MCPInstall

review-animations

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Installs
948
Last 24h
+18
Trending rank
#6255
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill review-animations
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads review-animations automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Reviewing Animations

A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

Operating Posture

You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass. Default to flagging. Approval is earned, not assumed.

The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review method — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteria — is adapted from aggressive code-quality review.

For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see STANDARDS.md. Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.

The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards

Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.

  1. Justified motion. Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a block.

  2. Frequency-appropriate. Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get no animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.

  3. Responsive easing. Entering/exiting elements use ease-out or a strong custom curve. ease-in on UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.

  4. Sub-300ms UI. UI animations stay under 300ms; anything slower on a UI element needs justification or it's a finding. Per-element budgets live in STANDARDS.md.

  5. Origin & physical correctness. Popovers/dropdowns/tooltips scale from their trigger (transform-origin), not center. Never animate from scale(0) — start from scale(0.9–0.97) + opacity (Modals are exempt — they stay centered.)

  6. Interruptibility. Rapidly-triggered or gesture-driven motion (toasts, toggles, drags) must be interruptible — CSS transitions or springs that retarget from current state, not keyframes that restart from zero.

  7. GPU-only properties. Animate transform and opacity only. Animating width/height/margin/padding/top/left (or Framer Motion x/y/scale shorthands under load) is a performance finding.

  8. Accessibility. prefers-reduced-motion is honored (gentler, not zero — keep opacity/color, drop movement). Hover animations are gated behind @media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine).

  9. Asymmetric enter/exit. Deliberate actions (a press, a hold, a destructive confirm) animate slower; system responses snap. Symmetric timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction is a finding.

  10. Cohesion. Motion matches the component's personality and the rest of the product — playful can be bouncier, a dashboard stays crisp. Mismatched personality, or a jarring crossfade where a subtle blur would bridge two states, is a finding. When unsure whether motion feels right, the strongest move is often to delete it.

Aggressive Escalation Triggers

Flag these on sight, hard:

  • transition: all (unbounded property animation)
  • scale(0) or pure-fade entrances with no initial transform
  • ease-in on any UI interaction; weak built-in easing on a deliberate animation
  • Animation on a keyboard shortcut, command-palette toggle, or 100+/day action
  • UI duration > 300ms with no stated reason
  • transform-origin: center on a trigger-anchored popover/dropdown/tooltip
  • Keyframes on toasts, toggles, or anything added/triggered rapidly
  • Animating layout properties (width/height/margin/padding/top/left)
  • Framer Motion x/y/scale props on motion that runs while the page is busy
  • Updating a CSS variable on a parent to drive a child transform (style recalc storm)
  • Missing prefers-reduced-motion handling on movement
  • Ungated :hover motion
  • Symmetric enter/exit timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction
  • Everything-at-once entrance where a 30–80ms stagger belongs

Remedial Preference Hierarchy

When proposing fixes, prefer earlier moves over later ones:

  1. Delete the animation (high-frequency / no purpose / keyboard-triggered).
  2. Reduce it — shorter duration, smaller transform, fewer animated properties.
  3. Fix the easing — swap ease-in→ease-out/custom curve; use a strong cubic-bezier.
  4. Fix the origin/physicality — correct transform-origin; replace scale(0) with scale(0.95)+opacity.
  5. Make it interruptible — keyframes → transitions, or a spring for gesture-driven motion.
  6. Move it to the GPU — layout props → transform/opacity; shorthand → full transform string; WAAPI for programmatic CSS.
  7. Asymmetric timing — slow the deliberate phase, snap the response.
  8. Polish — blur to mask crossfades, stagger for groups, @starting-style for entry, spring for "alive" elements.
  9. Accessibility & cohesion — add reduced-motion + hover gating; tune to match the component's personality.

Required Output Format

Two parts, in this order.

Part 1 — Findings table (REQUIRED)

A single markdown table. One row per issue. Never a "Before:/After:" list.

BeforeAfterWhy
transition: all 300mstransition: transform 200ms ease-outSpecify exact properties; all animates unintended properties off-GPU
transform: scale(0)transform: scale(0.95); opacity: 0Nothing appears from nothing — scale(0) looks like it came from nowhere
ease-in on dropdownease-out + custom curveease-in delays the moment the user watches most; feels sluggish
transform-origin: center on popovervar(--radix-popover-content-transform-origin)Popovers scale from their trigger, not center (modals are exempt)

Part 2 — Verdict (REQUIRED)

Group remaining commentary by impact tier, highest first. Omit empty tiers.

  1. Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.
  2. Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.
  3. Performance — non-GPU properties, dropped-frame risks, recalc storms.
  4. Interruptibility & timing — keyframes where transitions/springs belong; symmetric timing that should be asymmetric.
  5. Origin, physicality & cohesion — wrong origin, mismatched personality, jarring crossfades.
  6. Accessibility — reduced-motion and pointer/hover gating.

Close with an explicit decision:

  • Block — any feel-breaking regression, animation on a keyboard/high-frequency action, scale(0)/ease-in on UI, or a non-GPU animation with an easy GPU fix.
  • Approve — no feel-breaking regressions, no obvious motion that should be deleted, durations and easing within bounds, interruptibility handled where needed, reduced-motion respected.

Be specific and cite file:line. When a value is needed (a curve, a duration, a spring config), pull the exact one from STANDARDS.md rather than approximating.

Guidelines

  • Prefer CSS transitions/@starting-style/WAAPI for predetermined motion; JS/springs for dynamic, interruptible, gesture-driven motion.
  • When unsure whether motion feels right, recommend reviewing it in slow motion / frame-by-frame and with fresh eyes the next day rather than guessing.

FAQ

What does the review-animations skill do?

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

How do I install review-animations?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill review-animations in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/review-animations/ (personal) or .claude/skills/review-animations/ (project).

Which AI agents can use review-animations?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is review-animations safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains review-animations?

It is published by nexu-io in nexu-io/open-design. It has 948 recorded installs.

More from nexu-io/open-design

View all →

ui-ux-pro-max

nexu-io/open-design

Catalog-only UI/UX Pro Max entry. The full upstream templates, data, and search workflow are not bundled in OpenDesign.

Frontend & Design5.4K installs

frontend-design

nexu-io/open-design

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with strong visual direction, polished typography, considered layout, and working HTML/CSS/JS or framework code. Use for websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, application screens, and UI beautification.

Frontend & Design4.8K installs

web-design-guidelines

nexu-io/open-design

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance by the Vercel engineering team. Covers layout, typography, color, motion, and accessibility for product UI.

Frontend & Design3.9K installs

design-brief

nexu-io/open-design

Parse a structured design brief written in I-Lang protocol format into a concrete design spec. Eliminates ambiguity from vague requests like "make it professional" by requiring explicit dimensions: palette, typography, layout, mood, density, and constraints. Trigger keywords: "design brief", "create a design brief", "ilang brief", "structured brief".

Frontend & Design3.4K installs

creative-director

nexu-io/open-design

AI creative director with recursive self-assessment: 20+ methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Bisociation, SCAMPER, Synectics), 3-axis evaluation calibrated against Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind, 5-phase process from brief to presentation.

Media & Creative3.4K installs

threejs

nexu-io/open-design

Three.js skills for creating 3D elements and interactive experiences in the browser — scenes, materials, controls, and post-processing.

Media & Creative3.4K installs

Popular code quality & workflow skills

View category →

grill-me

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

handoff

mattpocock/skills

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

domain-modeling

mattpocock/skills

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

codebase-design

mattpocock/skills

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

diagnosing-bugs

mattpocock/skills

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.