microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection

Q: How do I install microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection/ (personal) or .claude/skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection/ (project).

by wshaddixSecurity

Dependency injection patterns and best practices using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection for .NET applications. Use when configuring DI containers in .NET, choosing between service lifetimes (Singleton, Scoped, Transient), or implementing decorator patterns and service interception.

Installs: 549
Last 24h: —
Trending rank: —
Security: Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection

01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection automatically when relevant.
03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Dependency Injection Patterns

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection

The Problem

Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:

// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);

builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IEmailComposer, MjmlEmailComposer>();
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IPaymentProcessor, StripePaymentProcessor>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IInvoiceGenerator, InvoiceGenerator>();
// ... 150 more lines ...

Problems:

Hard to find related registrations
No clear boundaries between subsystems
Can't reuse configuration in tests
Merge conflicts in team settings
No encapsulation of internal dependencies

The Solution: Extension Method Composition

Group related registrations into extension methods:

// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);

builder.Services
    .AddUserServices()
    .AddOrderServices()
    .AddEmailServices()
    .AddPaymentServices()
    .AddValidators();

var app = builder.Build();

Each Add* method encapsulates a cohesive set of registrations.

Extension Method Pattern

Basic Structure

namespace MyApp.Users;

public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        // Repositories
        services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserReadStore, UserReadStore>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserWriteStore, UserWriteStore>();

        // Services
        services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserValidationService, UserValidationService>();

        // Return for chaining
        return services;
    }
}

With Configuration

namespace MyApp.Email;

public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
        this IServiceCollection services,
        string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
    {
        // Bind configuration
        services.AddOptions<EmailOptions>()
            .BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
            .ValidateDataAnnotations()
            .ValidateOnStart();

        // Register services
        services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
        services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserEmailComposer, UserEmailComposer>();
        services.AddScoped<IOrderEmailComposer, OrderEmailComposer>();

        // SMTP client depends on environment
        services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();

        return services;
    }
}

With Dependencies on Other Extensions

namespace MyApp.Orders;

public static class OrderServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddOrderServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        // This subsystem depends on email services
        // Caller is responsible for calling AddEmailServices() first
        // Or we can call it here if it's idempotent

        services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
        services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();
        services.AddScoped<IOrderEmailNotifier, OrderEmailNotifier>();

        return services;
    }
}

File Organization

Place extension methods near the services they register:

src/
  MyApp.Api/
    Program.cs                    # Composes all Add* methods
  MyApp.Users/
    Services/
      UserService.cs
      IUserService.cs
    Repositories/
      UserRepository.cs
    UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs   # AddUserServices()
  MyApp.Orders/
    Services/
      OrderService.cs
    OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs  # AddOrderServices()
  MyApp.Email/
    Composers/
      UserEmailComposer.cs
    EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs  # AddEmailServices()

Convention: {Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs next to the feature's services.

Naming Conventions

Pattern	Use For
`Add{Feature}Services()`	General feature registration
`Add{Feature}()`	Short form when unambiguous
`Configure{Feature}()`	When primarily setting options
`Use{Feature}()`	Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder)

// Feature services
services.AddUserServices();
services.AddEmailServices();
services.AddPaymentServices();

// Third-party integrations
services.AddStripePayments();
services.AddSendGridEmail();

// Configuration-heavy
services.ConfigureAuthentication();
services.ConfigureAuthorization();

Testing Benefits

The main advantage: reuse production configuration in tests.

WebApplicationFactory

public class ApiTests : IClassFixture<WebApplicationFactory<Program>>
{
    private readonly WebApplicationFactory<Program> _factory;

    public ApiTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory)
    {
        _factory = factory.WithWebHostBuilder(builder =>
        {
            builder.ConfigureServices(services =>
            {
                // Production services already registered via Add* methods
                // Only override what's different for testing

                // Replace email sender with test double
                services.RemoveAll<IEmailSender>();
                services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, TestEmailSender>();

                // Replace external payment processor
                services.RemoveAll<IPaymentProcessor>();
                services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor, FakePaymentProcessor>();
            });
        });
    }

    [Fact]
    public async Task CreateOrder_SendsConfirmationEmail()
    {
        var client = _factory.CreateClient();
        var emailSender = _factory.Services.GetRequiredService<IEmailSender>() as TestEmailSender;

        await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/orders", new CreateOrderRequest(...));

        Assert.Single(emailSender!.SentEmails);
    }
}

Akka.Hosting.TestKit

public class OrderActorSpecs : Akka.Hosting.TestKit.TestKit
{
    protected override void ConfigureAkka(AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder, IServiceProvider provider)
    {
        // Reuse production Akka configuration
        builder.AddOrderActors();
    }

    protected override void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
    {
        // Reuse production service configuration
        services.AddOrderServices();

        // Override only external dependencies
        services.RemoveAll<IPaymentProcessor>();
        services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor, FakePaymentProcessor>();
    }

    [Fact]
    public async Task OrderActor_ProcessesPayment()
    {
        var orderActor = ActorRegistry.Get<OrderActor>();
        orderActor.Tell(new ProcessOrder(orderId));

        ExpectMsg<OrderProcessed>();
    }
}

Standalone Unit Tests

public class UserServiceTests
{
    private readonly ServiceProvider _provider;

    public UserServiceTests()
    {
        var services = new ServiceCollection();

        // Reuse production registrations
        services.AddUserServices();

        // Add test infrastructure
        services.AddSingleton<IUserRepository, InMemoryUserRepository>();

        _provider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
    }

    [Fact]
    public async Task CreateUser_ValidData_Succeeds()
    {
        var service = _provider.GetRequiredService<IUserService>();
        var result = await service.CreateUserAsync(new CreateUserRequest(...));

        Assert.True(result.IsSuccess);
    }
}

Layered Extensions

For larger applications, compose extensions hierarchically:

// Top-level: Everything the app needs
public static class AppServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddAppServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        return services
            .AddDomainServices()
            .AddInfrastructureServices()
            .AddApiServices();
    }
}

// Domain layer
public static class DomainServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddDomainServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        return services
            .AddUserServices()
            .AddOrderServices()
            .AddProductServices();
    }
}

// Infrastructure layer
public static class InfrastructureServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddInfrastructureServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        return services
            .AddEmailServices()
            .AddPaymentServices()
            .AddStorageServices();
    }
}

Akka.Hosting Integration

The same pattern works for Akka.NET actor configuration:

public static class OrderActorExtensions
{
    public static AkkaConfigurationBuilder AddOrderActors(
        this AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder)
    {
        return builder
            .WithActors((system, registry, resolver) =>
            {
                var orderProps = resolver.Props<OrderActor>();
                var orderRef = system.ActorOf(orderProps, "orders");
                registry.Register<OrderActor>(orderRef);
            })
            .WithShardRegion<OrderShardActor>(
                typeName: "order-shard",
                (system, registry, resolver) =>
                    entityId => resolver.Props<OrderShardActor>(entityId),
                new OrderMessageExtractor(),
                ShardOptions.Create());
    }
}

// Usage in Program.cs
builder.Services.AddAkka("MySystem", (builder, sp) =>
{
    builder
        .AddOrderActors()
        .AddInventoryActors()
        .AddNotificationActors();
});

See akka/hosting-actor-patterns skill for complete Akka.Hosting patterns.

Common Patterns

Conditional Registration

public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
    this IServiceCollection services,
    IHostEnvironment environment)
{
    services.AddSingleton<IEmailComposer, MjmlEmailComposer>();

    if (environment.IsDevelopment())
    {
        // Use Mailpit in development
        services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, MailpitEmailSender>();
    }
    else
    {
        // Use real SMTP in production
        services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
    }

    return services;
}

Factory-Based Registration

public static IServiceCollection AddPaymentServices(
    this IServiceCollection services,
    string configSection = "Stripe")
{
    services.AddOptions<StripeOptions>()
        .BindConfiguration(configSection)
        .ValidateOnStart();

    // Factory for complex initialization
    services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor>(sp =>
    {
        var options = sp.GetRequiredService<IOptions<StripeOptions>>().Value;
        var logger = sp.GetRequiredService<ILogger<StripePaymentProcessor>>();

        return new StripePaymentProcessor(options.ApiKey, options.WebhookSecret, logger);
    });

    return services;
}

Keyed Services (.NET 8+)

public static IServiceCollection AddNotificationServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
    // Register multiple implementations with keys
    services.AddKeyedSingleton<INotificationSender, EmailNotificationSender>("email");
    services.AddKeyedSingleton<INotificationSender, SmsNotificationSender>("sms");
    services.AddKeyedSingleton<INotificationSender, PushNotificationSender>("push");

    // Resolver that picks the right one
    services.AddScoped<INotificationDispatcher, NotificationDispatcher>();

    return services;
}

Anti-Patterns

Don't: Register Everything in Program.cs

// BAD: Massive Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
// ... 200 more lines ...

Don't: Create Overly Generic Extensions

// BAD: Too vague, doesn't communicate what's registered
public static IServiceCollection AddServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
    // Registers 50 random things
}

Don't: Hide Important Configuration

// BAD: Buried important settings
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(this IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer("hardcoded-connection-string"));  // Hidden!
}

// GOOD: Accept configuration explicitly
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(
    this IServiceCollection services,
    string connectionString)
{
    services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
}

Best Practices Summary

Practice	Benefit
Group related services into `Add*` methods	Clean Program.cs, clear boundaries
Place extensions near the services they register	Easy to find and maintain
Return `IServiceCollection` for chaining	Fluent API
Accept configuration parameters	Flexibility
Use consistent naming (`Add{Feature}Services`)	Discoverability
Test by reusing production extensions	Confidence, less duplication

Lifetime Management

Choose the right lifetime based on state:

Lifetime	Use When	Examples
Singleton	Stateless, thread-safe, expensive to create	Configuration, HttpClient factories, caches
Scoped	Stateful per-request, database contexts	DbContext, repositories, user context
Transient	Lightweight, stateful, cheap to create	Validators, short-lived helpers

Rules of Thumb

// SINGLETON: Stateless services, shared safely
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();

// SCOPED: Database access, per-request state
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();  // DbContext dependency
services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();       // Uses scoped repos

// TRANSIENT: Cheap, short-lived
services.AddTransient<CreateUserRequestValidator>();

Scope Requirements

Scoped services require a scope to exist. In ASP.NET Core, each HTTP request creates a scope automatically. But in other contexts (background services, actors), you must create scopes manually.

// ASP.NET Controller - scope exists automatically
public class OrdersController : ControllerBase
{
    private readonly IOrderService _orderService;  // Scoped - works!

    public OrdersController(IOrderService orderService)
    {
        _orderService = orderService;
    }
}

// Background Service - no automatic scope!
public class OrderProcessingService : BackgroundService
{
    private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;

    public OrderProcessingService(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
    {
        // Inject IServiceProvider, NOT scoped services directly
        _serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
    }

    protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
    {
        while (!ct.IsCancellationRequested)
        {
            // Create scope manually for each unit of work
            using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
            var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderService>();

            await orderService.ProcessPendingOrdersAsync(ct);
            await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1), ct);
        }
    }
}

Akka.NET Actor Scope Management

Actors don't have automatic DI scopes. If you need scoped services inside an actor, inject IServiceProvider and create scopes manually.

Pattern: Scope Per Message

public sealed class AccountProvisionActor : ReceiveActor
{
    private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
    private readonly IActorRef _mailingActor;

    public AccountProvisionActor(
        IServiceProvider serviceProvider,
        IRequiredActor<MailingActor> mailingActor)
    {
        _serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
        _mailingActor = mailingActor.ActorRef;

        ReceiveAsync<ProvisionAccount>(HandleProvisionAccount);
    }

    private async Task HandleProvisionAccount(ProvisionAccount msg)
    {
        // Create scope for this message processing
        using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();

        // Resolve scoped services
        var userManager = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<UserManager<User>>();
        var orderRepository = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderRepository>();
        var emailComposer = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IPaymentEmailComposer>();

        // Do work with scoped services
        var user = await userManager.FindByIdAsync(msg.UserId);
        var order = await orderRepository.CreateAsync(msg.Order);

        // DbContext commits when scope disposes
    }
}

Why This Pattern Works

Each message gets fresh DbContext - No stale entity tracking
Proper disposal - Connections released after each message
Isolation - One message's errors don't affect others
Testable - Can inject mock IServiceProvider

Singleton Services in Actors

For stateless services, inject directly (no scope needed):

public sealed class NotificationActor : ReceiveActor
{
    private readonly IEmailLinkGenerator _linkGenerator;  // Singleton - OK!
    private readonly IActorRef _mailingActor;

    public NotificationActor(
        IEmailLinkGenerator linkGenerator,  // Direct injection
        IRequiredActor<MailingActor> mailingActor)
    {
        _linkGenerator = linkGenerator;
        _mailingActor = mailingActor.ActorRef;

        Receive<SendWelcomeEmail>(Handle);
    }
}

Akka.DependencyInjection Reference

Akka.NET's DI integration is documented at:

Akka.DependencyInjection: https://getakka.net/articles/actors/dependency-injection.html
Akka.Hosting: https://github.com/akkadotnet/Akka.Hosting

Common Mistakes

Injecting Scoped into Singleton

// BAD: Singleton captures scoped service - stale DbContext!
public class CacheService  // Registered as Singleton
{
    private readonly IUserRepository _repo;  // Scoped!

    public CacheService(IUserRepository repo)  // Captured at startup!
    {
        _repo = repo;  // This DbContext lives forever - BAD
    }
}

// GOOD: Inject factory or IServiceProvider
public class CacheService
{
    private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;

    public CacheService(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
    {
        _serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
    }

    public async Task<User> GetUserAsync(string id)
    {
        using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
        var repo = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IUserRepository>();
        return await repo.GetByIdAsync(id);
    }
}

No Scope in Background Work

// BAD: No scope for scoped services
public class BadBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
    private readonly IOrderService _orderService;  // Scoped!

    public BadBackgroundService(IOrderService orderService)
    {
        _orderService = orderService;  // Will throw or behave unexpectedly
    }
}

// GOOD: Create scope for each unit of work
public class GoodBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
    private readonly IServiceScopeFactory _scopeFactory;

    public GoodBackgroundService(IServiceScopeFactory scopeFactory)
    {
        _scopeFactory = scopeFactory;
    }

    protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
    {
        using var scope = _scopeFactory.CreateScope();
        var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderService>();
        // ...
    }
}

Resources

Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/extensions/dependency-injection
Akka.Hosting: https://github.com/akkadotnet/Akka.Hosting
Akka.DependencyInjection: https://getakka.net/articles/actors/dependency-injection.html
Options Pattern: See microsoft-extensions/configuration skill

FAQ

What does the microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection skill do?

How do I install microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection/ (personal) or .claude/skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection/ (project).

Which AI agents can use microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection?

It is published by wshaddix in wshaddix/dotnet-skills. It has 549 recorded installs.

More from wshaddix/dotnet-skills

View all →

dotnet-xunit

wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Writing xUnit tests. v3 Fact/Theory, fixtures, parallelism, IAsyncLifetime, v2 compatibility.

Backend & APIs613 installs

dotnet-testing-strategy

wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Deciding how to test .NET code. Unit vs integration vs E2E decision tree, test doubles.

Testing & QA610 installs

modern-csharp-coding-standards

wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Write modern, high-performance C code using records, pattern matching, value objects, async/await, Span /Memory , and best-practice API design patterns. Emphasizes functional-style programming with C 12+ features. Use when writing new C code or refactoring existing code, designing public APIs for libraries or services, optimizing performance-critical code paths, or building async/await-heavy applications.

Code Quality & Workflow583 installs

csharp-wolverinefx

wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Build .NET applications with WolverineFX for messaging, HTTP services, and event sourcing. Use when implementing command handlers, message handlers, HTTP endpoints with WolverineFx.HTTP, transactional outbox patterns, event sourcing with Marten, CQRS architectures, cascading messages, batch message processing, or configuring transports like RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus, or Amazon SQS.

Backend & APIs570 installs

testcontainers

wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Patterns for using Testcontainers in .NET integration tests to spin up real dependencies like databases and message queues. Use when writing integration tests that require real databases, testing with message brokers like RabbitMQ or Kafka, or isolating test dependencies with Docker containers.

Testing & QA565 installs

logging-observability

wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Production-grade logging and observability patterns for ASP.NET Core Razor Pages. Covers structured logging with Serilog, correlation IDs, health checks, request logging, OpenTelemetry integration, and diagnostic best practices. Use when setting up structured logging in ASP.NET Core applications, implementing distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry, or configuring health checks and observability.

DevOps & Cloud542 installs

Popular security skills

View category →

azure-compliance

microsoft/azure-skills

Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.

OfficialSecurity567K installs

minimal-run-and-audit

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.

Security477.4K installs

seo-audit

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

Security238.7K installs

firebase-security-rules-auditor

firebase/agent-skills

Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.

OfficialSecurity139.1K installs

audit

pbakaus/impeccable

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

Security81.9K installs

competitors

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

Security79.3K installs

microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection

Install

Install

Describe the task

Review the result

SKILL.md

Dependency Injection Patterns

When to Use This Skill

The Problem

The Solution: Extension Method Composition

Extension Method Pattern

Basic Structure

With Configuration

With Dependencies on Other Extensions

File Organization

Naming Conventions

Testing Benefits

WebApplicationFactory

Akka.Hosting.TestKit

Standalone Unit Tests

Layered Extensions

Akka.Hosting Integration

Common Patterns

Conditional Registration

Factory-Based Registration

Keyed Services (.NET 8+)

Anti-Patterns

Don't: Register Everything in Program.cs

Don't: Create Overly Generic Extensions

Don't: Hide Important Configuration

Best Practices Summary

Lifetime Management

Rules of Thumb

Scope Requirements

Akka.NET Actor Scope Management

Pattern: Scope Per Message

Why This Pattern Works

Singleton Services in Actors

Akka.DependencyInjection Reference

Common Mistakes

Injecting Scoped into Singleton

No Scope in Background Work

Resources

FAQ

More from wshaddix/dotnet-skills

Popular security skills