waybarrios

Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging. This is NOT a general code review.

Review a pull request or a set of code changes for bugs, logic errors, and project-convention violations using a confidence-filtered, multi-agent process. Use this skill when the user asks to review a PR, audit pending changes, or inspect a diff for problems before merging.

Audit and improve project-rules files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .agents/instructions, local overrides) so the agent keeps accurate project context. Use when the user asks to check, audit, review, update, improve, or fix their AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, mentions "project rules maintenance" or "agent context optimization", or when the codebase has changed enough that the rules file may be stale. Scans the repository for every rules file, grades each against a quality rubric, outputs a quality report, and applies targeted edits only after user approval.

Deeply analyze an existing codebase feature by tracing execution paths, mapping architecture layers, understanding patterns and abstractions, and documenting dependencies. Use this skill when you need to understand how a feature works before modifying or extending it, when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev exploration, or when the user asks "how does X work in this codebase".

Review code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Use this skill when reviewing a small set of changes locally (such as unstaged diff), when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev quality review, or when the user wants a critique of a specific file or function.

Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than diving straight to code.

Design a feature architecture by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then provide a comprehensive implementation blueprint with specific files to create or modify, component designs, data flows, and a build sequence. Use this skill when the user asks for an architecture design, an implementation plan for a non-trivial feature, or when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev architecture phase.

Guide the creation of high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when the user wants to build an MCP server to integrate an external API or service, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

Create new skills (SKILL.md files), modify and improve existing skills, and design skill descriptions for accurate triggering. Use when the user wants to create a new skill from scratch, edit an existing skill, optimize a skill's description, or convert a workflow they just demonstrated into a reusable skill.

Agents should invoke this skill for code reviews, linting/formatting setup, maintainability checks, complexity concerns, warning cleanup, coding standards, or quality gates in Rust, TypeScript, Python, shell, and mixed repos.

Operational rubric that turns "don't make AI slop" into observable properties, severity levels, evidence requirements, and repair actions for interface design. Use as the reference rubric when building or reviewing marketing sites, product interfaces, dashboards, portfolios, or e-commerce pages, especially alongside frontend-design.

Agents should invoke this skill when choosing patterns, designing traits/interfaces/components, deciding abstraction boundaries, evaluating dependency injection/callbacks, or comparing implementation approaches in Rust, TypeScript/React, or Django/Python.

Identifies dependencies at heightened risk of exploitation or takeover. Use when assessing supply chain attack surface, evaluating dependency health, or scoping security engagements.

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.

Detects fail-open insecure defaults (hardcoded secrets, weak auth, permissive security) that allow apps to run insecurely in production. Use when auditing security, reviewing config management, or analyzing environment variable handling.

Run Semgrep static analysis across a codebase, optionally using Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis. Use when Semgrep or a static-analysis scan is requested; use security-review for a manual audit.

Turn one confirmed security finding into a disclosure-ready GitHub advisory with root cause, proof of concept, impact, and source evidence. Use for reporting an established vulnerability, not discovering or validating one.

Audit GitHub Actions that run AI agents for prompt injection, unsafe interpolation, sandbox gaps, and permissive actor rules. Use for agentic CI workflows, not general application code review.

Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.

Systematically verifies suspected security bugs to eliminate false positives. Produces TRUE POSITIVE or FALSE POSITIVE verdicts with documented evidence for each bug.

Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis. Use when hunting bug variants, building CodeQL/Semgrep queries, analyzing security vulnerabilities, or performing systematic code audits after finding an initial issue.

Identify error-prone APIs, dangerous configuration, and footgun designs that enable security mistakes. Use for API ergonomics, misuse resistance, secure defaults, or pit-of-success reviews; use code-review for general defects.