
elixir-antipatterns
Core catalog of 8 critical Elixir/Phoenix anti-patterns covering error handling, separation of concerns, Ecto queries, and testing. Trigger: During Elixir code review, refactoring sessions, or when writing Phoenix/Ecto code.
- Installs
- 191
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills --skill elixir-antipatterns- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads elixir-antipatterns automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Elixir Anti-Patterns
Critical anti-patterns that compromise robustness and maintainability in Elixir/Phoenix applications.
Complement with:
mix formatandCredofor style enforcement
Extended reference: SeeEXTENDED.mdfor 40+ patterns and deep-dive examples
When to Use
Topics: Error handling (3 patterns) • Architecture (2 patterns) • Performance (2 patterns) • Testing (1 pattern)
Load this skill when:
- Writing Elixir modules and functions
- Working with Phoenix Framework (Controllers, LiveView)
- Building Ecto schemas and database queries
- Implementing BEAM concurrency (Task, GenServer)
- Handling errors with tagged tuples
- Writing tests with ExUnit
Critical Patterns
Quick reference to the 8 core patterns this skill enforces:
- Tagged Tuples: Return
{:ok, value} | {:error, reason}instead ofnilor exceptions - Explicit @spec: Document error cases in function signatures
- Context Separation: Business logic in contexts, not LiveView
- Preload Associations: Use
Repo.preload/2to avoid N+1 queries - with Arrow Binding: Use
<-for all failable operations inwith - Database Indexes: Index frequently queried columns
- Test Assertions: Every test must assert expected behavior
- Cohesive Functions: Group
withchains >4 steps into functions
See
## Anti-Patternssection below for detailed ❌ BAD / ✅ CORRECT code examples.
Code Examples
Example 1: Error Handling with Tagged Tuples
# ✅ CORRECT - Errors as values, explicit in @spec
defmodule UserService do
@spec fetch_user(String.t()) :: {:ok, User.t()} | {:error, :not_found}
def fetch_user(id) do
case Repo.get(User, id) do
nil -> {:error, :not_found}
user -> {:ok, user}
end
end
end
# ❌ BAD - Exceptions for business errors
def fetch_user(id) do
Repo.get(User, id) || raise "User not found"
end
Example 2: Phoenix LiveView with Context Separation
Architecture Layers:
User Request → LiveView (UI only) → Context (business logic) → Schema/Repo (data)
↓ ↓ ↓
handle_event() Accounts.create_user() Repo.insert()
# ✅ CORRECT - Thin LiveView, logic in context
defmodule MyAppWeb.UserLive.Index do
use MyAppWeb, :live_view
def handle_event("create", params, socket) do
case Accounts.create_user(params) do
{:ok, user} -> {:noreply, redirect(socket, to: ~p"/users/#{user}")}
{:error, changeset} -> {:noreply, assign(socket, changeset: changeset)}
end
end
end
# ❌ BAD - Business logic in LiveView
def handle_event("create", %{"user" => params}, socket) do
if String.length(params["name"]) < 3 do
{:noreply, put_flash(socket, :error, "Too short")}
else
case Repo.insert(User.changeset(%User{}, params)) do
{:ok, user} -> send_email(user); redirect(socket)
end
end
end
Example 3: Ecto N+1 Query Optimization
# ✅ CORRECT - Preload associations (2 queries total)
users = User |> Repo.all() |> Repo.preload(:posts)
Enum.map(users, fn user -> process(user, user.posts) end)
# Note: For complex filtering (e.g., WHERE posts.status = 'published'),
# use join + preload in the query itself. See EXTENDED.md for advanced patterns.
# ❌ BAD - Query in loop (101 queries for 100 users)
users = Repo.all(User)
Enum.map(users, fn user ->
posts = Repo.all(from p in Post, where: p.user_id == ^user.id)
{user, posts}
end)
Anti-Patterns
Error Management
Don't: Use raise for Business Errors
# ❌ BAD
def fetch_user(id) do
Repo.get(User, id) || raise "User not found"
end
# ✅ CORRECT
@spec fetch_user(String.t()) :: {:ok, User.t()} | {:error, :not_found}
def fetch_user(id) do
case Repo.get(User, id) do
nil -> {:error, :not_found}
user -> {:ok, user}
end
end
Why: @spec documents errors, pattern matching forces explicit handling.
Don't: Return nil for Errors
# ❌ BAD - No context on failure
def find_user(email), do: Repo.get_by(User, email: email)
# ✅ CORRECT - Explicit error reason
@spec find_user(String.t()) :: {:ok, User.t()} | {:error, :not_found}
def find_user(email) do
case Repo.get_by(User, email: email) do
nil -> {:error, :not_found}
user -> {:ok, user}
end
end
Don't: Use = Inside with for Failable Operations
# ❌ BAD - Validate errors silenced
with {:ok, user} <- fetch_user(id),
validated = validate(user), # ← Doesn't check for {:error, _}
{:ok, saved} <- save(validated) do
{:ok, saved}
end
# ✅ CORRECT - All operations use <-
with {:ok, user} <- fetch_user(id),
{:ok, validated} <- validate(user),
{:ok, saved} <- save(validated) do
{:ok, saved}
end
Architecture & Boundaries
Don't: Put Business Logic in LiveView
# ❌ BAD - Validation in view
def handle_event("create", %{"user" => params}, socket) do
if String.length(params["name"]) < 3 do
{:noreply, put_flash(socket, :error, "Too short")}
else
case Repo.insert(User.changeset(%User{}, params)) do
{:ok, user} -> redirect(socket)
end
end
end
# ✅ CORRECT - Delegate to context
def handle_event("create", params, socket) do
case Accounts.create_user(params) do
{:ok, user} -> {:noreply, redirect(socket, to: ~p"/users/#{user}")}
{:error, changeset} -> {:noreply, assign(socket, changeset: changeset)}
end
end
Why: Contexts testable without Phoenix, logic reusable.
Don't: Chain More Than 4 Steps in with
# ❌ BAD - Too many responsibilities
with {:ok, a} <- step1(),
{:ok, b} <- step2(a),
{:ok, c} <- step3(b),
{:ok, d} <- step4(c),
{:ok, e} <- step5(d) do
{:ok, e}
end
# ✅ CORRECT - Group into cohesive functions
with {:ok, validated} <- validate_and_fetch(id),
{:ok, processed} <- process_business_rules(validated),
{:ok, result} <- persist_and_notify(processed) do
{:ok, result}
end
Data & Performance
Don't: Query Inside Loops (N+1)
# ❌ BAD - 101 queries for 100 users
users = Repo.all(User)
Enum.map(users, fn user ->
posts = Repo.all(from p in Post, where: p.user_id == ^user.id)
end)
# ✅ CORRECT - 2 queries total
User |> Repo.all() |> Repo.preload(:posts)
Impact: 100 users with N+1 = 10 seconds vs 5ms with preload.
Don't: Query Without Indexes
# ❌ BAD - No index on frequently queried column
# Migration:
create table(:users) do
add :email, :string
end
# ✅ CORRECT - Add index
create table(:users) do
add :email, :string
end
create unique_index(:users, [:email])
Why: Full table scan on 1M+ rows vs instant index lookup.
Testing
Don't: Write Tests Without Assertions
# ❌ BAD - What's being tested?
test "creates user" do
UserService.create_user(%{name: "Juan"})
end
# ✅ CORRECT - Assert expected behavior
test "creates user successfully" do
assert {:ok, user} = UserService.create_user(%{name: "Juan"})
assert user.name == "Juan"
end
Quick Reference
| Situation | Anti-Pattern | Correct Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Error handling | raise "Not found" | {:error, :not_found} |
| Missing data | Return nil | {:error, :not_found} |
| Business logic | In LiveView | In context modules |
| Associations | Enum.map + Repo.get | Repo.preload |
| with chains | validated = fn() | {:ok, validated} <- fn() |
| Frequent queries | No index | create index(:table, [:column]) |
| Testing | No assertions | assert expected behavior |
| Complex logic | 6+ step with | Group into 3 functions |
Resources
- Elixir Style Guide
- Phoenix Contexts
- Ecto Query Performance
- ExUnit Best Practices
- Extended patterns: See
EXTENDED.mdfor 40+ anti-patterns
FAQ
What does the elixir-antipatterns skill do?
Core catalog of 8 critical Elixir/Phoenix anti-patterns covering error handling, separation of concerns, Ecto queries, and testing. Trigger: During Elixir code review, refactoring sessions, or when writing Phoenix/Ecto code.
How do I install elixir-antipatterns?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills --skill elixir-antipatterns in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/elixir-antipatterns/ (personal) or .claude/skills/elixir-antipatterns/ (project).
Which AI agents can use elixir-antipatterns?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is elixir-antipatterns safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains elixir-antipatterns?
It is published by gentleman-programming in gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills. It has 191 recorded installs.
More from gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
typescript
gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
TypeScript strict patterns and best practices. Trigger: When writing TypeScript code - types, interfaces, generics.
angular-performance
gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
Angular performance: NgOptimizedImage, @defer, lazy loading, SSR. Trigger: When optimizing Angular app performance, images, or lazy loading.
java-21
gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
Java 21 language and runtime patterns for modern, safe code. Trigger: When writing Java 21 code using records, sealed types, or virtual threads.
angular-architecture
gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
pytest
gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
Pytest testing patterns for Python. Trigger: When writing Python tests - fixtures, mocking, markers.
tailwind-4
gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills
Tailwind CSS 4 patterns and best practices. Trigger: When styling with Tailwind - cn(), theme variables, no var() in className.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.