
arize-instrumentation
Adds Arize AX tracing to an LLM application for the first time. Follows a two-phase agent-assisted flow to analyze the codebase then implement instrumentation after user confirmation. Use when the user wants to instrument their app, add tracing from scratch, set up LLM observability, integrate OpenTelemetry or openinference, or get started with Arize tracing.
- Installs
- 1.1K
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill arize-instrumentation- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads arize-instrumentation automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Arize Instrumentation Skill
Use this skill when the user wants to add Arize AX tracing to their application. Follow the two-phase, agent-assisted flow from the Agent-Assisted Tracing Setup and the Arize AX Tracing — Agent Setup Prompt.
Quick start (for the user)
If the user asks you to "set up tracing" or "instrument my app with Arize", you can start with:
Follow the instructions from https://arize.com/docs/PROMPT.md and ask me questions as needed.
Then execute the two phases below.
Core principles
- Prefer inspection over mutation — understand the codebase before changing it.
- Do not change business logic — tracing is purely additive.
- Use auto-instrumentation where available — add manual spans only for custom logic not covered by integrations.
- Follow existing code style and project conventions.
- Keep output concise and production-focused — do not generate extra documentation or summary files.
- NEVER embed literal credential values in generated code — always reference environment variables (e.g.,
os.environ["ARIZE_API_KEY"],process.env.ARIZE_API_KEY). This includes API keys, space IDs, and any other secrets. The user sets these in their own environment; the agent must never output raw secret values.
Phase 0: Environment preflight
Before changing code:
- Confirm the repo/service scope is clear. For monorepos, do not assume the whole repo should be instrumented.
- Identify the local runtime surface you will need for verification:
- package manager and app start command
- whether the app is long-running, server-based, or a short-lived CLI/script
- whether
axwill be needed for post-change verification
- Do NOT proactively check
axinstallation or version. Ifaxis needed for verification later, just run it when the time comes. If it fails, see references/ax-profiles.md. - Never silently replace a user-provided space ID, project name, or project ID. If the CLI, collector, and user input disagree, surface that mismatch as a concrete blocker.
Phase 1: Analysis (read-only)
Do not write any code or create any files during this phase.
Steps
-
Check dependency manifests to detect stack:
- Python:
pyproject.toml,requirements.txt,setup.py,Pipfile - TypeScript/JavaScript:
package.json - Java:
pom.xml,build.gradle,build.gradle.kts - Go:
go.mod
- Python:
-
Scan import statements in source files to confirm what is actually used.
-
Check for existing tracing/OTel — look for
TracerProvider,register(),opentelemetryimports,ARIZE_*,OTEL_*,OTLP_*env vars, or other observability config (Datadog, Honeycomb, etc.). -
Identify scope — for monorepos or multi-service projects, ask which service(s) to instrument.
What to identify
| Item | Examples |
|---|---|
| Language | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Java, Go |
| Package manager | pip/poetry/uv, npm/pnpm/yarn, maven/gradle, go modules |
| LLM providers | OpenAI, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Bedrock, etc. |
| Frameworks | LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, Vercel AI SDK, Mastra, etc. |
| Existing tracing | Any OTel or vendor setup |
| Tool/function use | LLM tool use, function calling, or custom tools the app executes (e.g. in an agent loop) |
Key rule: When a framework is detected alongside an LLM provider, inspect the framework-specific tracing docs first and prefer the framework-native integration path when it already captures the model and tool spans you need. Add separate provider instrumentation only when the framework docs require it or when the framework-native integration leaves obvious gaps. If the app runs tools and the framework integration does not emit tool spans, add manual TOOL spans so each invocation appears with input/output (see Enriching traces below).
Phase 1 output
Return a concise summary:
- Detected language, package manager, providers, frameworks
- Proposed integration list (from the routing table in the docs)
- Any existing OTel/tracing that needs consideration
- If monorepo: which service(s) you propose to instrument
- If the app uses LLM tool use / function calling: note that you will add manual CHAIN + TOOL spans so each tool call appears in the trace with input/output (avoids sparse traces).
If the user explicitly asked you to instrument the app now, and the target service is already clear, present the Phase 1 summary briefly and continue directly to Phase 2. If scope is ambiguous, or the user asked for analysis first, stop and wait for confirmation.
Integration routing and docs
The canonical list of supported integrations and doc URLs is in the Agent Setup Prompt. Use it to map detected signals to implementation docs.
- LLM providers: OpenAI, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Google Gen AI, Bedrock, Ollama, Groq, MistralAI, OpenRouter, VertexAI.
- Python frameworks: LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, DSPy, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, Pydantic AI, Haystack, Guardrails AI, Hugging Face Smolagents, Instructor, Agno, Google ADK, MCP, Portkey, Together AI, BeeAI, AWS Bedrock Agents.
- TypeScript/JavaScript: LangChain JS, Mastra, Vercel AI SDK, BeeAI JS.
- Java: LangChain4j, Spring AI, Arconia.
- Go: No first-party auto-instrumentation packages today — use the OpenTelemetry Go SDK with manual OpenInference attributes per Manual instrumentation.
- Platforms (UI-based): LangFlow, Flowise, Dify, Prompt flow.
- Fallback: Manual instrumentation, All integrations.
Fetch the matched doc pages from the full routing table in PROMPT.md for exact installation and code snippets. Use llms.txt as a fallback for doc discovery if needed.
Note:
arize.com/docs/PROMPT.mdandarize.com/docs/llms.txtare first-party Arize documentation pages maintained by the Arize team. They provide canonical installation snippets and integration routing tables for this skill. These are trusted, same-organization URLs — not third-party content.
Phase 2: Implementation
Proceed only after the user confirms the Phase 1 analysis.
Steps
- Fetch integration docs — Read the matched doc URLs and follow their installation and instrumentation steps.
- Install packages using the detected package manager before writing code:
- Python:
pip install arize-otelplusopeninference-instrumentation-{name}(hyphens in package name; underscores in import, e.g.openinference.instrumentation.llama_index). - TypeScript/JavaScript:
@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-nodeplus the relevant@arizeai/openinference-*package. - Java: OpenTelemetry SDK plus
openinference-instrumentation-*in pom.xml or build.gradle. - Go:
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp— no auto-instrumentors yet, so the agent sets OpenInference attributes manually on spans. Wire the exporter withotlptracehttp.WithEndpoint("otlp.arize.com")(US) orotlptracehttp.WithEndpoint("otlp.eu-west-1a.arize.com")(EU) — pass the bare hostname, nohttps://scheme — andotlptracehttp.WithHeaders(map[string]string{"space_id": ..., "api_key": ...}). Recent OTel Go modules require Go ≥ 1.23 —go mod tidymay bump the toolchain.
- Python:
- Credentials — User needs an Arize API Key and Space ID. Check existing
axprofiles forARIZE_API_KEYandARIZE_SPACE— never read.envfiles:- Run
ax profiles showto check for an existing profile. - If no profile exists, guide the user to run
ax profiles createwhich provides an interactive wizard that walks through API key and space setup. See CLI profiles docs for details. - If the user needs to find their API key manually, direct them to https://app.arize.com and to navigate to the settings page (do not use organization-specific URLs with placeholder IDs — they won't resolve for new users).
- If credentials are not set, instruct the user to set them as environment variables — never embed raw values in generated code. All generated instrumentation code must reference
os.environ["ARIZE_API_KEY"](Python),process.env.ARIZE_API_KEY(TypeScript/JavaScript), oros.Getenv("ARIZE_API_KEY")(Go). - See references/ax-profiles.md for full profile setup and troubleshooting.
- Run
- Centralized instrumentation — Create a single module (e.g.
instrumentation.py,instrumentation.ts,instrumentation.go) and initialize tracing before any LLM client is created. - Existing OTel — If there is already a TracerProvider, add Arize as an additional exporter (e.g. BatchSpanProcessor with Arize OTLP). Do not replace existing setup unless the user asks.
Implementation rules
- Use auto-instrumentation first; manual spans only when needed.
- Prefer the repo's native integration surface before adding generic OpenTelemetry plumbing. If the framework ships an exporter or observability package, use that first unless there is a documented gap.
- Fail gracefully if env vars are missing (warn, do not crash).
- Import order: register tracer → attach instrumentors → then create LLM clients.
- Project name attribute (required): Arize rejects spans with HTTP 500 if the project name is missing —
service.namealone is not accepted. Set it as a resource attribute on the TracerProvider (recommended — one place, applies to all spans):- Python:
register(project_name="my-app")handles it automatically (sets"openinference.project.name"on the resource). For routing spans to different projects, useset_routing_context(space_id=..., project_name=...)fromarize.otel. - TypeScript: Arize accepts both
"model_id"(shown in the official TS quickstart) and"openinference.project.name"viaSEMRESATTRS_PROJECT_NAMEfrom@arizeai/openinference-semantic-conventions(shown in the manual instrumentation docs) — both work. - Go: Pass
attribute.String("openinference.project.name", "my-app")toresource.New(...)and apply viasdktrace.WithResource(res). The Go SDK has no helper for this, so it must be set manually on every TracerProvider.
- Python:
- CLI/script apps — flush before exit:
provider.shutdown()(TS) /provider.force_flush()thenprovider.shutdown()(Python) /tp.Shutdown(ctx)(Go) must be called before the process exits, otherwise async OTLP exports are dropped and no traces appear. - When the app has tool/function execution: add manual CHAIN + TOOL spans (see Enriching traces below) so the trace tree shows each tool call and its result — otherwise traces will look sparse (only LLM API spans, no tool input/output).
Enriching traces: manual spans for tool use and agent loops
Why doesn't the auto-instrumentor do this?
Provider instrumentors (Anthropic, OpenAI, etc.) only wrap the LLM client — the code that sends HTTP requests and receives responses. They see:
- One span per API call: request (messages, system prompt, tools) and response (text, tool_use blocks, etc.).
They cannot see what happens inside your application after the response:
- Tool execution — Your code parses the response, calls
run_tool("check_loan_eligibility", {...}), and gets a result. That runs in your process; the instrumentor has no hook into yourrun_tool()or the actual tool output. The next API call (sending the tool result back) is just anothermessages.createspan — the instrumentor doesn't know that the message content is a tool result or what the tool returned. - Agent/chain boundary — The idea of "one user turn → multiple LLM calls + tool calls" is an application-level concept. The instrumentor only sees separate API calls; it doesn't know they belong to the same logical "run_agent" run.
So TOOL and CHAIN spans have to be added manually (or by a framework instrumentor like LangChain/LangGraph that knows about tools and chains). Once you add them, they appear in the same trace as the LLM spans because they use the same TracerProvider.
To avoid sparse traces where tool inputs/outputs are missing:
- Detect agent/tool patterns: a loop that calls the LLM, then runs one or more tools (by name + arguments), then calls the LLM again with tool results.
- Add manual spans using the same TracerProvider (e.g.
opentelemetry.trace.get_tracer(...)afterregister()):- CHAIN span — Wrap the full agent run (e.g.
run_agent): setopeninference.span.kind="CHAIN",input.value= user message,output.value= final reply. - TOOL span — Wrap each tool invocation: set
openinference.span.kind="TOOL",input.value= JSON of arguments,output.value= JSON of result. Use the tool name as the span name (e.g.check_loan_eligibility).
- CHAIN span — Wrap the full agent run (e.g.
OpenInference attributes (use these so Arize shows spans correctly):
| Attribute | Use |
|---|---|
openinference.span.kind | Pick the right value: "LLM" for raw provider API calls (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.); "CHAIN" for orchestration / agent-loop boundaries; "TOOL" for tool/function execution; "RETRIEVER" for vector-store / search lookups; "EMBEDDING" for embedding API calls; "AGENT" for an autonomous sub-agent run nested inside a larger chain; "RERANKER" for rerank API calls; "GUARDRAIL" for guardrail/policy checks; "EVALUATOR" for online eval calls. |
input.value | string (e.g. user message or JSON of tool args) |
output.value | string (e.g. final reply or JSON of tool result) |
LLM-span attributes (set these in addition to the three above when the span is an actual LLM call):
| Attribute | Use |
|---|---|
llm.model_name | model identifier (e.g. "gpt-4o-mini") |
llm.provider / llm.system | provider name (e.g. "openai", "anthropic") |
llm.input_messages.{i}.message.role | "system" / "user" / "assistant" / "tool" for the i-th input message |
llm.input_messages.{i}.message.content | text content of the i-th input message |
llm.output_messages.{i}.message.role | role of the i-th output message |
llm.output_messages.{i}.message.content | text content of the i-th output message |
llm.token_count.prompt | int — prompt/input tokens |
llm.token_count.completion | int — completion/output tokens |
llm.token_count.total | int — total tokens |
In Python and TypeScript these names are exposed via openinference-semantic-conventions packages; in Go they must be hand-typed as the strings above.
Python pattern: Get the global tracer (same provider as Arize), then use context managers so tool spans are children of the CHAIN span and appear in the same trace as the LLM spans:
from opentelemetry.trace import get_tracer
tracer = get_tracer("my-app", "1.0.0")
# In your agent entrypoint:
with tracer.start_as_current_span("run_agent") as chain_span:
chain_span.set_attribute("openinference.span.kind", "CHAIN")
chain_span.set_attribute("input.value", user_message)
# ... LLM call ...
for tool_use in tool_uses:
with tracer.start_as_current_span(tool_use["name"]) as tool_span:
tool_span.set_attribute("openinference.span.kind", "TOOL")
tool_span.set_attribute("input.value", json.dumps(tool_use["input"]))
result = run_tool(tool_use["name"], tool_use["input"])
tool_span.set_attribute("output.value", result)
# ... append tool result to messages, call LLM again ...
chain_span.set_attribute("output.value", final_reply)
Go pattern: Get a tracer from the global TracerProvider (registered via otel.SetTracerProvider), then nest spans with tracer.Start so tool spans become children of the CHAIN span.
Critical for short-lived processes: never call
log.Fatalf/os.Exitafter a span has started — they skip the deferredtp.Shutdown(ctx)and the in-flight CHAIN/LLM spans never flush. Uselog.Printf+returnfrommaininstead, and keeptp.Shutdown(ctx)deferred at the top ofmain.
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/attribute"
)
var tracer = otel.Tracer("my-app")
func runAgent(ctx context.Context, userMessage string) string {
ctx, chainSpan := tracer.Start(ctx, "run_agent")
defer chainSpan.End()
chainSpan.SetAttributes(
attribute.String("openinference.span.kind", "CHAIN"),
attribute.String("input.value", userMessage),
)
// ... LLM call ...
for _, toolUse := range toolUses {
ctx, toolSpan := tracer.Start(ctx, toolUse.Name)
argsJSON, err := json.Marshal(toolUse.Input)
if err != nil {
toolSpan.RecordError(err)
}
toolSpan.SetAttributes(
attribute.String("openinference.span.kind", "TOOL"),
attribute.String("input.value", string(argsJSON)),
)
result := runTool(toolUse.Name, toolUse.Input)
toolSpan.SetAttributes(attribute.String("output.value", result))
toolSpan.End()
// ... append tool result to messages, call LLM again ...
}
chainSpan.SetAttributes(attribute.String("output.value", finalReply))
return finalReply
}
See Manual instrumentation for more span kinds and attributes.
Verification
Treat instrumentation as complete only when all of the following are true:
- The app still builds or typechecks after the tracing change.
- The app starts successfully with the new tracing configuration.
- You trigger at least one real request or run that should produce spans.
- You either verify the resulting trace in Arize, or you provide a precise blocker that distinguishes app-side success from Arize-side failure.
After implementation:
- Run the application and trigger at least one LLM call.
- Use the
arize-traceskill to confirm traces arrived. If empty, retry shortly. Verify spans have expectedopeninference.span.kind,input.value/output.value, and parent-child relationships. - If no traces: verify
ARIZE_SPACEandARIZE_API_KEY, ensure tracer is initialized before instrumentors and clients, check connectivity tootlp.arize.com:443, and inspect app/runtime exporter logs so you can tell whether spans are being emitted locally but rejected remotely. For debug setGRPC_VERBOSITY=debugor passlog_to_console=Truetoregister(). Common gotchas: (a) missing project name resource attribute causes HTTP 500 rejections —service.namealone is not enough; Python: passproject_nametoregister(); TypeScript: set"model_id"orSEMRESATTRS_PROJECT_NAMEon the resource; Go: addattribute.String("openinference.project.name", "my-app")toresource.New(...); (b) CLI/script processes exit before OTLP exports flush — callprovider.force_flush()thenprovider.shutdown()(Python/TS) ortp.Shutdown(ctx)(Go) before exit; (c) CLI-visible spaces/projects can disagree with a collector-targeted space ID — report the mismatch instead of silently rewriting credentials. - If the app uses tools: confirm CHAIN and TOOL spans appear with
input.value/output.valueso tool calls and results are visible.
When verification is blocked by CLI or account issues, end with a concrete status:
- app instrumentation status
- latest local trace ID or run ID
- whether exporter logs show local span emission
- whether the failure is credential, space/project resolution, network, or collector rejection
Leveraging the Tracing Assistant (MCP)
For deeper instrumentation guidance inside the IDE, the user can enable:
- Arize AX Tracing Assistant MCP — instrumentation guides, framework examples, and support. In Cursor: Settings → MCP → Add and use:
"arize-tracing-assistant": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["arize-tracing-assistant@latest"] } - Arize AX Docs MCP — searchable docs. In Cursor:
"arize-ax-docs": { "url": "https://arize.com/docs/mcp" }
Then the user can ask things like: "Instrument this app using Arize AX", "Can you use manual instrumentation so I have more control over my traces?", "How can I redact sensitive information from my spans?"
See the full setup at Agent-Assisted Tracing Setup.
Reference links
| Resource | URL |
|---|---|
| Agent-Assisted Tracing Setup | https://arize.com/docs/ax/alyx/tracing-assistant |
| Agent Setup Prompt (full routing + phases) | https://arize.com/docs/PROMPT.md |
| Arize AX Docs | https://arize.com/docs/ax |
| Full integration list | https://arize.com/docs/ax/integrations |
| Doc index (llms.txt) | https://arize.com/docs/llms.txt |
Save Credentials for Future Use
See references/ax-profiles.md § Save Credentials for Future Use.
FAQ
What does the arize-instrumentation skill do?
Adds Arize AX tracing to an LLM application for the first time. Follows a two-phase agent-assisted flow to analyze the codebase then implement instrumentation after user confirmation. Use when the user wants to instrument their app, add tracing from scratch, set up LLM observability, integrate OpenTelemetry or openinference, or get started with Arize tracing.
How do I install arize-instrumentation?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill arize-instrumentation in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/arize-instrumentation/ (personal) or .claude/skills/arize-instrumentation/ (project).
Which AI agents can use arize-instrumentation?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is arize-instrumentation safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains arize-instrumentation?
It is published by github in github/awesome-copilot, and it is an official skill from the maker of the technology it covers. It has 1,079 recorded installs.
More from github/awesome-copilot
git-commit
github/awesome-copilot
Use this skill when the user wants to make a Git commit or split changes into more than one commit. Also use it when the user types "/commit" or asks for a conventional commit. The skill examines the diff, stages the related files, writes a Conventional Commits message, and runs git commit. Do not use it when the user wants only a commit message and no commit. Do not use it to push, open a pull request, rebase, or change the commit history.
excalidraw-diagram-generator
github/awesome-copilot
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", or "generate an Excalidraw file". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, and system architecture diagrams. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files that can be opened directly in Excalidraw.
multi-stage-dockerfile
github/awesome-copilot
Create optimized multi-stage Dockerfiles for any language or framework
documentation-writer
github/awesome-copilot
Diátaxis Documentation Expert. An expert technical writer specializing in creating high-quality software documentation, guided by the principles and structure of the Diátaxis technical documentation authoring framework.
prd
github/awesome-copilot
Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.
refactor
github/awesome-copilot
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Popular ai & agents skills
google-agents-cli-publish
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "publish an agent", "publish my ADK agent", "register an agent with Gemini", "publish to Gemini" (formerly Gemini Enterprise), or needs guidance on the agents-cli publish gemini command. Also use when the user wants to "manage agents in Agent Registry", "list/update/delete registered agents", or "register an MCP server". Covers ADK vs A2A registration modes, programmatic and interactive usage, flag reference, auto-detection from deployment metadata, Agent Registry fleet management, and troubleshooting. Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy).
google-agents-cli-eval
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics, dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. Applies to any agents-cli project, whatever framework the agent is written in. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).
skill-creator
anthropics/skills
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
codex-pet
prime-skills/runcomfy-agent-skills
Codex Pet generator on RunComfy. Build a Codex-compatible Codex Pet spritesheet.webp + pet.json from a single reference image, drop it into ${CODEXHOME:-$HOME/.codex}/pets/ / and Codex picks it up as a custom Codex Pet next to the 8 built-ins. This skill produces the exact Codex Pet atlas Codex expects (1536x1872 PNG/WebP, 8 cols x 9 rows, 192x208 cells, 9 animation states — idle, running-right, running-left, waving, jumping, failed, waiting, running, review). Calls OpenAI GPT Image 2 edit ONCE via the local RunComfy CLI as runcomfy run openai/gpt-image-2/edit to produce a canonical Codex Pet pose, then assembles all 9 animation rows programmatically with ImageMagick micro-transforms — no Codex Pro, no $imagegen, no OPENAIAPIKEY required, only RUNCOMFYTOKEN. Triggers on "codex pet", "create codex pet", "make codex pet", "hatch codex pet", "/hatch image", "desktop pet codex", "codex pets", "spritesheet.webp", or any explicit ask to build a custom pet for OpenAI Codex.
full-output-enforcement
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
executing-plans
obra/superpowers
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available