
foundation-meeting-recap
Produces a topic-segmented post-meeting summary for attendees with decisions highlighted and actions captured inline per topic (plus a consolidated action view at the end). Auto-populates topic skeleton from a sibling meeting-agenda when available and reconciles planned vs. actual topics. Accepts transcripts from Zoom, Meet, Otter, Fireflies, Krisp MCP, or manual notes; runs on variable-quality input without blocking. For synthesizing user research interviews across participants, use discover-interview-synthesis.
- Installs
- 694
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-recap- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads foundation-meeting-recap automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Meeting Recap
A meeting recap is a post-meeting topic-segmented summary produced for attendees and light distribution. It organizes content by topic rather than chronology, highlights decisions visually, and captures actions inline (with owner, due date, dependencies) per topic segment, plus a consolidated actions view at the end for scannability.
This skill absorbs what would otherwise be a separate "meeting-actions" skill. Actions in this family live alongside the context that makes them meaningful, not in a sibling artifact.
This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract.
When to Use
- After any internal meeting that produces decisions or actions affecting attendees
- When a sibling
foundation-meeting-agendaexists and needs reconciliation (planned vs. actual topics) - When the team needs a topic-organized reference rather than a chronological transcript dump
- When inputs include a transcript (Zoom, Meet, Otter, Fireflies, Krisp MCP) or mixed notes and transcript
When NOT to Use
- Setting the pre-meeting structure attendees will see (topics, owners, time boxes) before the meeting happens. Use
foundation-meeting-agenda. recap summarizes what happened after a meeting; agenda sets expectations before it. - Preparing the user's private strategic positioning before a meeting that matters. Use
foundation-meeting-brief. recap is a shared post-meeting record; brief is pre-meeting tactical prep never shown to attendees. - Communicating outcomes to non-attendees. Use
foundation-stakeholder-update. recap assumes reader context; stakeholder-update translates to readers without it. - Cross-meeting synthesis (patterns across multiple meetings). Use
foundation-meeting-synthesize. - Synthesizing user research interviews across participants, not one meeting's attendees. Use
discover-interview-synthesis. recap organizes a single meeting by topic; interview-synthesis finds patterns across many research conversations. - Live meeting note-taking. This skill consumes finished inputs; it does not transcribe live.
Zero-friction execution
Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:
- Read all provided inputs (transcript, notes, or hybrid) and note input quality upfront
- Auto-discover related agenda via filename-prefix match on same-directory
*_{title}_agenda.md - Run inference: meeting metadata from content, decisions from language markers, actions from imperative-future patterns, owners from attendee context
- Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word
goor corrections - Produce the recap
If invoked with --go, skip the inference summary. If the user provides all metadata upfront, no checkpoint appears.
Fabrication prohibition
This skill never fabricates owners, decisions, or actions. When an action lacks an explicit owner, it is captured as [owner: unassigned, needs confirmation] not invented. When a decision is implicit ("it sounded like we decided X"), it is flagged with a confidence marker rather than stated as fact. Trust decay from fabrication is worse than the mild friction of flagging.
Ownership reconciliation threshold (v1.1.0)
When the ratio of unassigned actions to total actions exceeds 0.3 (30%), OR when any high-priority action lacks an owner, the skill surfaces a dedicated ## ⚠ Ownership reconciliation required section at the top of the recap (above the topic segments) listing:
- All unassigned actions
- A suggested next step for each (who should probably own this based on topic context, flagged as inference)
- A recommended follow-up action (Slack thread, 15-min sync, async survey)
The shareable summary also leads with this flag when triggered: ⚠ Ownership reconciliation required: N of M actions lack owners.
The unassigned_action_ratio frontmatter field (float 0.0-1.0) records the ratio for downstream tools.
Rationale: a recap with 60% ownerless actions is "non-fabricated" (per the prohibition above) but operationally broken. a pile of broken tickets. The threshold makes this visible instead of silently shipping.
Instructions
When asked to create a meeting recap, follow these steps:
-
Parse inputs and detect type Transcript (timestamped speaker-attributed lines), notes (bullet or prose), or hybrid. Note input quality upfront. transcript plus structured notes is high; scrappy bullets is low.
-
Auto-discover related agenda Look in the same directory for a file matching the pattern
{YYYY-MM-DD}_{HH-MMtimezone}_{title-slug}_agenda.md. If found, load it. its topic list is the recap's topic skeleton and itsdesired_outcomesdrive the meeting-quality reconciliation. -
Present go-mode inference summary Show detected meeting date, title, attendees (if inferred), input quality assessment. Accept
goor corrections. -
Topic-segment the content
- If agenda was loaded, use its topic list as scaffold (plus any emergent topics)
- If no agenda, identify topics from transcript discourse markers ("moving on to", "the other thing")
-
Per topic segment, extract
- Discussion summary: 2-3 sentences capturing what was discussed
- Decisions made: bold-flagged visually. Never fabricate. if uncertain, flag "appears to have decided X [confidence: medium]"
- Actions: owner + due date + dependencies. Flag missing owners as
[owner: unassigned]and missing dates as[due: not specified]. Never invent. - Open questions: unresolved items with confidence marker on whether they are truly unresolved or simply not re-raised
-
Consolidate actions by owner Regroup all actions under each owner. Enables single-owner scan ("what do I owe after this meeting?").
-
Reconcile agenda (if agenda loaded)
topics_planned: from agenda topic listtopics_hit: topics actually discussedtopics_skipped: planned but not discussed, with brief reasontopics_emerged: discussed but not on agenda
-
Assess meeting quality signals
outcomes_achieved: N/M ratio of agendadesired_outcomesmet (when agenda present)started_on_time/ended_on_time: from timestamps when available; skipped when notkey_attendees_present: flag if decision-makers were absent
-
Surface next steps When we reconvene, what needs to happen on the critical path before that.
-
Render TEMPLATE.md and validate
- Every action's owner appears in
attendeesor is explicitlyunassigned meeting_quality.outcomes_achievedmatchesN/Mpattern when populatedagenda_reconciliationfields present even when empty lists
- Every action's owner appears in
Project Memory Contract
Active only when .claude/pm-skills.local.md exists. With no file, ignore this section entirely
and behave exactly as described above.
- Reads:
active_initiative, so decisions are recorded against the initiative they belong to. - Writes: each decision actually reached in the meeting to the
## Decisionssection, dated and attributed, plus the recap itself as adecisionartifact. - Posture: propose the entry and wait for confirmation before writing, unless
memory_auto_append: trueis set, in which case append and echo what was written. - Write discipline: re-read the file immediately before writing, never from the copy that produced the proposal. If it changed in between, merge your entry into the current state and re-propose rather than overwriting; add only your own entry and leave every other field and section byte-identical. Nothing enforces this at runtime and the file is gitignored, so a careless whole-file write loses another session's work with no way to recover it.
The fabrication prohibition above governs this write without exception: record only decisions that were stated. An unrecorded decision is recoverable; an invented one in durable memory is not. This complements the family's filename-based chaining rather than replacing it: filenames still locate the sibling artifacts of one meeting, while project memory carries the durable product context across meetings.
Quality Checklist
- Input quality flagged honestly (high / medium / low)
- Agenda auto-discovery attempted; result noted in Generation context
- Every topic segment has Discussion / Decisions / Actions / Open questions subsections
- Decisions are bold-flagged; never invented; confidence marked when inferred
- Every action has owner (or explicit
unassigned) + due date (or explicitnot specified) - Consolidated actions view regrouped by owner
- Agenda reconciliation populated when agenda was loaded
- Meeting quality signals populated with data available; skipped fields flagged
- Shareable summary 5-6 lines, lead with decisions and top actions
- Sources and References Generation context notes transcript source and any missing owners/dates
See also
- Meeting Skills Family Contract
foundation-meeting-agenda. upstream: provides topic skeleton and desired-outcomesfoundation-meeting-synthesize. downstream: consumes recaps for cross-meeting synthesisfoundation-stakeholder-update. downstream: translates recap outcomes to non-attendees
FAQ
What does the foundation-meeting-recap skill do?
Produces a topic-segmented post-meeting summary for attendees with decisions highlighted and actions captured inline per topic (plus a consolidated action view at the end). Auto-populates topic skeleton from a sibling meeting-agenda when available and reconciles planned vs. actual topics. Accepts transcripts from Zoom, Meet, Otter, Fireflies, Krisp MCP, or manual notes; runs on variable-quality input without blocking. For synthesizing user research interviews across participants, use discover-interview-synthesis.
How do I install foundation-meeting-recap?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-recap in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/foundation-meeting-recap/ (personal) or .claude/skills/foundation-meeting-recap/ (project).
Which AI agents can use foundation-meeting-recap?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is foundation-meeting-recap safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains foundation-meeting-recap?
It is published by product-on-purpose in product-on-purpose/pm-skills. It has 694 recorded installs.
More from product-on-purpose/pm-skills
deliver-acceptance-criteria
product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Generates structured Given/When/Then acceptance criteria for a user story or feature slice, covering the happy path, key failure scenarios, and non-functional expectations in testable form. Use when turning requirements into verifiable scenarios for engineering handoff and QA sign-off. For a dedicated catalog of boundary conditions, error states, and recovery paths across a feature, use deliver-edge-cases; to write the stories themselves, use deliver-user-stories.
deliver-prd
product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Creates a comprehensive Product Requirements Document that aligns stakeholders on what to build, why, and how success will be measured. Use when specifying features, epics, or product initiatives for engineering handoff.
deliver-user-stories
product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Generates user stories in the standard persona, action, benefit story format from product requirements or feature descriptions. Use when breaking a feature into stories for sprint planning, writing tickets, or communicating scope to engineering. For testable Given/When/Then acceptance criteria on a story, use deliver-acceptance-criteria; for boundary and failure scenarios, use deliver-edge-cases.
deliver-edge-cases
product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, race conditions, and recovery paths for a feature - the systematic catalog of what can go wrong and the failure modes to design for. Use during specification to map the failure surface and ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify boundary and limit scenarios to test. Distinct from deliver-acceptance-criteria, which writes story-level Given/When/Then checks; this skill produces the whole-feature edge-case catalog.
discover-competitive-analysis
product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Creates a structured competitive analysis comparing features, pricing, and positioning across 3-5 direct and indirect competitors, with a 2x2 map and actionable strategic recommendations. Use before entering a market, planning differentiation, or after losing deals. For market size rather than competitor positioning, use discover-market-sizing instead.
define-problem-statement
product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Creates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.
Popular productivity & automation skills
agent-browser
vercel-labs/agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.
lark-doc
open.feishu.cn
飞书云文档(Docx / Wiki)内容操作:读取、创建、编辑文档,插入或下载图片附件,以及操作思维笔记。用户提供文档 URL/token(包括 doubao.com 的 /docx/、/wiki/)时使用;按 URL 路径/token 而非域名路由;/page/ 是妙搭应用,非飞书云文档。文档内嵌资源按读取参考中的统一规则分流。独立评论操作走 lark-drive;随正文读取评论使用 docs +fetch。表格或 Base 内部数据操作不在本 skill。
lark-base
open.feishu.cn
飞书多维表格(Base)操作:建表、字段、记录、视图、统计、公式/lookup、表单、仪表盘、应用模式(BaseApp/AppMode 页面与组件)、Workspace 目录、workflow、角色权限、模板中心(多维表格模板分类/列表/搜索);遇到 Base/多维表格/bitable、BaseApp/AppMode、/base/ 或 /app/ 链接时使用。BaseApp 不走 lark-apps;文件导入/导出转 lark-drive,认证/授权转 lark-shared。
lark-drive
open.feishu.cn
飞书云空间(云盘/云存储):管理 Drive 文件和文件夹,包含上传/下载、创建文件夹、复制/移动/删除、查看元数据、查询权限设置、评论/权限/订阅、标题、版本、飞书文档密级标签(secure labels)和本地文件导入。用户需要整理云盘目录、处理云空间资源 URL/token、判断链接类型/真实 token/标题,或导入 Word/Markdown/Excel/CSV/PPTX/.base 为 docx/sheet/bitable/slides 时使用;doubao.com 云空间 URL/token 也按资源路径和 token 路由,不回退 WebFetch。不负责:文档内容编辑(走 lark-doc)、表格/Base 表内数据操作(走 lark-sheets/lark-base)、知识空间节点/成员管理(走 lark-wiki)、原生 Markdown 文件读写/patch/diff(走 lark-markdown)。
lark-shared
open.feishu.cn
Use for lark-cli setup/auth tasks: auth login/status/logout, user vs bot identity, business-domain permissions (--domain, including all/docs/drive), missing scopes, revoking authorization, or handling notice JSON.
lark-im
open.feishu.cn
飞书即时通讯:收发消息和管理群聊。发送和回复消息、搜索聊天记录、管理群聊成员、上传下载图片和文件、管理表情回复、发送应用内/短信/电话加急、发送和处理交互卡片(Interactive Card)、监听卡片按钮回调(card.action.trigger)。当用户需要发消息、查看或搜索聊天记录、下载聊天中的文件、查看群成员、搜索群、创建群聊或话题群、管理标记数据、管理 Feed 置顶(添加/移除/查询置顶会话)、管理标签数据、处理卡片回调时使用。