/hard-cheese

The gate reduces epistemic debt. This debt exists when code passes checks, but the author cannot explain it.

Inputs

/hard-cheese [<slug>] [--socratic-cap N=3] [--passing-score N=3] [--no-judge]

Arguments:

• <slug> identifies the artifact at .cheese/hard-cheese/<slug>.md. This argument is optional. Without it, use the short SHA of HEAD. An explicit slug overrides the SHA.
• --socratic-cap N sets the maximum number of retries. The gate then marks the artifact FAILED and returns a non-zero status. The default is 3. Vibecheck has no limit, but easy-cheese prevents infinite loops.
• --passing-score N sets the minimum SOLO score for PASS. Use a value from 1 through 5. The default is 3. The gate treats a previous PASS below this value as stale.
• --no-judge enables log-only mode. Record the user's explanation with status: LOGGED. Do not start the judge sub-agent. This mode is the easy-cheese equivalent of the optional JSONL telemetry mode in vibecheck. It retains more content. See ## Divergence from the paper.

Invocation modes

--hard passes through /cheese → /mold → /cook (⇄ /press) → /age → /cure → /plate. Only /plate runs /hard-cheese.

See ../cheese/references/harness-portability.md for portability requirements. It covers helper resolution, sub-agent dispatch, GitHub operations, and handoff transitions. Use the bundle or repository helper first. Use ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} only as an optional host fallback. The handoff blocks define the portable contract because slash commands are host renderings, not the control model.

Flow

1. Resolve scope.

   • Set diff_base = origin/main and diff_head = <short-sha of HEAD>.
   • Load .cheese/specs/<slug>.md as the optional intent reference when it exists. The diff remains the source of truth.
   • Use the short SHA of HEAD when no slug exists.
   • If the diff against origin/main is empty, return 0 with "nothing to gate on". Do not write an artifact.

2. Freshness check. Run the freshness check before you run the gate:

   python3 skills/hard-cheese/scripts/hard-cheese.pyz freshness-check \
     --slug <slug> --passing-score <n>
   

   Copy

   The command prints one JSON object and exits 0 for every state. Read its state field. For previously_passed, print "previously passed" and stop. Continue to step 3 for stale or new. A nonzero exit status is an input error; its stderr line is JSON with error and exit_code. A result is stale when HEAD changes or the last PASS score is too low.

3. Rank the hunks, then compose the vibecheck prompt. Keep it faithful to Sankaranarayanan 2026. Use "share for review" to keep the gate implementation independent.

   Run rank-hunks before you compose the prompt:

   python3 skills/hard-cheese/scripts/hard-cheese.pyz rank-hunks \
     --base origin/main --head HEAD
   

   Copy

   Show the ranked regions next to the diff summary, one line per hunk, as path:start-end — reasons. Put the changed lines from every ranked region in the 80-line diff summary before other context. Make no judge call before the first attempt.

   Before this is shared for review, explain in your own words what this change is for. How does <feature or fix> work? Why does it produce the desired behavior? What state, control flow, or invariants does it rely on? Start with the highlighted regions.

   Show a diff summary with the prompt. For /plate, also show the complete final evidence:

   • the final artifact inventory,
   • each {target, backend, verified} completion row,
   • the tracked artifact diff,
   • the quality gate result.

   Stop with a non-zero status when /plate omits one of these four values. Stop with a non-zero status when a completion row has verified: false.

4. Record the user's explanation as free text. Do not provide coaching or example answers. The explanation is the artifact under test.

5. Start the judge sub-agent in a fresh context. Use the same pattern as the /cook fan pathway.

   • Use references/judge-prompt.md as the system prompt.
   • Provide the passing score, diff summary, optional spec excerpt, the targets JSON from rank-hunks, and user's explanation.
   • Require this JSON object: {score, level, pass, feedback, socratic_qs, targets_addressed}.

   See references/judge-prompt.md for the full system prompt and output shape.

   Skip this step when the user sets --no-judge. Mark the attempt status: LOGGED, write the artifact, and return 0.

6. Process the judge result.

   • Mark the attempt PASS when score >= <passing-score>.
   • Mark the attempt FAIL when score < <passing-score>. Show the Socratic questions; at least one question anchors to a ranked hunk from targets_addressed. When targets is empty or absent, skip the anchoring requirement and expect an empty targets_addressed. Return to step 4 while retries remain.
   • Mark the attempt ERROR when the judge fails. Print a warning and return 0. See ## Divergence from the paper.

   Append the attempt row:

   python3 skills/hard-cheese/scripts/hard-cheese.pyz append-attempt \
     --slug <slug> --status <PASS|FAIL|ERROR> --score <n> \
     --feedback "<judge feedback>" --explanation "<user explanation>"
   

   Copy

7. Process an exhausted limit. Set the artifact status: FAILED. Print the artifact path and return a non-zero status. Stop downstream chains.

Artifact

.cheese/hard-cheese/<slug>.md contains the audit trail. The .gitignore file excludes .cheese/, so the audit trail remains local.

Each file starts with this YAML frontmatter block:

---
slug: <slug>
attribution: Sankaranarayanan 2026 / vibecheck
rubric: SOLO Taxonomy (1-5), pass threshold = <passing-score>
passing_score: <n>
divergence: fail-open on judge error (vibecheck fails closed)
diff_base: <sha>
diff_head: <short-sha>
status: PASS | FAIL | FAILED | LOGGED | ERROR
attempts: <n>
---

append-attempt writes the attempt log as this six-column markdown table:

| timestamp | head_sha | status | score | feedback | explanation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-06-25T10:00:00+00:00 | a1b2c3d | FAIL | 2 | "Unistructural: lists steps but no causal link" | <user explanation verbatim> |
| 2026-06-25T10:05:00+00:00 | a1b2c3d | PASS | 4 | "Relational: explains why invariant holds" | <user explanation verbatim> |

Each invocation appends attempts and does not overwrite rows. If HEAD changes, append new rows below the earlier rows.

Sub-agent contract — fresh judge

• Use fresh context for every invocation. The code-writing context can bias the judge.
• Resolve a no-tool or read-only reviewer at powerful power and high effort. Use the shared agent resolver.
• The shared resolver pins each reviewer to powerful. Do not lower this value for the judge.
• Use a general worker only with no-write enforcement. Set degraded: true.
• Use references/judge-prompt.md as the system prompt.
• Give the judge the diff summary, the optional spec excerpt, the targets JSON, and the explanation. Require a JSON reply. Prohibit repository writes.
• Parse the JSON output. On a parse error, log an ERROR attempt and fail open.

The gate requires a host sub-agent feature. Without this feature, recommend /hard-cheese --no-judge to record the explanation without a grade.

Attribution

Sankaranarayanan, S. (2026). Mitigating 'Epistemic Debt' in Generative AI-Scaffolded Novice Programming using Metacognitive Scripts. Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20206

The implementation uses the open-source VS Code extension from the paper's author:

https://github.com/sreecharansankaranarayanan/vibecheck

This SKILL.md, references/judge-prompt.md, and each artifact include the attribution. Thus, the citation stays with the audit trail.

Divergence from the paper

Hard-cheese has three differences from vibecheck:

1. Judge errors. Vibecheck fails closed. The modal blocks code application until the judge recovers or the user retries.

Hard-cheese fails open. The gate records an ERROR, prints a warning, and returns 0.

This policy prevents API failures from blocking pull request work.

2. Telemetry content. Vibecheck records the length of an explanation. It never records the text of an explanation.

Hard-cheese records the complete text of every explanation in the local artifact. The .gitignore file excludes .cheese/, so this text remains on the author's machine.

Tell the user about this retention before --no-judge records the first explanation.

3. Prompt wording. Vibecheck's prompt states its three questions without a lead sentence.

Hard-cheese adds a purpose-first lead sentence and a pointer to the ranked regions. The paper's three questions stay verbatim.

Add each new difference to this section.

Composition with --auto

--hard and --auto can operate together. Terminal /plate --hard pauses automation once before publication, after /plate verifies the final artifacts. The user responds to the prompt. PASS permits publication. FAILED stops publication. ERROR uses the documented fail-open behavior.

Commit-only /plate --hard does not run the gate. That path shares nothing. See references/composition.md for new pull requests and non-TTY behavior.

Output

When the gate ends, print:

Hard-cheese artifact: .cheese/hard-cheese/<slug>.md
Status: PASS | FAILED | LOGGED | ERROR
Score: <n>/5 (<SOLO level>, pass ≥ <passing-score>)
Attempts: <n>

The Score line reports the latest judged attempt. Omit this line for LOGGED mode or an ERROR without a scored attempt.

Then print one applicable message:

• On PASS: Ready to share for review.
• On FAILED: Cap exhausted. Improve understanding of the change before sharing.
• On LOGGED: Telemetry only — judge skipped via --no-judge.
• On ERROR: Print one warning that identifies the failure. Include Fail-open divergence active — gate exited 0; you may share for review at your discretion.

Preferred tools and fallbacks

Rules

• Run the judge sub-agent in fresh context. Do not use the code-writing context to grade the author's understanding.
• Do not coach the user before the answer. The explanation is the artifact under test.
• Show only the judge's Socratic questions after a FAIL. Do not add hints.
• Show the ranked regions; add no question or hint before the first attempt.
• Pass the user's explanation to the judge unchanged.
• Always run the freshness check. A changed HEAD requires a new attempt sequence.
• Record every ERROR attempt. Show a warning for each judge failure.
• Do not call a GitHub tool or a pull request tool. The gate operates before code enters review.
• Apply the shared voice rules from ../age/references/voice.md. Report the result. Classify the residual risk as certain | speculating | don't know.
• Do not describe FAILED as "almost passing".

References

• references/judge-prompt.md defines the SOLO Taxonomy rubric, judge prompt, and JSON output.
• references/composition.md defines the complete --hard and --auto matrix.
• references/commands.md lists the generated bundle commands.

Agent resolution

Resolve the fresh judge through ../cheese/references/agent-resolution.md.

The canonical hard-cheese audit includes the shared agent_resolution block.