
go-code-review
Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design. Covers generics (Go 1.18+), errors.Join and slog (Go 1.21+), and Go 1.22 loop variable semantics.
- Installs
- 201
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle --skill go-code-review- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads go-code-review automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Go Code Review
Review Workflow
Follow this sequence in order. Do not emit findings until every Pass below is satisfied.
-
Baseline
go.mod— Opengo.modand read thegodirective.
Pass: You can state the exactgo X.YYvalue (in the review preamble or working notes). Apply version-gated advice only when it matches this baseline (loop capture pre-1.22,slog/structured logging from 1.21,errors.Joinfrom 1.20). -
Read surrounding code — For each changed
.gofile, read full functions or logical units that contain the edits, not only the diff hunk.
Pass: At least one full enclosing function (or package-levelinit/var block) containing the change was read per changed file. -
Scope the checklist — Decide which Review Checklist blocks apply (error handling, concurrency, interfaces/types, resources, naming). Load references for those blocks; skip blocks that are irrelevant to the diff.
Pass: The review (or working notes) lists which checklist blocks you applied, or marks blocks N/A with a one-line reason tied to the diff (e.g. “no concurrency in change”). -
Pre-report verification — Load and follow review-verification-protocol.
Pass: The protocol’s Pre-Report Verification Checklist is satisfied for each finding you will report (actual code read, surrounding context checked, “wrong” vs “different style” distinguished, etc.).
Hard gates (same sequence, shorter)
| Step | Objective pass condition |
|---|---|
| 1 | go X.YY from go.mod is recorded before version-specific advice. |
| 2 | Full enclosing context read per changed file, not diff-only. |
| 3 | In-scope checklist blocks listed or N/A with diff-tied reason; references opened as needed. |
| 4 | review-verification-protocol completed for every reported issue. |
Output Format
Report findings as:
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Missing error checks, wrapping, errors.Join | references/error-handling.md |
| Race conditions, channel misuse, goroutine lifecycle | references/concurrency.md |
| Interface pollution, naming, generics | references/interfaces.md |
| Resource leaks, defer misuse, slog, naming | references/common-mistakes.md |
Review Checklist
Error Handling
- All errors checked (no
_ = errwithout justifying comment) - Errors wrapped with context (
fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err)) -
errors.Is/errors.Asused instead of string matching -
errors.Joinused for aggregating multiple errors (Go 1.20+) - Zero values returned alongside errors
Concurrency
- No goroutine leaks (context cancellation or shutdown signal exists)
- Channels closed by sender only, exactly once
- Shared state protected by mutex or sync types
- WaitGroups used to wait for goroutine completion
- Context propagated through call chain
- Loop variable capture handled (pre-Go 1.22 codebases only)
Interfaces and Types
- Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
- Interface names follow
-erconvention - Interfaces minimal (1-3 methods)
- Concrete types returned from constructors
-
anypreferred overinterface{}(Go 1.18+) - Generics used where appropriate instead of
anyor code generation
Resources and Lifecycle
- Resources closed with
deferimmediately after creation - HTTP response bodies always closed
- No
deferin loops without closure wrapping -
init()functions avoided in favor of explicit initialization
Naming and Style
- Exported names have doc comments
- No stuttering names (
user.UserService→user.Service) - No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
- Context passed as first parameter
-
slogused overlogfor structured logging (Go 1.21+)
Severity Calibration
Critical (Block Merge)
- Unchecked errors on I/O, network, or database operations
- Goroutine leaks (no shutdown path)
- Race conditions on shared state (concurrent map access without sync)
- Unbounded resource accumulation (defer in loop, unclosed connections)
Major (Should Fix)
- Errors returned without context (bare
return err) - Missing WaitGroup for spawned goroutines
panicfor recoverable errors- Context not propagated to downstream calls
Minor (Consider Fixing)
interface{}instead ofanyin Go 1.18+ codebases- Missing doc comments on exports
- Stuttering names
- Slice not preallocated when size is known
Informational (Note Only)
- Suggestions to add generics where code generation exists
- Refactoring ideas for interface design
- Performance optimizations without measured impact
When to Load References
- Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
- Reviewing goroutines, channels, or sync types → concurrency.md
- Reviewing type definitions, interfaces, or generics → interfaces.md
- General review (resources, naming, init, performance) → common-mistakes.md
Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)
These are acceptable Go patterns — reporting them wastes developer time:
_ = errwith reason comment — Intentionally ignored errors with explanation- Empty interface /
any— For truly generic code or interop with untyped APIs - Naked returns in short functions — Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
- Channel without close — When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
- Mutex protecting struct fields — Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
//nolintdirectives with reason — Acceptable when accompanied by explanation- Defer in loop — When function scope cleanup is intentional (e.g., processing files in batches)
- Functional options pattern —
type Option func(*T)withWith*constructors is idiomatic sync.Poolfor hot paths — Acceptable for reducing allocation pressure in performance-critical codecontext.Background()in main/tests — Valid root context for top-level callsselectwithdefault— Non-blocking channel operation, intentional pattern- Short variable names in small scope —
i,err,ctx,okare idiomatic Go
Context-Sensitive Rules
Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:
| Issue | Flag ONLY IF |
|---|---|
| Missing error check | Error return is actionable (can retry, log, or propagate) |
| Goroutine leak | No context cancellation path exists for the goroutine |
| Missing defer | Resource isn't explicitly closed before next acquisition or return |
| Interface pollution | Interface has > 1 method AND only one consumer exists |
| Loop variable capture | go.mod specifies Go < 1.22 |
| Missing slog | go.mod specifies Go >= 1.21 AND code uses log package for structured output |
Before Submitting Findings
Satisfy step 4 in Review Workflow: load review-verification-protocol and complete its pre-report checks for each issue.
FAQ
What does the go-code-review skill do?
Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design. Covers generics (Go 1.18+), errors.Join and slog (Go 1.21+), and Go 1.22 loop variable semantics.
How do I install go-code-review?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle --skill go-code-review in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/go-code-review/ (personal) or .claude/skills/go-code-review/ (project).
Which AI agents can use go-code-review?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is go-code-review safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains go-code-review?
It is published by existential-birds in existential-birds/beagle. It has 201 recorded installs.
More from existential-birds/beagle
react-flow
existential-birds/beagle
React Flow (@xyflow/react) for workflow visualization with custom nodes and edges. Use when building graph visualizations, creating custom workflow nodes, implementing edge labels, or controlling viewport. Triggers on ReactFlow, @xyflow/react, Handle, NodeProps, EdgeProps, useReactFlow, fitView.
python-code-review
existential-birds/beagle
Reviews Python code for type safety, async patterns, error handling, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .py files, checking type hints, async/await usage, or exception handling.
langgraph-code-review
existential-birds/beagle
Reviews LangGraph code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses StateGraph, nodes, edges, checkpointing, or other LangGraph features. Catches common mistakes in state management, graph structure, and async patterns.
tailwind-v4
existential-birds/beagle
Tailwind CSS v4 with CSS-first configuration and design tokens. Use when setting up Tailwind v4, defining theme variables, using OKLCH colors, or configuring dark mode. Triggers on @theme, @tailwindcss/vite, oklch, CSS variables, --color-, tailwind v4.
react-flow-advanced
existential-birds/beagle
Advanced React Flow patterns for complex use cases. Use when implementing sub-flows, custom connection lines, programmatic layouts, drag-and-drop, undo/redo, or complex state synchronization.
react-router-v7
existential-birds/beagle
React Router v7 best practices for data-driven routing. Use when implementing routes, loaders, actions, Form components, fetchers, navigation guards, protected routes, or URL search params. Triggers on createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider, useLoaderData, useActionData, useFetcher, NavLink, Outlet.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.