MCPInstall

measure-experiment-design

Designs an A/B test or experiment with variants, success metrics, sample size, and duration for an existing hypothesis. Use when planning an experiment to validate a product change or test an assumption you have already framed. To articulate the hypothesis itself first, use define-hypothesis.

Installs
759
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill measure-experiment-design
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads measure-experiment-design automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Experiment Design

An experiment design document defines all parameters needed to run a rigorous A/B test or controlled experiment. It ensures the team aligns on what you're testing, how you'll measure success, and how long to run the test before drawing conclusions. Good experiment design prevents common pitfalls: underpowered tests, unclear success criteria, and decisions based on noise rather than signal.

When to Use

  • Before launching an A/B test to validate a product change
  • When testing a hypothesis that requires quantitative validation
  • After solution design to validate assumptions before full rollout
  • When stakeholders want data-driven evidence for a decision
  • To establish a culture of experimentation and learning

When NOT to Use

  • The hypothesis itself is not yet articulated -> use define-hypothesis first; this skill designs the test for a claim you already have
  • You are analyzing a completed experiment -> use measure-experiment-results
  • You need the event tracking that will measure the experiment -> use measure-instrumentation-spec
  • You are gathering opinions rather than running a controlled test -> use measure-survey-analysis

Instructions

When asked to design an experiment, follow these steps:

  1. Articulate the Hypothesis Write a clear, testable hypothesis in the format: "We believe [change] for [users] will [outcome] as measured by [metric]." One hypothesis per experiment - if you're testing multiple things, run multiple experiments.

  2. Define the Variants Describe the control (current experience) and treatment (new experience) in sufficient detail. Include screenshots, mockups, or precise descriptions so anyone can understand what users will see.

  3. Choose Primary and Secondary Metrics Select one primary metric that will determine success or failure. Add 2-3 secondary metrics to understand the broader impact. Include guardrail metrics to catch unintended negative effects.

  4. Calculate Sample Size Determine how many users you need per variant to detect your minimum detectable effect (MDE) with statistical significance. Specify your significance level (typically 0.05) and power (typically 0.80).

  5. Estimate Duration Based on sample size and available traffic, calculate how long the experiment needs to run. Account for weekly patterns - avoid ending mid-week if behavior varies by day.

  6. Define Targeting and Allocation Specify which users are eligible for the experiment and how traffic is split between variants. Document any exclusions (e.g., employees, specific segments).

  7. Set Success Criteria Define upfront what constitutes a win, a loss, or an inconclusive result. This prevents post-hoc rationalization and moving goalposts.

  8. Document Risks and Mitigations Identify what could go wrong and how you'll detect/address it. Include monitoring plans and rollback criteria.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete design fills every template section: Overview; Hypothesis; Background; Variants; Metrics; Sample Size & Duration; Audience Targeting; Success Criteria; Risks & Mitigations; Implementation Notes; and References.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Hypothesis is falsifiable and specific
  • Only one primary metric is defined
  • Sample size calculation is documented with assumptions
  • Duration accounts for traffic patterns and statistical requirements
  • Success criteria are defined before the experiment starts
  • Guardrail metrics protect against unintended harm

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

FAQ

What does the measure-experiment-design skill do?

Designs an A/B test or experiment with variants, success metrics, sample size, and duration for an existing hypothesis. Use when planning an experiment to validate a product change or test an assumption you have already framed. To articulate the hypothesis itself first, use define-hypothesis.

How do I install measure-experiment-design?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill measure-experiment-design in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/measure-experiment-design/ (personal) or .claude/skills/measure-experiment-design/ (project).

Which AI agents can use measure-experiment-design?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is measure-experiment-design safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains measure-experiment-design?

It is published by product-on-purpose in product-on-purpose/pm-skills. It has 759 recorded installs.

More from product-on-purpose/pm-skills

View all →

deliver-acceptance-criteria

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Generates structured Given/When/Then acceptance criteria for a user story or feature slice, covering the happy path, key failure scenarios, and non-functional expectations in testable form. Use when turning requirements into verifiable scenarios for engineering handoff and QA sign-off. For a dedicated catalog of boundary conditions, error states, and recovery paths across a feature, use deliver-edge-cases; to write the stories themselves, use deliver-user-stories.

Testing & QA1.1K installs

deliver-prd

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Creates a comprehensive Product Requirements Document that aligns stakeholders on what to build, why, and how success will be measured. Use when specifying features, epics, or product initiatives for engineering handoff.

deliver-user-stories

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Generates user stories in the standard persona, action, benefit story format from product requirements or feature descriptions. Use when breaking a feature into stories for sprint planning, writing tickets, or communicating scope to engineering. For testable Given/When/Then acceptance criteria on a story, use deliver-acceptance-criteria; for boundary and failure scenarios, use deliver-edge-cases.

deliver-edge-cases

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, race conditions, and recovery paths for a feature - the systematic catalog of what can go wrong and the failure modes to design for. Use during specification to map the failure surface and ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify boundary and limit scenarios to test. Distinct from deliver-acceptance-criteria, which writes story-level Given/When/Then checks; this skill produces the whole-feature edge-case catalog.

Testing & QA878 installs

discover-competitive-analysis

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Creates a structured competitive analysis comparing features, pricing, and positioning across 3-5 direct and indirect competitors, with a 2x2 map and actionable strategic recommendations. Use before entering a market, planning differentiation, or after losing deals. For market size rather than competitor positioning, use discover-market-sizing instead.

define-problem-statement

product-on-purpose/pm-skills

Creates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.

Business & Finance821 installs

Popular testing & qa skills

View category →

tdd

mattpocock/skills

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

Testing & QA1.2M installs

grilling

mattpocock/skills

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Testing & QA996.2K installs

migrate-to-shoehorn

mattpocock/skills

Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.

Testing & QA484.1K installs

run-train

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.

Testing & QA337.8K installs

test-driven-development

obra/superpowers

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Testing & QA261.8K installs

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

Testing & QA216.8K installs