
caveman-evidence-review
Read-only review of Caveman Cloud evidence: cost, Cave Score, workflows, traces, latency, errors, routing, savings. Use when asked what Caveman found or where LLM spend goes.
- Installs
- 105.6K
- Last 24h
- +1.1K
- Trending rank
- #317
- Security
- Pass
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/juliusbrussee/caveman --skill caveman-evidence-review- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads caveman-evidence-review automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
Security audits
Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Review Caveman evidence
Act as a read-only operator. Build conclusions from current Caveman data, not from repository guesses. Never start, approve, cancel, or roll back an experiment from this skill.
Hard rules
- Keep these buckets separate:
- measured provider-complete list-price cost;
inferreddaily headroom;verifiedledger savings;- evidence cost. Never add or relabel them.
- Do not fetch prompt, completion, tool, or artifact payloads unless the user explicitly asks for payload review. Metadata, spans, timing, models, token counts, status, and optimizer attribution are enough for the default review.
- Scope every read to the project selected by Caveman context. Never supply an organization id.
- Empty results are evidence of no current signal, not zero cost or zero risk.
- Cite trace ids and exact time windows used. Do not claim a cause from an aggregate alone.
Step 1 — Load context
Prefer MCP:
caveman_context {}
CLI fallback:
caveman cloud whoami
caveman cloud projects list
Stop if login or project selection is missing. Ask the user to run
caveman login or select a project; never guess.
Step 2 — Establish baseline
Use caveman_report for:
overviewcostsscoreworkflowsverified_savings
Then use caveman_plan for ranked daily headroom. If question is narrow, skip
unrelated reports. Read shortest set that can answer it.
CLI fallback:
caveman cloud costs
caveman cloud score
caveman cloud plan --json
State report window and basis before interpreting direction.
Step 3 — Test the leading explanation with traces
Use caveman_trace_search. Choose a bounded window and closed filters:
workflow, agent, model, provider, error code, runtime mode, cache status,
optimization id, status class, token/cost/latency bounds, compression, or
monitor verdict.
Useful groupings:
workflow— find jobs driving cost or failures;model— compare model mix;session— isolate retry or loop behavior;- ungrouped — identify exact traces.
Compare a suspect cohort with a control cohort or earlier bounded window. Do not infer causality from one expensive trace.
CLI fallback:
caveman cloud traces search \
--workflow <slug> \
--from <RFC3339> \
--to <RFC3339> \
--sort total_cost_usd \
--dir desc \
--limit 25
Step 4 — Inspect representative traces
Call caveman_trace_get for a small number of high-signal trace ids. Inspect
request and span metadata, latency, status, token counts, cache state, applied
optimizers, and model route. Keep payload retrieval off.
CLI fallback:
caveman cloud traces show <trace-id> --spans
Step 5 — Report
Use this shape:
## Caveman evidence review
Scope: <project> · <from> to <to>
Measured cost: <value and basis>
Verified savings: <ledger value, kept separate>
Inferred headroom: <per-day band, kept separate>
Findings:
1. <finding> — <aggregate evidence> — traces <ids>
2. <finding> — <aggregate evidence> — traces <ids>
Unproven:
- <plausible explanation lacking a control, trace, or eval>
Next read-only check:
- <one bounded query>
Possible action:
- <proposal only; use caveman-manage for read-only lifecycle review and safety gate>
If data is missing, name missing signal and stop at strongest supported statement. Never turn a catalog subtotal into an invoice or an experiment result into verified savings.
FAQ
What does the caveman-evidence-review skill do?
Read-only review of Caveman Cloud evidence: cost, Cave Score, workflows, traces, latency, errors, routing, savings. Use when asked what Caveman found or where LLM spend goes.
How do I install caveman-evidence-review?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/juliusbrussee/caveman --skill caveman-evidence-review in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/caveman-evidence-review/ (personal) or .claude/skills/caveman-evidence-review/ (project).
Which AI agents can use caveman-evidence-review?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is caveman-evidence-review safe to install?
Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.
Who maintains caveman-evidence-review?
It is published by juliusbrussee in juliusbrussee/caveman. It has 105,572 recorded installs.
More from juliusbrussee/caveman
caveman
juliusbrussee/caveman
Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
caveman-commit
juliusbrussee/caveman
Write a Conventional Commits message compressed to intent only. Use for "write a commit", "commit message", /commit or /caveman-commit.
caveman-review
juliusbrussee/caveman
Compressed code review - one line per finding with location, problem and fix. Use for /caveman-review, "review this PR", or "review the diff".
caveman-compress
juliusbrussee/caveman
Compress a memory file such as CLAUDE.md or a todo list into caveman format to save input tokens, keeping a readable backup. Sends the file's text to the configured model provider. Trigger: /caveman-compress.
caveman-help
juliusbrussee/caveman
Quick-reference card for the three caveman skills and their commands. Trigger: /caveman-help or "caveman help".
cavecrew
juliusbrussee/caveman
When to delegate to cavecrew-investigator (locate code), cavecrew-builder (1-2 file edit) or cavecrew-reviewer (diff review) instead of working inline or using Explore. Their output is compressed, so main context lasts longer.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
code-review
mattpocock/skills
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
implement
mattpocock/skills
Implement a piece of work based on a spec or set of tickets.
wayfinder
mattpocock/skills
Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.