MCPInstall

attach-review-to-pr

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

Installs
1.2K
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill attach-review-to-pr
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads attach-review-to-pr automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

How to Attach Line-Specific Review Comments to Pull Requests

This guide explains how to add line-specific review comments to pull requests using the GitHub CLI (gh) API or mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment if it not available, similar to how the GitHub UI allows commenting on specific lines of code.

Preferred Approach: Using MCP GitHub Tools

If available, use the mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment MCP tool for posting line-specific inline comments on pull requests. This approach provides better integration with GitHub's UI and is the recommended method.

Fallback: If the MCP tool is not available, use the GitHub CLI (gh) API methods described below:

Overview

While gh pr review provides basic review functionality (approve, request changes, general comments), it does not support line-specific comments directly. To add comments on specific lines of code, you must use the lower-level gh api command to call GitHub's REST API directly.

Prerequisites

  1. GitHub CLI installed and authenticated:

    gh auth status
    
  2. Access to the repository and pull request you want to review

Understanding GitHub's Review Comment System

GitHub has two types of PR comments:

  1. Issue Comments - General comments on the PR conversation
  2. Review Comments - Line-specific comments on code changes

Review comments can be added in two ways:

  • Single comment - Using the /pulls/{pr}/comments endpoint
  • Review with multiple comments - Using the /pulls/{pr}/reviews endpoint

Adding a Single Line-Specific Comment

Basic Syntax

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
  -f body='Your comment text here' \
  -f commit_id='<commit-sha>' \
  -f path='path/to/file.js' \
  -F line=42 \
  -f side='RIGHT'

Parameters Explained

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
bodystringYesThe text of the review comment (supports Markdown)
commit_idstringYesThe SHA of the commit to comment on
pathstringYesRelative path to the file being commented on
lineintegerYesThe line number in the diff (use -F for integers)
sidestringYesRIGHT for new/modified lines, LEFT for deleted lines
start_lineintegerNoFor multi-line comments, the starting line
start_sidestringNoFor multi-line comments, the starting side

Parameter Flags

  • -f (--field) - For string values
  • -F (--field) - For integer values (note the capital F)

Complete Example

# First, get the latest commit SHA for the PR
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4 --jq '.head.sha'

# Then add your comment
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/comments \
  -f body='Consider adding error handling here. Should we confirm the lesson was successfully marked as completed before navigating away?' \
  -f commit_id='e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4' \
  -f path='src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx' \
  -F line=26 \
  -f side='RIGHT'

Understanding Line Numbers

The line parameter refers to the position in the diff, not the absolute line number in the file:

  • For new files: Line numbers match the file's line numbers
  • For modified files: Use the line number as it appears in the "Files changed" tab
  • For multi-line comments: Use start_line and line to specify the range

Response

On success, returns a JSON object with comment details:

{
  "id": 2532291222,
  "pull_request_review_id": 3470545909,
  "path": "src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx",
  "line": 26,
  "body": "Consider adding error handling here...",
  "html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#discussion_r2532291222",
  "created_at": "2025-11-16T22:40:46Z"
}

Adding Multiple Line-Specific Comments Together

To add multiple comments across different files in a single review, use the /reviews endpoint with JSON input.

Why Use Reviews for Multiple Comments?

  • Atomic operation - All comments are added together
  • Single notification - Doesn't spam with multiple notifications
  • Better UX - Appears as one cohesive review
  • Same mechanism as GitHub UI - "Start a review" → "Finish review"

Basic Syntax

cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews --input -
{
  "event": "COMMENT",
  "body": "Overall review summary (optional)",
  "comments": [
    {
      "path": "file1.tsx",
      "body": "Comment on file 1",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 15
    },
    {
      "path": "file2.tsx",
      "body": "Comment on file 2",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 30
    }
  ]
}
EOF

Review Event Types

EventDescriptionWhen to Use
COMMENTGeneral review commentJust leaving feedback without approval
APPROVEApprove the PRChanges look good, ready to merge
REQUEST_CHANGESRequest changesIssues that must be fixed before merge

Complete Example

cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/reviews --input -
{
  "event": "COMMENT",
  "body": "Testing multiple line-specific comments via gh api",
  "comments": [
    {
      "path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
      "body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 15
    },
    {
      "path": "src/components/CourseProgressWidget.tsx",
      "body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 30
    },
    {
      "path": "src/components/LessonProgressTracker.tsx",
      "body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 20
    }
  ]
}
EOF

Response

{
  "id": 3470546747,
  "state": "COMMENTED",
  "html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#pullrequestreview-3470546747",
  "submitted_at": "2025-11-16T22:42:43Z",
  "commit_id": "e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4"
}

Common Issues and Solutions

Issue 1: "user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"

Error Message:

gh: Validation Failed (HTTP 422)
{"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequestReview","code":"custom","field":"user_id","message":"user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"}]}

Cause: GitHub only allows one pending (unsubmitted) review per user per PR. If you previously started a review through the UI or API and didn't submit it, it blocks new review creation.

Solution 1: Submit the pending review

# Check for pending reviews
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews | jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING")'

# Submit it through the UI or ask the user to submit it

Solution 2: Use the single comment endpoint instead

# Add individual comments without creating a review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
  -f body='Comment text' \
  -f commit_id='<sha>' \
  -f path='file.tsx' \
  -F line=26 \
  -f side='RIGHT'

Issue 2: Array syntax not working with --raw-field

Failed Attempt:

# This does NOT work - GitHub API receives an object, not an array
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews \
  --raw-field 'comments[0][path]=file1.tsx' \
  --raw-field 'comments[0][line]=15' \
  --raw-field 'comments[1][path]=file2.tsx' \
  --raw-field 'comments[1][line]=30'

Error:

Invalid request. For 'properties/comments', {"0" => {...}, "1" => {...}} is not an array.

Solution: Use JSON input via heredoc:

cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews --input -
{
  "comments": [...]
}
EOF

Issue 3: Invalid line number

Error Message:

Pull request review thread line must be part of the diff

Cause: The line number doesn't exist in the diff for this file.

Solutions:

  • Verify the file was actually changed in this PR
  • Check the "Files changed" tab to see actual line numbers in the diff
  • Ensure you're using the correct commit_id (the latest commit in the PR)

Issue 4: Wrong commit_id

Error Message:

commit_sha is not part of the pull request

Solution: Get the latest commit SHA:

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number} --jq '.head.sha'

Best Practices

1. Get PR Information First

Before adding comments, gather necessary information:

# Get PR details
gh pr view {pr_number} --json headRefOid,files

# Or use the API
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number} --jq '{commit: .head.sha, files: [.changed_files]}'

# List files changed
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/files --jq '.[] | {filename: .filename, additions: .additions, deletions: .deletions}'

2. Check for Pending Reviews

# Check if you have a pending review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews \
  --jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING" and .user.login=="YOUR_USERNAME")'

3. Use Meaningful Comment Text

  • Be specific and constructive
  • Reference documentation or best practices
  • Suggest alternatives when requesting changes
  • Use code blocks for code suggestions:
Consider using async/await:

\`\`\`typescript
async function getData() {
  const result = await fetch(url);
  return result.json();
}
\`\`\`

4. Batch Related Comments

Use the review endpoint to group related comments:

  • All comments for a single file/area
  • All comments for a specific concern (security, performance, etc.)
  • Complete review session

5. Choose the Right Event Type

# For feedback during development
"event": "COMMENT"

# When approving
"event": "APPROVE"

# When blocking merge
"event": "REQUEST_CHANGES"

Workflow Examples

Example 1: Quick Single Comment

#!/bin/bash
OWNER="NeoLabHQ"
REPO="learning-platform-app"
PR=4

# Get latest commit
COMMIT=$(gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR --jq '.head.sha')

# Add comment
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments \
  -f body='Consider extracting this into a separate function for better testability' \
  -f commit_id="$COMMIT" \
  -f path='src/utils/validation.ts' \
  -F line=45 \
  -f side='RIGHT'

Example 2: Comprehensive Review

#!/bin/bash
OWNER="NeoLabHQ"
REPO="learning-platform-app"
PR=4

# Create review with multiple comments
cat <<EOF | gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --input -
{
  "event": "COMMENT",
  "body": "Thanks for the PR! I've reviewed the changes and have a few suggestions.",
  "comments": [
    {
      "path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
      "body": "Consider memoizing this component to prevent unnecessary re-renders",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 25
    },
    {
      "path": "src/utils/courseProgress.ts",
      "body": "This function could benefit from error handling for invalid course IDs",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 12
    },
    {
      "path": "src/state/CourseProgressState.ts",
      "body": "Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the expected behavior",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 8
    }
  ]
}
EOF

Example 3: Multi-line Comment

# Comment on a range of lines (e.g., lines 10-15)
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments \
  -f body='This entire block could be simplified using array destructuring' \
  -f commit_id="$COMMIT" \
  -f path='src/utils/parser.ts' \
  -F start_line=10 \
  -f start_side='RIGHT' \
  -F line=15 \
  -f side='RIGHT'

Helpful Helper Scripts

Get PR Files and Lines

#!/bin/bash
# pr-files.sh - List all files changed in a PR with line counts

OWNER="$1"
REPO="$2"
PR="$3"

gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/files --jq '.[] | "\(.filename): +\(.additions)/-\(.deletions)"'

Check Review Status

#!/bin/bash
# check-reviews.sh - Check review status for a PR

OWNER="$1"
REPO="$2"
PR="$3"

echo "=== Reviews ==="
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --jq '.[] | "\(.user.login): \(.state) at \(.submitted_at)"'

echo -e "\n=== Pending Reviews ==="
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING") | "\(.user.login): \(.state)"'

Related Documentation

API Reference

POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/comments

Creates a review comment on a specific line.

Endpoint: https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/comments

Parameters:

  • body (string, required): Comment text
  • commit_id (string, required): SHA of commit
  • path (string, required): Relative file path
  • line (integer, required): Line number in diff
  • side (string, required): "LEFT" or "RIGHT"
  • start_line (integer, optional): Start line for multi-line
  • start_side (string, optional): Start side for multi-line

POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews

Creates a review with optional line-specific comments.

Endpoint: https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews

Parameters:

  • event (string, required): "APPROVE", "REQUEST_CHANGES", or "COMMENT"
  • body (string, optional): Overall review comment
  • comments (array, optional): Array of comment objects
  • commit_id (string, optional): SHA of commit to review

Comment Object:

  • path (string, required): Relative file path
  • body (string, required): Comment text
  • line (integer, required): Line number in diff
  • side (string, required): "LEFT" or "RIGHT"
  • start_line (integer, optional): Start line for multi-line
  • start_side (string, optional): Start side for multi-line

FAQ

What does the attach-review-to-pr skill do?

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

How do I install attach-review-to-pr?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill attach-review-to-pr in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/attach-review-to-pr/ (personal) or .claude/skills/attach-review-to-pr/ (project).

Which AI agents can use attach-review-to-pr?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is attach-review-to-pr safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains attach-review-to-pr?

It is published by neolabhq in neolabhq/context-engineering-kit. It has 1,172 recorded installs.

More from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

View all →

prompt-engineering

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use this skill when you writing commands, hooks, skills for Agent, or prompts for sub agents or any other LLM interaction, including optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.

AI & Agents1.4K installs

thought-based-reasoning

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns

Frontend & Design1.4K installs

context-engineering

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Understand the components, mechanics, and constraints of context in agent systems. Use when writing, editing, or optimizing commands, skills, or sub-agents prompts.

AI & Agents1.4K installs

reflect

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification

1.4K installs

write-concisely

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Apply writing rules to any documentation that humans will read. Makes your writing clearer, stronger, and more professional.

Docs & Writing1.3K installs

kaizen

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use when Code implementation and refactoring, architecturing or designing systems, process and workflow improvements, error handling and validation. Provide tehniquest to avoid over-engineering and apply iterative improvements.

Popular code quality & workflow skills

View category →

grill-me

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

handoff

mattpocock/skills

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

domain-modeling

mattpocock/skills

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

codebase-design

mattpocock/skills

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

diagnosing-bugs

mattpocock/skills

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.