer Discovery Interviews

## Customer Discovery Interview Framework

### PHASE 1: Problem Discovery (First 5-10 interviews)

**Goal:** Understand the problem space, NOT pitch solutions

**Interview Structure:**
1. **Context** (5 min): Their role, background, day-to-day
2. **Problem Exploration** (15 min): Deep dive into the problem area
3. **Existing Solutions** (5 min): What they use today
4. **Impact** (5 min): How the problem affects them
5. **Wrap-up** (5 min): Referrals, next steps

**Key Questions:**
- "Tell me about your biggest challenge with [area]..."
- "Walk me through the last time you dealt with [problem]..."
- "What solutions have you tried? What worked/didn't work?"
- "How much time/money does this cost you?"
- "If this magically disappeared, what would change?"

**DO NOT:**
- Pitch your solution
- Ask leading questions
- Talk more than 30% of the time
- Ask "would you use/pay for..."

### PHASE 2: Solution Discovery (Next 5-10 interviews)

**Goal:** Test if your solution addresses validated problems

**Only proceed to Phase 2 if:**
- [ ] You've talked to 10+ potential customers
- [ ] Clear problem patterns emerged
- [ ] Problems are severe and frequent enough
- [ ] Customers are actively seeking solutions

**Solution Interview Structure:**
1. **Recap** (3 min): Confirm the problem you heard
2. **Solution Demo** (10 min): Show concept/prototype
3. **Reaction** (10 min): Their honest feedback
4. **Commitment** (5 min): Would they try/buy/refer?

**Key Questions:**
- "Does this solve the problem you described?"
- "What's missing?"
- "What would you pay for this?"
- "Would you be willing to pilot this?"
- "Who else should see this?"

Step 5: Evaluate Results and Decide

## Customer Discovery Scorecard

### Problem Validation

| Criteria | Threshold | Your Result | Pass? |
|----------|-----------|-------------|-------|
| # of interviews completed | 10+ | | Y/N |
| % who confirmed the problem unprompted | 70%+ | | Y/N |
| Problem severity (1-10 avg) | 7+ | | Y/N |
| Already spending money on solutions | 50%+ | | Y/N |
| Actively seeking alternatives | 30%+ | | Y/N |

**Problem Validated:** All Y → Proceed to Solution Validation
**Problem NOT Validated:** Any N → Pivot or dig deeper

### Solution Validation

| Criteria | Threshold | Your Result | Pass? |
|----------|-----------|-------------|-------|
| # of solution interviews | 10+ | | Y/N |
| Said "this solves my problem" | 70%+ | | Y/N |
| Willing to try/pilot | 50%+ | | Y/N |
| Willing to pay (some amount) | 30%+ | | Y/N |
| Gave commitment (deposit, LOI, intro) | 3+ people | | Y/N |

**Solution Validated:** All Y → Proceed to MVP
**Solution NOT Validated:** Any N → Iterate or pivot

### Decision Framework

IF Problem NOT Validated: → PIVOT: Different customer segment? → PIVOT: Different problem? → STOP: No market here?

IF Problem Validated BUT Solution NOT Validated: → ITERATE: Different solution to same problem → ITERATE: Different features/approach

IF Both Validated: → BUILD: Minimum Viable Product → SELL: Pre-sales before building


Step 6: Document Learnings and Update Hypotheses

## Customer Discovery Learning Log

### Round [#] Summary

**Dates:** [Start] - [End]
**Interviews Conducted:** [#]
**Customer Segments Covered:** [List]

### Validated Hypotheses ✅
| Hypothesis | Evidence | Confidence Now |
|------------|----------|----------------|
| [H1] | [Quotes/Data] | High |

### Invalidated Hypotheses ❌
| Hypothesis | Evidence | Next Step |
|------------|----------|-----------|
| [H2] | [Quotes/Data] | Pivot to... |

### Surprises / New Insights 🔍
| Insight | Implication |
|---------|-------------|
| [Learning] | [What this means] |

### Updated Business Model
[What changed based on learnings]

### Next Validation Round
| Hypothesis to Test | Experiment | Timeline |
|--------------------|------------|----------|
| [H3] | [Method] | [Dates] |

Examples

Example 1: B2B SaaS - HR Tech Startup

Context: Founder believes mid-size companies need better employee onboarding software.

Input:

"I want to build HR onboarding software for mid-size companies. Help me set up Customer Discovery."

Output:

Business Model Hypotheses:

#HypothesisRisk if WrongPriority
C1HR managers at 100-500 employee companies manage onboardingFatalP1
C2Current onboarding is manual, time-consuming (5+ hrs/new hire)FatalP1
C3Poor onboarding causes turnover they care aboutFatalP1
V1Automated workflows would save 3+ hours per new hireMajorP2
V2They'd pay $50-100/employee/month for thisMajorP2
H1We can reach HR managers through LinkedInMinorP3

P1 Validation Plan:

Experiment 1: Problem Discovery

  • Target: 15 HR managers at 100-500 employee companies
  • Method: 30-minute phone interviews
  • Questions:
    1. "Walk me through what happens when you hire someone..."
    2. "What's the biggest headache in that process?"
    3. "How much time does onboarding take per new hire?"
    4. "What tools are you using today?"
    5. "What's the cost when onboarding goes poorly?"

Success Criteria:

  • Validated if: 10+ of 15 describe manual, time-consuming process; 8+ mention specific pain points
  • Invalidated if: Most say "onboarding is fine" or <4 hours per hire

Sample Interview Guide:

Opening: "I'm researching how mid-size companies handle employee onboarding.
Not selling anything - just learning. Mind if I ask some questions?"

Problem Exploration:
1. "When you hired your last employee, walk me through the onboarding process..."
2. "What took the most time?"
3. "Where do things typically go wrong?"
4. "Tell me about a time onboarding didn't go well..."

Current State:
5. "What tools or systems are you using for this?"
6. "What do you like about your current process?"
7. "What's frustrating about it?"

Impact:
8. "How does onboarding quality affect employee retention?"
9. "If you could wave a magic wand, what would change?"

Close:
10. "Who else should I talk to about this?"
11. "Can I follow up in a few weeks to share what I'm learning?"

Example 2: Consumer App - Fitness

Context: Founder wants to build a fitness app for busy parents.

Input:

"I did 12 customer discovery interviews. Here's my summary. Evaluate my progress."

Interview Summary:

  • 12 interviews with working parents, ages 30-45
  • 10/12 said they want to exercise more
  • 8/12 said lack of time is the main barrier
  • 6/12 have tried fitness apps before
  • Only 2/12 are currently paying for any fitness solution
  • 4/12 said they'd "probably" use a new app

Output:

Customer Discovery Evaluation:

CriteriaThresholdYour ResultPass?
Interviews completed10+12✅
Problem confirmed unprompted70%+83% (10/12)✅
Problem severity7+Unknown⚠️
Spending on solutions50%+17% (2/12)❌
Actively seeking alternatives30%+Unknown⚠️

Analysis:

Good Signs:

  • Strong problem confirmation (want to exercise, no time)
  • Consistent pattern across interviews

Warning Signs:

  • Only 17% paying for anything (low willingness to pay)
  • "Probably use" is weak signal (opinions, not commitment)
  • 6 tried apps, only 2 still paying (high churn)

Missing Data:

  • How severe is the pain? (scale 1-10)
  • What have they tried recently?
  • What would they pay? (past behavior, not predictions)

Diagnosis: Problem validated, but MARKET not validated.

The problem is real (busy parents want to exercise). But evidence suggests:

  • People SAY they want this but don't PAY for it
  • High awareness but low conversion/retention
  • "Nice to have" not "must have"

Recommendation: Go Deeper Before Building

Next 5 interviews, focus on:

  1. "Tell me about a fitness product you actually paid for and kept using..."
  2. "What made you stop using [previous app]?"
  3. "What's different about the 2 of you who are paying now vs. when you weren't?"
  4. "If I told you this app costs $20/month, what's your reaction?"
  5. "What would make fitness a MUST instead of NICE TO HAVE?"

Decision: Do not build yet. Either find a more acute pain point within this segment, or find a segment that demonstrates stronger buying behavior.


Example 3: Pivot Decision

Context: Founder validated problem but solution bombed.

Input:

"Problem validated: Small business owners hate bookkeeping. But when I showed my automated bookkeeping tool, response was lukewarm. 3 of 10 were excited. Should I pivot?"

Output:

Situation Analysis:

PhaseResult
Problem Discovery✅ Validated
Solution Discovery❌ Failed (30% < 70% threshold)

Questions Before Pivoting:

  1. Who were the 3 excited customers?

    • What made them different?
    • Same problem, different intensity?
    • Different sub-segment?
  2. Why were 7 NOT excited?

    • Wrong solution to right problem?
    • Right solution, wrong positioning?
    • Problem not severe enough for them?
    • Already have adequate solution?
  3. What specifically was lukewarm?

    • "Too complex"
    • "Already have something"
    • "Doesn't solve my real problem"
    • "Price too high"

Pivot Decision Framework:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 SOLUTION FAILED                          │
│                                                          │
│  Is the problem still validated?                         │
│  └── YES → Solution Pivot (keep problem, change solution)│
│                                                          │
│  Were some customers excited?                            │
│  └── YES → Segment Pivot (narrow to excited segment)     │
│                                                          │
│  Did feedback suggest different problem?                 │
│  └── YES → Problem Pivot (keep customer, find new problem)│
│                                                          │
│  Is there any signal at all?                             │
│  └── NO → Consider stopping or major pivot               │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Recommended Next Steps:

  1. Interview the 3 excited customers deeply

    • What specifically excited them?
    • What would they pay?
    • Would they commit to pilot?
  2. Understand the 7 "no"s

    • What would have made them excited?
    • What are they using instead?
  3. Consider these pivots:

    • Segment Pivot: Target the excited segment only
    • Solution Pivot: Same problem, different solution (maybe simpler?)
    • Channel Pivot: Same solution, different delivery
  4. Before building anything:

    • Get 3 paying pilots or LOIs
    • "I'll build this if you prepay $X"

Checklists & Templates

Customer Discovery Readiness Checklist

## Before Starting Customer Discovery

### Preparation
- [ ] Business Model Canvas hypotheses documented
- [ ] P1 hypotheses identified (highest risk)
- [ ] Target customer segment defined
- [ ] Interview questions drafted
- [ ] 15+ potential interviews scheduled

### Mindset
- [ ] Committed to learning, not selling
- [ ] Ready to hear "your idea is wrong"
- [ ] Willing to pivot based on evidence
- [ ] No code written yet (or willing to throw away)

### Resources
- [ ] 2-4 weeks allocated for discovery
- [ ] Note-taking system ready
- [ ] Team aligned on validation criteria

Interview Tracking Template

## Customer Discovery Interview Log

| # | Date | Name | Company | Segment | Problem Confirmed? | Solution Fit? | Commitment? | Key Quote |
|---|------|------|---------|---------|-------------------|---------------|-------------|-----------|
| 1 | | | | | Y/N | Y/N/NA | | |
| 2 | | | | | Y/N | Y/N/NA | | |
| 3 | | | | | Y/N | Y/N/NA | | |

### Running Totals
- Interviews completed: __/15
- Problem confirmed: __%
- Solution fit (if applicable): __%
- Commitments received: __

Go/No-Go Decision Template

## Customer Discovery Decision Point

**Date:** _______________
**Total Interviews:** _______________
**Hypothesis Being Tested:** _________________________________

### Evidence Summary

| Metric | Target | Actual | Pass? |
|--------|--------|--------|-------|
| Problem confirmation rate | 70%+ | | |
| Average severity score | 7+/10 | | |
| Currently paying for alternatives | 50%+ | | |
| Solution fit (if tested) | 70%+ | | |
| Concrete commitments | 3+ | | |

### Strongest Evidence FOR:
1.
2.
3.

### Strongest Evidence AGAINST:
1.
2.
3.

### Decision

- [ ] **PROCEED:** Build MVP / Start selling
- [ ] **ITERATE:** More interviews needed, adjust approach
- [ ] **PIVOT:** Change [customer/problem/solution]
- [ ] **STOP:** No viable market here

### If Proceeding, Next Steps:
1.
2.
3.

### If Pivoting, New Hypothesis:


Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Structuring persuasive content
  • Applying copywriting frameworks
  • Creating draft variations
  • Analyzing competitor approaches

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Guarantee conversion rates
  • Replace brand voice development
  • Know your specific audience
  • Make final approval decisions

References

  • Blank, Steve. "The Four Steps to the Epiphany" (2005) - Original methodology
  • Blank, Steve & Dorf, Bob. "The Startup Owner's Manual" (2012) - Expanded playbook
  • Ries, Eric. "The Lean Startup" (2011) - Build-Measure-Learn context
  • Fitzpatrick, Rob. "The Mom Test" (2013) - Interview techniques
  • Osterwalder, Alex. "Business Model Generation" (2010) - BMC framework
  • Maurya, Ash. "Running Lean" (2012) - Lean Canvas approach

Related Skills

  • mom-test - Interview techniques for honest feedback
  • lean-canvas - One-page business model documentation
  • jobs-to-be-done - Understanding customer progress
  • problem-interview - Deep dive on problem discovery
  • solution-interview - Testing solution fit

Skill Metadata (Internal Use)

name: customer-discovery
category: validation
subcategory: methodology
version: 1.0
author: MKTG Skills
source_expert: Steve Blank
source_work: The Four Steps to the Epiphany
difficulty: intermediate
estimated_value: $5,000 startup consulting engagement
tags: [customer-development, validation, startups, YC, lean-startup, interviews]
created: 2026-01-25
updated: 2026-01-25

FAQ

What does the customer-discovery skill do?

Systematically validate your business hypotheses before building anything. Master Steve Blank's Customer Development methodology that became the foundation of Lean Startup and YC's approach. Use when: Starting a new venture to avoid building something nobody wants; Before writing a line of code to validate problem-solution fit; Pivoting decisions to systematically test new directions; Early-stage fundraising to prove market validation; Product roadmap planning to prioritiz...

How do I install customer-discovery?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill customer-discovery in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/customer-discovery/ (personal) or .claude/skills/customer-discovery/ (project).

Which AI agents can use customer-discovery?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is customer-discovery safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains customer-discovery?

It is published by guia-matthieu in guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills. It has 287 recorded installs.

More from guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

View all →

whisper-transcription

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

Transcribe audio and video files to text using OpenAI Whisper. Use when: converting podcasts to blog posts; creating video subtitles; extracting quotes from interviews; repurposing video content to text; building searchable audio archives

Media & Creative944 installs

yc-pitch-deck

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

Create a compelling startup pitch deck that follows the structure proven to raise billions from top investors. Master the YC and Sequoia formats that get founders funded. Use when: Fundraising to create investor pitch decks; YC application to structure your narrative; Demo Day prep to craft your 2-minute pitch; Angel investors to communicate your opportunity; Partnership pitches to structure compelling asks

Business & Finance807 installs

conversion-copywriting

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

Write copy that gets a "yes" using Joanna Wiebe's research-first, Voice of Customer methodology Use when: Writing landing pages, emails, or sales pages that need measurable conversion results; Starting a new copy project and need a systematic process to follow; Struggling with what to write and staring at a blank page; Wanting to prove ROI to clients with data-backed decisions; Improving existing copy through validation and testing

Marketing & SEO696 installs

web-scraper

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

Extract structured data from websites. Use when: collecting competitor pricing; scraping product listings; extracting contact information; gathering research data; monitoring website changes

sound-design-film

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

Apply Walter Murch's legendary film sound principles to marketing video, creating emotionally resonant audio that audiences feel without consciously noticing. Use when: Designing sound for brand films and documentaries; Creating emotional impact in video ads; Layering music, effects, and voice effectively; Building immersive soundscapes for content; Elevating production value through audio

Media & Creative548 installs

report-generator

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills

Generate PDF/HTML reports from templates and data. Use when: creating client reports; generating weekly summaries; producing marketing performance reports; automating recurring reports

Docs & Writing502 installs

Popular business & finance skills

View category →

sales-enablement

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'battle card,' 'battlecard,' 'competitive one-pager,' 'win-loss analysis,' 'why are we losing deals,' 'loss reasons,' 'how do I respond to this objection,' 'prospect just said,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps,' 'cold call script,' or 'voicemail script.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. For public competitor comparison pages, see competitors. For running buyer interviews or churn research, see customer-research. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For the offer being sold (bonuses, guarantees, pricing structure),

Business & Finance119.5K installs

revops

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'outbound pipeline stages,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see emails. For pricing decisions, see pricing.

Business & Finance114.1K installs

sales-funnel-blueprint

autonnel/autonnel-skills

Turn an offer into a concrete multi-step sales funnel spec - page-by-page structure, price ladder, copy outline and the metrics each step must hit. Use when asked to build a sales funnel, marketing funnel, landing page flow, lead magnet funnel, webinar funnel, tripwire or VSL funnel, when planning a product launch page flow, or when someone asks "what pages do I need" for selling something online.

Business & Finance104.5K installs

pricing

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers.

Business & Finance80K installs

cross-border-ecommerce

nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills

Cross-border e-commerce expansion advisor. Scores target markets on 8 weighted dimensions (market size, ecommerce penetration, competition, regulatory complexity, logistics infrastructure, payment ecosystem, cultural distance, IP protection), compares 5 fulfillment models with cost and transit data, provides country-by-country tax/duty compliance guides (EU VAT/IOSS, UK VAT, US sales tax, CA GST, AU GST, JP consumption tax), maps local payment preferences by market, and builds a phased expansion roadmap. No API key required.

Business & Finance62.9K installs

pricing-strategy

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' or 'should I offer a free plan.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge or how to structure their plans. For in-app upgrade screens, see paywall-upgrade-cro.

Business & Finance61.2K installs