
scope-creep-detector
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad pull requests, changes that grew beyond a fix, dependency additions, public API renames, config or CI edits, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files. Use when the user asks whether a change grew beyond the fix, a PR is too broad, or what unrelated stuff they touched, and wants keep, split, or justify guidance. Operates locally and offline.
- Installs
- 611
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill scope-creep-detector- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads scope-creep-detector automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Scope Creep Detector
A one-line fix should not require a reviewer to reverse-engineer fourteen files across three subsystems. This skill compares a git diff with its stated intent, surfaces scope signals, and turns them into keep, split, or justify decisions.
Everything runs locally. The script makes no network calls and does not change the working tree, index, commits, or branches.
When to use
- Before opening a pull request whose diff may have grown beyond its intent
- When a bug fix touches unexpected files or subsystems
- When the user asks whether staged changes are too broad
- When a diff includes dependency, public API, config, CI, or build changes
- When the user wants a concrete split plan for a mixed change
When not to use
- Formatting code, running a linter, or writing a commit message
- Reviewing correctness, security, or test quality inside an agreed scope
- Measuring historical project growth across many commits
- Editing or reverting files without the user's approval
Establish the intent
Use the user's one-line intent when available. Keep it concrete, such as
fix null dereference in parser or add retry limit to webhook delivery.
If no intent was given, the script falls back to the current branch name. If that name is generic, detached, or unrelated to the work, ask for one line of intent before treating relatedness as meaningful.
Run the classifier
Run from this skill directory and point --repo at the target repository.
Working tree diff:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo \
--intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json
Staged diff:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --staged \
--intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json
Branch diff against a merge base:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --base main \
--intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json
Saved diff or stdin:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff change.diff --intent "parser fix" --json
git diff --staged | python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff - \
--intent "parser fix" --json
Use --hunk-threshold only when the repository has a documented reason to
change the default churn threshold. Do not tune the threshold merely to make a
warning disappear.
Interpret the JSON
Read references/scope-signals.md before making a recommendation. Treat the classifier as triage evidence, not proof of authorial intent.
in_scope: file paths with at least one intent/path keyword overlaplikely_creep: paths without overlap, with the reason and detected signalsnew_deps: dependencies introduced in supported manifest formatsapi_renames: nearby removed and added public function or class declarationsconfig_edits: CI, container, build, YAML, and TOML changesstats: churn, subsystem counts, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files
Empty arrays are evidence too. Say that no signal was detected, not that the diff is guaranteed to be in scope.
Recommend keep, split, or justify
Give every item in likely_creep one disposition:
- Keep when the path is necessary for the stated intent and the connection is direct. Explain the connection in one sentence.
- Split when it can land independently, belongs to another subsystem, or introduces a dependency, API rename, config edit, or large hunk that is not required for the intent. Name the files or hunks for the follow-up change.
- Justify when a cross-cutting edit cannot be separated safely. State the invariant or build constraint that requires it and call out reviewer risk.
Prefer split when evidence is ambiguous. Never claim that a zero overlap score proves a file is unrelated. Path vocabulary is a cheap, deterministic proxy.
Write the scope report
Use this compact structure:
- Intent and diff source
- Files and subsystems touched, with total additions and deletions
- In-scope changes
- Likely creep with signal evidence
- Keep, split, or justify table
- Proposed follow-up grouping, if any
Name file paths and hunk headers. For an oversized mixed hunk, explain that the script cannot split it automatically and describe the smallest coherent edit. Ask before applying any split, revert, staging, or commit operation.
Files
scripts/scope_creep.py: deterministic unified-diff parser and classifierreferences/scope-signals.md: signal definitions, thresholds, and limits
FAQ
What does the scope-creep-detector skill do?
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad pull requests, changes that grew beyond a fix, dependency additions, public API renames, config or CI edits, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files. Use when the user asks whether a change grew beyond the fix, a PR is too broad, or what unrelated stuff they touched, and wants keep, split, or justify guidance. Operates locally and offline.
How do I install scope-creep-detector?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill scope-creep-detector in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/scope-creep-detector/ (personal) or .claude/skills/scope-creep-detector/ (project).
Which AI agents can use scope-creep-detector?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is scope-creep-detector safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains scope-creep-detector?
It is published by shubhamsaboo in shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps. It has 611 recorded installs.
More from shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
fullstack-developer
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Modern web development expertise covering React, Node.js, databases, and full-stack architecture. Use when: building web applications, developing APIs, creating frontends, setting up databases, deploying web apps, or when user mentions React, Next.js, Express, REST API, GraphQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, or full-stack development.
academic-researcher
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Academic research assistant for literature reviews, paper analysis, and scholarly writing. Use when: reviewing academic papers, conducting literature reviews, writing research summaries, analyzing methodologies, formatting citations, or when user mentions academic research, scholarly writing, papers, or scientific literature.
content-creator
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Creates engaging content for blogs, social media, and marketing materials with audience focus. Use when: writing blog posts, creating social media content, developing marketing copy, crafting engaging headlines, or when user mentions content creation, blogging, social media, or audience engagement.
code-reviewer
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Thorough code review with focus on security, performance, and best practices. Use when: reviewing code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests, or when user mentions code review, PR review, security vulnerabilities, performance issues.
technical-writer
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Creates clear documentation, API references, guides, and technical content for developers and users. Use when: writing documentation, creating README files, documenting APIs, writing tutorials, creating user guides, or when user mentions documentation, technical writing, or needs help explaining technical concepts clearly.
project-planner
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Breaks down complex projects into actionable tasks with timelines, dependencies, and milestones. Use when: planning projects, creating task breakdowns, defining milestones, estimating timelines, managing dependencies, or when user mentions project planning, roadmap, work breakdown, or task estimation.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.