MCPInstall

measure-experiment-results

Documents the results of a completed experiment or A/B test with statistical analysis, learnings, and recommendations. Use after experiments conclude to communicate findings, inform decisions, and build organizational knowledge.

Installs
746
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill measure-experiment-results
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads measure-experiment-results automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Experiment Results

An experiment results document captures what happened when you tested a hypothesis, including statistical outcomes, segment analysis, learnings, and clear recommendations. Good results documentation turns individual experiments into organizational knowledge that improves future decision-making.

When to Use

  • After an A/B test or experiment reaches statistical significance
  • When an experiment is ended early (for any reason)
  • To communicate findings to stakeholders who weren't involved
  • During decision-making about whether to ship, iterate, or kill a feature
  • To build a repository of learnings that inform future experiments

When NOT to Use

  • The experiment is not designed or run yet -> use measure-experiment-design
  • The results demand a direction decision -> use iterate-pivot-decision; this skill reports the evidence, that one decides
  • You want the transferable learning banked for the organization -> follow up with iterate-lessons-log
  • Your data is survey responses, not a controlled experiment -> use measure-survey-analysis

Instructions

When asked to document experiment results, follow these steps:

  1. Summarize the Experiment Provide context: what was tested, when it ran, how much traffic it received. Link to the original experiment design document if one exists.

  2. Restate the Hypothesis Remind readers what you believed would happen and why. This frames the results interpretation.

  3. Present Primary Results Show the primary metric outcome clearly: what were the values for control and treatment? Include statistical significance (p-value), confidence intervals, and sample sizes. Be honest about whether results are conclusive.

  4. Analyze Secondary Metrics Present guardrail metrics that ensure you didn't cause unintended harm. Note any secondary metrics that moved unexpectedly.both positive and negative.

  5. Segment the Data Look for differential effects across user segments (platform, tenure, plan type, etc.). Sometimes overall results mask important segment-level insights.

  6. Extract Learnings What did you learn beyond the numbers? Include surprising findings, questions raised, and implications for the product hypothesis. Negative results are valuable learnings.

  7. Make a Recommendation Be clear: should we ship, iterate, or kill? Support the recommendation with the evidence. If the decision is nuanced, explain the trade-offs.

  8. Define Next Steps Specify what happens now.engineering work to ship, follow-up experiments, metrics to continue monitoring, or documentation to update.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete readout fills every template section: Summary; Hypothesis Recap; Results; Segment Analysis; Visualization; Learnings; Recommendation; Next Steps; and Appendix.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Statistical methods and significance are clearly stated
  • Confidence intervals are included (not just p-values)
  • Segment analysis checked for differential effects
  • Secondary/guardrail metrics are reported
  • Learnings go beyond just the numbers
  • Recommendation is clear and actionable
  • Negative or inconclusive results are reported honestly

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

FAQ

What does the measure-experiment-results skill do?

Documents the results of a completed experiment or A/B test with statistical analysis, learnings, and recommendations. Use after experiments conclude to communicate findings, inform decisions, and build organizational knowledge.

How do I install measure-experiment-results?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill measure-experiment-results in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/measure-experiment-results/ (personal) or .claude/skills/measure-experiment-results/ (project).

Which AI agents can use measure-experiment-results?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is measure-experiment-results safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains measure-experiment-results?

It is published by product-on-purpose in product-on-purpose/pm-skills. It has 746 recorded installs.

More from product-on-purpose/pm-skills

View all →

deliver-acceptance-criteria

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Generates structured Given/When/Then acceptance criteria for a user story or feature slice, covering the happy path, key failure scenarios, and non-functional expectations in testable form. Use when turning requirements into verifiable scenarios for engineering handoff and QA sign-off. For a dedicated catalog of boundary conditions, error states, and recovery paths across a feature, use deliver-edge-cases; to write the stories themselves, use deliver-user-stories.

Testing & QA1.1K installs

deliver-prd

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Creates a comprehensive Product Requirements Document that aligns stakeholders on what to build, why, and how success will be measured. Use when specifying features, epics, or product initiatives for engineering handoff.

deliver-user-stories

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Generates user stories in the standard persona, action, benefit story format from product requirements or feature descriptions. Use when breaking a feature into stories for sprint planning, writing tickets, or communicating scope to engineering. For testable Given/When/Then acceptance criteria on a story, use deliver-acceptance-criteria; for boundary and failure scenarios, use deliver-edge-cases.

deliver-edge-cases

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, race conditions, and recovery paths for a feature - the systematic catalog of what can go wrong and the failure modes to design for. Use during specification to map the failure surface and ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify boundary and limit scenarios to test. Distinct from deliver-acceptance-criteria, which writes story-level Given/When/Then checks; this skill produces the whole-feature edge-case catalog.

Testing & QA878 installs

discover-competitive-analysis

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Creates a structured competitive analysis comparing features, pricing, and positioning across 3-5 direct and indirect competitors, with a 2x2 map and actionable strategic recommendations. Use before entering a market, planning differentiation, or after losing deals. For market size rather than competitor positioning, use discover-market-sizing instead.

define-problem-statement

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Creates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.

Business & Finance821 installs

Popular testing & qa skills

View category →

tdd

mattpocock/skills

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

Testing & QA1.2M installs

grilling

mattpocock/skills

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Testing & QA996.2K installs

migrate-to-shoehorn

mattpocock/skills

Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.

Testing & QA484.1K installs

run-train

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.

Testing & QA337.8K installs

test-driven-development

obra/superpowers

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Testing & QA261.8K installs

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

Testing & QA216.8K installs