
architecture-decision-record
ADR templates in the Nygard format with context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording an architectural decision, or evaluating options.
- Installs
- 1.5K
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill architecture-decision-record- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads architecture-decision-record automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Architecture Decision Records
Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) are lightweight documents that capture important architectural decisions along with their context and consequences. This skill provides templates, examples, and best practices for creating and maintaining ADRs in your projects.
Overview
- Making significant technology choices (databases, frameworks, cloud providers)
- Designing system architecture or major components
- Establishing patterns or conventions for the team
- Evaluating trade-offs between multiple approaches
- Documenting decisions that will impact future development
Why ADRs Matter
ADRs serve as architectural memory for your team:
- Context Preservation: Capture why decisions were made, not just what was decided
- Onboarding: Help new team members understand architectural rationale
- Prevent Revisiting: Avoid endless debates about settled decisions
- Track Evolution: See how architecture evolved over time
- Accountability: Clear ownership and decision timeline
ADR Format (Nygard Template)
Each ADR should follow this structure:
1. Title
Format: ADR-####: [Decision Title]
Example: ADR-0001: Adopt Microservices Architecture
2. Status
Current state of the decision:
- Proposed: Under consideration
- Accepted: Decision approved and being implemented
- Superseded: Replaced by a later decision (reference ADR number)
- Deprecated: No longer recommended but not yet replaced
- Rejected: Considered but not adopted (document why)
3. Context
What to include:
- Problem statement or opportunity
- Business/technical constraints
- Stakeholder requirements
- Current state of the system
- Forces at play (conflicting concerns)
4. Decision
What to include:
- The choice being made
- Key principles or patterns to follow
- What will change as a result
- Who is responsible for implementation
Be specific and actionable:
- ✅ "We will adopt microservices architecture using Node.js with Express"
- ❌ "We will consider using microservices"
5. Consequences
What to include:
- Positive outcomes (benefits)
- Negative outcomes (costs, risks, trade-offs)
- Neutral outcomes (things that change but aren't clearly better/worse)
6. Alternatives Considered
Document at least 2 alternatives:
For each alternative, explain:
- What it was
- Why it was considered
- Why it was not chosen
7. References (Optional)
Links to relevant resources:
- Meeting notes or discussion threads
- Related ADRs
- External research or articles
- Proof of concept implementations
ADR Lifecycle
Proposed → Accepted → [Implemented] → (Eventually) Superseded/Deprecated
↓
Rejected
Best Practices
1. Keep ADRs Immutable
Once accepted, don't edit ADRs. Create new ADRs that supersede old ones.
- ✅ Create ADR-0015 that supersedes ADR-0003
- ❌ Update ADR-0003 with new decisions
2. Write in Present Tense
ADRs are historical records written as if the decision is being made now.
- ✅ "We will adopt microservices"
- ❌ "We adopted microservices"
3. Focus on 'Why', Not 'How'
ADRs capture decisions, not implementation details.
- ✅ "We chose PostgreSQL for relational consistency"
- ❌ "Configure PostgreSQL with these specific settings..."
4. Review ADRs as Team
Get input from relevant stakeholders before accepting.
- Architects: Technical viability
- Developers: Implementation feasibility
- Product: Business alignment
- DevOps: Operational concerns
5. Number Sequentially
Use 4-digit zero-padded numbers: ADR-0001, ADR-0002, etc. Maintain a single sequence even with multiple projects.
6. Store in Git
Keep ADRs in version control alongside code:
- Location:
/docs/adr/or/architecture/decisions/ - Format: Markdown for easy reading
- Branch: Same branch as implementation
Quick Start Checklist
Option 1: Use Script-Enhanced Generator (Recommended)
- Run
/create-adr [number] [title]to generate ADR with auto-filled context - ADR number, date, and author are auto-populated
- Review and fill in decision details
- Set Status to "Proposed" and review with team
Option 2: Use Static Template
- Copy ADR template from
assets/adr-template.md - Assign next sequential number (check existing ADRs)
- Fill in Context: problem, constraints, requirements
- Document Decision: what, why, how, who
- List Consequences: positive, negative, neutral
- Describe at least 2 Alternatives: what, pros/cons, why not chosen
- Add References: discussions, research, related ADRs
- Set Status to "Proposed"
- Review with team
- Update Status to "Accepted" after approval
- Link ADR in implementation PR
- Update Status to "Implemented" after deployment
Available Scripts
-
scripts/create-adr.md- Dynamic ADR generator with auto-filled context- Auto-fills: ADR number, date, author, total ADRs count
- Usage:
/create-adr [number] [title] - Uses
$ARGUMENTSand!commandfor dynamic context
-
assets/adr-template.md- Static template for manual use
Rules Quick Reference
| Rule | Impact | What It Covers |
|---|---|---|
| interrogation-scalability | HIGH | Scale questions, data volume, growth projections |
| interrogation-reliability | HIGH | Data patterns, UX impact, coherence validation |
| interrogation-security | HIGH | Access control, tenant isolation, attack surface |
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
❌ Too Technical: "We'll use Kubernetes with these 50 YAML configs..." ✅ Right Level: "We'll use Kubernetes for container orchestration because..."
❌ Too Vague: "We'll use a better database" ✅ Specific: "We'll use PostgreSQL 15+ for transactional data because..."
❌ No Alternatives: Only documenting the chosen solution ✅ Comparative: Document why alternatives weren't chosen
❌ Missing Consequences: Only listing benefits ✅ Balanced: Honest about costs and trade-offs
❌ No Context: "We decided to use Redis" ✅ Contextual: "Given our 1M+ concurrent users and sub-50ms latency requirement..."
Related Skills
ork:api-design: Use when designing APIs referenced in ADRsork:database-patterns: Use when ADR involves database choices- security-checklist: Consult when ADR has security implications
Skill Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-08 Maintained by: OrchestKit
Capability Details
adr-creation
Keywords: adr, architecture decision, decision record, document decision Solves:
- How do I document an architectural decision?
- Create an ADR
- Architecture decision template
adr-best-practices
Keywords: when to write adr, adr lifecycle, adr workflow, adr process, adr review, quantify impact Solves:
- When should I write an ADR?
- How do I manage ADR lifecycle?
- What's the ADR review process?
- How to quantify decision impact?
- ADR anti-patterns to avoid
- Link related ADRs
tradeoff-analysis
Keywords: tradeoff, pros cons, alternatives, comparison, evaluate options Solves:
- How do I analyze tradeoffs?
- Compare architectural options
- Document alternatives considered
consequences
Keywords: consequence, impact, risk, benefit, outcome Solves:
- What are the consequences of this decision?
- Document decision impact
- Risk and benefit analysis
FAQ
What does the architecture-decision-record skill do?
ADR templates in the Nygard format with context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording an architectural decision, or evaluating options.
How do I install architecture-decision-record?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill architecture-decision-record in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/architecture-decision-record/ (personal) or .claude/skills/architecture-decision-record/ (project).
Which AI agents can use architecture-decision-record?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is architecture-decision-record safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains architecture-decision-record?
It is published by yonatangross in yonatangross/orchestkit. It has 1,519 recorded installs.
More from yonatangross/orchestkit
devops-deployment
yonatangross/orchestkit
Use when setting up CI/CD pipelines, containerizing applications, deploying to Kubernetes, or writing infrastructure as code. DevOps & Deployment covers GitHub Actions, Docker, Helm, and Terraform patterns.
responsive-patterns
yonatangross/orchestkit
Responsive design with Container Queries, fluid typography, cqi/cqb units, subgrid, intrinsic layouts, foldable devices, and mobile-first patterns for React applications. Use when building responsive layouts or container queries.
ui-components
yonatangross/orchestkit
UI component library patterns for shadcn/ui and Radix Primitives. Use when building accessible component libraries, customizing shadcn components, using Radix unstyled primitives, or creating design system foundations.
rag-retrieval
yonatangross/orchestkit
Retrieval-Augmented Generation patterns for grounded LLM responses. Use when building RAG pipelines, embedding documents, implementing hybrid search, contextual retrieval, HyDE, agentic RAG, multimodal RAG, query decomposition, reranking, or pgvector search.
zustand-patterns
yonatangross/orchestkit
Reference for Zustand 5.x state management including slices, middleware, Immer, useShallow, persistence, selectors, and devtools integration. Documents 7 core patterns with TypeScript examples and anti-patterns. Use when building React state management with Zustand instead of Redux.
agent-orchestration
yonatangross/orchestkit
Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.