MCPInstall

parallel-code-review

Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.

Installs
534
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills --skill parallel-code-review
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads parallel-code-review automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Parallel Code Review

Use Cursor’s Task tool to run four explore (read-only) subagents at once. Each subagent only reads code and produces findings for one dimension. The main agent merges results into a single prioritized review — something only a multi-agent setup does efficiently.

When to use

  • Large diffs or refactors where a single pass misses categories.
  • Security-sensitive changes (auth, payments, parsing untrusted input).
  • Performance-sensitive paths (hot loops, N+1 queries, bundle entry points).

Workflow

1. Scope the change set

Prefer a concrete list of files for reviewers:

git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD

Or paste the PR link and let the main agent list changed files from the branch.

2. Launch four parallel subagents

Send one message with four Task invocations, each subagent_type: "explore" and readonly: true, with prompts like:

Security

Read-only review: SECURITY

Changed files:
<list>

Focus: injection (SQL, shell, XSS), authZ/authN gaps, secrets in code, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSRF, IDOR, dependency CVEs mentioned in diff.

Output:
- Critical / High / Medium / Low findings
- File:line and short fix recommendation
- "No issues" if nothing material

Performance

Read-only review: PERFORMANCE

Changed files:
<list>

Focus: N+1 queries, missing indexes, accidental O(n²) loops, bundle size impact, unnecessary re-renders, sync I/O on hot paths, unbounded caches.

Output: same severity + location format as above.

Correctness

Read-only review: CORRECTNESS

Changed files:
<list>

Focus: logic bugs, off-by-one, wrong edge cases, race conditions, error handling gaps, breaking API changes, test gaps for new behavior.

Output: same format.

Readability / maintainability

Read-only review: READABILITY

Changed files:
<list>

Focus: naming, duplication, abstraction boundaries, file size, unclear control flow, missing types/docs where they would prevent bugs.

Output: same format; prefer suggestions over nitpicks.

3. Synthesize

The main agent should:

  1. De-duplicate findings that appear in multiple dimensions (count once, worst severity).
  2. Order by severity, then by fix cost.
  3. Produce a short executive summary (5 bullets max) and a table or list of actionable items.

4. Optional — address findings

Fix in the main agent or spawn targeted non-readonly follow-up tasks only for approved items.

Notes

  • Keep prompts read-only so parallel runs never fight over writes.
  • If the diff is huge, split by directory and run four reviewers per directory in a second wave — do not cram unrelated megadiffs into one pass.
  • This complements human review; it does not replace compliance or security sign-off for regulated environments.

FAQ

What does the parallel-code-review skill do?

Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.

How do I install parallel-code-review?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills --skill parallel-code-review in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/parallel-code-review/ (personal) or .claude/skills/parallel-code-review/ (project).

Which AI agents can use parallel-code-review?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is parallel-code-review safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains parallel-code-review?

It is published by spencerpauly in spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills. It has 534 recorded installs.

More from spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

View all →

visual-qa-testing

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

Visually QA a web application by launching it in Cursor's built-in browser, taking screenshots, checking console errors, and auditing network requests. Use after making UI changes to verify they look correct.

Testing & QA648 installs

auditing-security

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

Perform a systematic security audit of a codebase, checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and insecure patterns.

Security598 installs

responsive-testing

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

Open the app in Cursor's browser at multiple viewport sizes, screenshot each, and report any layout breakage.

Testing & QA569 installs

suggesting-cursor-rules

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

When the user repeats the same correction or convention multiple times, suggest a Cursor rule to encode it permanently.

559 installs

systematic-debugging

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

Structured debugging methodology — reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, verify. Covers git bisect, binary search, logging, and minimal reproduction.

grinding-until-pass

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

Keep iterating on code changes until the tests pass, the build succeeds, or linting is clean. Runs in a tight loop of fix → run → check → repeat. Use when you want the agent to autonomously grind through test failures or build errors.

Testing & QA551 installs

Popular code quality & workflow skills

View category →

grill-me

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

handoff

mattpocock/skills

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

domain-modeling

mattpocock/skills

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

codebase-design

mattpocock/skills

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

diagnosing-bugs

mattpocock/skills

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.