
literature-review
Conduct comprehensive literature reviews using multi-perspective dialogue simulation. Generate diverse expert personas, conduct grounded Q&A conversations, and synthesize findings into structured knowledge. Use when starting a new research project or writing a survey section.
- Installs
- 4K
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Warn
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill literature-review- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads literature-review automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
Security audits
Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Literature Review
Conduct deep literature reviews through multi-perspective dialogue and systematic search.
Input
$0— Research topic or question$1— Optional: specific focus or angle
References
- Multi-perspective dialogue prompts (STORM):
~/.claude/skills/literature-review/references/dialogue-prompts.md - Literature review workflow (AgentLaboratory):
~/.claude/skills/literature-review/references/review-workflow.md
Scripts (from literature-search skill)
# Search Semantic Scholar
python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_semantic_scholar.py --query "topic" --max-results 20
# Search OpenAlex
python ~/.claude/skills/literature-search/scripts/search_openalex.py --query "topic" --max-results 20
# Search arXiv
python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_arxiv.py --query "topic" --max-results 10
Workflow
Step 1: Generate Expert Personas (from STORM)
Given the topic, create 3-5 diverse expert personas:
- Each represents a different perspective, role, or research angle
- Example: "ML systems researcher focused on efficiency", "Theoretical statistician concerned with guarantees"
- Use the persona generation prompts from references
Step 2: Multi-Perspective Dialogue
For each persona, simulate a multi-turn Q&A conversation:
- Persona asks a question from their unique angle
- Generate search queries from the question
- Search literature using the search scripts
- Synthesize an answer grounded in retrieved papers with inline citations
- Record the dialogue turn with search results
- Repeat for 3-5 turns per persona
- End when persona says "Thank you so much for your help!"
Step 3: Synthesize Knowledge
- Combine all persona conversations into a unified knowledge base
- Remove redundancy across personas
- Organize by theme/subtopic
- Generate an outline based on the collected information
Step 4: Generate Literature Review
- Write a structured review organized by the generated outline
- Every claim must be supported by a citation
- Include a summary table of key papers (method, contribution, limitations)
Output
A structured literature review with:
- Outline — Hierarchical topic structure
- Per-section summaries — Each grounded in retrieved papers
- Paper database — Structured entries for all reviewed papers
- Knowledge gaps — Identified areas needing further investigation
Rules
- Every sentence in the review must be supported by gathered information
- If information is not found, explicitly state the gap
- Cite broadly — cover diverse approaches, not just the most popular
- Include recent papers (last 2-3 years) alongside foundational work
- Use inline citations: "Smith et al. [1] propose..."
Related Skills
- Upstream: literature-search, deep-research
- Downstream: related-work-writing, research-planning
- See also: survey-generation
FAQ
What does the literature-review skill do?
Conduct comprehensive literature reviews using multi-perspective dialogue simulation. Generate diverse expert personas, conduct grounded Q&A conversations, and synthesize findings into structured knowledge. Use when starting a new research project or writing a survey section.
How do I install literature-review?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill literature-review in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/literature-review/ (personal) or .claude/skills/literature-review/ (project).
Which AI agents can use literature-review?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is literature-review safe to install?
Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk flagged items to review; Runlayer flagged items to review; ZeroLeaks passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.
Who maintains literature-review?
It is published by lingzhi227 in lingzhi227/agent-research-skills. It has 4,002 recorded installs.
More from lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
literature-search
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
Search academic literature using Semantic Scholar, arXiv, and OpenAlex APIs. Returns structured JSONL with title, authors, year, venue, abstract, citations, and BibTeX. Use when the user needs to find papers, check related work, or build a bibliography.
figure-generation
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
Generate publication-quality scientific figures using matplotlib/seaborn with a three-phase pipeline (query expansion, code generation with execution, VLM visual feedback). Handles bar charts, line plots, heatmaps, training curves, ablation plots, and more. Use when the user needs figures, plots, or visualizations for a paper.
latex-formatting
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
Handle LaTeX formatting, templates, and styling for academic papers. Set up conference templates (ICML, ICLR, NeurIPS, AAAI, ACL), fix formatting issues, manage packages, and ensure venue-specific compliance. Use when the user needs to set up a paper template, fix LaTeX formatting, or prepare for submission.
math-reasoning
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
Formal mathematical reasoning for research papers — derive equations, write proofs, formalize problem settings, select statistical tests, and generate LaTeX math notation. Use when the user needs mathematical derivations, theorem proofs, notation tables, or statistical analysis formalization.
backward-traceability
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
Make every number in the final PDF traceable to the exact code line that produced it. Uses \hypertarget/\hyperlink LaTeX commands and \num{formula} evaluated at compile time. Use for reproducibility and data integrity verification.
citation-management
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
Manage BibTeX citations for LaTeX papers. Harvest missing citations from a draft using Semantic Scholar, validate cite keys against .bib files, deduplicate entries, and format bibliography. Use when working with references, BibTeX, or citations.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.