MCPInstall

analyze-selective-testing

Analyzes Xcode selective testing effectiveness for a test run, showing which test targets were skipped or ran, and diagnosing regressions in test selection. Can compare two test runs to identify what changed.

Installs
290
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/tuist/agent-skills --skill analyze-selective-testing
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads analyze-selective-testing automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Analyze Selective Testing

Quick Start

  1. Run tuist test list --json to find test runs.
  2. Run tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --json to see per-target selective testing status.
  3. If effectiveness dropped, compare targets between a known-good run and the regressed run.

Step 1: Resolve Test Runs

Find the test run to analyze

List recent test runs, optionally filtering by branch:

tuist test list --json --page-size 10
tuist test list --git-branch feature-x --json --page-size 5

Get basic info for a specific test run:

tuist test show <test-run-id> --json

Use this to confirm the run's branch, status, scheme, and environment (xcode_version, macos_version).

Defaults

  • If no test run is specified, use the most recent CI test run on the current branch.
  • For comparison, use the most recent CI test run on the project's default branch.

Step 2: Drill Into Selective Testing Targets

List per-target selective testing data for a test run:

tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --json

Each target includes:

  • name: The test target name
  • hit_status: miss (ran), local (skipped via local cache), or remote (skipped via remote cache)
  • hash: The selective testing hash for this target

Filter by status to focus your analysis:

tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --hit-status miss --json
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --hit-status local --json
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --hit-status remote --json

Assess effectiveness

Count the targets by status:

effectiveness = (local_hits + remote_hits) / total_targets * 100
EffectivenessVerdict
60-100%Healthy — most unchanged tests are being skipped
30-60%Moderate — some cache invalidation occurring, worth investigating
0-30%Low — likely a core dependency changed or the cache was invalidated
0%Cold cache — first run, environment change, or full invalidation

Step 3: Diagnose Regressions

If effectiveness dropped, investigate:

Check for global invalidation

If nearly all targets show as miss, the entire selective testing cache was invalidated. Common causes:

CauseHow to verify
Xcode version changeCompare xcode_version between good and bad runs via tuist test show
CI environment changeCompare macos_version, model_identifier between runs
Project graph or dependency changeCheck git history for changes to project manifests, dependency versions, or target configurations
Core dependency changeA widely-depended-on target changed, invalidating all its dependents

Note: Tuist CLI version upgrades rarely cause hash invalidation — the hash version is not updated on every release.

Check for cascade invalidation

If only some targets show as miss, a dependency change likely cascaded:

  1. Run tuist test xcode target list <good-run-id> --json and tuist test xcode target list <bad-run-id> --json.
  2. Match targets by name — identify those that changed from local/remote to miss.
  3. Compare hashes for changed targets — if a target's hash differs, its sources or dependencies changed.
  4. Look for a common dependency among the invalidated targets.

Compare two test runs

For each target:

  • Match by name
  • Compare hit_status (hit -> miss = invalidated, miss -> hit = improved)
  • Compare hash (different hash = target or its dependencies changed)

Step 4: Recommendations

Based on the diagnosis:

  • Environment change: Ensure CI uses consistent Xcode/macOS versions. This is the most common cause of full cache invalidation.
  • Cascade from dependency change: Consider if the change to the root target was necessary. If the root target is a widely-shared module, consider splitting it.
  • Cold cache on new branch: Run tests once to warm the cache. Subsequent runs will benefit from selective testing.

Summary Format

Produce a summary with:

  1. Overall: effectiveness percentage, verdict (healthy/moderate/low/cold)
  2. Target breakdown: targets grouped by hit status
  3. Comparison (if applicable): targets that changed status between runs, with hash diffs
  4. Root cause: what caused the regression
  5. Recommendations: actionable next steps

Example:

Selective Testing Analysis: test run abc123 on feature-x

Effectiveness: 15% (3/20 targets skipped) -- LOW
  Local hits:  2 targets (CoreTests, UtilTests)
  Remote hits: 1 target (NetworkTests)
  Misses:      17 targets

Comparison with baseline (run def456, 75% effectiveness):
  14 targets changed from hit to miss
  All changed targets have different hashes

Root cause: Xcode version changed from 15.2 to 16.0 between runs.
This changed all target hashes, invalidating the entire cache.

Recommendations:
- Align CI Xcode version with the version used in the baseline run.
- If the upgrade is intentional, run tests once to re-warm the cache.

Done Checklist

  • Identified the test run(s) to analyze
  • Drilled into per-target selective testing status via tuist test xcode target list
  • Diagnosed root cause if effectiveness is low
  • Compared targets with baseline if regression detected
  • Provided actionable recommendations

FAQ

What does the analyze-selective-testing skill do?

Analyzes Xcode selective testing effectiveness for a test run, showing which test targets were skipped or ran, and diagnosing regressions in test selection. Can compare two test runs to identify what changed.

How do I install analyze-selective-testing?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/tuist/agent-skills --skill analyze-selective-testing in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/analyze-selective-testing/ (personal) or .claude/skills/analyze-selective-testing/ (project).

Which AI agents can use analyze-selective-testing?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is analyze-selective-testing safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains analyze-selective-testing?

It is published by tuist in tuist/agent-skills. It has 290 recorded installs.

More from tuist/agent-skills

View all →

Guides day-to-day work in Tuist-generated Xcode workspaces, including generation, build and test commands, and buildable folders. Use when working in a Tuist-generated project or when users mention tuist generate, xcodebuild test, or generated workspaces.

Testing & QA597 installs

debug-generated-project

tuist/agent-skills

Debugs issues users encounter with Tuist-generated projects by reproducing the scenario locally, building Tuist from source when needed, and triaging whether it is a bug, misconfiguration, or something that needs team input. Use when users report generation failures, build errors after generation, or unexpected project behavior.

fix-flaky-tests

tuist/agent-skills

Fixes flaky tests by analyzing failure patterns from Tuist test insights, identifying root causes, and applying targeted corrections. Can be invoked with a specific test case URL (e.g. https://tuist.dev/{account}/{project}/tests/test-cases/{id}) or without arguments to discover and fix all flaky tests in the project.

Testing & QA504 installs

Migrates existing Xcode projects to Tuist generated workspaces with build and run validation, external dependency mapping, and migration checklists. Use when adopting Tuist for an existing app or converting a hand-edited Xcode project to generated projects.

Mobile501 installs

compare-builds

tuist/agent-skills

Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.

AI & Agents299 installs

compare-generations

tuist/agent-skills

Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.

AI & Agents282 installs

Popular testing & qa skills

View category →

tdd

mattpocock/skills

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

Testing & QA1.2M installs

grilling

mattpocock/skills

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Testing & QA996.2K installs

migrate-to-shoehorn

mattpocock/skills

Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.

Testing & QA484.1K installs

run-train

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.

Testing & QA337.8K installs

test-driven-development

obra/superpowers

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Testing & QA261.8K installs

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

Testing & QA216.8K installs