career-document-architect
Guides the creation of career documents for academic advancement including research statements, teaching statements, diversity statements, CVs, and biosketches. Combines strategic positioning, narrative coherence, and institutional alignment with authentic representation of contributions and vision. Use when writing or reviewing faculty applications, fellowship statements, promotion packages, award applications, or when user mentions research statement, teaching philosophy, diversity statement, biosketch, academic CV, or career narrative.
- Installs
- 131
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill career-document-architect- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads career-document-architect automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Career Document Architect
Table of Contents
Related skills (use instead for):
- Grant proposals:
grant-proposal-assistant - Recommendation letters:
academic-letter-architect - Manuscript writing:
scientific-manuscript-review
Core Principles
1. Vision + Track Record: Show where you're going AND what you've accomplished
2. Coherent Narrative: All pieces should tell a unified story
3. Audience Awareness: Tailor depth and framing to readers
4. Evidence-Based Claims: Support assertions with specifics
5. Future-Oriented: Emphasize trajectory and potential
6. Authentic Voice: Represent yourself genuinely
Workflow
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Career Document Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify document type and audience
- [ ] Step 2: Gather raw materials (CV, accomplishments)
- [ ] Step 3: Develop core narrative thread
- [ ] Step 4: Draft document using appropriate framework
- [ ] Step 5: Add evidence and specifics
- [ ] Step 6: Align with institutional expectations
- [ ] Step 7: Polish and format
Step 1: Identify Type and Audience
Determine document type (research/teaching/diversity statement, CV, biosketch). Identify audience (search committee, review panel). Note any specific requirements (page limits, format specifications). See resources/methodology.md for audience considerations.
Step 2: Gather Raw Materials
Compile: Current CV, publications, grants, teaching evaluations, mentorship record, outreach activities, preliminary data, future plans. See resources/methodology.md for comprehensive list.
Step 3: Develop Core Narrative
Identify the through-line connecting your work. What question drives you? What impact do you seek? How does past work connect to future plans? See resources/methodology.md for narrative construction.
Step 4: Draft Using Framework
Select appropriate framework for document type. Follow structure that matches institutional norms. See Document Frameworks for each type.
Step 5: Add Evidence and Specifics
Replace generic claims with specific accomplishments. Quantify where possible (papers, citations, students mentored). Add concrete examples for abstract claims.
Step 6: Align with Institution
Research institution's priorities. Emphasize fit without fabricating. Address how you contribute to their mission. See resources/methodology.md for alignment strategies.
Step 7: Polish and Format
Check length constraints. Ensure consistent formatting. Proofread carefully. Validate using resources/evaluators/rubric_career_document.json. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.
Document Frameworks
Research Statement
Purpose: Articulate research vision, demonstrate independence, show future potential
Length: Typically 2-5 pages (check requirements)
Structure:
OPENING (1 paragraph)
- Hook: Compelling statement of your research focus
- Big picture: Why this matters to the field/society
- Your role: How you contribute to addressing this
PAST RESEARCH (1-2 pages)
- Organize by themes, not chronology
- Highlight key contributions with impact
- Show how past work builds foundation for future
- Include quantifiable outcomes (papers, citations, methods)
CURRENT RESEARCH (0.5-1 page)
- Ongoing projects and preliminary results
- Bridge between past and future
- Show productivity and momentum
FUTURE DIRECTIONS (1-2 pages)
- 2-3 specific research directions
- For each: Why important? What's the approach? What's expected impact?
- Show independence and creativity
- Connect to fundable questions (NIH/NSF relevance)
CLOSING (1 paragraph)
- Synthesis: How pieces fit together
- Why this institution/department
- Broader impact statement
Teaching Statement
Purpose: Articulate teaching philosophy and demonstrate effectiveness
Length: Typically 1-2 pages
Structure:
PHILOSOPHY (1-2 paragraphs)
- Core beliefs about teaching/learning
- What makes your approach distinctive
- Grounded in evidence or experience
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS (1-2 paragraphs)
- Courses taught with enrollments
- Teaching evaluations (quote specific feedback)
- Student outcomes (publications, placements)
- Innovations introduced
METHODS AND APPROACHES (1-2 paragraphs)
- Specific techniques you use
- Active learning strategies
- Assessment approaches
- Technology integration
MENTORSHIP (1 paragraph)
- Undergraduate/graduate mentoring
- Student achievements
- Mentoring philosophy
FUTURE TEACHING (1 paragraph)
- Courses you could teach
- New courses you'd develop
- Curricular contributions
Diversity Statement
Purpose: Demonstrate commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion
Length: Typically 1-2 pages
Structure:
INTRODUCTION (1 paragraph)
- Your understanding of DEI in academia
- Why it matters to you
- Preview of your contributions
PAST ACTIONS (1-2 paragraphs)
- Specific activities promoting DEI
- Mentoring underrepresented students
- Curriculum development
- Outreach activities
- Quantify impact where possible
PERSONAL CONTEXT (optional, 1 paragraph)
- Your own background if relevant
- Experiences informing your commitment
- Only include if comfortable and genuine
FUTURE PLANS (1 paragraph)
- How you'll contribute at this institution
- Specific programs or initiatives
- Connection to institutional DEI priorities
CLOSING
- Synthesis of commitment
- Why this matters for your field
CV Format (Academic)
Standard Sections:
CONTACT INFORMATION
EDUCATION
- Degrees in reverse chronological order
- Institution, degree, year, advisor (for PhD)
POSITIONS
- Academic appointments
- Industry positions (if relevant)
PUBLICATIONS
- Peer-reviewed (mark * for corresponding author)
- Preprints
- Reviews/Book chapters
GRANTS AND FUNDING
- Current and past funding
- Role (PI, Co-PI, etc.)
- Amount and duration
HONORS AND AWARDS
PRESENTATIONS
- Invited talks
- Conference presentations
TEACHING
- Courses taught
- Mentoring record
SERVICE
- Editorial boards
- Review panels
- Committee work
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
NIH Biosketch
Length: 5 pages maximum
Sections:
A. PERSONAL STATEMENT (0.5 page)
- Why you're well-suited for this project
- Relevant experience and expertise
- Key accomplishments that qualify you
- Up to 4 publications supporting this statement
B. POSITIONS, SCIENTIFIC APPOINTMENTS, AND HONORS
C. CONTRIBUTIONS TO SCIENCE (up to 5 contributions, 0.5 page each)
- Contribution 1:
- Description of contribution (1 paragraph)
- Your specific role
- Impact on field
- Up to 4 publications supporting this contribution
- [Repeat for each contribution]
D. RESEARCH SUPPORT
- Current (with role, title, dates, description)
- Completed (last 3 years)
Writing Strategies
The "So What?" Test
For every claim, ask "so what?" If you can't answer, the claim needs more:
| Claim | So What? | Improved |
|---|---|---|
| "I published 10 papers" | Impact? | "My 10 papers have been cited 500 times, including 3 that established new methods in the field" |
| "I'm passionate about teaching" | Evidence? | "My passion for teaching is reflected in consistent evaluation scores above 4.5/5 and 5 undergraduates who went to PhD programs" |
| "I'm committed to diversity" | What have you done? | "I co-founded a mentoring program that has supported 20 students from underrepresented groups" |
Showing vs. Telling
| Telling (Weak) | Showing (Strong) |
|---|---|
| "I am a productive researcher" | "I have published 15 peer-reviewed articles including 3 in high-impact journals" |
| "I am an effective teacher" | "Student evaluations average 4.7/5.0 with comments highlighting my use of active learning" |
| "I am committed to mentoring" | "I have mentored 8 undergraduates, 5 of whom are now in PhD programs" |
Future Vision Formula
For each future direction:
- The Question: What will you investigate?
- The Importance: Why does this matter?
- The Approach: How will you do it?
- The Expected Impact: What changes if successful?
Guardrails
Key requirements:
- Truthful: Never fabricate or exaggerate
- Evidence-based: Claims supported by specifics
- Audience-appropriate: Match depth to readers
- Forward-looking: Emphasize trajectory and vision
- Coherent narrative: All pieces connect
- Compliant: Follow format and length requirements
Common pitfalls:
- ❌ Laundry lists: Lists without narrative
- ❌ Vague claims: "I am passionate about..." without evidence
- ❌ Missing future: All past, no vision
- ❌ Generic fit: Same statement for every application
- ❌ Too long: Ignoring page limits
- ❌ Missing impact: What you did without why it matters
Quick Reference
Key resources:
- resources/methodology.md: Audience analysis, narrative development, institutional fit
- resources/template.md: Section templates, examples
- resources/evaluators/rubric_career_document.json: Quality scoring
Typical lengths:
| Document | Typical Length |
|---|---|
| Research Statement | 2-5 pages |
| Teaching Statement | 1-2 pages |
| Diversity Statement | 1-2 pages |
| NIH Biosketch | 5 pages max |
Time estimates:
- Research statement (from scratch): 2-4 weeks
- Research statement (revision): 1-2 days
- Teaching statement: 1-2 days
- Diversity statement: 1-2 days
- CV update: 1-2 hours
- Biosketch: 2-4 hours
Inputs required:
- Current CV
- Job/fellowship description
- Institutional priorities (if known)
- Specific accomplishments to highlight
Outputs produced:
- Polished career document
- Commentary on structure and positioning
FAQ
What does the career-document-architect skill do?
Guides the creation of career documents for academic advancement including research statements, teaching statements, diversity statements, CVs, and biosketches. Combines strategic positioning, narrative coherence, and institutional alignment with authentic representation of contributions and vision. Use when writing or reviewing faculty applications, fellowship statements, promotion packages, award applications, or when user mentions research statement, teaching philosophy, diversity statement, biosketch, academic CV, or career narrative.
How do I install career-document-architect?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill career-document-architect in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/career-document-architect/ (personal) or .claude/skills/career-document-architect/ (project).
Which AI agents can use career-document-architect?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is career-document-architect safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains career-document-architect?
It is published by lyndonkl in lyndonkl/claude. It has 131 recorded installs.
More from lyndonkl/claude
evaluation-rubrics
lyndonkl/claude
Designs structured scoring tools with explicit criteria, performance scales, and descriptors for consistent, transparent quality assessment. Use when need quality criteria and scoring scales to evaluate work consistently, compare alternatives objectively, set acceptance thresholds, reduce subjective bias, or when user mentions rubric, scoring criteria, quality standards, evaluation framework, inter-rater reliability, or grading/assessing work.
strategy-and-competitive-analysis
lyndonkl/claude
Develops business strategies grounded in rigorous competitive and market analysis using proven frameworks (Good Strategy kernel, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, Blue Ocean, Playing to Win, Value Chain Analysis, BCG Matrix). Use when developing strategy (market entry, product launch, expansion, M&A, turnaround), conducting competitive analysis, making strategic decisions (build vs buy, pricing, positioning), planning strategic initiatives, or when user mentions strategy, competitive analysis, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, market positioning, or strategic frameworks.
scientific-manuscript-review
lyndonkl/claude
Guides systematic multi-pass review and editing of scientific manuscripts (research articles, reviews, perspectives) to improve clarity, structure, scientific rigor, and reader comprehension. Use when reviewing or editing research manuscripts, journal articles, or perspectives, when user mentions manuscript, paper draft, article, research writing, journal submission, reviewer feedback, or needs to improve scientific writing.
memory-retrieval-learning
lyndonkl/claude
Creates evidence-based learning plans that maximize long-term retention through spaced repetition, retrieval practice, interleaving, and elaboration. Guides through goal definition, material breakdown, review scheduling, and progress tracking. Use when long-term knowledge retention is needed, studying for exams or certifications, learning new job skills or technology, mastering substantial material, combating forgetting, or when user mentions studying, memorizing, learning plans, spaced repetition, flashcards, active recall, or durable learning.
socratic-teaching-scaffolds
lyndonkl/claude
Guides learners to discover knowledge through strategic Socratic questioning and progressive scaffolding removal. Combines question ladders, misconception detectors, Feynman explanations, and worked-example fading to build durable understanding. Use when teaching complex concepts, correcting misconceptions, onboarding team members, mentoring problem-solving, or designing self-paced learning. Use when user mentions "teach me", "help me understand", "explain like I'm", "learning path", "guided discovery", or "Socratic method".
grant-proposal-assistant
lyndonkl/claude
Guides creation and review of competitive grant proposals (NIH R01/R21/K, NSF, foundations) by applying reviewer-perspective thinking to ensure clear hypotheses, compelling significance, genuine innovation, and feasible approaches. Use when writing or reviewing grant proposals, crafting specific aims, drafting significance/innovation/approach sections, or when user mentions R01, R21, K-series, grant writing, proposal review, study section, or fundable hypothesis.
Popular productivity & automation skills
agent-browser
vercel-labs/agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.
lark-doc
open.feishu.cn
飞书云文档（Docx / Wiki）内容操作：读取、创建、编辑文档，插入或下载图片附件，以及操作思维笔记。用户提供文档 URL/token（包括 doubao.com 的 /docx/、/wiki/）时使用；按 URL 路径/token 而非域名路由；/page/ 是妙搭应用，非飞书云文档。文档内嵌资源按读取参考中的统一规则分流。独立评论操作走 lark-drive；随正文读取评论使用 docs +fetch。表格或 Base 内部数据操作不在本 skill。
lark-base
open.feishu.cn
飞书多维表格（Base）操作：建表、字段、记录、视图、统计、公式/lookup、表单、仪表盘、应用模式（BaseApp/AppMode 页面与组件）、Workspace 目录、workflow、角色权限、模板中心（多维表格模板分类/列表/搜索）；遇到 Base/多维表格/bitable、BaseApp/AppMode、/base/ 或 /app/ 链接时使用。BaseApp 不走 lark-apps；文件导入/导出转 lark-drive，认证/授权转 lark-shared。
lark-drive
open.feishu.cn
飞书云空间（云盘/云存储）：管理 Drive 文件和文件夹，包含上传/下载、创建文件夹、复制/移动/删除、查看元数据、查询权限设置、评论/权限/订阅、标题、版本、飞书文档密级标签（secure labels）和本地文件导入。用户需要整理云盘目录、处理云空间资源 URL/token、判断链接类型/真实 token/标题，或导入 Word/Markdown/Excel/CSV/PPTX/.base 为 docx/sheet/bitable/slides 时使用；doubao.com 云空间 URL/token 也按资源路径和 token 路由，不回退 WebFetch。不负责：文档内容编辑（走 lark-doc）、表格/Base 表内数据操作（走 lark-sheets/lark-base）、知识空间节点/成员管理（走 lark-wiki）、原生 Markdown 文件读写/patch/diff（走 lark-markdown）。
lark-shared
open.feishu.cn
Use for lark-cli setup/auth tasks: auth login/status/logout, user vs bot identity, business-domain permissions (--domain, including all/docs/drive), missing scopes, revoking authorization, or handling notice JSON.
lark-im
open.feishu.cn
飞书即时通讯：收发消息和管理群聊。发送和回复消息、搜索聊天记录、管理群聊成员、上传下载图片和文件、管理表情回复、发送应用内/短信/电话加急、发送和处理交互卡片（Interactive Card）、监听卡片按钮回调（card.action.trigger）。当用户需要发消息、查看或搜索聊天记录、下载聊天中的文件、查看群成员、搜索群、创建群聊或话题群、管理标记数据、管理 Feed 置顶（添加/移除/查询置顶会话）、管理标签数据、处理卡片回调时使用。