MCPInstall

pentest-validation

Use when validating security findings from SAST/DAST scans, proving exploitability of reported vulnerabilities, eliminating false positives, or running the 4-phase pentest pipeline (recon, analysis, validation, report).

Installs
142
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill pentest-validation
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads pentest-validation automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Pentest Validation

<default_to_action> When validating security findings:

  1. REQUIRE explicit authorization for target URL
  2. SCAN with qe-security-scanner (SAST + dependency + secrets)
  3. ANALYZE with qe-security-reviewer + qe-security-auditor (parallel)
  4. VALIDATE with qe-pentest-validator (graduated exploitation, parallel per vuln type)
  5. REPORT only confirmed findings with PoC evidence ("No Exploit, No Report")
  6. UPDATE exploit playbook with new patterns

Quality Gates:

  • Authorization confirmed before ANY exploitation
  • Target URL is staging/dev (NOT production)
  • Budget cap enforced ($15 default)
  • Time cap enforced (30 min default)
  • All exploitation attempts logged </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

The 4-Phase Pipeline

PhaseAgent(s)PurposeParallelism
1. Reconqe-security-scannerSAST, DAST, dependency scan, secretsInternal parallel
2. Analysisqe-security-reviewer + qe-security-auditorCode review + compliance checkBoth in parallel
3. Validationqe-pentest-validatorGraduated exploit validationPer-vuln-type parallel
4. Reportqe-quality-gate"No Exploit, No Report" filterSequential

Graduated Exploitation Tiers

TierHandlerCostLatencyUse When
1Agent Booster (WASM)$0<1msCode pattern is conclusive (eval, innerHTML, hardcoded creds)
2Haiku$0.0002~500msNeed payload test against live target
3Sonnet/Opus$0.003-$0.0152-5sFull exploit chain with data proof

When to Use This Skill

ScenarioTierEstimated Cost
PR security review (source only)1$0
Pre-release validation (staging)1-2$1-5
Full pentest validation1-3$5-15
Compliance audit evidence1-3$5-15

Configuration

pentest:
  target_url: https://staging.app.com    # REQUIRED for Tier 2-3
  source_repo: ./src                      # REQUIRED for Tier 1+
  exploitation_tier: 2                    # 1=pattern-only, 2=payload-test, 3=full-exploit
  vuln_types:                             # Which pipelines to run
    - injection                           # SQL, NoSQL, command injection
    - xss                                 # Reflected, stored, DOM XSS
    - auth                                # Auth bypass, session, JWT
    - ssrf                                # URL scheme abuse, metadata
  max_cost_usd: 15                        # Budget cap per run
  timeout_minutes: 30                     # Time cap per run
  require_authorization: true             # MUST confirm target ownership
  no_production: true                     # Block production URLs
  production_patterns:                    # URL patterns to block
    - "*.prod.*"
    - "api.*"
    - "www.*"

Safeguards (Mandatory)

Authorization Gate

Every pentest validation run MUST:

  1. Display target URL and exploitation tier to user
  2. Require explicit confirmation: "I own/authorized testing of this target"
  3. Log authorization with timestamp
  4. Block if target URL matches production patterns

What This Skill Does NOT Do

  • Full autonomous reconnaissance (Nmap, Subfinder)
  • Zero-day exploit development
  • Attack targets without explicit authorization
  • Test production systems
  • Store actual exfiltrated data (only proof of access)
  • Social engineering or phishing simulation
  • Port scanning or service discovery

Validation Pipelines

Injection Pipeline

AttackTier 1 (Pattern)Tier 2 (Payload)Tier 3 (Full)
SQL injectionString concat in query' OR '1'='1 response diffUNION SELECT data extraction
NoSQL injection$where, $gt in queryOperator injection testCollection enumeration
Command injectionexec(), system() callsCommand delimiter testReverse shell proof
LDAP injectionString concat in filterWildcard injectionDirectory enumeration

XSS Pipeline

AttackTier 1 (Pattern)Tier 2 (Payload)Tier 3 (Full)
Reflected XSSNo output encoding<img onerror> reflectionBrowser JS execution via qe-browser (Vibium)
Stored XSSinnerHTML assignmentPayload stored + retrievedCookie theft PoC
DOM XSSdocument.write(location)Fragment injectionDOM manipulation proof

Auth Pipeline

AttackTier 1 (Pattern)Tier 2 (Payload)Tier 3 (Full)
JWT noneNo algorithm validationModified JWT acceptedAdmin access with forged token
Session fixationNo session rotationPre-set session reusedCross-user session hijack
Credential stuffingNo rate limiting100 attempts unblockedValid credential discovery
IDORNo authorization checkAccess other user dataFull CRUD on foreign resources

SSRF Pipeline

AttackTier 1 (Pattern)Tier 2 (Payload)Tier 3 (Full)
Internal URLUser-controlled URL fetchhttp://169.254.169.254Cloud metadata extraction
DNS rebindingURL validation bypassRebind to internal IPInternal service access
Protocol smugglingURL scheme not restrictedfile:///etc/passwdFile content in response

Agent Coordination

Orchestration Pattern

// Phase 1: Recon (parallel scans)
await Task("Security Scan", {
  target: "./src",
  layers: { sast: true, dast: true, dependencies: true, secrets: true }
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// Phase 2: Analysis (parallel review)
await Promise.all([
  Task("Code Security Review", {
    findings: phase1Results,
    depth: "comprehensive"
  }, "qe-security-reviewer"),

  Task("Compliance Audit", {
    findings: phase1Results,
    frameworks: ["owasp-top-10"]
  }, "qe-security-auditor")
]);

// Phase 3: Validation (graduated exploitation)
await Task("Exploit Validation", {
  findings: [...phase1Results, ...phase2Results],
  target_url: "https://staging.app.com",
  exploitation_tier: 2,
  vuln_types: ["injection", "xss", "auth", "ssrf"],
  max_cost_usd: 15,
  timeout_minutes: 30
}, "qe-pentest-validator");

// Phase 4: Report ("No Exploit, No Report" gate)
await Task("Security Quality Gate", {
  findings: phase3Results.confirmedFindings,
  gate: "no-exploit-no-report",
  require_poc: true
}, "qe-quality-gate");

Finding Classification

StatusMeaningAction
confirmed-exploitableExploitation succeeded with PoCReport with evidence
likely-exploitablePartial exploitation, defenses detectedReport with caveats
not-exploitableAll exploitation attempts failedFilter from report
inconclusiveWAF/defense blocked, unclear if vulnerableReport for manual review

Exploit Playbook Memory

Namespace Structure

aqe/pentest/
 playbook/
  exploit/{vuln_type}/{tech_stack}/{technique}
  bypass/{defense_type}/{technique}
  payload/{vuln_type}/{variant}
 results/
  validation-{timestamp}
 poc/
  {finding_id}-poc

Learning Loop

  1. Before validation: Query playbook for known patterns matching findings
  2. During validation: Try known payloads first (higher success rate)
  3. After validation: Store new successful patterns with confidence scores
  4. Over time: Agent converges on most effective payloads per tech stack

Cost Optimization

Estimated Cost by Scenario

ScenarioTier MixFindingsEst. CostEst. Time
PR check (source only)100% Tier 15$0<5s
Sprint validation70% T1, 30% T215$2-55-10 min
Release validation40% T1, 40% T2, 20% T325$8-1515-30 min
Full pentest20% T1, 30% T2, 50% T340$15-3030-60 min

Cost vs Shannon Comparison

MetricShannonAQE Pentest Validation
Cost per run~$50$5-15 (graduated tiers)
Runtime60-90 min15-30 min (parallel pipelines)
False positive rateLow (exploit-proven)Low (same principle)
LearningNone (static prompts)ReasoningBank playbook

Success Metrics

MetricTargetMeasurement
False positive reduction>60% of findings eliminatedPre/post validator comparison
Exploit confirmation rate>80% of confirmed findings truly exploitableManual PoC verification
Cost per run<$15 USDToken tracking per pipeline
Time per run<30 minutesExecution time metrics
Playbook growth100+ patterns after 6 monthsMemory namespace count

Related Skills

  • security-testing - OWASP vulnerability scanning, SAST/DAST automation
  • compliance-testing - Regulatory compliance
  • api-testing-patterns - API security testing
  • chaos-engineering-resilience - Security under chaos

Remember

"No Exploit, No Report." A vulnerability scanner that can't prove exploitation delivers uncertain value. This skill transforms security findings from theoretical risks into proven vulnerabilities with evidence. Every confirmed finding comes with a reproducible proof-of-concept. Every false positive is eliminated before it reaches the report.

Think proof, not prediction. Don't report what MIGHT be vulnerable. Prove what IS vulnerable.

FAQ

What does the pentest-validation skill do?

Use when validating security findings from SAST/DAST scans, proving exploitability of reported vulnerabilities, eliminating false positives, or running the 4-phase pentest pipeline (recon, analysis, validation, report).

How do I install pentest-validation?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill pentest-validation in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/pentest-validation/ (personal) or .claude/skills/pentest-validation/ (project).

Which AI agents can use pentest-validation?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is pentest-validation safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains pentest-validation?

It is published by proffesor-for-testing in proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe. It has 142 recorded installs.

More from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

View all →

code-review-quality

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.

compatibility-testing

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Cross-browser, cross-platform, and cross-device compatibility testing ensuring consistent experience across environments. Use when validating browser support, testing responsive design, or ensuring platform compatibility.

Testing & QA652 installs

api-testing-patterns

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.

Testing & QA606 installs

regression-testing

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Strategic regression testing with test selection, impact analysis, and continuous regression management. Use when verifying fixes don't break existing functionality, planning regression suites, or optimizing test execution for faster feedback.

Testing & QA331 installs

test-automation-strategy

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Design and implement effective test automation with proper pyramid, patterns, and CI/CD integration. Use when building automation frameworks or improving test efficiency.

Testing & QA254 installs

github-code-review

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

Popular security skills

View category →

azure-compliance

microsoft/azure-skills

Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.

OfficialSecurity567K installs

minimal-run-and-audit

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.

Security477.4K installs

seo-audit

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

Security238.7K installs

firebase-security-rules-auditor

firebase/agent-skills

Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.

OfficialSecurity139.1K installs

audit

pbakaus/impeccable

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

Security81.9K installs

competitors

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

Security79.3K installs