MCPInstall

sf-docs

Official Salesforce documentation retrieval guidance. Use when you need authoritative Salesforce docs from developer.salesforce.com or help.salesforce.com, especially when pages are JS-heavy, shell-rendered, or hard to extract with naive fetching.

Installs
1.2K
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-docs
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads sf-docs automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

sf-docs

Use this skill to retrieve and ground answers in official Salesforce documentation on the public web.

This skill is intentionally simple:

  • no local corpus
  • no indexing
  • no benchmark workflow
  • no helper CLI dependency
  • no PDF fallback

Its job is to provide a reliable online retrieval playbook for Salesforce docs that are hard to fetch, especially help.salesforce.com, JS-heavy developer.salesforce.com, Lightning Design System docs on lightningdesignsystem.com, and other official Salesforce-owned doc pages such as architect.salesforce.com and admin.salesforce.com.

An optional wrapper script is available at:

  • skills/sf-docs/scripts/extract_salesforce_doc.py

It automatically routes help.salesforce.com URLs into the dedicated Help extractor and supports other official documentation pages such as *.salesforce.com and lightningdesignsystem.com through a generic browser-rendered path. For bot-sensitive pages, it also supports best-effort optional stealth mode via --stealth when playwright-stealth is installed.

The dedicated Help extractor is also available directly at:

  • skills/sf-docs/scripts/extract_help_salesforce.py

Core Goal

Find the best official Salesforce HTML page online and extract enough real content to answer confidently.

If the evidence is weak, say so clearly instead of forcing a weak answer.

When to Use

Use sf-docs when a user asks for:

  • official Salesforce documentation
  • Apex, API, LWC, metadata, Agentforce, setup, or help articles
  • docs from developer.salesforce.com
  • docs from help.salesforce.com
  • pages that look JS-heavy, shell-rendered, or difficult to read with ordinary fetches

Official Sources Only

Prefer Salesforce-owned documentation sources:

  • developer.salesforce.com
  • help.salesforce.com
  • architect.salesforce.com
  • admin.salesforce.com
  • lightningdesignsystem.com
  • other relevant official Salesforce documentation pages when Salesforce uses them as the source of truth

Avoid third-party blogs, videos, or summary articles unless the user explicitly asks for them.

Do not fall back to PDFs.

Retrieval Workflow

1. Classify the request first

Before fetching anything, identify the likely doc family.

FamilyTypical SourceUse For
Developer docsdeveloper.salesforce.com/docs/...Apex, APIs, LWC, metadata, Agentforce developer docs
Help docshelp.salesforce.com/...setup, admin, product configuration
Architect/Admin docsarchitect.salesforce.com/..., admin.salesforce.com/...best practices, patterns, well-architected guidance, admin enablement
Design system docslightningdesignsystem.com/...SLDS, Cosmos, design tokens, component and styling guidance
Legacy atlas docsdeveloper.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.*older official guide and reference docs

2. Identify the exact concept

Extract the real target before you search:

  • exact API/class/method name
  • exact feature name
  • exact product phrase
  • exact setup concept

Examples:

  • Lightning Message Service
  • Wire Service
  • System.StubProvider
  • Agentforce Actions
  • Messaging for In-App and Web allowed domains

3. Prefer targeted official retrieval

Do not broad-crawl Salesforce docs.

Instead:

  1. identify the most likely official guide root or article
  2. if search is needed, restrict it to official Salesforce domains only
  3. fetch that official page
  4. check whether the exact concept actually appears on the page
  5. if not, inspect and follow the most relevant 1–3 official child links
  6. stop once you have grounded evidence

4. Do not stop at broad landing pages

A guide landing page is not enough unless it clearly contains the exact requested concept.

This is especially important for:

  • LWC docs
  • Agentforce docs
  • broad platform guide homepages
  • help landing pages that link to the real article

5. For developer.salesforce.com

Use this playbook:

  • start with the most likely official guide root
  • if the page is JS-heavy, prefer browser-rendered extraction
  • check whether the exact concept appears on the page
  • if the concept is missing, inspect official child links and follow the best matching 1–3 links
  • prefer exact concept pages over broad guide roots
  • legacy atlas pages are valid if they are the real official reference for the concept

6. For help.salesforce.com

Help pages often fail with naive fetching.

Use this playbook:

  • prefer exact articleView?id=... URLs when available
  • use browser-rendered extraction when plain fetch returns shell content
  • treat outputs like Loading, Sorry to interrupt, CSS Error, or mostly chrome/navigation text as failed extraction, not evidence
  • look for the real article body, not just header, nav, or footer text
  • reject shell pages and soft-404 pages such as:
    • "We looked high and low but couldn't find that page"
    • generic empty help shells
  • if starting from a nearby guide or hub page, follow linked Help articles until you reach the real article body
  • if extraction still fails after targeted retries, return the best official Help URLs you found and explicitly say that article-body extraction was unsuccessful

Acceptance Rules

A page is good enough to answer from only when at least one of these is true:

  • the exact identifier appears on the page
  • the exact concept phrase appears on the page
  • multiple query-specific phrases appear in the correct official context

A page is not good enough when:

  • it is only a broad landing page
  • it is a shell page with little real article text
  • it is from the wrong product area
  • it does not contain the requested identifier or concept
  • it is a third-party explanation when an official page should exist

Rejection Rules

Reject these as final evidence:

  • broad guide homepages without the exact concept
  • release notes when a concept/reference page is expected
  • admin blog posts when developer docs are requested
  • third-party blogs when official docs are available
  • shell-rendered pages with no real article body
  • pages whose titles sound right but whose body does not contain the requested concept

Grounding Requirements

When answering, include:

  1. guide/article title
  2. exact official URL
  3. source type:
    • developer doc page
    • atlas reference page
    • help article page
  4. any caveat if extraction was partial or browser-rendered

If evidence is weak, say so plainly.

Examples

Example: Lightning Message Service

Do not stop at the general LWC guide root. Find the exact LWC page for Lightning Message Service or follow the most relevant child links from the LWC docs until the exact concept appears.

Example: Wire Service

Do not answer from the LWC homepage unless Wire Service is actually present there. Follow the relevant child doc page for wire service or wire adapters.

Example: Agentforce Actions

Do not answer from a broad Agentforce landing page or a blog post. Find the official Agentforce developer page for actions, or follow the best matching child pages from the official Agentforce docs.

Example: Messaging for In-App and Web allowed domains

Prefer official Help articles and browser-rendered extraction. Reject generic help shells. Follow linked Help articles from nearby official messaging docs if needed.

Example: System.StubProvider

Prefer the official Salesforce reference/developer page where the exact identifier appears. Do not substitute a broader Apex landing page if the identifier is absent.

Non-Goals

This skill should not:

  • maintain a local documentation corpus
  • rely on a local index
  • use PDF fallback
  • run benchmark workflows
  • depend on repo-specific scripts to be useful

Cross-Skill Role

Other sf-* skills should use sf-docs when they need authoritative Salesforce documentation instead of relying on generic search alone.

FAQ

What does the sf-docs skill do?

Official Salesforce documentation retrieval guidance. Use when you need authoritative Salesforce docs from developer.salesforce.com or help.salesforce.com, especially when pages are JS-heavy, shell-rendered, or hard to extract with naive fetching.

How do I install sf-docs?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-docs in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/sf-docs/ (personal) or .claude/skills/sf-docs/ (project).

Which AI agents can use sf-docs?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is sf-docs safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains sf-docs?

It is published by jaganpro in jaganpro/sf-skills. It has 1,209 recorded installs.

More from jaganpro/sf-skills

View all →

sf-apex

jaganpro/sf-skills

Generates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.

Testing & QA1.6K installs

sf-lwc

jaganpro/sf-skills

Lightning Web Components with PICKLES methodology and 165-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user creates/edits LWC components, touches lwc//.js, .html, .css, .js-meta.xml files, or asks about wire service, SLDS, or Jest LWC tests. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Apex classes (use sf-apex), Aura components, or Visualforce.

Frontend & Design1.5K installs

sf-flow

jaganpro/sf-skills

Creates and validates Salesforce Flows with 110-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user builds or edits record-triggered, screen, autolaunched, or scheduled flows, or touches .flow-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Apex automation (use sf-apex), process builder migration questions only, or non-Flow declarative config (use sf-metadata).

sf-metadata

jaganpro/sf-skills

Salesforce metadata generation and querying with 120-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user creates custom objects, fields, validation rules, or touches .object-meta.xml, .field-meta.xml, .profile-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: permission set analysis (use sf-permissions), deploying metadata (use sf-deploy), or Flow XML (use sf-flow).

DevOps & Cloud1.5K installs

sf-soql

jaganpro/sf-skills

SOQL query generation, optimization, and analysis with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, optimizes, or debugs SOQL/SOSL queries, touches .soql files, or asks about relationship queries, aggregates, or query performance. DO NOT TRIGGER when: bulk data operations (use sf-data), Apex DML logic (use sf-apex), or report/dashboard queries.

Data & Databases1.5K installs

sf-debug

jaganpro/sf-skills

Salesforce debug log analysis and troubleshooting with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user analyzes debug logs, hits governor limits, reads stack traces, or touches .log files from Salesforce orgs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: running Apex tests (use sf-testing), fixing Apex code (use sf-apex), or Agentforce session tracing (use sf-ai-agentforce-observability).

Popular docs & writing skills

View category →

grill-with-docs

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

Docs & Writing1.2M installs

lark-markdown

open.feishu.cn

飞书 Markdown:查看、创建、上传、编辑和比较飞书中的原生 Markdown 文件。当用户要操作飞书 Markdown 文件,或比较其远端版本及本地草稿时使用。纯本地 Markdown 文件操作不触发本 skill。不负责将 Markdown 导入为飞书在线文档,也不负责文件搜索、权限、评论、移动、删除等云空间管理操作。

Docs & Writing778.7K installs

writing-beats

mattpocock/skills

Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.

Docs & Writing490.7K installs

writing-shape

mattpocock/skills

Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.

Docs & Writing490.2K installs

writing-fragments

mattpocock/skills

Writing, explore: mine raw fragments, no structure yet.

Docs & Writing489.6K installs

writing-for-agents

mattpocock/skills

Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.

Docs & Writing479.3K installs