
email-testing
End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, ShazaMail, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, template-aware extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "ShazaMail," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing
- Installs
- 1K
- Last 24h
- +12
- Trending rank
- #8079
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill email-testing- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads email-testing automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Quick Route
| Situation | Go to |
|---|---|
| Pick a capture tool | "Capture-inbox decision tree" below |
| Poll an inbox without a sleep | references/mailpit-playwright.md (polling helper) |
| Pull an OTP / link out of the body | references/mailpit-playwright.md (extraction) |
| Full password-reset / signup / magic-link E2E | references/mailpit-playwright.md |
| Real addresses on staging | references/hosted-inboxes.md (Mailosaur) |
| Per-test throwaway inbox | references/hosted-inboxes.md (MailSlurp / ShazaMail) |
| Just preview a template locally | references/hosted-inboxes.md (Ethereal) |
| Flag SPF/DKIM/DMARC problems | references/deliverability.md |
| Tests pass locally, "no email yet" in CI | "Flaky email in CI" below |
Discovery Questions
Check .agents/qa-project-context.md first — if it exists, use it and skip anything
answered there.
- Where does the email need to be received? Local capture (Mailpit) covers most functional flows for free. A real, externally-deliverable address (staging, a third- party ESP, real DNS) means a hosted inbox (Mailosaur / MailSlurp). This is the single biggest tool-selection driver.
- How parallel is the suite? High parallelism makes "the latest email" ambiguous — you need per-test unique addresses or per-test inboxes, not a shared mailbox.
- Which flows? Signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA, notification emails — they share one shape (capture, extract, complete) but differ in what you extract (link vs 6-digit code).
- Is deliverability in scope? "Lands in inbox / passes SPF, DKIM, DMARC" is a separate non-blocking suite, not part of the functional OTP test. Decide upfront.
- Local-only preview, or CI assertions? Previewing a template during dev is Ethereal; asserting in CI is Mailpit/Mailosaur/MailSlurp/ShazaMail. Don't confuse the two.
Core Principles
-
Capture the real email; never shortcut past it. Calling the reset endpoint directly or hardcoding a token skips the exact integration the test exists to cover — templating, recipient resolution, link generation, token signing. Submit on the UI, read the inbox.
-
Poll, never sleep. Email arrival is asynchronous. A fixed
waitForTimeoutis either too short (flake) or too slow (wasted minutes) and is the #1 cause of flaky email tests. Useexpect.poll/.toPassagainst/api/v1/search?query=..., or a built-in waiter (messages.get,waitForLatestEmail) that already polls for you. Bound each HTTP call at the client, including response-body parsing; a provider wait budget alone does not protect against a stalled connection. -
One unique recipient per test. Two parallel tests both reading "the latest signup email" grab each other's mail. Make every test's address unique (plus-addressing or a per-test inbox) and filter by recipient when reading. ShazaMail can instead isolate each test with a dedicated test inbox ID and
received_aftermatcher. Clearing the inbox between tests does NOT survive parallelism. -
Extract against the real template and reject ambiguity. Pull the OTP from the email body with a label-specific regex and require one distinct code. Parse HTML links with a DOM parser, then require the exact approved origin and the flow's path and token. A missing or ambiguous match fails; never navigate to a guessed URL.
-
Assert content, not existence. "An email arrived" is a weak assertion. Check the
subject, thefromaddress, and that links point to the right domain. Wrong-template and wrong-link bugs only surface if you assert on content. -
Deliverability is a separate, non-blocking suite. SPF/DKIM/DMARC come from a real receiving server's authentication, never from the body text — and they must not block the functional flow tests.
Capture-inbox decision tree
Pick the cheapest tool that can actually receive your mail. Default to Mailpit for local + CI functional tests; reach for a hosted inbox only when you need real addresses or high-parallelism isolation.
| Tool | Hosting / cost | Address type | Use when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mailpit | Self-host, single binary or docker, free / open source | Any local SMTP recipient | Default. Local + GitHub Actions functional tests, tight budget. REST API at :8025 (/api/v1/messages). |
| Mailosaur | Hosted (API key), paid | Real *.mailosaur.net addresses | Staging/prod-like flows needing a real deliverable address; auto-waiting messages.get(serverId, { sentTo }); structured links/codes; real SPF/DKIM/DMARC. |
| MailSlurp | Hosted (API key), paid | Real, per-inbox | Per-test throwaway inboxes via createInbox() + waitForLatestEmail; strong parallel isolation. |
| ShazaMail | Hosted (Bearer API key), receive-only | Real, per-test inbox | Signup/reset/OTP flows via POST /api/v1/test-inboxes + bounded POST /api/v1/test-inboxes/:id/wait; no outbound SMTP. |
| Ethereal | Hosted throwaway, free | Captures, delivers nothing | Local-dev template preview only (createTestAccount + getTestMessageUrl). NOT for CI assertions. |
For the budget signup-flow case (local + GitHub Actions, self-host fine): use Mailpit
— a single binary / docker image with a free, open-source REST API at :8025. If you
later need a real deliverable address, graduate that suite to Mailosaur or
MailSlurp or ShazaMail (hosted inboxes with real addresses). Do not "just check the database instead
of the email" — that proves the row was written, not that the email was sent, addressed,
and linkable.
Avoid: MailHog — archived/unmaintained since 2020; Mailpit is its drop-in replacement (same ports, compatible API), verified mid-2026. Also skip smtp4dev / Papercut for new suites — Mailpit's API and full-text search are better for automated assertions.
See references/mailpit-playwright.md for the docker-compose, the polling helper, and the
extraction utilities; references/hosted-inboxes.md for Mailosaur / MailSlurp / Ethereal.
Polling an inbox (Mailpit)
Read the search endpoint with Playwright's request fixture, find the message addressed to
this test's recipient, then fetch the full body by ID. Use expect.poll with a timeout
and intervals — it retries until a match appears, so fast inboxes resolve instantly and
slow ones still pass.
// `request` is the Playwright APIRequestContext fixture; plain fetch() works too.
await expect.poll(async () => {
const query = new URLSearchParams({ query: `to:${to}` });
const res = await request.get(`http://localhost:8025/api/v1/search?${query}`);
expect(res.ok(), `Mailpit search HTTP ${res.status()}`).toBe(true);
const { messages } = await res.json();
return messages.find((m) => m.To.some((t) => t.Address === to))?.ID ?? null;
}, { timeout: 30_000, intervals: [500, 1_000, 2_000] }).not.toBeNull();
// then: request.get(`http://localhost:8025/api/v1/message/${id}`) → { Text, HTML, Subject, From, To }
The search endpoint's query=to: filter plus the .find on the recipient is what makes parallel tests
deterministic. Never take messages[0] / messages.at(-1) (newest overall) with no
recipient filter. When asking for a second email to the same account, exclude IDs
already seen; an old matching message must not satisfy a new request. Full helper in
references/mailpit-playwright.md, including HTTP/schema failures and detail checks.
Extracting OTPs and links
Use the guarded helpers in references/mailpit-playwright.md against the email body:
const otp = extractOtp(message.Text, /\bcode:\s*(\d{6})\b/gi);
const resetUrl = await extractLink(page, message, new URL(baseURL).origin,
url => url.pathname === '/reset' && Boolean(url.searchParams.get('token')));
await page.goto(resetUrl);
Do NOT slice by index (body.split(' ')[3], substring(0, 6), indexOf('code')) — those
break the moment the template changes a word. Do NOT read innerText of the live page when
you mean the email body. If a 6-digit code could collide with other numbers, anchor on the
label and reject multiple distinct matches. A broad \S* URL regex can consume closing
HTML tags and preserve & in query parameters. Hosted services expose structured
message.html.links / message.html.codes — prefer those when available. See
references/mailpit-playwright.md.
Deterministic addresses (parallel isolation)
The parallel-flake bug: two tests sign up at once and both poll for "the latest signup email," so they swap messages. Fixes, in order of preference:
- Per-test unique address — plus-addressing / sub-addressing:
user+${randomUUID()}@example.test, created anew on every retry. Timestamps alone can collide across workers. Most providers routeuser+anything@touser@, so one real mailbox yields infinite unique recipients. - Filter every read by recipient —
sentTo(Mailosaur) or aquery=to:+.findmatch (Mailpit). Never take the newest message overall. - Per-test dedicated inbox — MailSlurp
createInbox()or ShazaMailPOST /api/v1/test-inboxesgives each test its own inbox; Mailosaur gives each test a unique address on your server domain.
Clearing the inbox between tests is not sufficient under parallelism — two tests
running at the same instant still collide. Unique address + recipient filter is the real
fix. See references/hosted-inboxes.md.
Asserting subject / from / headers / links
After capture, assert on content:
expect(message.subject).toBe('Welcome to Example')— catches wrong-template bugs.expect(message.from?.[0].email).toBe('hello@example.com')— catches misconfigured sender / reply-to. Pin the sender only when the product or its contract names one; if it names none, record the sender as unpinned rather than asserting a guessed address.- Headers (
List-Unsubscribe, customX-headers) when your product sets them. - Links point to the right domain:
expect(new URL(link.href).origin).toBe('https://staging.example.com')before navigation. A hostname suffix check also acceptsevil-staging.example.com; require an exact origin or a deliberately approved subdomain boundary.
Mailosaur example asserting subject, from, and link domain is in
references/hosted-inboxes.md.
Deliverability: SPF / DKIM / DMARC
Keep this in its own non-blocking suite, separate from functional flow tests. SPF,
DKIM, and DMARC pass/fail + alignment come from a real receiving server authenticating
your sending domain — they are not strings in the body, so never
body.includes('spf') or body.match(/dkim/). And Mailpit does not validate
SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment — it only does basic SpamAssassin content scoring, because
nothing was sent over real DNS. Real alignment needs a hosted send-and-receive
(Mailosaur deliverability report, or mail-tester.com for a one-off). Tag the suite
@deliverability, run it as a non-required CI job (continue-on-error), and never assert
deliverability inside the OTP / reset flow test. See references/deliverability.md.
Flaky email in CI
Tests pass locally but the email "hasn't arrived yet" when CI asserts. The four root causes — diagnose all of them, do not just bump the sleep:
- A fixed sleep instead of polling.
waitForTimeout/ arbitrary delay races the email. Replace withexpect.poll/.toPass/ a built-inwaitFor. - Timeout too short. CI mail delivery is slower than local. Once polling, increase the
poll
timeout(e.g. 30–60s) rather than adding a longer blind sleep. - No recipient filter. Reading the newest message overall picks up another test's mail
under parallelism. Filter by
sentTo/to:and use a unique address per test. - Stale messages from a previous run. An old matching email satisfies the assertion before the new one arrives. Clear the inbox in global setup and/or make the address unique per run so prior-run mail can't match.
Retrying the whole job, quarantining the test, or raising a global sleep to 30s treats the symptom and leaves the race in place.
Anti-Patterns
1. Fixed sleep before reading the inbox
page.waitForTimeout(5000) / setTimeout / sleep() then read. Too short flakes, too long
wastes minutes. Poll with expect.poll against /api/v1/messages (or a built-in waiter).
2. Recommending a dead capture tool
MailHog is archived (2020). Papercut / smtp4dev are weaker for automation. Use Mailpit.
3. Checking the database instead of the email
A DB row proves the write happened, not that the email was sent, addressed, and linkable. Read the actual captured message.
4. Shortcutting past the email
Calling the reset endpoint directly or hardcoding a token skips templating, link
generation, and token signing. Capture the email, extract the link, page.goto it.
5. Brittle index-based extraction
body.split(' ')[3], substring(0, 6), indexOf('code'). Use an anchored \d{6} regex
with a null guard. And extract from the email body, not the live page's innerText.
6. Newest-message-overall with no recipient filter
messages[0] / messages.at(-1) collide under parallelism. Filter by recipient and use a
unique per-test address; "delete all messages between tests" alone does not fix it.
7. Asserting only that an email exists
No subject / from / link checks misses wrong-template and wrong-link bugs. Assert
content.
8. Regexing SPF/DKIM/DMARC out of the body, or trusting Mailpit for it
Auth results come from a real receiving server, not body text; Mailpit only does spam scoring. Use Mailosaur's deliverability report, in a separate non-blocking suite.
9. IMAP libraries against a real mailbox
imap-simple / node-imap / imapflow reinvent polling and lose isolation. Use
MailSlurp createInbox + waitForLatestEmail, one inbox per test.
10. Ethereal in CI, or a paid service for a local preview
Ethereal delivers nothing — it's preview-only (createTestAccount + getTestMessageUrl).
Don't assert on it in CI; equally, don't spin up a paid hosted service just to eyeball a
template locally.
Verification
Prove the suite actually captures and asserts, smallest check first:
- Capture is wired:
curl -s localhost:8025/api/v1/messages | jq '.total'returns a number (Mailpit up, API reachable). For a hosted inbox, a one-linemessages.get/createInboxsmoke script returns without auth error. - No blind sleeps:
grep -rE 'waitForTimeout|sleep\(|setTimeout' tests/over the email specs prints nothing. - The flow is green and real: run the signup/reset spec and confirm it fails when you temporarily break the template subject — if it still passes, you are not asserting content.
- Determinism holds: run the email specs with
--workers=4 --repeat-each=3; a passing run proves the per-recipient filter survives parallelism. - Deliverability is isolated:
--grep @deliverabilityselects only the auth suite, and that CI job iscontinue-on-error/ non-required.
Done When
- The capture tool is chosen against the decision tree and recorded in
.agents/qa-project-context.md(Mailpit for local/CI, a hosted inbox only where a real address is needed). - No email test contains
waitForTimeout/sleep/setTimeoutbefore reading the inbox —grep -rE 'waitForTimeout|sleep\(|setTimeout' tests/over the email specs is clean; arrival is awaited viaexpect.poll/.toPass/ a built-in waiter. - Each email test uses a unique recipient (plus-address or per-test inbox) and filters
reads by that recipient — no
messages[0]/messages.at(-1)without a filter. - OTP extraction uses a template label and rejects distinct competing codes; link extraction parses HTML anchors and requires one match for the exact approved origin, path, and token. Missing or ambiguous results fail before navigation.
- At least the signup-confirmation (or reset / magic-link) flow has a green E2E test that
captures the real email and completes the flow through
page.goto(link). - Content assertions on
subject,from, and link domain exist — not just existence. - Deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) tests, if in scope, live in a separate
@deliverabilitysuite that is non-blocking in CI.
Related Skills
- playwright-automation — the browser-driving half of every email flow: forms, navigation, fixtures, and the poll helpers. This skill adds the inbox side.
- api-testing — go there to test the email provider's API directly or to test that your app sends mail; this skill is about receiving and asserting in an E2E flow.
- test-data-management — generating unique per-test addresses, factories, and seeded users that feed the recipient strategy here.
- qa-project-context — records the chosen capture tool, SMTP target, and credentials so every email test shares one configuration.
Reference Files (in references/)
- mailpit-playwright.md — docker-compose, the
expect.pollMailpit helper, OTP/link extraction utilities, and full password-reset / signup / OTP / magic-link E2E tests. - hosted-inboxes.md — Mailosaur (
messages.getauto-wait, real addresses, structured links/codes), MailSlurp (createInbox+waitForLatestEmail, per-test inbox), ShazaMail (per-test inbox with client deadlines for create/wait), and Ethereal (local preview viacreateTestAccount+getTestMessageUrl). - deliverability.md — SPF/DKIM/DMARC as a separate non-blocking suite, why body-regex and Mailpit don't validate auth, and the Mailosaur deliverability assertion.
FAQ
What does the email-testing skill do?
End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, ShazaMail, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, template-aware extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "ShazaMail," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing
How do I install email-testing?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill email-testing in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/email-testing/ (personal) or .claude/skills/email-testing/ (project).
Which AI agents can use email-testing?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is email-testing safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains email-testing?
It is published by petrkindlmann in petrkindlmann/qa-skills. It has 1,003 recorded installs.
More from petrkindlmann/qa-skills
playwright-automation
petrkindlmann/qa-skills
Write production-grade Playwright tests in TypeScript: Page Object Model, fixtures, auto-waiting, user-facing locators, parallel execution, CI integration, sharding, and installed-version checks. Includes an explicit "do not" list for AI agents. Use when: "Playwright," "write E2E test," "page object," "new Playwright suite," "Playwright config." Not for: fixing one flaky test at runtime — use test-reliability. Not for: bulk regenerating selectors after a UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery. Not for: visual baseline creation/management — use visual-testing. Not for: deep WCAG/axe audits — use accessibility-testing. Related: visual-testing, ci-cd-integration, api-testing, test-reliability, selector-drift-recovery, accessibility-testing.
exploratory-testing
petrkindlmann/qa-skills
Design and execute structured exploratory testing sessions. Covers Session-Based Test Management (SBTM), charter writing, heuristic-based exploration (HICCUPS, FEW HICCUPS), bug discovery patterns, note-taking templates, and conversion of findings to automated tests. Use when: "exploratory testing," "SBTM," "manual testing," "bug hunting," "test charter," "heuristic testing." Not for: an AI browser agent autonomously exploring the app from a natural-language goal — use agentic-browser-testing. Not for: testing your product's own AI/LLM features — use ai-system-testing. Related: test-planning, ai-bug-triage, risk-based-testing, agentic-browser-testing.
test-strategy
petrkindlmann/qa-skills
Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when: "test strategy," "QA strategy doc," "testing approach," "QA roadmap," "multi-quarter QA direction." Not for: a single-sprint or single-release plan — use test-planning. Not for: identifying which areas carry the most risk — use risk-based-testing first. Related: risk-based-testing, qa-metrics, release-readiness, test-planning, test-reliability.
test-planning
petrkindlmann/qa-skills
Build a single sprint or release test plan. Covers feature decomposition into testable scenarios, requirements-to-test coverage mapping, effort estimation by test type, prioritization matrices (risk × effort), resource allocation, and scheduling with buffers. Use when: "sprint test plan," "release test plan," "what to test this sprint," "test estimation," "coverage mapping." Not for: multi-quarter strategy — use test-strategy. Not for: ranking areas by risk — use risk-based-testing. Not for: the go/no-go decision itself — use release-readiness. Related: test-strategy, risk-based-testing, release-readiness.
qa-project-context
petrkindlmann/qa-skills
Create and fill .agents/qa-project-context.md with the project's tech stack, test frameworks, CI/CD pipeline, environments, quality goals, risk areas, team structure, and conventions. This is the one file every other QA skill reads first, so they skip redundant discovery and give context-aware advice. Use when: "set up QA context," "configure testing," "initialize project," first use of any QA skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project's QA end-to-end — use qa-start (which calls this skill as its first step). Related: qa-start, risk-based-testing, test-strategy, qa-metrics, playwright-automation.
risk-based-testing
petrkindlmann/qa-skills
Produce a risk matrix or heatmap that quantifies what could break by business impact × probability, runs failure mode analysis on the top items, and maps test coverage to risk zones. Includes stakeholder interview frameworks and continuous reassessment. Run this BEFORE test-strategy or test-planning. Use when: "risk assessment," "risk matrix," "risk heatmap," "what could break," "critical paths," "failure modes," "where to focus testing." Not for: multi-quarter QA direction — use test-strategy. Not for: a single sprint/release test plan — use test-planning. Not for: hands-on session-based bug hunting — use exploratory-testing. Related: test-strategy, test-planning, release-readiness, qa-metrics.
Popular testing & qa skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
grilling
mattpocock/skills
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
migrate-to-shoehorn
mattpocock/skills
Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.
run-train
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.
test-driven-development
obra/superpowers
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
finishing-a-development-branch
obra/superpowers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work