
mantis-threat-model
Synthesizes trust boundaries, attack surfaces, and attacker profiles into a living threat model. Use as Stage B of the Knowledge Base generation process, reading architecture and entity definitions from the KB. Don't use for analyzing source code or extracting raw learnings from JSONL files.
- Installs
- 1.8K
- Last 24h
- +9
- Trending rank
- #9142
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/google/mantis --skill mantis-threat-model- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads mantis-threat-model automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Threat Modeler (/mantis-threat-model)
System Goal
Security Architect. Synthesizes trust boundaries, attack surfaces, and attacker
profiles into THREAT_MODEL.md based exclusively on the entities and
architecture defined in the Knowledge Base (KB).
Command Definition
- Command:
/mantis-threat-model - Description: Evaluates architectural perimeters, entry points, and trust boundaries to construct the threat model.
- Arguments (all optional; absent → today's behavior):
--state_root <dir>: parent ofworkspace/. If absent, use./workspace/...relative to the current directory. Locates.mantis_state.json, the KB, and the archive directory.--snapshot_id <id>: theSNAPSHOT_IDthis pass is pinned to. Used ONLY as the provenance value stamped intoTHREAT_MODEL.md(theKB_SNAPSHOT:line). If absent, fall back toactive_snapshot.snapshot_idfrom state; if that is also absent orsnapshot_pinnedis false, the stamp is the literalUNPINNED.--snapshot_root <dir>: accepted for interface uniformity but NOT used — this stage never reads target source (Block A step 0, findings-only role).
Input/Output Contract
- Reads:
workspace/.mantis_state.json—pass_number(to archive per pass) and, for provenance only,active_snapshot({root, snapshot_id, snapshot_pinned}). Both optional; absent → degraded (see Backward-compat).workspace/kb/architecture.md.workspace/kb/entities/*.md.- The EXISTING
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.mdfrom the previous pass, if present — only its firstKB_SNAPSHOT:line, for the freshness check in step 0.
- Writes:
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md(first line is aKB_SNAPSHOT:provenance header).- Archives the previous
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md(if any) toworkspace/archive/kb/THREAT_MODEL_pass_${N}.mdBEFORE overwriting.
- Preconditions:
- Knowledge Base files must exist and be populated.
- Idempotency Guarantee:
- Copies the prior
THREAT_MODEL.md(if any) to the pass archive, then deterministically overwritesworkspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.mdin-place. Re-running a pass with an unchanged snapshot reproduces an equivalent model plus aSTALEbanner (see step 0 and the final save step).
- Copies the prior
Instructions
LOCATOR RESOLUTION (before reading ANY target code or artifact):
0. ROLE: If this skill NEVER reads target source (report, calibrate, reflect),
you are a FINDINGS-ONLY stage: skip steps 2-6; still read active_snapshot from
state for provenance/annotation; NEVER stop merely because a code root is unset.
1. Determine CODE_ROOT, in this priority order:
a. If --target_root is passed on THIS invocation, CODE_ROOT = --target_root.
It is AUTHORITATIVE and OVERRIDES SNAPSHOT_ROOT and the state fallback
(used when a caller hands you a prepared tree, e.g. a patched shadow).
b. Else if --snapshot_root (or SNAPSHOT_ROOT) is passed, use it.
c. Else read state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json (state_root from
--state_root if passed, else ./workspace/... relative to the current dir)
-> active_snapshot.root / .snapshot_id / .snapshot_pinned.
d. Else (no arg AND no readable active_snapshot): CODE_ROOT = current directory,
treat snapshot_pinned = false (MODE-OFF). Do NOT stop.
2. SENTINEL CHECK (only if snapshot_pinned is true AND you did NOT take path 1a):
verify CODE_ROOT/.mantis_snapshot_id exists and equals SNAPSHOT_ID. If missing
or different -> STOP "snapshot sentinel mismatch". (A --target_root tree (1a) is
deliberately mutated and is sentinel-EXEMPT.)
3. PATH FIELDS:
- SNAPSHOT-RELATIVE (read under CODE_ROOT): code_paths entries; plan target_files
that are file paths. Strip ONLY a trailing ":<digits>". A code_paths entry
containing "://" is a URL/endpoint, NOT a file read. A code_paths entry that is
NOT of the form <existing-path>:<integer> is a non-source LOCATOR
(symbol/offset/endpoint): only check that the artifact/symbol exists; skip ALL
line-range and line-existence logic.
- STATE-RELATIVE (read/write under state_root/workspace, NEVER prefix CODE_ROOT):
kb_references, repro_file_path, reattack_file_path, helper scripts, report
files, and all state/findings JSON.
4. Never WRITE under CODE_ROOT when snapshot_pinned is true. Any command that
compiles, generates, or writes artifacts MUST run in a PRIVATE SHADOW copy
(mktemp -d from CODE_ROOT), never with cwd=CODE_ROOT. Read-only inspection may
cd into CODE_ROOT.
5. VCS-METADATA CARVE-OUT: history-log extraction and any VCS diff/blame command
run in the LIVE repository root (which still has .git/.hg/.repo), NOT CODE_ROOT
(the snapshot copy strips VCS metadata). Do NOT stop merely because CODE_ROOT
lacks .git/.hg/.repo.
6. Every shell command uses ABSOLUTE paths and sets its own working directory on
that call. Do NOT assume the working directory persists between calls.
Role for this stage (findings-only / KB-only). /mantis-threat-model NEVER
reads target source. Every input it uses — architecture.md, entities/*.md,
the prior THREAT_MODEL.md, and .mantis_state.json — is STATE-RELATIVE (read
under state_root/workspace, NEVER under CODE_ROOT). This stage therefore
takes Block A step 0's FINDINGS-ONLY path: SKIP Block A steps 2–6, but STILL
read active_snapshot from state for provenance, and NEVER stop merely because
a code root is unset or unpinned.
Maintain a high-level Threat Model that explicitly defines who the attackers are and where they can interact with the system, relying on the pre-processed entities in the KB.
Execute the threat modeling process as follows:
-
Resolve Snapshot Provenance, Freshness, and Archive the Prior Model:
a. Compute
CUR(the snapshot this threat model is stamped against):- If
--snapshot_idwas passed →CUR= that value. - Else if state
active_snapshot.snapshot_pinnedis true →CUR=active_snapshot.snapshot_id. - Else →
CUR= the literalUNPINNED(degraded / today's behavior).
b. Compute
PREV_TM(what the last model was stamped against): read the FIRST line matching^KB_SNAPSHOT:in the existingworkspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md; its value (trimmed) isPREV_TM. If the file is absent, has no such line, or the value is empty →PREV_TM= the empty string"".c. SYNC-DELTA DECISION (mechanical; exact string equality, no fuzzy compare):
CUR == "UNPINNED"→SYNC_OCCURRED = true(degraded: always re-derive).- else
PREV_TM == ""→SYNC_OCCURRED = true(first run / legacy KB). - else
PREV_TM != CUR→SYNC_OCCURRED = true(a sync or dirty edit advanced the snapshot). - else (
PREV_TM == CUR) →SYNC_OCCURRED = false(snapshot unchanged since the last model).
d. Archive the prior model (per pass), so overwrite is non-destructive:
- Resolve
N: read"pass_number"fromworkspace/.mantis_state.json. If missing or invalid, scanworkspace/archive/for folders matchingfindings_pass_NorloopN_findingsand setN = max_found + 1, defaulting to1if no archives exist. (Same rule the architecture stage uses.) - If
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.mdexists: ensureworkspace/archive/kb/exists (mkdir -p workspace/archive/kb/) and COPY (do NOT move) the file toworkspace/archive/kb/THREAT_MODEL_pass_${N}.md. You will overwrite the live file in step 3. If the file does not exist, skip the copy. - All paths in this step are STATE-RELATIVE (under
state_root/workspace); NEVER prefixCODE_ROOT.
Carry
CUR,SYNC_OCCURRED, andNforward into steps 1–3 and the final save. - If
-
Read the Synthesized KB:
- Read
workspace/kb/architecture.mdto understand the system's data flows and high-level design. - Read the files inside
workspace/kb/entities/to understand the individual components and any historical constraints or vulnerability patterns mapped to them by the/mantis-architecturestage.
- Read
-
Analyze Trust Boundaries:
- Evaluate the entities to determine where trust boundaries lie. Where does untrusted data cross into a trusted context? Which components are exposed to external input?
-
Synthesize the Threat Model:
- Write a comprehensive, structured Markdown file and save it directly to
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md(overwriting the old one). - Token Optimization: Use your file-writing tools to write the file directly to disk; do not output the threat model text in your chat response.
Include the following sections to ensure downstream planning agents have sufficient context:
-
System Overview Summary: A concise summary derived from
architecture.md. -
Deployment Intent: State exactly one of
Intent: PRODUCTIONorIntent: SAMPLE_OR_TEST_ONLY. This verdict has a large blast radius:/mantis-criticmarks EVERY findingSAMPLE_OR_TEST(dismissing the whole pass) the instant it readsIntent: SAMPLE_OR_TEST_ONLY. SoSAMPLE_OR_TEST_ONLYis FAIL-CLOSED behind a mechanical checklist:PRODUCTION-SIGNAL CHECKLIST — you may write
Intent: SAMPLE_OR_TEST_ONLYONLY IF ALL five checks are TRUE. If ANY is FALSE, or the KB is silent on / you are unsure about any one of them, you MUST writeIntent: PRODUCTION.- NO entity in
workspace/kb/entities/*.mdis classifiedCRITICALorSTANDARDavailability (either implies an operated/production service). architecture.mdnames NO externally-reachable service, daemon, server, API, or network endpoint, AND NO deployment/packaging descriptor (systemd, Dockerfile/docker, kubernetes/k8s/helm, load balancer, cloud/VPC/IaC, CI/CD publish or release).- The KB describes NO installable/publishable package or runtime
entrypoint (e.g.,
console_scripts/entry_points, amain()/service binary, a published library or package manifest). - EVERY component/path referenced in the KB lies exclusively under
test/sample directories — its path contains one of
test,tests,example,examples,sample,samples,tutorial,demo,docs,fixtures— and NONE lie under production source roots such assrc,lib,pkg,internal,cmd,app,server, orcore. - NO entity documents a real (non-mock, non-test) untrusted external input crossing a trust boundary into privileged/production logic.
After a sync (
SYNC_OCCURRED == truefrom step 0) you MUST re-run this checklist from scratch against the CURRENT KB and MUST NOT inherit a priorIntent:verdict — a sync can add production code to a tree that was previously sample-only, which would otherwise silently dismiss every new finding. - NO entity in
-
Trust Boundaries: Clear, rigorous definitions of where untrusted inputs meet internal trusted states. Reference the specific entities (e.g.,
[Auth Module](entities/auth_module.md)). -
Threat Actors & Vectors: Define the profiles of potential attackers (e.g., Unauthenticated Network Attacker, Malicious Local User) and the specific boundaries they can reach.
-
High-Risk Assets: The data, execution privileges, or availability targets an attacker wants to compromise. For availability targets, classify them into one of these Availability Tiers based on the KB:
CRITICAL: 24/7 immediate operational impact if disrupted.STANDARD: Important operations; short downtime is tolerable.LOW_CRITICALITY: Non-blocking utilities; disruption is a mild annoyance.
- Write a comprehensive, structured Markdown file and save it directly to
Stamp and save the model:
- The FIRST line of
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.mdMUST be the provenance stampKB_SNAPSHOT:followed byCUR(from step 0) — e.g.KB_SNAPSHOT: <CUR>, orKB_SNAPSHOT: UNPINNEDin degraded mode. The next pass reads this back asPREV_TM, andmantis-criticreads it as a KB freshness check. - If
SYNC_OCCURRED == false(snapshot unchanged since the last model): you MAY reuse the prior model's substance, but you MUST insert this STALE banner as the line immediately AFTER theKB_SNAPSHOT:line:> STALE: Threat model NOT re-evaluated this pass; carried unchanged from snapshot <CUR>.IfSYNC_OCCURRED == true: do NOT emit the STALE banner — you re-derived every section fresh this pass, including the Deployment-Intent checklist. - Save directly to
workspace/kb/THREAT_MODEL.md(STATE-RELATIVE; the prior file was already copied to the pass archive in step 0d). Use your file-writing tools; do not print the model to chat. When complete, notify the user.
FAQ
What does the mantis-threat-model skill do?
Synthesizes trust boundaries, attack surfaces, and attacker profiles into a living threat model. Use as Stage B of the Knowledge Base generation process, reading architecture and entity definitions from the KB. Don't use for analyzing source code or extracting raw learnings from JSONL files.
How do I install mantis-threat-model?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/google/mantis --skill mantis-threat-model in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/mantis-threat-model/ (personal) or .claude/skills/mantis-threat-model/ (project).
Which AI agents can use mantis-threat-model?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is mantis-threat-model safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains mantis-threat-model?
It is published by google in google/mantis. It has 1,811 recorded installs.
More from google/mantis
mantis-review
google/mantis
Independently reviews findings and filters out false positives. Use when consolidated findings need validation against the actual source code. Don't use for reproducing crashes or patching code.
mantis-architecture
google/mantis
Synthesizes raw learnings and codebase analysis into an interlinked Markdown Knowledge Base (KB). Use at the beginning of a loop to build or update architecture.md, entities, and vulnerabilities. Don't use for generating threat models or formulating execution plans.
mantis-summarize
google/mantis
Pre-processes the repository by generating security-focused summaries (mantis-summary.md) for each directory to make planning and research more efficient. Use when starting a review campaign to map the codebase before threat modeling and planning. Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
mantis-plan
google/mantis
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
mantis-critic
google/mantis
Assesses the production viability of findings, filtering out debug-only features and assertion traps. Use when findings have been validated and you need to confirm they are triggerable in production release builds (with assertions disabled). Don't use for writing reproduction scripts or patches.
mantis-researcher
google/mantis
Audits production source code files based on the strategy in workspace/plan.json. Use when a review plan exists and you need to perform static analysis and deep-dive reviews of targeted files. Don't use for planning, deduplicating, or writing patches.
Popular security skills
azure-compliance
microsoft/azure-skills
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
seo-audit
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
firebase-security-rules-auditor
firebase/agent-skills
Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.
audit
pbakaus/impeccable
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
competitors
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.