
analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents
Analyzes network traffic captures and flow data to identify adversary activity during security incidents, including command-and-control communications, lateral movement, data exfiltration, and exploitation attempts. Uses Wireshark, Zeek, and NetFlow analysis techniques. Activates for requests involving network traffic analysis, packet capture investigation, PCAP analysis, network forensics, C2 traffic detection, or exfiltration detection.
- Installs
- 432
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Analyzing Network Traffic for Incidents
When to Use
- SIEM alerts on anomalous network traffic patterns requiring deeper investigation
- C2 beaconing is suspected and needs confirmation through packet-level analysis
- Data exfiltration volume or destination must be quantified from network evidence
- Lateral movement between systems needs to be traced through network connections
- An IDS/IPS alert requires packet-level validation to confirm or dismiss
Do not use for host-based forensic analysis (process execution, file system artifacts); use endpoint forensics tools instead.
Prerequisites
- Full packet capture (PCAP) infrastructure or on-demand capture capability (network tap, SPAN port)
- Wireshark installed on the analysis workstation with appropriate display filters knowledge
- Zeek (formerly Bro) deployed for network metadata generation (conn.log, dns.log, http.log, ssl.log)
- NetFlow/IPFIX collection from network devices for traffic flow analysis
- Network architecture diagram showing VLAN layout, firewall placement, and monitoring points
- Threat intelligence feeds for correlating observed network indicators
Workflow
Step 1: Capture or Acquire Network Traffic
Obtain the relevant traffic data for the investigation:
Live Capture (if incident is active):
# Capture on specific interface filtering by host
tcpdump -i eth0 -w capture.pcap host 10.1.5.42
# Capture C2 traffic to specific external IP
tcpdump -i eth0 -w c2_traffic.pcap host 185.220.101.42
# Capture with rotation (1GB files, keep 10)
tcpdump -i eth0 -w capture_%Y%m%d%H%M.pcap -C 1000 -W 10
From Existing Infrastructure:
- Export PCAP from full packet capture appliance (Arkime/Moloch, ExtraHop, Corelight)
- Pull Zeek logs from the Zeek cluster for the investigation timeframe
- Export NetFlow data from network devices for high-level traffic analysis
Step 2: Identify C2 Communications
Detect command-and-control traffic patterns:
Beaconing Detection (Zeek conn.log):
# Extract connections to external IPs with regular intervals
cat conn.log | zeek-cut ts id.orig_h id.resp_h id.resp_p duration orig_bytes resp_bytes \
| awk '$4 ~ /^185\.220/' | sort -t. -k1,1n -k2,2n
Wireshark Beacon Analysis:
# Filter for traffic to suspected C2 IP
ip.addr == 185.220.101.42
# Filter HTTPS traffic to non-standard ports
tcp.port != 443 && ssl
# Filter DNS queries for suspicious domains
dns.qry.name contains "evil" or dns.qry.name matches "^[a-z0-9]{32}\."
# Filter HTTP POST (common C2 check-in method)
http.request.method == "POST" && ip.dst == 185.220.101.42
Beaconing characteristics to identify:
- Regular time intervals between connections (e.g., every 60 seconds with 10-15% jitter)
- Consistent packet sizes in requests and responses
- HTTPS to external IPs not associated with legitimate CDNs or services
- DNS queries with high entropy subdomains (DNS tunneling indicator)
Step 3: Analyze Lateral Movement Traffic
Trace adversary movement between internal systems:
Key protocols for lateral movement detection:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SMB (TCP 445): PsExec, file share access, ransomware propagation
RDP (TCP 3389): Remote desktop sessions
WinRM (TCP 5985): PowerShell remoting
WMI (TCP 135): Remote command execution
SSH (TCP 22): Linux lateral movement
DCE/RPC (TCP 135): DCOM-based lateral movement
Wireshark Filters for Lateral Movement:
# SMB lateral movement
smb2 && ip.src == 10.1.5.42 && ip.dst != 10.1.5.42
# RDP connections from compromised host
tcp.dstport == 3389 && ip.src == 10.1.5.42
# Kerberos ticket requests (potential pass-the-ticket)
kerberos.msg_type == 12 && ip.src == 10.1.5.42
# NTLM authentication (potential pass-the-hash)
ntlmssp.auth.username && ip.src == 10.1.5.42
Step 4: Detect Data Exfiltration
Identify unauthorized data transfers leaving the network:
# Identify large outbound transfers in Zeek conn.log
cat conn.log | zeek-cut ts id.orig_h id.resp_h id.resp_p orig_bytes \
| awk '$5 > 100000000' | sort -t$'\t' -k5 -rn
# DNS tunneling detection (high volume of TXT queries)
cat dns.log | zeek-cut query qtype | grep TXT | cut -f1 \
| rev | cut -d. -f1,2 | rev | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head
# Unusual protocol usage (ICMP tunneling, DNS over HTTPS)
cat conn.log | zeek-cut proto id.resp_p orig_bytes | awk '$1 == "icmp" && $3 > 1000'
Wireshark Exfiltration Filters:
# Large HTTP POST uploads
http.request.method == "POST" && tcp.len > 10000
# FTP data transfers
ftp-data && ip.src == 10.0.0.0/8
# DNS with large TXT responses (tunneling)
dns.resp.type == 16 && dns.resp.len > 200
Step 5: Extract and Correlate IOCs
Pull network-based indicators from traffic analysis:
- External IP addresses contacted by compromised hosts
- Domains resolved via DNS during the incident timeframe
- URLs accessed via HTTP/HTTPS (if SSL inspection is in place)
- TLS certificate details (subject, issuer, serial number, JA3/JA3S hashes)
- User-Agent strings from HTTP requests
- File transfers captured in PCAP (extract using Wireshark Export Objects)
Step 6: Document Network Forensic Findings
Compile analysis into a structured report with evidence references:
- Reference specific PCAP files, frame numbers, and timestamps for each finding
- Include packet captures of key evidence as screenshots or exported PDFs
- Map network activity to the incident timeline
- Correlate network findings with host-based evidence from endpoint forensics
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| PCAP (Packet Capture) | File format storing raw network packets captured from a network interface for offline analysis |
| Beaconing | Regular, periodic network connections from a compromised host to a C2 server, identifiable by consistent timing intervals |
| JA3/JA3S | TLS client and server fingerprinting method based on the ClientHello and ServerHello parameters; unique per application |
| NetFlow/IPFIX | Network traffic metadata (source, destination, ports, bytes, duration) collected by routers and switches without full packet capture |
| DNS Tunneling | Technique encoding data in DNS queries and responses to exfiltrate data or maintain C2 through DNS protocol |
| Network Tap | Hardware device that creates an exact copy of network traffic for monitoring without impacting network performance |
| Zeek Logs | Structured metadata logs generated by the Zeek network analysis framework covering connections, DNS, HTTP, SSL, and more |
Tools & Systems
- Wireshark: Open-source packet analyzer for deep inspection of network protocols at the packet level
- Zeek (formerly Bro): Network analysis framework generating structured metadata logs from live or captured traffic
- Arkime (formerly Moloch): Open-source full packet capture and search platform for large-scale network forensics
- NetworkMiner: Network forensic analysis tool for extracting files, images, and credentials from PCAP files
- RITA (Real Intelligence Threat Analytics): Open-source beacon detection and DNS tunneling analysis tool for Zeek logs
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Confirming C2 Beaconing and Quantifying Exfiltration
Context: EDR detects a suspicious process on a workstation but cannot determine the volume of data exfiltrated. Network team provides PCAP from the full packet capture appliance covering the incident timeframe.
Approach:
- Filter PCAP to traffic from the compromised host IP to external destinations
- Identify the C2 channel by analyzing connection timing patterns (beacon detection)
- Extract TLS certificate and JA3 hash from the C2 connection for IOC generation
- Calculate total bytes transferred to C2 infrastructure over the incident duration
- Check for additional exfiltration channels (DNS tunneling, cloud storage uploads)
- Extract any unencrypted files transferred using Wireshark Export Objects feature
Pitfalls:
- Analyzing only HTTP traffic when C2 is operating over HTTPS without SSL inspection
- Missing DNS tunneling because the data volume per query is small (but total over time is significant)
- Not correlating network timestamps with endpoint timestamps (timezone mismatches)
- Overlooking legitimate cloud services abused for exfiltration (OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox)
Output Format
NETWORK TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT
=================================
Incident: INC-2025-1547
Analyst: [Name]
Capture Source: Arkime full packet capture
Analysis Period: 2025-11-15 14:00 UTC - 2025-11-15 18:00 UTC
Total PCAP Size: 4.7 GB
C2 COMMUNICATIONS
Source: 10.1.5.42 (WKSTN-042)
Destination: 185.220.101.42:443 (HTTPS)
Beacon Interval: 60 seconds ± 12% jitter
Sessions: 237 connections over 4 hours
JA3 Hash: a0e9f5d64349fb13191bc781f81f42e1
TLS Certificate: CN=update.evil[.]com (self-signed)
Total Data Sent: 147 MB (outbound)
Total Data Recv: 2.3 MB (inbound - commands)
LATERAL MOVEMENT
10.1.5.42 → 10.1.10.15 (SMB, TCP 445) - 14:35 UTC
10.1.5.42 → 10.1.10.20 (RDP, TCP 3389) - 14:42 UTC
10.1.5.42 → 10.1.1.5 (LDAP, TCP 389) - 15:10 UTC
EXFILTRATION SUMMARY
Protocol: HTTPS to C2 server
Volume: 147 MB outbound
Duration: 14:23 UTC - 18:00 UTC
Files Extracted: [list if recoverable from unencrypted channels]
DNS ANALYSIS
Suspicious Queries: 0 DNS tunneling indicators
DGA Detection: 0 algorithmically generated domains
EVIDENCE REFERENCES
PCAP File: INC-2025-1547_capture.pcap (SHA-256: ...)
Zeek Logs: /logs/zeek/2025-11-15/ (conn.log, ssl.log, dns.log)
FAQ
What does the analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents skill do?
Analyzes network traffic captures and flow data to identify adversary activity during security incidents, including command-and-control communications, lateral movement, data exfiltration, and exploitation attempts. Uses Wireshark, Zeek, and NetFlow analysis techniques. Activates for requests involving network traffic analysis, packet capture investigation, PCAP analysis, network forensics, C2 traffic detection, or exfiltration detection.
How do I install analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents/ (personal) or .claude/skills/analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents/ (project).
Which AI agents can use analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents?
It is published by mukul975 in mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills. It has 432 recorded installs.
More from mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
testing-api-security-with-owasp-top-10
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Systematically assesses REST, GraphQL, and gRPC API endpoints against the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) using Burp Suite and Postman for automated and manual testing. Use during authorized API penetration tests, before deploying new endpoints to production, or when validating API gateway controls and rate limiting.
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.
analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
performing-web-application-penetration-test
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Performs systematic security testing of web applications following the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) methodology to identify vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, input validation, session management, and business logic. The tester uses Burp Suite as the primary interception proxy alongside manual testing techniques to find flaws that automated scanners miss. Activates for requests involving web app pentest, OWASP testing, application security assessment, or web vulnerability testing.
testing-for-xss-vulnerabilities
mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
Tests web applications for reflected, stored, and DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting by injecting JavaScript payloads with Burp Suite (XSS extensions, Active Scan++) and browser tools, then bypassing sanitization and CSP to demonstrate session hijacking and user impersonation. Use for OWASP WSTG client-side injection testing or when evaluating input sanitization and output encoding coverage.
Popular ai & agents skills
google-agents-cli-publish
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "publish an agent", "publish my ADK agent", "register an agent with Gemini", "publish to Gemini" (formerly Gemini Enterprise), or needs guidance on the agents-cli publish gemini command. Also use when the user wants to "manage agents in Agent Registry", "list/update/delete registered agents", or "register an MCP server". Covers ADK vs A2A registration modes, programmatic and interactive usage, flag reference, auto-detection from deployment metadata, Agent Registry fleet management, and troubleshooting. Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy).
google-agents-cli-eval
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics, dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. Applies to any agents-cli project, whatever framework the agent is written in. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).
skill-creator
anthropics/skills
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
codex-pet
prime-skills/runcomfy-agent-skills
Codex Pet generator on RunComfy. Build a Codex-compatible Codex Pet spritesheet.webp + pet.json from a single reference image, drop it into ${CODEXHOME:-$HOME/.codex}/pets/ / and Codex picks it up as a custom Codex Pet next to the 8 built-ins. This skill produces the exact Codex Pet atlas Codex expects (1536x1872 PNG/WebP, 8 cols x 9 rows, 192x208 cells, 9 animation states — idle, running-right, running-left, waving, jumping, failed, waiting, running, review). Calls OpenAI GPT Image 2 edit ONCE via the local RunComfy CLI as runcomfy run openai/gpt-image-2/edit to produce a canonical Codex Pet pose, then assembles all 9 animation rows programmatically with ImageMagick micro-transforms — no Codex Pro, no $imagegen, no OPENAIAPIKEY required, only RUNCOMFYTOKEN. Triggers on "codex pet", "create codex pet", "make codex pet", "hatch codex pet", "/hatch image", "desktop pet codex", "codex pets", "spritesheet.webp", or any explicit ask to build a custom pet for OpenAI Codex.
full-output-enforcement
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
executing-plans
obra/superpowers
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available