
eval-creator-ci
[Beta] CI-only eval regression runner using gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows). Runs all eval cases in .evals/ on a schedule or per-PR, reports pass/fail results, and can block merges on regressions. Also creates new eval cases from promoted patterns flagged by learning-aggregator-ci. Use when: you want automated regression testing of promoted rules in CI/headless pipelines. For interactive eval creation and runs, use eval-creator.
- Installs
- 50
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills --skill eval-creator-ci- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads eval-creator-ci automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Eval Creator CI
Install
gh skill install pskoett/pskoett-skills eval-creator-ci
For interactive sessions, use:
gh skill install pskoett/pskoett-skills eval-creator
Fallback using the Agent Skills CLI:
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-skills/skills/eval-creator-ci
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-skills/skills/eval-creator
Purpose
Runs the outer loop's regress-test step in CI. Executes all eval cases in .evals/, reports pass/fail results, and optionally blocks merges on regressions. Can also create new eval cases from promotion candidates flagged by learning-aggregator-ci.
The interactive eval-creator skill is designed for in-session use where the user creates evals and runs them with immediate feedback. This CI variant runs on schedule or per-PR and posts results as check annotations.
Context Limitation (Important)
CI agents do not have implementation context. They execute mechanical verification methods (grep checks, command checks, file checks, rule checks) defined in eval case files. They do not interpret results beyond pass/fail — nuanced judgment is left to human review of the posted report.
Prerequisites
- GitHub Actions enabled on the repository
ghCLI authenticated with repo accessgh-awextension installed (gh extension install github/gh-aw, v0.40.1+).evals/directory with eval cases (created byeval-creatororeval-creator-ci).evals/EVAL_INDEX.mdwith eval case index
CI Contract
Hard rules for headless execution:
- Eval execution is read-only for code — eval cases read files and run check commands but do not modify source code
- Eval case creation writes to
.evals/only — when creating new evals from promotion candidates - Headless — no interactive prompts, no approval gates
- Structured output — emit results as YAML under
eval_creator_cikey - Gate policy — can fail the check run on eval regressions (configurable)
- Single comment — post one consolidated results comment per run
Authoring Workflow (gh-aw)
- Copy
references/workflow-example.mdinto.github/workflows/eval-creator-ci.md - Customize trigger and gate policy
- Validate:
gh aw compile(add--actionlint --zizmorfor security scan) - Push to enable
Persistence and Chaining
cache-memory:stores eval run history (last-run dates, result trends) across runs. Avoids re-running evals that haven't changed.workflow_call:in create mode, triggered bylearning-aggregator-civiacall-workflow. Receives promotion candidates as workflow inputs.upload-artifact:persists eval results YAML for downstream consumption.
Workflow Rules
The CI agent follows these rules in order:
Mode: Run Evals (default)
- Read
.evals/EVAL_INDEX.mdto get the list of all eval cases - For each eval case file in
.evals/cases/: a. Read the eval case metadata and verification method b. Check preconditions — if not met, mark asskipc. Execute the verification method:grep-check: Search target files for pattern, compare to expected (found/not_found)command-check: Run the command, check exit code and/or outputfile-check: Verify file or section existsrule-check: Read target file, search for expected content d. Compare result to expected outcome e. Record pass/fail/skip
- Update
.evals/EVAL_INDEX.mdwithlast-rundate andlast-resultfor each case - Emit structured YAML under key
eval_creator_ci - Post results summary as a PR comment or check annotation
- If gate policy is enabled and any eval fails: fail the check run
Mode: Create Evals (from promotion candidates)
- Read the
learning_aggregator_ciartifact or gap report from the most recent learning-aggregator-ci run - For each promotion-ready pattern with
eval_candidate: true: a. Determine the appropriate verification method based on the pattern type b. Create the eval case file in.evals/cases/with proper frontmatter c. Add the entry to.evals/EVAL_INDEX.md - Commit the new eval cases (if running with write permissions)
- Report created evals in the output
Output Schema
eval_creator_ci:
version: "0.1.0"
source:
run_id: "<workflow run ID>"
trigger: "pull_request | schedule | workflow_dispatch"
run_date: "YYYY-MM-DD"
mode: "run | create | both"
run_results:
total: 12
passed: 10
failed: 1
skipped: 1
failures:
- id: "eval-20260301-001"
pattern_key: "harden.input_validation"
rule_summary: "Always validate external inputs"
expected: "not_found"
actual: "found"
target: "src/api/handler.ts"
recovery_action: "Add input validation to new handler endpoint"
skips:
- id: "eval-20260315-003"
reason: "Precondition not met: project does not use TypeScript"
create_results:
created: 2
cases:
- id: "eval-20260411-001"
pattern_key: "simplify.dead_code"
verification_method: "grep-check"
source_learning: "LRN-20260301-001"
- id: "eval-20260411-002"
pattern_key: "harden.authorization"
verification_method: "rule-check"
source_learning: "LRN-20260315-003"
summary:
regressions: 1
new_evals_created: 2
gate_result: "fail"
followup_required: true
Recommended Outputs
| Output | Destination | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Eval results | PR comment or check annotation | Pass/fail summary with failure details |
| YAML artifact | Workflow artifact | Machine-readable eval_creator_ci payload |
| Check status | Check run | Pass or fail based on gate policy |
| New eval files | .evals/cases/ (if create mode) | Eval case markdown files |
Gate Policy
Configure blocking behavior:
| Policy | Behavior |
|---|---|
strict | Any eval failure blocks the check run |
advisory | Failures are reported but do not block |
critical-only | Only evals from critical or high severity patterns block |
Default: advisory (report but don't block). Teams should escalate to strict once eval coverage stabilizes.
Trigger Configuration
Recommended: per-PR + weekly schedule
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, ready_for_review]
schedule:
- cron: '0 10 * * 1' # Monday 10am UTC (after learning-aggregator-ci)
workflow_dispatch:
Per-PR runs catch regressions before merge. Weekly runs catch drift in the harness itself. Schedule after learning-aggregator-ci so new evals from promotions are available.
Integration with Other Skills
Upstream (feeds from)
eval-creator(interactive) — creates eval cases manuallylearning-aggregator-ci— produces promotion candidates witheval_candidate: trueharness-updater(interactive) — flags eval candidates after promoting patterns
Downstream (feeds into)
- self-improvement / self-improvement-ci — regression failures become new error entries in
.learnings/ - Human review — failure report posted for team triage
- PR merge gate — can block merge on regressions (configurable)
Data Flow
learning-aggregator-ci → promotion candidates (eval_candidate: true)
↓
eval-creator-ci (create mode)
↓
.evals/cases/
↓
eval-creator-ci (run mode, per-PR)
↓
pass/fail report → PR comment + check annotation
↓
regression failures → self-improvement-ci → .learnings/
Differences from Interactive Version
| Aspect | Interactive (eval-creator) | CI (eval-creator-ci) |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Manual invocation | PR events, cron schedule, workflow_dispatch |
| Eval creation | User-driven with immediate feedback | Automated from learning-aggregator-ci candidates |
| Eval execution | In-session with inline results | Headless with PR comment output |
| Human interaction | User reviews results inline | Async review via GitHub |
| Gate behavior | No blocking — informational | Configurable: advisory, critical-only, strict |
| File modification | Updates eval case metadata | Updates eval index + creates new cases (in create mode) |
FAQ
What does the eval-creator-ci skill do?
[Beta] CI-only eval regression runner using gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows). Runs all eval cases in .evals/ on a schedule or per-PR, reports pass/fail results, and can block merges on regressions. Also creates new eval cases from promoted patterns flagged by learning-aggregator-ci. Use when: you want automated regression testing of promoted rules in CI/headless pipelines. For interactive eval creation and runs, use eval-creator.
How do I install eval-creator-ci?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills --skill eval-creator-ci in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/eval-creator-ci/ (personal) or .claude/skills/eval-creator-ci/ (project).
Which AI agents can use eval-creator-ci?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is eval-creator-ci safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains eval-creator-ci?
It is published by pskoett in pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills. It has 50 recorded installs.
More from pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
self-improvement
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
Captures learnings, errors, corrections, and feature requests to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) User corrects Claude ('No, that's wrong...', 'Actually...'), (2) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (3) Claude realizes its knowledge is outdated or incorrect, (4) A better approach is discovered for a recurring task, (5) Receiving a Handoff block from self-healing (a recurring verified heal with Recurrence-Count at least 3) to distill into a memory file or new skill. For ACTIVE runtime failures where the agent needs to apply and verify a fix mid-task, use self-healing instead (it files HEAL- entries with proof; self-improvement promotes accumulated patterns). Also review learnings before major tasks. For CI-only/headless learning capture, use self-improvement-ci.
self-improvement-ci
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
CI-only self-improvement workflow using gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows). Captures recurring failure patterns and quality signals from pull request checks, emits structured learning candidates, and proposes durable prevention rules without interactive prompts. Use when: you want automated learning capture in CI/headless pipelines.
simplify-and-harden
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
Post-completion self-review for coding agents that runs simplify, harden, re-verification, and micro-documentation passes on non-trivial code or high-impact configuration changes. Use when a task is complete in a general agent session and you want a bounded quality and security sweep before signaling done. For CI pipeline execution, use simplify-and-harden-ci.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or the loop cap is reached. Use when: implementing features from a spec or plan, hardening existing code, fixing a batch of issues, or any multi-file task that benefits from a build-verify-fix cycle.
plan-interview
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
Ensures alignment between user and Claude during feature/spec planning through a structured interview process. Use this skill when the user invokes /plan-interview before implementing a new feature, refactoring, or any non-trivial implementation task. The skill runs an upfront interview to gather requirements across technical constraints, scope boundaries, risk tolerance, and success criteria before any codebase exploration. Do NOT use this skill for: pure research/exploration tasks, simple bug fixes, or when the user just wants standard planning without the interview process.
intent-framed-agent
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
Frames coding-agent work sessions with explicit intent capture and drift monitoring. Use when a session transitions from planning/Q&A to implementation for coding tasks, refactors, feature builds, bug fixes, or other multi-step execution where scope drift is a risk.
Popular ai & agents skills
google-agents-cli-publish
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "publish an agent", "publish my ADK agent", "register an agent with Gemini", "publish to Gemini" (formerly Gemini Enterprise), or needs guidance on the agents-cli publish gemini command. Also use when the user wants to "manage agents in Agent Registry", "list/update/delete registered agents", or "register an MCP server". Covers ADK vs A2A registration modes, programmatic and interactive usage, flag reference, auto-detection from deployment metadata, Agent Registry fleet management, and troubleshooting. Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy).
google-agents-cli-eval
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics, dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. Applies to any agents-cli project, whatever framework the agent is written in. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).
skill-creator
anthropics/skills
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
codex-pet
prime-skills/runcomfy-agent-skills
Codex Pet generator on RunComfy. Build a Codex-compatible Codex Pet spritesheet.webp + pet.json from a single reference image, drop it into ${CODEXHOME:-$HOME/.codex}/pets/ / and Codex picks it up as a custom Codex Pet next to the 8 built-ins. This skill produces the exact Codex Pet atlas Codex expects (1536x1872 PNG/WebP, 8 cols x 9 rows, 192x208 cells, 9 animation states — idle, running-right, running-left, waving, jumping, failed, waiting, running, review). Calls OpenAI GPT Image 2 edit ONCE via the local RunComfy CLI as runcomfy run openai/gpt-image-2/edit to produce a canonical Codex Pet pose, then assembles all 9 animation rows programmatically with ImageMagick micro-transforms — no Codex Pro, no $imagegen, no OPENAIAPIKEY required, only RUNCOMFYTOKEN. Triggers on "codex pet", "create codex pet", "make codex pet", "hatch codex pet", "/hatch image", "desktop pet codex", "codex pets", "spritesheet.webp", or any explicit ask to build a custom pet for OpenAI Codex.
full-output-enforcement
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
executing-plans
obra/superpowers
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available