kanon-repo

Run a two-agent code review: spawn two fresh, clean-context agents that examine the SAME committed branch diff in parallel. One agent runs Codex's native codex review --base command, while the other independently reviews the code against Google's "What to look for in a code review" guidance. Merge both outputs into one agreement-ranked report. Use this whenever the user asks for "review-all", a second-opinion review, a dual review, a cross-check before a PR, or a maximum-confidence review of committed branch changes. Do not use it to APPLY fixes; it is review-only.

Review the current Kelos branch, or an explicitly specified PR, issue, or diff, for Kubernetes API and CRD design quality. Use when asked for a Kelos API review, CRD/API compatibility review, Kubernetes API convention review, or review of changes under api/, generated CRDs, examples/, or self-development/ manifests. Default to the current branch when no target is specified. This skill is review-only.

Create and maintain gjkiminstruction.md, the root document for a loop-engineering effort. The document holds only the minimum requirements and confirmed decisions, and deliberately leaves everything else open so that later iterations are not locked into early guesses. Use whenever the user mentions gjkiminstruction.md, a root document or root doc for a loop, loop engineering, starting a long-running agent loop on a goal, or asks to record a requirement or a confirmed decision for such an effort. Also use at the start of a loop iteration to check what is already decided versus still open.

Sweep the current branch for leftovers of an abandoned design after a significant mid-work decision change, and rewrite the affected code, comments, tests, and docs so the result reads as if it had been designed this way from the beginning. Use when the user says "design cleanup", "clean up the old approach", "erase the journey", says a design decision changed and asks to clean up after it, or after a pivot in approach mid-branch. This is a rewrite pass over the code touched by the decision only — not a general refactoring or bug-hunting pass.

Use this skill PROACTIVELY when the user indicates they are done working, ending the session, wrapping up, or saying goodbye. Also use when significant work has been completed and the user hasn't explicitly asked to continue. Analyzes the session to evolve skills/commands/agents and propagates useful project permissions to global settings.

Review the comments on a PR and address the findings that are valid and required. Use when the user says "address-pr-review", asks to address the PR review, handle or apply the review comments or review feedback on a PR, or fix what the reviewers asked for. Defaults to the PR for the current branch when none is named. This skill changes code; it is not a review pass.

Finish an open PR by batching review feedback, applying valid fixes, running verification, pushing once per batch, and monitoring CI with bounded waits. Use when the user asks to update code until PR review comments are handled, review-all has no valid blocking findings, and required checks pass.