
six-thinking-hats
Apply Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats methodology to software testing for comprehensive quality analysis. Use when designing test strategies, conducting test retrospectives, analyzing test failures, evaluating testing approaches, or facilitating testing discussions. Each hat provides a distinct testing perspective: facts (White), risks (Black), benefits (Yellow), creativity (Green), emotions (Red), and process (Blue).
- Installs
- 126
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill six-thinking-hats- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads six-thinking-hats automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Six Thinking Hats for Testing
<default_to_action> When analyzing testing decisions:
- DEFINE focus clearly (specific testing question)
- APPLY each hat sequentially (5 min each)
- DOCUMENT insights per hat
- SYNTHESIZE into action plan
Quick Hat Rotation (30 min):
🤍 WHITE (5 min) - Facts only: metrics, data, coverage
❤️ RED (3 min) - Gut feelings (no justification needed)
🖤 BLACK (7 min) - Risks, gaps, what could go wrong
💛 YELLOW (5 min) - Strengths, opportunities, what works
💚 GREEN (7 min) - Creative ideas, alternatives
🔵 BLUE (3 min) - Action plan, next steps
Example for "API Test Strategy":
- 🤍 47 endpoints, 30% coverage, 12 integration tests
- ❤️ Anxious about security, confident on happy paths
- 🖤 No auth tests, rate limiting untested, edge cases missing
- 💛 Good docs, CI/CD integrated, team experienced
- 💚 Contract testing with Pact, chaos testing, property-based
- 🔵 Security tests first, contract testing next sprint </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
The Six Hats
| Hat | Focus | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| 🤍 White | Facts & Data | What do we KNOW? |
| ❤️ Red | Emotions | What do we FEEL? |
| 🖤 Black | Risks | What could go WRONG? |
| 💛 Yellow | Benefits | What's GOOD? |
| 💚 Green | Creativity | What ELSE could we try? |
| 🔵 Blue | Process | What should we DO? |
When to Use Each Hat
| Hat | Use For |
|---|---|
| 🤍 White | Baseline metrics, test data inventory |
| ❤️ Red | Team confidence check, quality gut feel |
| 🖤 Black | Risk assessment, gap analysis, pre-mortems |
| 💛 Yellow | Strengths audit, quick win identification |
| 💚 Green | Test innovation, new approaches, brainstorming |
| 🔵 Blue | Strategy planning, retrospectives, decision-making |
Hat Details
🤍 White Hat - Facts & Data
Output: Quantitative testing baseline
Questions:
- What test coverage do we have?
- What is our pass/fail rate?
- What environments exist?
- What is our defect history?
Example Output:
Coverage: 67% line, 45% branch
Test Suite: 1,247 unit, 156 integration, 23 E2E
Execution Time: Unit 3min, Integration 12min, E2E 45min
Defects: 23 open (5 critical, 8 major, 10 minor)
🖤 Black Hat - Risks & Cautions
Output: Comprehensive risk assessment
Questions:
- What could go wrong in production?
- What are we NOT testing?
- What assumptions might be wrong?
- Where are the coverage gaps?
HIGH RISKS:
- No load testing (production outage risk)
- Auth edge cases untested (security vulnerability)
- Database failover never tested (data loss risk)
💛 Yellow Hat - Benefits & Optimism
Output: Strengths and opportunities
Questions:
- What's working well?
- What strengths can we leverage?
- What quick wins are available?
STRENGTHS:
- Strong CI/CD pipeline
- Team expertise in automation
- Stakeholders value quality
QUICK WINS:
- Add smoke tests (reduce incidents)
- Automate manual regression (save 2 days/release)
💚 Green Hat - Creativity
Output: Innovative testing ideas
Questions:
- How else could we test this?
- What if we tried something completely different?
- What emerging techniques could we adopt?
IDEAS:
1. AI-powered test generation
2. Chaos engineering for resilience
3. Property-based testing for edge cases
4. Production traffic replay
5. Synthetic monitoring
❤️ Red Hat - Emotions
Output: Team gut feelings (NO justification needed)
Questions:
- How confident do you feel about quality?
- What makes you anxious?
- What gives you confidence?
FEELINGS:
- Confident: Unit tests, API tests
- Anxious: Authentication flow, payment processing
- Frustrated: Flaky tests, slow E2E suite
🔵 Blue Hat - Process
Output: Action plan with owners and timelines
Questions:
- What's our strategy?
- How should we prioritize?
- What's the next step?
PRIORITIZED ACTIONS:
1. [Critical] Address security testing gap - Owner: Alice
2. [High] Implement contract testing - Owner: Bob
3. [Medium] Reduce flaky tests - Owner: Carol
Session Templates
Solo Session (30 min)
# Six Hats Analysis: [Topic]
## 🤍 White Hat (5 min)
Facts: [list metrics, data]
## ❤️ Red Hat (3 min)
Feelings: [gut reactions, no justification]
## 🖤 Black Hat (7 min)
Risks: [what could go wrong]
## 💛 Yellow Hat (5 min)
Strengths: [what works, opportunities]
## 💚 Green Hat (7 min)
Ideas: [creative alternatives]
## 🔵 Blue Hat (3 min)
Actions: [prioritized next steps]
Team Session (60 min)
- Each hat: 10 minutes
- Rotate through hats as group
- Document on shared whiteboard
- Blue Hat synthesizes at end
Agent Integration
// Risk-focused analysis (Black Hat)
const risks = await Task("Identify Risks", {
scope: 'payment-module',
perspective: 'black-hat',
includeMitigation: true
}, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");
// Creative test approaches (Green Hat)
const ideas = await Task("Generate Test Ideas", {
feature: 'new-auth-system',
perspective: 'green-hat',
includeEmergingTechniques: true
}, "qe-test-generator");
// Comprehensive analysis (All Hats)
const analysis = await Task("Six Hats Analysis", {
topic: 'Q1 Test Strategy',
hats: ['white', 'black', 'yellow', 'green', 'red', 'blue']
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/six-hats/
├── analyses/* - Complete hat analyses
├── risks/* - Black hat findings
├── opportunities/* - Yellow hat findings
└── innovations/* - Green hat ideas
Fleet Coordination
const analysisFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'six-hats-analysis',
agents: [
'qe-quality-analyzer', // White + Blue hats
'qe-regression-risk-analyzer', // Black hat
'qe-test-generator' // Green hat
],
topology: 'parallel'
});
Related Skills
- risk-based-testing - Black Hat deep dive
- exploratory-testing-advanced - Green Hat exploration
- context-driven-testing - Adapt to context
Anti-Patterns
| ❌ Avoid | Why | ✅ Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Mixing hats | Confuses thinking | One hat at a time |
| Justifying Red Hat | Kills intuition | State feelings only |
| Skipping hats | Misses insights | Use all six |
| Rushing | Shallow analysis | 5 min minimum per hat |
Remember
Separate thinking modes for clarity. Each hat reveals different insights. Red Hat intuition often catches what Black Hat analysis misses.
Everyone wears all hats. This is parallel thinking, not role-based. The goal is comprehensive analysis, not debate.
FAQ
What does the six-thinking-hats skill do?
Apply Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats methodology to software testing for comprehensive quality analysis. Use when designing test strategies, conducting test retrospectives, analyzing test failures, evaluating testing approaches, or facilitating testing discussions. Each hat provides a distinct testing perspective: facts (White), risks (Black), benefits (Yellow), creativity (Green), emotions (Red), and process (Blue).
How do I install six-thinking-hats?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill six-thinking-hats in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/six-thinking-hats/ (personal) or .claude/skills/six-thinking-hats/ (project).
Which AI agents can use six-thinking-hats?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is six-thinking-hats safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains six-thinking-hats?
It is published by proffesor-for-testing in proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe. It has 126 recorded installs.
More from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
code-review-quality
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
compatibility-testing
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Cross-browser, cross-platform, and cross-device compatibility testing ensuring consistent experience across environments. Use when validating browser support, testing responsive design, or ensuring platform compatibility.
api-testing-patterns
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
regression-testing
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Strategic regression testing with test selection, impact analysis, and continuous regression management. Use when verifying fixes don't break existing functionality, planning regression suites, or optimizing test execution for faster feedback.
test-automation-strategy
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Design and implement effective test automation with proper pyramid, patterns, and CI/CD integration. Use when building automation frameworks or improving test efficiency.
github-code-review
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Popular testing & qa skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
grilling
mattpocock/skills
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
migrate-to-shoehorn
mattpocock/skills
Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.
run-train
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.
test-driven-development
obra/superpowers
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
finishing-a-development-branch
obra/superpowers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work