
hash-attack-techniques
Hash attack playbook. Use when exploiting length extension, MD5/SHA1 collisions, HMAC timing leaks, birthday attacks, or hash-based proof of work in CTF and authorized testing scenarios.
- Installs
- 3.6K
- Last 24h
- +17
- Trending rank
- #6488
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill hash-attack-techniques- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads hash-attack-techniques automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
SKILL: Hash Attack Techniques — Expert Cryptanalysis Playbook
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert hash attack techniques for CTF and security assessments. Covers length extension attacks, MD5/SHA1 collision generation, meet-in-the-middle hash attacks, HMAC timing side channels, birthday attacks, and proof-of-work solving. Base models often incorrectly apply length extension to HMAC or SHA-3, or fail to distinguish between identical-prefix and chosen-prefix collisions.
0. RELATED ROUTING
- rsa-attack-techniques when hash weaknesses affect RSA signature schemes
- symmetric-cipher-attacks when hash is used in key derivation
- classical-cipher-analysis when analyzing hash-like constructions in classical ciphers
Quick attack selection
| Scenario | Attack | Tool |
|---|---|---|
H(secret || msg) known, extend message | Length extension | HashPump, hash_extender |
| Need two files with same MD5 | Identical-prefix collision | fastcoll |
| Need specific MD5 prefix match | Chosen-prefix collision | hashclash |
| Byte-by-byte HMAC comparison | Timing attack | Custom script |
| Find any collision | Birthday attack | O(2^(n/2)) |
| Proof of work: find hash with leading zeros | Brute force | hashcat, Python |
1. LENGTH EXTENSION ATTACK
1.1 Vulnerable vs Non-Vulnerable
| Hash | Vulnerable | Why |
|---|---|---|
| MD5 | Yes | Merkle-Damgard construction |
| SHA-1 | Yes | Merkle-Damgard construction |
| SHA-256 | Yes | Merkle-Damgard construction |
| SHA-512 | Yes | Merkle-Damgard construction |
| SHA-3 / Keccak | No | Sponge construction |
| HMAC-* | No | Double hashing prevents extension |
| SHA-256 truncated | No (if truncated) | Missing internal state bits |
| BLAKE2 | No | Different construction |
1.2 Attack Mechanism
Given: MAC = H(secret || original_message)
Known: original_message, len(secret), MAC value
Compute: H(secret || original_message || padding || extension)
WITHOUT knowing the secret!
How: The MAC value IS the internal hash state after processing
(secret || original_message || padding).
Initialize hash with this state, continue hashing extension.
1.3 Padding Calculation (MD5/SHA)
def md5_padding(message_len_bytes):
"""Calculate MD5/SHA padding for given message length."""
bit_len = message_len_bytes * 8
# Pad with 0x80 + zeros until length ≡ 56 (mod 64)
padding = b'\x80'
padding += b'\x00' * ((55 - message_len_bytes) % 64)
# Append original length as 64-bit little-endian (MD5)
# or big-endian (SHA)
padding += bit_len.to_bytes(8, 'little') # MD5
# padding += bit_len.to_bytes(8, 'big') # SHA
return padding
1.4 Tool Usage
# HashPump
hashpump -s "known_mac_hex" \
-d "original_data" \
-k 16 \ # secret length
-a "extension_data"
# Output: new_mac, new_data (original + padding + extension)
# hash_extender
hash_extender --data "original" \
--secret 16 \
--append "extension" \
--signature "known_mac_hex" \
--format md5
1.5 Python Implementation
import struct
def md5_extend(original_mac, original_data_len, secret_len, extension):
"""
Perform MD5 length extension attack.
original_mac: hex string of H(secret || original_data)
"""
# Parse MAC into MD5 internal state (4 × 32-bit words, little-endian)
h = struct.unpack('<4I', bytes.fromhex(original_mac))
# Calculate total length after padding
total_original = secret_len + original_data_len
padding = md5_padding(total_original)
forged_len = total_original + len(padding) + len(extension)
# Continue MD5 from saved state with extension
# (requires MD5 implementation that accepts initial state)
from hashlib import md5
# Most stdlib md5 doesn't expose state setting
# Use: hlextend library or custom MD5
import hlextend
sha = hlextend.new('md5')
new_hash = sha.extend(extension, original_data, secret_len,
original_mac)
new_data = sha.payload # includes original + padding + extension
return new_hash, new_data
2. MD5 COLLISION ATTACKS
2.1 Identical-Prefix Collision (fastcoll)
Two messages with same prefix but different content, producing identical MD5.
# Generate collision pair
fastcoll -p prefix_file -o collision1.bin collision2.bin
# Result: MD5(collision1.bin) == MD5(collision2.bin)
# Files differ in exactly 128 bytes (two MD5 blocks)
2.2 Chosen-Prefix Collision (hashclash)
Two messages with different chosen prefixes, appended with computed suffixes to collide.
# hashclash (Marc Stevens)
./hashclash prefix1.bin prefix2.bin
# Result: MD5(prefix1 || suffix1) == MD5(prefix2 || suffix2)
2.3 UniColl (Single-Block Near-Collision)
Produces two messages differing in a single byte within one MD5 block, with same hash.
Application: forge two PDF/PE files with same MD5
- File 1: benign content
- File 2: malicious content
- Same MD5 hash
2.4 Collision Applications
| Application | Technique | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate forgery | Chosen-prefix | Rogue CA certificate (proven in 2008) |
| Binary substitution | Identical-prefix + conditional | Two executables, same MD5, different behavior |
| PDF collision | UniColl | Two PDFs showing different content |
| Git commit collision | Chosen-prefix (SHAttered for SHA1) | Two commits with same hash |
| CTF: bypass MD5 check | fastcoll | Two different inputs accepted as same |
2.5 CTF MD5 Collision Tricks
// PHP: md5($_GET['a']) == md5($_GET['b']) && $_GET['a'] != $_GET['b']
// Method 1: Array trick (not real collision)
?a[]=1&b[]=2 // md5(array) returns NULL, NULL == NULL
// Method 2: Real collision (fastcoll output, URL-encoded binary)
?a=<collision1_urlencoded>&b=<collision2_urlencoded>
// Method 3: 0e magic hashes (loose comparison ==)
// md5("240610708") = "0e462097431906509019562988736854"
// md5("QNKCDZO") = "0e830400451993494058024219903391"
// PHP: "0e..." == "0e..." is TRUE (both evaluate to 0 as floats)
3. SHA-1 COLLISION
3.1 SHAttered Attack (2017)
First practical SHA-1 collision: two PDF files with same SHA-1.
- Complexity: ~2^63 SHA-1 computations
- Cost: ~$110K on GPU clusters (2017 prices)
- Tool: shattered.io provides the collision PDFs
3.2 SHA-1 Chosen-Prefix Collision (2020)
- Complexity: ~2^63.4 computations
- Practical for attacking PGP/GnuPG key servers
- Demonstrates SHA-1 is broken for collision resistance
3.3 Impact
SHA-1 should NOT be used for:
✗ Digital signatures
✗ Certificate fingerprints
✗ Git commit integrity (migration to SHA-256 in progress)
✗ Deduplication based on hash
SHA-1 is still OK for:
✓ HMAC-SHA1 (collision resistance not required)
✓ HKDF-SHA1 (PRF security suffices)
✓ Non-adversarial checksums
4. BIRTHDAY ATTACK
4.1 Generic Birthday Bound
For n-bit hash: expected collisions after ~2^(n/2) hashes
Hash Bits Birthday bound
MD5 128 2^64
SHA-1 160 2^80
SHA-256 256 2^128
CTF application: if hash is truncated to k bits,
collision in ~2^(k/2) attempts
4.2 Birthday Attack Implementation
import hashlib
import os
def birthday_attack(hash_func, output_bits, max_attempts=2**28):
"""Find collision for truncated hash."""
mask = (1 << output_bits) - 1
seen = {}
for _ in range(max_attempts):
msg = os.urandom(16)
h = int(hash_func(msg).hexdigest(), 16) & mask
if h in seen and seen[h] != msg:
return seen[h], msg # collision!
seen[h] = msg
return None
# Example: find collision for first 32 bits of SHA-256
result = birthday_attack(hashlib.sha256, 32)
5. HMAC TIMING ATTACK
5.1 Vulnerable Comparison
# VULNERABLE: early-exit string comparison
def verify_hmac(received, expected):
return received == expected # Python == compares left to right
# The comparison may short-circuit on first differing byte,
# leaking timing information
5.2 Attack Strategy
import requests
import time
def hmac_timing_attack(url, data, hmac_len=32):
"""Byte-by-byte HMAC recovery via timing."""
known = ""
for pos in range(hmac_len * 2): # hex chars
best_char = ""
best_time = 0
for c in "0123456789abcdef":
candidate = known + c + "0" * (hmac_len * 2 - len(known) - 1)
times = []
for _ in range(50): # multiple samples for accuracy
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
requests.get(url, params={**data, "mac": candidate})
elapsed = time.perf_counter_ns() - start
times.append(elapsed)
avg_time = sorted(times)[len(times)//2] # median
if avg_time > best_time:
best_time = avg_time
best_char = c
known += best_char
print(f"Position {pos}: {known}")
return known
5.3 Constant-Time Comparison (Defense)
import hmac
# SECURE: constant-time comparison
def verify_hmac_secure(received, expected):
return hmac.compare_digest(received, expected)
6. MEET-IN-THE-MIDDLE (HASH)
6.1 Concept
Split hash computation into two halves, precompute one, match against the other.
Hash computation: H = f(g(x₁), h(x₂))
Precompute: table[g(x₁)] = x₁ for all x₁ in space₁
Search: for each x₂ in space₂:
if h(x₂) in table:
found! (x₁, x₂)
Time: O(2^(n/2)) instead of O(2^n)
Space: O(2^(n/2))
7. HASH PROOF-OF-WORK
7.1 Common CTF PoW Formats
# Format 1: Find x such that SHA256(prefix + x) starts with N zero bits
import hashlib
def solve_pow_prefix(prefix, zero_bits):
target = '0' * (zero_bits // 4)
i = 0
while True:
candidate = prefix + str(i)
h = hashlib.sha256(candidate.encode()).hexdigest()
if h.startswith(target):
return str(i)
i += 1
# Format 2: Find x such that SHA256(x) ends with specific suffix
def solve_pow_suffix(suffix_hex, hash_func=hashlib.sha256):
i = 0
while True:
h = hash_func(str(i).encode()).hexdigest()
if h.endswith(suffix_hex):
return str(i)
i += 1
7.2 GPU-Accelerated PoW
# hashcat for SHA256 PoW
hashcat -a 3 -m 1400 --hex-charset \
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000:prefix" \
"?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a"
8. RAINBOW TABLES & SALTING
8.1 Rainbow Table Attack
Precomputed chain: password → hash → reduce → password₂ → hash₂ → ...
Lookup: given hash h, check if h appears in any chain
Time-memory tradeoff: less space than full table, more time than direct lookup
8.2 Salt Defeats Rainbow Tables
Without salt: H(password) — same password always produces same hash
With salt: H(salt || password) — different salt per user
Rainbow tables are password-specific, not (salt+password)-specific
Each unique salt requires a separate table → infeasible
8.3 Modern Password Hashing
| Algorithm | Salt | Iterations | Memory-Hard | Recommended |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD5 | No | 1 | No | Never |
| SHA-256 | No | 1 | No | Never for passwords |
| bcrypt | Yes | Configurable | No | Yes |
| scrypt | Yes | Configurable | Yes | Yes |
| Argon2 | Yes | Configurable | Yes | Best choice |
| PBKDF2 | Yes | Configurable | No | Acceptable |
9. DECISION TREE
Hash-related challenge — what's the scenario?
│
├─ Have H(secret || message), need to extend?
│ ├─ Hash is MD5/SHA1/SHA256/SHA512?
│ │ └─ Yes → Length extension attack
│ │ └─ Need: MAC value, original message, secret length
│ │ └─ Tool: HashPump or hash_extender
│ │
│ └─ Hash is SHA3/HMAC/BLAKE2?
│ └─ Length extension doesn't work
│ └─ Look for other vulnerabilities
│
├─ Need two inputs with same hash?
│ ├─ MD5?
│ │ ├─ Same prefix → fastcoll (seconds)
│ │ ├─ Different prefixes → hashclash (hours)
│ │ └─ CTF PHP loose comparison → 0e magic hashes
│ │
│ ├─ SHA-1?
│ │ └─ SHAttered (expensive, use precomputed if possible)
│ │
│ └─ SHA-256+?
│ └─ No practical collision attack
│ └─ Look for logic flaws instead
│
├─ Need to forge HMAC?
│ ├─ Timing side channel available?
│ │ └─ Byte-by-byte timing attack
│ │
│ ├─ Key is short/weak?
│ │ └─ Brute force key with hashcat
│ │
│ └─ No weakness?
│ └─ HMAC is secure — look elsewhere
│
├─ Hash is truncated (short output)?
│ └─ Birthday attack — collision in 2^(bits/2)
│
├─ Proof of work?
│ └─ Brute force with parallel computation
│ ├─ Python multiprocessing for < 28 bits
│ ├─ hashcat/GPU for > 28 bits
│ └─ Optimize: pre-increment string, avoid re-encoding
│
└─ Password hash cracking?
├─ No salt → rainbow tables (pre-computed)
├─ Known salt → hashcat / John the Ripper
└─ Memory-hard (Argon2/scrypt) → limited by memory, slow brute force
10. TOOLS
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| HashPump | Length extension attack | hashpump -s MAC -d data -k secret_len -a extension |
| hash_extender | Length extension (multiple algorithms) | hash_extender --data D --secret L --append E --sig MAC |
| fastcoll | MD5 identical-prefix collision | fastcoll -p prefix -o out1 out2 |
| hashclash | MD5 chosen-prefix collision | hashclash prefix1 prefix2 |
| hashcat | Password/hash cracking (GPU) | hashcat -m MODE -a ATTACK hash wordlist |
| John the Ripper | Password cracking (CPU/GPU) | john --wordlist=rockyou.txt hashes.txt |
| CyberChef | Quick hash computation and encoding | Web-based |
FAQ
What does the hash-attack-techniques skill do?
Hash attack playbook. Use when exploiting length extension, MD5/SHA1 collisions, HMAC timing leaks, birthday attacks, or hash-based proof of work in CTF and authorized testing scenarios.
How do I install hash-attack-techniques?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill hash-attack-techniques in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/hash-attack-techniques/ (personal) or .claude/skills/hash-attack-techniques/ (project).
Which AI agents can use hash-attack-techniques?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is hash-attack-techniques safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains hash-attack-techniques?
It is published by yaklang in yaklang/hack-skills. It has 3,591 recorded installs.
More from yaklang/hack-skills
hack
yaklang/hack-skills
Entry P0 primary router and operating doctrine for HackSkills. Use when the task involves web application testing, API security assessment, recon, vulnerability triage, exploit path planning, authorized pentest, code audit, source-leak mining, middleware audit, SOC triage, detection engineering, incident response, or choosing the right next category skill before any deep topic skill. Also use when the user mentions 安全工程师, 渗透测试, 红队, 蓝队, 代码审计, 源码泄露, SRC. Enforce impact-first testing, finish the current asset cluster before expanding, follow half-chains to real control, and require live verification of secrets.
android-pentesting-tricks
yaklang/hack-skills
Android pentesting playbook. Use when testing Android applications for SSL pinning bypass, exported component abuse, WebView vulnerabilities, intent redirection, root detection bypass, tapjacking, and backup extraction during authorized mobile security assessments.
recon-and-methodology
yaklang/hack-skills
Reconnaissance and methodology playbook. Use when mapping assets, discovering endpoints, fingerprinting technology, and building a structured testing plan for a new target.
sqli-sql-injection
yaklang/hack-skills
SQL injection playbook. Use when input reaches SQL queries, authentication logic, sorting, filtering, reporting, or DB-specific blind and out-of-band execution paths.
code-obfuscation-deobfuscation
yaklang/hack-skills
Code obfuscation analysis and deobfuscation playbook. Use when reversing binaries protected by junk code, opaque predicates, self-modifying code, control flow flattening, VM protection, or string encryption.
xss-cross-site-scripting
yaklang/hack-skills
XSS playbook. Use when user-controlled content reaches HTML, attributes, JavaScript, DOM sinks, uploads, or multi-context rendering paths.
Popular testing & qa skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
grilling
mattpocock/skills
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
migrate-to-shoehorn
mattpocock/skills
Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.
run-train
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.
test-driven-development
obra/superpowers
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
finishing-a-development-branch
obra/superpowers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work