
mantis-history
Analyzes the repository's version control system (VCS) history to extract past vulnerabilities, security fixes, and vulnerability patterns. Use as an initial pre-processing step to build a historical vulnerabilities database (workspace/historicallearnings.jsonl) that informs subsequent stages about past issues and fixes. Don't use for code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
- Installs
- 1.5K
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/google/mantis --skill mantis-history- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads mantis-history automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
History Analyzer (/mantis-history)
System Goal
Historical Vulnerability Extractor. Analyzes repository's version control system (VCS) history to extract past vulnerabilities, security-related fixes, patches, and associated files, creating a historical learnings database to inform downstream skills.
Command Definition
- Command:
/mantis-history - Description: Analyzes repository's version control system (VCS) history to
extract past vulnerabilities and fixes, producing a structured historical
learnings file (
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl). - Arguments (optional; supplied by the orchestrator, consumed by Block A):
--snapshot_root/--snapshot_id/--state_root. History reads VCS logs from the LIVE repository root (Block A step 5), not the snapshot; it uses--state_rootonly to place its cache/output/script. All absent -> DEGRADED (behaves as today, live cwd).
Input/Output Contract
- Reads:
workspace/.mantis_state.json(to track current loop pass).- Codebase directory structure and key files (to determine stack).
- VCS history logs (commit messages, titles, diffs).
mantis-summary.md(optional, if available).- Internal history analysis cache (optional, if exists).
- Writes:
- VCS extraction script (written on-the-fly to workspace).
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl.- Internal history analysis cache.
- All under
--state_root/workspace/(cache,historical_learnings.jsonl, extraction script): kept outside the target tree. Optionalhistory_statusmarker (UNSUPPORTED_VCS/PARTIAL_SHALLOW).
- Preconditions:
- Target repository and VCS logs must be accessible.
- Idempotency Guarantee:
- The cache is the source of truth: the output DB is rebuilt from it every run
and is never truncated to empty while the cache is non-empty. The cache is
invalidated on VCS-history rewrite (
_analyzed_headno longer reachable) or a vcs_type/repo-identity change. Onnone/unknownVCS the stage writes an empty DB +history_status=UNSUPPORTED_VCSand exits.
- The cache is the source of truth: the output DB is rebuilt from it every run
and is never truncated to empty while the cache is non-empty. The cache is
invalidated on VCS-history rewrite (
Instructions
Step 0: Locator Resolution (run first)
LOCATOR RESOLUTION (before reading ANY target code or artifact):
0. ROLE: If this skill NEVER reads target source (report, calibrate, reflect),
you are a FINDINGS-ONLY stage: skip steps 2-6; still read active_snapshot from
state for provenance/annotation; NEVER stop merely because a code root is unset.
1. Determine CODE_ROOT, in this priority order:
a. If --target_root is passed on THIS invocation, CODE_ROOT = --target_root.
It is AUTHORITATIVE and OVERRIDES SNAPSHOT_ROOT and the state fallback
(used when a caller hands you a prepared tree, e.g. a patched shadow).
b. Else if --snapshot_root (or SNAPSHOT_ROOT) is passed, use it.
c. Else read state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json (state_root from
--state_root if passed, else ./workspace/... relative to the current dir)
-> active_snapshot.root / .snapshot_id / .snapshot_pinned.
d. Else (no arg AND no readable active_snapshot): CODE_ROOT = current directory,
treat snapshot_pinned = false (MODE-OFF). Do NOT stop.
2. SENTINEL CHECK (only if snapshot_pinned is true AND you did NOT take path 1a):
verify CODE_ROOT/.mantis_snapshot_id exists and equals SNAPSHOT_ID. If missing
or different -> STOP "snapshot sentinel mismatch". (A --target_root tree (1a) is
deliberately mutated and is sentinel-EXEMPT.)
3. PATH FIELDS:
- SNAPSHOT-RELATIVE (read under CODE_ROOT): code_paths entries; plan target_files
that are file paths. Strip ONLY a trailing ":<digits>". A code_paths entry
containing "://" is a URL/endpoint, NOT a file read. A code_paths entry that is
NOT of the form <existing-path>:<integer> is a non-source LOCATOR
(symbol/offset/endpoint): only check that the artifact/symbol exists; skip ALL
line-range and line-existence logic.
- STATE-RELATIVE (read/write under state_root/workspace, NEVER prefix CODE_ROOT):
kb_references, repro_file_path, reattack_file_path, helper scripts, report
files, and all state/findings JSON.
4. Never WRITE under CODE_ROOT when snapshot_pinned is true. Any command that
compiles, generates, or writes artifacts MUST run in a PRIVATE SHADOW copy
(mktemp -d from CODE_ROOT), never with cwd=CODE_ROOT. Read-only inspection may
cd into CODE_ROOT.
5. VCS-METADATA CARVE-OUT: history-log extraction and any VCS diff/blame command
run in the LIVE repository root (which still has .git/.hg/.repo), NOT CODE_ROOT
(the snapshot copy strips VCS metadata). Do NOT stop merely because CODE_ROOT
lacks .git/.hg/.repo.
6. Every shell command uses ABSOLUTE paths and sets its own working directory on
that call. Do NOT assume the working directory persists between calls.
CRITICAL for history: the pinned snapshot copy STRIPS .git/.hg/.repo, so
per Block A step 5 you MUST run every VCS log / diff / blame command in the LIVE
repository root (the working directory Mantis was launched in), NOT under
CODE_ROOT. Do NOT stop because CODE_ROOT lacks VCS metadata. Write the cache,
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl, and your generated extraction script
under --state_root/workspace/ (STATE-RELATIVE) — never into the target tree,
so a sync/clean cannot wipe them. Record active_snapshot.snapshot_id on
entries only for provenance.
Your task is to analyze the codebase architecture, determine what constitutes security-relevant history, and write a script on-the-fly to extract and document historical vulnerabilities from the project's version control system (VCS).
Execute the history analysis stage as follows:
-
Phase 1: Analyze Codebase and Define Target History:
- Read existing summaries (e.g.
mantis-summary.mdif available) or quickly inspect the root codebase structure to understand the primary files, programming languages, and core components. - Determine what types of historical security issues (e.g., memory corruption, authentication bypass, SQL injection, buffer overflow, or others) are relevant to this project and what keywords or commits should be targeted.
- Read existing summaries (e.g.
-
Phase 2: Write a History Extraction Script:
-
VCS-support guard (run BEFORE writing/executing the script): Determine
vcs_typefrom.mantis_state.jsonvcs_info(or detect it in the LIVE root). Ifvcs_typeisnoneorunknown, OR the VCS history is otherwise unreachable: write an EMPTYworkspace/historical_learnings.jsonl, set a top-of-file / sidecar markerhistory_status = "UNSUPPORTED_VCS", and EXIT — never fabricate history. Formulti-vcs(.repo): either iterate history per sub-project, or write the empty file withhistory_status = "UNSUPPORTED_VCS"rather than run a git-shaped script that errors. For a SHALLOW git clone (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository== true): proceed but sethistory_status = "PARTIAL_SHALLOW"so downstream stages do NOT read "no historical vuln for this file" as "clean." -
Read the active pass number from the state file
workspace/.mantis_state.jsonand resolve the current ISO 8601 timestamp. -
Write a script (e.g. Python, bash, or your choice) directly in your workspace that interacts with your repository version control system (VCS) history logs.
-
Cost-Efficiency & Scale Optimization: To ensure the historical analysis remains cost-effective and runs efficiently, the script must implement the following optimizations:
- Commit Message/Description Pre-filtering: Before retrieving diffs, the script should dynamically determine relevant keywords for commit message screening. It can do this by first inspecting the repository's files and languages/domains in scope to establish its primary stack (e.g. software versus hardware/RTL), then either querying an LLM/analysis agent for a tailored list of security/bug keywords or using a broader set of keywords augmented with these specific domain terms. Skip revisions whose messages or titles do not match these relevant keywords to avoid unnecessarily retrieving and analyzing changesets that are irrelevant to the codebase in scope.
- Diff Filtering and Size Limits: Ignore commits that only touch non-production code (e.g., tests, documentation, or configuration files). Skip commits with excessively large diffs (e.g., more than several thousand lines changed), as they are usually automated formatting changes or massive refactorings rather than discrete security patches.
- Caching Results (cache is the source of truth): Maintain a local
cache (JSON or SQLite) under
workspace/mappingrevision_id -> analyzed, AND storing the full extracted record for each analyzed revision plus an_analyzed_headhigh-water mark and thevcs_type+ repo identity the cache was built against. On each run, REBUILDworkspace/historical_learnings.jsonlfrom the cache (do NOT skip a revision merely because the cache says "analyzed" and then leave the output empty — that is the desync bug). NEVER truncate a non-empty output DB to empty. Only analyze revisions NEWER than_analyzed_head. Rewrite detection: before trusting the cache, verify_analyzed_headstill resolves in the current LIVE history (git:git cat-file -e <_analyzed_head>succeeds ANDgit merge-base --is-ancestor <_analyzed_head> HEAD; hg:hg log -r <_analyzed_head>succeeds). If it does not (force-push / rebase / squash) ORvcs_type/repo identity changed, INVALIDATE the cache and re-extract from scratch. - Batch Processing (Batching Diffs): Instead of making one LLM call per commit diff, the script should batch multiple commit diffs and messages (e.g. 3 to 5 commits) into a single LLM call. Ask the LLM to analyze all commits in the batch and return a JSON array of findings for the batch, reducing request overhead and cost.
- Model Selection: Use lightweight and cost-efficient models for the initial commit analysis/filtering, and only fall back to heavier model tiers if deeper verification of a suspected vulnerability is needed.
-
Detailed Analysis: For revisions or commits that look security-relevant, the script should retrieve the commit diffs and messages/change descriptions.
-
LLM/Agent Analysis: The script should make API calls (e.g., via subagent messages or Agent API subcommands) or use an LLM subagent to analyze the changes' diffs and messages to determine whether a revision/commit was a security fix, what component was affected, the vulnerability type, impact, and the mitigation diff. Make sure it uses batching and caching to minimize API calls.
-
Missing Information: Do not overindex on the lack of security-related keywords. Many security fixes do not get CVEs, and many security vulnerabilities are fixed without realizing they were vulnerabilities.
-
Output Format: Instruct your script to output the extracted findings into a JSONL file named
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl, matching the following format:
-
Historical Learnings Schema Format (workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl)
{
"revision_id": "...",
"title": "...",
"description": "...",
"code_paths": ["file:line_number"],
"vuln_type": "...",
"mitigation_diff": "...",
"cve": "...",
"history": [
{
"stage": "history_extractor",
"action": "created",
"details": "Extracted from repository revision history.",
"pass_number": <current_pass_number>,
"timestamp": "<current_iso8601_timestamp>"
}
]
}
- Phase 3: Execute and Verify:
- Run the script you just wrote to analyze the VCS history, process
revisions, and generate the
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonlfile. - Wait for the script to finish and verify that
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonlhas been written successfully and contains extracted data.
- Run the script you just wrote to analyze the VCS history, process
revisions, and generate the
When complete, notify the user.
FAQ
What does the mantis-history skill do?
Analyzes the repository's version control system (VCS) history to extract past vulnerabilities, security fixes, and vulnerability patterns. Use as an initial pre-processing step to build a historical vulnerabilities database (workspace/historicallearnings.jsonl) that informs subsequent stages about past issues and fixes. Don't use for code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
How do I install mantis-history?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/google/mantis --skill mantis-history in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/mantis-history/ (personal) or .claude/skills/mantis-history/ (project).
Which AI agents can use mantis-history?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is mantis-history safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains mantis-history?
It is published by google in google/mantis. It has 1,525 recorded installs.
More from google/mantis
mantis-threat-model
google/mantis
Synthesizes trust boundaries, attack surfaces, and attacker profiles into a living threat model. Use as Stage B of the Knowledge Base generation process, reading architecture and entity definitions from the KB. Don't use for analyzing source code or extracting raw learnings from JSONL files.
mantis-review
google/mantis
Independently reviews findings and filters out false positives. Use when consolidated findings need validation against the actual source code. Don't use for reproducing crashes or patching code.
mantis-architecture
google/mantis
Synthesizes raw learnings and codebase analysis into an interlinked Markdown Knowledge Base (KB). Use at the beginning of a loop to build or update architecture.md, entities, and vulnerabilities. Don't use for generating threat models or formulating execution plans.
mantis-summarize
google/mantis
Pre-processes the repository by generating security-focused summaries (mantis-summary.md) for each directory to make planning and research more efficient. Use when starting a review campaign to map the codebase before threat modeling and planning. Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
mantis-plan
google/mantis
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
mantis-critic
google/mantis
Assesses the production viability of findings, filtering out debug-only features and assertion traps. Use when findings have been validated and you need to confirm they are triggerable in production release builds (with assertions disabled). Don't use for writing reproduction scripts or patches.
Popular security skills
azure-compliance
microsoft/azure-skills
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
seo-audit
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
firebase-security-rules-auditor
firebase/agent-skills
Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.
audit
pbakaus/impeccable
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
competitors
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.