MCPInstall

domain-identification-grouping

Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis).

Installs
227
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill domain-identification-grouping
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads domain-identification-grouping automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Domain Identification and Grouping

This skill groups architectural components into logical domains (business areas) to prepare for creating domain services in a service-based architecture.

How to Use

Quick Start

Request analysis of your codebase:

  • "Group components into logical domains"
  • "Identify component domains for service-based architecture"
  • "Create domain groupings from components"
  • "Analyze which components belong to which domains"

Usage Examples

Example 1: Domain Identification

User: "Group components into logical domains"

The skill will:
1. Analyze component responsibilities and relationships
2. Identify business domains based on functionality
3. Group components into domains
4. Create domain diagrams
5. Suggest namespace refactoring for domain alignment

Example 2: Domain Analysis

User: "Which domain should the billing components belong to?"

The skill will:
1. Analyze billing component functionality
2. Check relationships with other components
3. Identify appropriate domain (e.g., Customer or Financial)
4. Recommend domain assignment

Example 3: Domain Refactoring

User: "What namespace refactoring is needed to align components with domains?"

The skill will:
1. Compare current component namespaces to identified domains
2. Identify misaligned components
3. Suggest namespace changes
4. Create refactoring plan

Step-by-Step Process

  1. Identify Domains: Analyze business capabilities and component relationships
  2. Group Components: Assign components to appropriate domains
  3. Validate Groupings: Ensure components fit well in their domains
  4. Refactor Namespaces: Align component namespaces with domains
  5. Create Domain Map: Visualize domain structure and component groupings

When to Use

Apply this skill when:

  • After identifying, sizing, and analyzing component dependencies
  • Before creating domain services (Pattern 6)
  • When planning service-based architecture migration
  • Analyzing component relationships and business alignment
  • Preparing for domain-driven design implementation
  • Grouping components for better organization

Core Concepts

Domain Definition

A domain is a logical grouping of components that:

  • Represents a distinct business capability or area
  • Contains related components that work together
  • Has clear boundaries and responsibilities
  • Can become a domain service in service-based architecture

Examples:

  • Customer Domain: Customer profile, billing, support contracts
  • Ticketing Domain: Ticket creation, assignment, routing, completion
  • Reporting Domain: Ticket reports, expert reports, financial reports

Component Domain Relationship

One-to-Many: A single domain contains multiple components

Domain: Customer
├── Component: Customer Profile
├── Component: Billing Payment
├── Component: Billing History
└── Component: Support Contract

Domain Manifestation

Domains are physically manifested through namespace structure:

Before Domain Alignment:

services/billing/payment
services/billing/history
services/customer/profile
services/supportcontract

After Domain Alignment:

services/customer/billing/payment
services/customer/billing/history
services/customer/profile
services/customer/supportcontract

Notice how all customer-related functionality is grouped under .customer domain.

Analysis Process

Phase 1: Identify Business Domains

Analyze the codebase to identify distinct business domains:

  1. Examine Component Responsibilities

    • Read component names and descriptions
    • Understand what each component does
    • Identify business capabilities
  2. Look for Business Language

    • Group components by business vocabulary
    • Example: "billing", "payment", "invoice" → Financial domain
    • Example: "customer", "profile", "contract" → Customer domain
  3. Identify Domain Boundaries

    • Where do business concepts change?
    • What are the distinct business areas?
    • How do components relate to business capabilities?
  4. Collaborate with Business Stakeholders

    • Validate domain identification with product owners
    • Ensure domains align with business understanding
    • Get feedback on domain boundaries

Example Domain Identification:

## Identified Domains

1. **Ticketing Domain** (ss.ticket)
   - Ticket creation, assignment, routing, completion
   - Customer surveys
   - Knowledge base

2. **Customer Domain** (ss.customer)
   - Customer profile
   - Billing and payment
   - Support contracts

3. **Reporting Domain** (ss.reporting)
   - Ticket reports
   - Expert reports
   - Financial reports

4. **Admin Domain** (ss.admin)
   - User maintenance
   - Expert profile management

5. **Shared Domain** (ss.shared)
   - Login
   - Notification

Phase 2: Group Components into Domains

Assign each component to an appropriate domain:

  1. Analyze Component Functionality

    • What business capability does it support?
    • What domain vocabulary does it use?
    • What other components does it relate to?
  2. Check Component Relationships

    • Which components are frequently used together?
    • What are the dependencies between components?
    • Do components share data or workflows?
  3. Assign to Domain

    • Place component in domain that best fits its functionality
    • Ensure component aligns with domain's business language
    • Verify component relationships support domain grouping
  4. Handle Edge Cases

    • Components that don't fit clearly: Analyze more deeply
    • Components that fit multiple domains: Choose primary domain
    • Shared components: May belong to Shared domain

Example Component Grouping:

## Component Domain Assignment

### Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket)

- Ticket Shared (ss.ticket.shared)
- Ticket Maintenance (ss.ticket.maintenance)
- Ticket Completion (ss.ticket.completion)
- Ticket Assign (ss.ticket.assign)
- Ticket Route (ss.ticket.route)
- KB Maintenance (ss.ticket.kb.maintenance)
- KB Search (ss.ticket.kb.search)
- Survey (ss.ticket.survey)

### Customer Domain (ss.customer)

- Customer Profile (ss.customer.profile)
- Billing Payment (ss.customer.billing.payment)
- Billing History (ss.customer.billing.history)
- Support Contract (ss.customer.supportcontract)

### Reporting Domain (ss.reporting)

- Reporting Shared (ss.reporting.shared)
- Ticket Reports (ss.reporting.tickets)
- Expert Reports (ss.reporting.experts)
- Financial Reports (ss.reporting.financial)

Phase 3: Validate Domain Groupings

Ensure components fit well in their assigned domains:

  1. Check Cohesion

    • Do components in domain share business language?
    • Are components frequently used together?
    • Do components have direct relationships?
  2. Verify Boundaries

    • Are domain boundaries clear?
    • Do components belong to only one domain?
    • Are there components that don't fit anywhere?
  3. Assess Completeness

    • Are all components assigned to a domain?
    • Are domains cohesive and well-formed?
    • Do domains represent distinct business capabilities?
  4. Get Stakeholder Validation

    • Review domain groupings with product owners
    • Ensure domains align with business understanding
    • Get feedback on domain boundaries

Validation Checklist:

  • All components assigned to a domain
  • Domains have clear boundaries
  • Components fit well in their domains
  • Domains represent distinct business capabilities
  • Stakeholders validate domain groupings

Phase 4: Refactor Namespaces for Domain Alignment

Align component namespaces with identified domains:

  1. Compare Current vs Target Namespaces

    • Current: services/billing/payment
    • Target: services/customer/billing/payment
    • Change: Add .customer domain node
  2. Identify Refactoring Needed

    • Which components need namespace changes?
    • What domain nodes need to be added?
    • Are there components already aligned?
  3. Create Refactoring Plan

    • List components needing namespace changes
    • Specify target namespace for each
    • Prioritize refactoring work
  4. Execute Refactoring

    • Update component namespaces
    • Update imports/references
    • Verify all references updated

Example Namespace Refactoring:

## Namespace Refactoring Plan

### Customer Domain Alignment

| Component        | Current Namespace   | Target Namespace            | Action        |
| ---------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Billing Payment  | ss.billing.payment  | ss.customer.billing.payment | Add .customer |
| Billing History  | ss.billing.history  | ss.customer.billing.history | Add .customer |
| Customer Profile | ss.customer.profile | ss.customer.profile         | No change     |
| Support Contract | ss.supportcontract  | ss.customer.supportcontract | Add .customer |

### Ticketing Domain Alignment

| Component      | Current Namespace | Target Namespace         | Action      |
| -------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------ | ----------- |
| KB Maintenance | ss.kb.maintenance | ss.ticket.kb.maintenance | Add .ticket |
| KB Search      | ss.kb.search      | ss.ticket.kb.search      | Add .ticket |
| Survey         | ss.survey         | ss.ticket.survey         | Add .ticket |

Phase 5: Create Domain Map

Visualize domain structure and component groupings:

  1. Create Domain Diagram

    • Show domains as boxes
    • Show components within each domain
    • Show relationships between domains
  2. Document Domain Structure

    • List domains and their components
    • Describe domain responsibilities
    • Note domain boundaries
  3. Create Domain Inventory

    • Table of domains and components
    • Component counts per domain
    • Size metrics per domain

Example Domain Map:

## Domain Map

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Ticket Shared │ │ • Ticket Maintenance │ │ • Ticket Completion │ │ • Ticket Assign │ │ • Ticket Route │ │ • KB Maintenance │ │ • KB Search │ │ • Survey │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ uses ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Customer Domain (ss.customer) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Customer Profile │ │ • Billing Payment │ │ • Billing History │ │ • Support Contract │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘


## Output Format

### Domain Identification Report

```markdown
## Domain Identification

### Domain: Customer (ss.customer)

**Business Capability**: Manages customer relationships, billing, and support contracts

**Components**:
- Customer Profile (ss.customer.profile)
- Billing Payment (ss.customer.billing.payment)
- Billing History (ss.customer.billing.history)
- Support Contract (ss.customer.supportcontract)

**Component Count**: 4
**Total Size**: ~15,000 statements (18% of codebase)

**Domain Cohesion**: ✅ High
- Components share customer-related vocabulary
- Components frequently used together
- Direct relationships between components

**Boundaries**:
- Clear separation from Ticketing domain
- Clear separation from Reporting domain
- Shared components (Notification) used by all domains

Component Domain Assignment Table

## Component Domain Assignment

| Component          | Current Namespace     | Assigned Domain | Target Namespace                  |
| ------------------ | --------------------- | --------------- | --------------------------------- |
| Customer Profile   | ss.customer.profile   | Customer        | ss.customer.profile (no change)   |
| Billing Payment    | ss.billing.payment    | Customer        | ss.customer.billing.payment       |
| Ticket Maintenance | ss.ticket.maintenance | Ticketing       | ss.ticket.maintenance (no change) |
| KB Maintenance     | ss.kb.maintenance     | Ticketing       | ss.ticket.kb.maintenance          |
| Reporting Shared   | ss.reporting.shared   | Reporting       | ss.reporting.shared (no change)   |

Namespace Refactoring Plan

## Namespace Refactoring Plan

### Priority: High

**Customer Domain Alignment**

**Components to Refactor**:

1. Billing Payment: `ss.billing.payment` → `ss.customer.billing.payment`
2. Billing History: `ss.billing.history` → `ss.customer.billing.history`
3. Support Contract: `ss.supportcontract` → `ss.customer.supportcontract`

**Steps**:

1. Update namespace declarations in source files
2. Update import statements in dependent components
3. Update directory structure
4. Run tests to verify changes
5. Update documentation

**Expected Impact**:

- All customer-related components aligned under `.customer` domain
- Clearer domain boundaries
- Easier to identify domain components

Domain Map Visualization

## Domain Map

### Domain Structure

Customer Domain (ss.customer) ├── Customer Profile ├── Billing Payment ├── Billing History └── Support Contract

Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket) ├── Ticket Shared ├── Ticket Maintenance ├── Ticket Completion ├── Ticket Assign ├── Ticket Route ├── KB Maintenance ├── KB Search └── Survey

Reporting Domain (ss.reporting) ├── Reporting Shared ├── Ticket Reports ├── Expert Reports └── Financial Reports

Admin Domain (ss.admin) ├── User Maintenance └── Expert Profile

Shared Domain (ss.shared) ├── Login └── Notification


### Domain Relationships

Ticketing Domain │ uses ├─→ Shared Domain (Login, Notification) └─→ Customer Domain (Customer Profile)

Customer Domain │ uses └─→ Shared Domain (Login, Notification)

Reporting Domain │ uses ├─→ Ticketing Domain (Ticket data) ├─→ Customer Domain (Customer data) └─→ Shared Domain (Login)

Analysis Checklist

Domain Identification:

  • Analyzed component responsibilities
  • Identified business capabilities
  • Identified distinct business domains
  • Validated domains with stakeholders

Component Grouping:

  • Assigned each component to a domain
  • Analyzed component relationships
  • Ensured components fit domain vocabulary
  • Handled edge cases (shared components, unclear assignments)

Domain Validation:

  • Checked cohesion within domains
  • Verified domain boundaries are clear
  • Ensured all components assigned
  • Validated with stakeholders

Namespace Refactoring:

  • Compared current vs target namespaces
  • Identified components needing refactoring
  • Created refactoring plan
  • Prioritized refactoring work

Domain Mapping:

  • Created domain diagram
  • Documented domain structure
  • Created domain inventory table
  • Documented domain relationships

Implementation Notes

For Node.js/Express Applications

Domains typically organized in services/ directory:

services/
├── customer/              ← Customer Domain
│   ├── profile/
│   ├── billing/
│   │   ├── payment/
│   │   └── history/
│   └── supportcontract/
├── ticket/                ← Ticketing Domain
│   ├── shared/
│   ├── maintenance/
│   ├── assign/
│   └── route/
└── reporting/             ← Reporting Domain
    ├── shared/
    ├── tickets/
    └── experts/

For Java Applications

Domains identified by package structure:

com.company.customer       ← Customer Domain
├── profile
├── billing
│   ├── payment
│   └── history
└── supportcontract

com.company.ticket         ← Ticketing Domain
├── shared
├── maintenance
├── assign
└── route

Domain Identification Strategies

Strategy 1: Business Capability Analysis

  • Identify what business capabilities the system provides
  • Group components by capability
  • Example: "Customer Management" capability → Customer Domain

Strategy 2: Vocabulary Analysis

  • Identify business vocabulary used by components
  • Group components sharing same vocabulary
  • Example: Components using "billing", "payment", "invoice" → Financial Domain

Strategy 3: Relationship Analysis

  • Identify components frequently used together
  • Group components with strong relationships
  • Example: Components that share data/workflows → Same Domain

Strategy 4: Stakeholder Collaboration

  • Work with product owners/business analysts
  • Use their understanding of business areas
  • Validate domain boundaries with them

Fitness Functions

After creating domains, create automated checks:

Domain Namespace Governance

// Ensure components belong to correct domain
function validateDomainNamespaces(components, domainRules) {
  const violations = []

  components.forEach((comp) => {
    const domain = identifyDomain(comp.namespace)
    const expectedDomain = domainRules[comp.name]

    if (domain !== expectedDomain) {
      violations.push({
        component: comp.name,
        currentDomain: domain,
        expectedDomain: expectedDomain,
        namespace: comp.namespace,
      })
    }
  })

  return violations
}

Domain Boundary Enforcement

// Prevent components from accessing other domains directly
function enforceDomainBoundaries(components) {
  const violations = []

  components.forEach((comp) => {
    comp.imports.forEach((imp) => {
      const importedDomain = identifyDomain(imp)
      const componentDomain = identifyDomain(comp.namespace)

      if (importedDomain !== componentDomain && importedDomain !== 'shared') {
        violations.push({
          component: comp.name,
          domain: componentDomain,
          importsFrom: imp,
          importedDomain: importedDomain,
          issue: 'Cross-domain direct dependency',
        })
      }
    })
  })

  return violations
}

Best Practices

Do's ✅

  • Collaborate with business stakeholders to identify domains
  • Group components by business capability, not technical layers
  • Ensure domains represent distinct business areas
  • Validate domain boundaries with stakeholders
  • Refactor namespaces to align with domains
  • Create clear domain documentation
  • Use business language in domain names

Don'ts ❌

  • Don't create domains based on technical layers (services, controllers, models)
  • Don't force components into domains where they don't fit
  • Don't skip stakeholder validation
  • Don't create too many small domains (aim for 3-7 domains)
  • Don't create domains that are too large (monolithic domains)
  • Don't ignore components that don't fit (analyze why)
  • Don't skip namespace refactoring (critical for clarity)

Common Domain Patterns

Typical Domains in Business Applications

  • Customer Domain: Customer management, profiles, relationships
  • Product Domain: Product catalog, inventory, pricing
  • Order Domain: Order processing, fulfillment, shipping
  • Billing Domain: Invoicing, payments, financial transactions
  • Reporting Domain: Reports, analytics, dashboards
  • Admin Domain: User management, system configuration
  • Shared Domain: Common functionality (login, notification, utilities)

Domain Size Guidelines

  • Small Domain: 2-4 components
  • Medium Domain: 5-8 components
  • Large Domain: 9-15 components
  • Too Large: >15 components (consider splitting)

Next Steps

After creating component domains:

  1. Apply Create Domain Services Pattern - Extract domains to separate services
  2. Plan Service Extraction - Create migration plan for domain services
  3. Implement Domain Services - Move domains to separately deployed services
  4. Monitor Domain Boundaries - Use fitness functions to enforce boundaries

Notes

  • Domains should represent business capabilities, not technical layers
  • Domain identification requires collaboration with business stakeholders
  • Namespace refactoring is critical for domain clarity
  • Domains prepare the codebase for service-based architecture
  • Well-formed domains make service extraction easier
  • Domain boundaries should be clear and well-documented

FAQ

What does the domain-identification-grouping skill do?

Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis).

How do I install domain-identification-grouping?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill domain-identification-grouping in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/domain-identification-grouping/ (personal) or .claude/skills/domain-identification-grouping/ (project).

Which AI agents can use domain-identification-grouping?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is domain-identification-grouping safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains domain-identification-grouping?

It is published by tech-leads-club in tech-leads-club/agent-skills. It has 227 recorded installs.

More from tech-leads-club/agent-skills

View all →

tlc-spec-driven

tech-leads-club/agent-skills

Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Asks every product decision before the spec is approved, writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks with a gate and a commit each, and one check per criterion with the test that proves it. Captures that come with the request bind, and each screen is judged against them. Ships deterministic Python scripts so the gates are enforced by code, not memory; the proofs run once at the end, and an independent Verifier (author != verifier) spends its time on mutations and judgement. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical

subagent-creator

tech-leads-club/agent-skills

Guide for creating AI subagents with isolated context for complex multi-step workflows. Use when users want to create a subagent, specialized agent, verifier, debugger, or orchestrator that requires isolated context and deep specialization. Works with any agent that supports subagent delegation. Triggers on "create subagent", "new agent", "specialized assistant", "create verifier". Do NOT use for Cursor-specific subagents (use cursor-subagent-creator instead).

AI & Agents911 installs

technical-design-doc-creator

tech-leads-club/agent-skills

Creates comprehensive Technical Design Documents (TDD) with mandatory and optional sections through interactive discovery. Use when user asks to "write a design doc", "create a TDD", "technical spec", "architecture document", "RFC", "design proposal", or needs to document a technical decision before implementation. Do NOT use for README files, API docs, or general documentation (use docs-writer instead).

Docs & Writing609 installs

security-best-practices

tech-leads-club/agent-skills

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Use when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Do NOT use for general code review, debugging, threat modeling (use security-threat-model), or non-security tasks.

domain-analysis

tech-leads-club/agent-skills

Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?", "where should I draw service boundaries?", "identify bounded contexts", "classify subdomains", "DDD analysis", or analyzing domain cohesion. Do NOT use for grouping existing components into domains (use domain-identification-grouping) or dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis).

nestjs-modular-monolith

tech-leads-club/agent-skills

Specialist in designing and implementing scalable modular monolith architectures using NestJS with DDD, Clean Architecture, and CQRS patterns. Use when building modular monolith backends, designing bounded contexts, creating domain modules, implementing event-driven module communication, or when user mentions "modular monolith", "bounded contexts", "module boundaries", "DDD", "CQRS", "clean architecture NestJS", or "monolith to microservices". Do NOT use for simple CRUD APIs, frontend work, general NestJS questions without architectural context, or stack-agnostic evolutionary modular monolith design (use evolutionary-modular-architecture).

Popular code quality & workflow skills

View category →

grill-me

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

handoff

mattpocock/skills

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

domain-modeling

mattpocock/skills

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

codebase-design

mattpocock/skills

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

diagnosing-bugs

mattpocock/skills

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.