
service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure
End-to-end Incident SLA setup for Service Cloud ITSM — the policy's Business Hours (reuse a named schedule, or create one from described hours or a time zone), MilestoneTypes, an Incident-scoped SLA Policy (SlaProcess), Milestones with criteria, and the Entitlement so Incidents get an EntityMilestone with a computed TargetDate. Use when the user asks to create or set up an Incident SLA policy (predefined or custom, with or without specific business hours), configure SLA milestones on Incidents, set up entitlement processes for ITSM, or enable SLA tracking for incident management. For Incidents, use this instead of the single-step SLA policy, milestone, or activation skills. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user asks about Case entitlements or Case SLA (not Incident), querying existing SLA policies without setup intent, general Entitlement sObject CRUD unrelated to Incident, or Milestone queries for reporting purposes only.
- Installs
- 1.2K
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/sf-skills --skill service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Configuring Incident SLA (End-to-End)
First action, before any question to the user: read the IT Service Enablement gate (Phase 1a) with
dispatch_readonly on GET /services/data/v68.0/connect/setup/discovery/features, filtered to the exact
apiName service-cloud-itsm-setup. Ask nothing else until it is ENABLED.
Configures a complete Incident SLA pipeline for Service Cloud ITSM — the chain deriving an
EntityMilestone (with a computed TargetDate) on every Incident with an Entitlement, all via the
Salesforce-hosted headless-360 MCP server (org from the OAuth JWT). Requires the org-level
IT Service Management enablement (the Phase 1a gate) and SLA Management for IT Service
setup item (the Phase 1c gate), plus Incident Management (the Phase 1b gate).
The custom pipeline (four ordered writes): MilestoneType (what you measure) → SLA Policy
(SlaProcess, Incident-scoped, created inactive, entry/exit criteria) → Milestone (time trigger +
criteria) → activate the policy (createEntitlement=true, which auto-provisions the Entitlement —
matching Incidents then engage the SLA per-Incident via EntitlementId, with no Account). An
org-wide auto-apply entitlement criterion is an optional fifth write, dispatched only on an
explicit always-match request (Phase 4A step 6) — never by default. (The predefined/OOB
seed fork differs — it does none of this by hand: a single seed call provisions the whole active
bundle — policy, milestones, and Entitlement — in one shot; see Phase 2 / Phase 4B.)
This skill owns all the Incident-SLA interaction (gates, forks, milestone strategy,
verification); the raw write operations are delegated to the approved SLA
leaf capabilities (csp-sun/MilestoneTypes, create-sla-policy, create-milestone,
create-milestone-action, activate-sla-policy, create-entitlement-criteria), which own the
approved Connect contracts — discover → describe → dispatch each rather than re-deriving its shape here.
The Phase 1c enable (+ Versioning) and Phase 4B seed writes delegate to
itsm-shakti/SLASettings (owns the SLA-Management settings surface) — same discover → describe → dispatch.
Scope
- In scope: the SLA artifacts above (MilestoneTypes, the SLA Policy and its milestones,
activation with its auto-provisioned Entitlement, and — only on an explicit org-wide always-match
request — the optional auto-apply criterion) + verifying SLA
engagement on Incident records; gating
SLA Management for IT Service (Phase 1c); offering the OOB Standard Support for Incidents
policy vs a custom one (Phase 2, Incident only) — all via
headless-360MCP. - Out of scope: Case SLA/entitlements; Assignment Rules; Escalation Rules; Notification Rules; general Entitlement CRUD not related to Incident SLA; SLA reporting.
Output contract — applies to EVERY message
Never print a raw Salesforce record Id (15/18-char: 55…, 550…, 0ny…, 00…, Account 001…) — full or
masked (557VW…R3XVYA0 still leaks) — in any user-facing text: interim narration and the
final report. Holds for artifacts you created and ones you detected/reused — name each (the
name you supplied on create, or matched on reuse), keep its Id internal (chaining only). Verifying or
matching via SOQL? Report the verified attributes/name, never the Id you queried by. Looking up
an Id is the same rule — resolving Business Hours (resolved, user-selected, or created in Phase 4A step 1) or an existing policy returns
{Id, Name}; narrate the resolved name only and keep the returned Id internal — never echo it
back as Resolved "<name>" (001VW…). One
exception: on a halt you may relay the raw error body verbatim even if it embeds an Id —
don't hand-edit it.
- Wrong:
SLA policy created (552VW…)·Incident created (0ny…)·First Response → 557VW…R3XVYA0(reuse) - Right:
Created SLA policy "Standard Support for Incidents"·reusing the existing First Response milestone type· the test Incident is "the test Incident" until Phase 6, then itsIncidentNumber; milestones byMilestoneTypename.
Routes at a glance
Reads → mcp__headless-360__dispatch_readonly, writes → mcp__headless-360__dispatch. Both take raw
HTTP {"url","method","body"?,"query_params"?} — not {operation_id, arguments}; read body
from {status_code, body}. Full route table with request/response shapes: references/mcp-invocation.md.
Clarifying Questions
Ask only what you cannot infer from context (pre-populate; note "(from conversation)"). Resolve the
Phase 1a gate, then the Phase 1b Incident Management gate, then the Phase 1c gate, first and in that order. Then: (headless-360 binds to the current OAuth session, so do not ask which org); milestone strategy? (Phase 3b); milestone criteria? (default
Status != Closed + pattern-specific filters). Do not ask for an Account — Incident has no
Account field; engagement is per-Incident via EntitlementId. Business Hours: ask only when the
user's choice is ambiguous or the org has none (Phase 3a step 4); never ask on the Predefined path.
Default suggestion: SLA Policy Incident SLA Policy, suggested default Business Hours (confirmed at
Phase 3c), Entitlement
auto-provisioned on activation (no Account), engagement per-Incident via EntitlementId, milestone
strategy resolved per Phase 3b.
Workflow
Sequential — always read before you write; every call goes through mcp__headless-360__*.
Per-phase detail (reads, delegated writes, API quirks) lives in references/workflow.md — read it
before executing. Phase index and their non-negotiable gates:
- Before you start — Reuse session state only from a successful
dispatch_readonlythis session on this org, unwritten since; a user statement is never cache-eligible. - Phase 1a — IT Service Management gate (
service-cloud-itsm-setup). ExactENABLEDcontinues. ExactNOT_ENABLEDwith no blocked reasons → ask “IT Service Enablement is off — enable it now?” viaAskUserQuestion(Yes/No, never plain text; No halts) → delegate to theIncidentMgmtSOR with that confirmation → use its verify step before continuing. Missing, error, blocked, or any other status halts and points to Setup. - Phase 1b — Incident Management gate (
service-cloud-itsm-incident). ExactENABLEDcontinues;NOT_AVAILABLE→ HALT; exactNOT_ENABLEDwith no blocked reasons → its own Yes/No “Incident Management is off — enable it now?” viaAskUserQuestion, delegate to theIncidentMgmtSOR (MCP steps, neverSkill), verify exactENABLED; No halts. - Phase 1c — SLA Management gate. SLA Management and the permanent SLA Versioning switch — two
writes; delegate to
itsm-shakti/SLASettings. Read both flags first. If either is off, ask withAskUserQuestionbefore ANY write, as two separate questions: Q1 “SLA Management for IT Service is off — enable it now?” (Yes/No; only when SLA Management is off), then Q2 the SLA Versioning permanence ack (Enable / Stop; exact wording inreferences/mcp-invocation.md). Never merge them, never preview later steps before each is answered, and never treat a Yes at Phase 1a/1b or the original request as consent; any No → HALT. - Phase 2 — Predefined vs Custom (Incident only). Detect the seeded policy first; read the live
Incident.Prioritypicklist before the fork (custom values → recommend Custom); warn if the priority matrix is off (only the default tier fires); Business Hours note only if the user specified hours. Predefined → 4B → 5 (if asked) → 6 → STOP; Custom → 3a → 3b → 3c → 4A → 5 (if asked) → 6. - Phase 3a — Preflight. Step 1 only reuses the Phase 1b Incident Management result; then
discover/describethe SLA ops, Incident describe, resolve Business Hours, idempotency probe. No Account.401/403/404→ halt with the raw error. - Phase 3b — Milestone strategy per
examples/milestone-patterns.md. - Phase 3c — Confirm the full plan (Business Hours by name, every milestone) before any write.
- Phase 4A — Create (Business Hours first if planned, step 1) →
MilestoneTypes→create-sla-policy→create-milestone×N →activate-sla-policy; optional step 6 criterion only on an explicit always-match request. - Phase 4B — Seed via
save-selected-options({"selectedOptions":["incident"]}), delegated toitsm-shakti/SLASettings; verify and name its Business Hours. - Phase 5 — Milestone actions (only if asked) on every named milestone.
- Phase 6 — Verify via SOQL + a non-lowest-tier test Incident with an
EntityMilestone; matrix off or still order-1 after one retry → stop and report the other tiers unchecked.
Rules / Constraints
| Constraint | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Gate IT Service Management enablement (Phase 1a), then Incident Management (Phase 1b, its own Yes/No) before Phase 1c — exact apiNames only, never a look-alike; rules as in the phase list above | Higher-level org gate sits above every ITSM feature |
Gate SLA Management first (Phase 1c) — two separate writes (SLA Management, then the one-way SLA Versioning); two separate AskUserQuestions before any write (Q1 SLA Management Yes/No, then Q2 permanence) — never merged, never inferred from an earlier gate's Yes; decline/blocked/verify-fail → HALT; re-read + report real state | Versioning is irreversible; writes don't confirm state |
| Offer predefined (OOB) first (Phase 2, Incident only); detect before seed; if chosen, seed → verify → STOP (no custom upsell) | OOB seed isn't idempotent — re-seed duplicates |
discover + describe before any mutation | Catches a missing SLA surface / disabled Incident Mgmt early |
Ask (AskUserQuestion) the milestone strategy — never silently default to Single | Real ITSM policies have >1 milestone |
| Reuse one MilestoneType per shared name; a distinct one per distinct concern | Runtime keys milestones by MilestoneType |
| Multi-milestone: halt on any milestone-create failure (no half-attached policy) | Partial attach diverges from the confirmed plan |
Priority-tiered: reconcile every Priority value against the live picklist before dispatch — drop/rename standard rows that don't match and add a milestone for each custom active value the org added | Server accepts any string → an unknown value is a dead milestone; a custom value with no milestone gets no SLA |
Delegate every owned write — prerequisite feature enables to the IncidentMgmt SOR; SLA writes to their approved SLA leaves (MilestoneTypes, create-sla-policy, create-milestone, create-milestone-action, activate-sla-policy, create-entitlement-criteria). The Phase 4A step 1 Business Hours create remains inline because no served SOR owns it | Single contract-owner per write; re-deriving an owned contract here would drift from its served owner |
Business Hours (Custom): honor a named schedule, described calendar, or time zone (time zone only → ask 24×7 (recommended) or custom hours; reuse a match, else create one after the Phase 3c confirm); zero active → offer a 24×7 create. Never set IsDefault or modify an existing record. Predefined: the seeder always uses the org default — warn only if the user specified hours | Default 24×7 or the customer's own calendar; BusinessHours is not API-deletable, so creates are confirmed first |
Custom flow: activation provisions the auto-Entitlement (activate-sla-policy: isActive + createEntitlement as QUERY params) — matching Incidents then engage per-Incident via EntitlementId (not a manual sObject Entitlement, and no Account). An org-wide auto-apply criterion via create-entitlement-criteria is optional — only on an explicit always-match request, never by default. OOB seed path: one seeder call (save-selected-options, lowercase selectedOptions) provisions the entire active bundle incl. the Entitlement — no per-leaf calls, no manual POST /sobjects/Entitlement, no activate PATCH | Custom: one call activates and provisions, so a manual POST /sobjects/Entitlement would duplicate it. OOB: the platform seeder builds and activates the whole default bundle server-side, so the skill neither rebuilds it leaf-by-leaf nor provisions the Entitlement by hand |
No record Id in any message (see Output contract, incl. reused artifacts); AskUserQuestion labels customer-facing (no "demo"/internal defaults) | Leaked Ids / internal framing look unprofessional to the customer |
Another Incident policy already active + Custom chosen → narrate coexistence only. The custom policy is targeted per-Incident via EntitlementId (Incident has no Account field to scope on) and additive; the existing (predefined/broad) policy stays the org-wide one. Never offer, plan, or perform — in the fork or the closing report — deactivating an existing policy, reordering its entitlement criteria, broadening the custom policy to match-all / auto-apply-to-all, or "deciding/resolving precedence" across policies. Target specific Incidents via EntitlementId; the existing policy stays active (see references/workflow.md → Coexistence) | Changing a policy the user didn't ask to touch is out of scope — this skill configures a new coexisting custom policy, not edits to an existing one. Deactivating (activate-sla-policy can send isActive=false) or re-ranking another policy's criteria risks disrupting a live SLA, and no leaf arbitrates cross-policy precedence (predefined: no un-seed path, manual delete only). Both are meant to coexist — the agent otherwise improvises an out-of-scope deactivation/reorder/precedence upsell |
Additional API quirks: references/mcp-invocation.md.
Verification Checklist
- IT Service Management enablement gated (Phase 1a) — exact apiName
service-cloud-itsm-setupread exactENABLED, or exactNOT_ENABLEDwith no blocked reasons received one Yes/No enable question delegated to theIncidentMgmtSOR and its verify step confirmed exactENABLED; declined, blocked, missing, error, or unexpected status → HALTED before Phase 1b. - Incident Management gated (Phase 1b) — exact
service-cloud-itsm-incidentENABLEDvia live read, or delegated to theIncidentMgmtSOR after its own Yes/No whenNOT_ENABLED(NOT_AVAILABLE→ HALT); its verify step confirmedENABLED— not a user assertion, not a look-alike. - SLA Management gated (Phase 1c) — SLA Management + SLA Versioning both on (two separate writes), only after Q1 (SLA Management Yes/No) and the separate Q2 permanence ack, each asked via
AskUserQuestion; reported state = a re-read, not the write. Declined / blocked / verify-fail → HALTED before Phase 2/3a, no artifacts. - Predefined vs Custom offered (Phase 2) — with the feature ON, OOB Standard Support for Incidents offered first; if present, reported not re-seeded; if chosen, seeded (2 MilestoneTypes + 6 milestones + Entitlement), verified, no custom offer after.
-
discover/describeconfirmed the SLA Connect ops. - Incident describe returned 200 with
EntitlementId,SlaStartDate,SlaExitDate. - Active Business Hours resolved and named in the confirmed plan — the user's named schedule / a matching calendar / the org default / a user-selected record, or a create (described calendar or 24×7 when none exist) confirmed at Phase 3c, then SOQL-verified active. Predefined: the seeded policy's Business Hours reported by name (or "none").
- Milestone strategy resolved — Phase 3b skip condition OR
AskUserQuestion; Priority-tiered / Custom reconciled everyPriority/criteria value against the live picklist before dispatch (dropped/renamed unmatched standard rows and added a milestone for each custom activePriorityvalue). - Configuration confirmed OR skip condition met (up-front auth / no-op / prior confirmation / "yes"); the resolved plan (org, SLA name, Business Hours by name, engagement model = per-Incident via
EntitlementId(no Account), per-milestone list) narrated before Phase 4A. - Writes delegated to the SLA leaves in order — the four core writes: MilestoneType(s) → Policy → Milestone(s) → activate + auto-Entitlement (the optional org-wide auto-apply criterion only if explicitly requested); any milestone-create failure halted (no partial attach). Trivial on no-op.
- Milestone actions (Phase 5) — if requested, attached to every named milestone; each confirmed from
body.success+actionMappings, not the201; full set narrated before write. - SLA Policy verified via SOQL, not the create response (no-op: the Phase-3a read is the verification).
- Test Incident has ≥1 EntityMilestone on the correct tier with a
TargetDate(the engagement proof; Priority matched for Priority-tiered); expected milestone(s) present. Matrix off / still order-1 after one retry → reported "other tiers not checked" + pointed to the Priority Matrix setting in Setup, no recreate loop.SlaStartDatepopulated confirms it too, but may be null when the Entitlement is auto-applied via criteria — not a failure. Skip on no-op. - No record Id in any message — interim narration and final report; artifacts by name, test Incident by
IncidentNumber(see Output contract). - Before/after + summary shown; no-op states the pre-existing config verbatim + "no changes made".
Output Format
Use the examples/output-templates.md templates; fill placeholders as-is. The success report must carry, unambiguously: the SLA Policy; every milestone by MilestoneType name + time + criteria; the Entitlement (auto-provisioned, no Account — Incident has no Account field); every requested action by milestone tier/MilestoneType name (never a milestone Id) + Warning/Violation role + offset + how confirmed; a Verification section (SOQL-confirmed policy + test-Incident SlaStartDate/EntityMilestones, or an honest partial note); created-vs-reused per artifact; a scope line (only the Incident SLA). No record Id anywhere. If another Incident policy is already active, state the coexistence plainly (both stay active; the existing/predefined policy stays the broad org-wide one; the custom is targeted per-Incident via EntitlementId) and do not offer to deactivate or reorder it, to broaden the custom policy to auto-apply to all Incidents, or to "decide precedence" across policies.
Reference File Index
| File | When to read |
|---|---|
references/workflow.md | Executing — the full step-by-step Phase 1–6 detail (per-phase reads, delegated writes, API quirks); the constraints table + verification checklist stay in this SKILL.md body |
references/mcp-invocation.md | Every phase — call shapes, templates, response envelope, discovery, gotchas |
examples/milestone-patterns.md | Phase 3b — the five strategies: times, criteria, MilestoneType reuse, filter extensions |
assets/attach-milestone.json | Phase 4A step 4 — milestone POST body; substitute ids/timeTrigger/order; append filterItems |
assets/attach-milestone-action.json | Phase 5 — Warn/Escalate action body templates (Field Update); pair with mcp-invocation.md (Milestone Actions) |
examples/output-templates.md | Output Format — success/partial report templates; fill placeholders, no record Id |
Related Skills
The priority matrix (Impact × Urgency → Priority) is separate and not configured here;
if a Priority-tiered strategy is requested but Incident.Priority lacks values, direct the user to the
Priority Matrix setting in Setup first. Other ITSM flows (Major Incident Mgmt, custom fields) are out of scope.
FAQ
What does the service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure skill do?
End-to-end Incident SLA setup for Service Cloud ITSM — the policy's Business Hours (reuse a named schedule, or create one from described hours or a time zone), MilestoneTypes, an Incident-scoped SLA Policy (SlaProcess), Milestones with criteria, and the Entitlement so Incidents get an EntityMilestone with a computed TargetDate. Use when the user asks to create or set up an Incident SLA policy (predefined or custom, with or without specific business hours), configure SLA milestones on Incidents, set up entitlement processes for ITSM, or enable SLA tracking for incident management. For Incidents, use this instead of the single-step SLA policy, milestone, or activation skills. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user asks about Case entitlements or Case SLA (not Incident), querying existing SLA policies without setup intent, general Entitlement sObject CRUD unrelated to Incident, or Milestone queries for reporting purposes only.
How do I install service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/sf-skills --skill service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure/ (personal) or .claude/skills/service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure/ (project).
Which AI agents can use service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure?
It is published by forcedotcom in forcedotcom/sf-skills. It has 1,220 recorded installs.
More from forcedotcom/sf-skills
platform-apex-generate
forcedotcom/sf-skills
Primary Apex authoring skill for class generation, refactoring, and review. ALWAYS ACTIVATE when the user mentions Apex, .cls, triggers, or asks to create/refactor a class (service, selector, domain, batch, queueable, schedulable, invocable, DTO, utility, interface, abstract, exception, REST resource). Use this skill for requests involving SObject CRUD, mapping collections, fetching related records, scheduled jobs, batch jobs, trigger design, @AuraEnabled controllers, @RestResource endpoints, custom REST APIs, or code review of existing Apex.
platform-apex-test-generate
forcedotcom/sf-skills
Use to generate and validate Apex test classes with TestDataFactory patterns, bulk testing (251+ records), mocking, assertions, and disciplined test-fix loops. Use when creating Apex test classes (for triggers, services, controllers, batch jobs, queueables, and callouts), improving coverage, debugging or fixing failing Apex tests, or running test/coverage analysis. Triggers on Test.cls files, sf apex run test, coverage reports. Do NOT trigger for production Apex (use platform-apex-generate) or Jest/LWC tests.
platform-apex-test-run
forcedotcom/sf-skills
Apex test execution, coverage analysis, and test-fix loops with 120-point scoring. Use when the user runs Apex tests, checks code coverage, fixes failing tests, or touches Test.cls / Test.cls files. DO NOT TRIGGER when writing Apex production code (use platform-apex-generate), Agentforce agent testing (use agentforce-test), or Jest/LWC tests (use experience-lwc-generate).
platform-apex-logs-debug
forcedotcom/sf-skills
Salesforce debug log analysis and troubleshooting with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user analyzes debug logs, hits governor limits, reads stack traces, or touches .log files from Salesforce orgs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: running Apex tests (use platform-apex-test-run), generating or fixing Apex code (use platform-apex-generate), or Agentforce session tracing (use agentforce-observe).
platform-soql-query
forcedotcom/sf-skills
Use when the user needs SOQL/SOSL authoring or optimization: natural-language-to-query generation, relationship queries, aggregates, query-plan/selectivity analysis, and performance or safety improvements. TRIGGER when the user writes, optimizes, or debugs SOQL/SOSL, touches .soql files, or asks about relationship queries, aggregates, or query performance. DO NOT TRIGGER for bulk data operations (use platform-data-manage), Apex DML logic (use platform-apex-generate), or report/dashboard queries.
platform-metadata-deploy
forcedotcom/sf-skills
Salesforce DevOps automation using sf CLI v2. TRIGGER when: user deploys metadata, validates a deploy or does a dry-run, deploys to a Production org, quick-deploys a validated job ID, ships/promotes to prod, creates/manages scratch orgs or sandboxes, sets up CI/CD pipelines, or troubleshoots deployment errors with sf project deploy. DO NOT TRIGGER when: writing Apex code, building LWC components (use experience-lwc-generate), creating metadata definitions (use platform-custom-object-generate), deleting metadata from an org (use platform-destructive-deploy), or querying org data (use platform-data-manage).
Popular ai & agents skills
google-agents-cli-publish
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "publish an agent", "publish my ADK agent", "register an agent with Gemini", "publish to Gemini" (formerly Gemini Enterprise), or needs guidance on the agents-cli publish gemini command. Also use when the user wants to "manage agents in Agent Registry", "list/update/delete registered agents", or "register an MCP server". Covers ADK vs A2A registration modes, programmatic and interactive usage, flag reference, auto-detection from deployment metadata, Agent Registry fleet management, and troubleshooting. Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy).
google-agents-cli-eval
google/agents-cli
This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics, dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. Applies to any agents-cli project, whatever framework the agent is written in. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).
skill-creator
anthropics/skills
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
codex-pet
prime-skills/runcomfy-agent-skills
Codex Pet generator on RunComfy. Build a Codex-compatible Codex Pet spritesheet.webp + pet.json from a single reference image, drop it into ${CODEXHOME:-$HOME/.codex}/pets/ / and Codex picks it up as a custom Codex Pet next to the 8 built-ins. This skill produces the exact Codex Pet atlas Codex expects (1536x1872 PNG/WebP, 8 cols x 9 rows, 192x208 cells, 9 animation states — idle, running-right, running-left, waving, jumping, failed, waiting, running, review). Calls OpenAI GPT Image 2 edit ONCE via the local RunComfy CLI as runcomfy run openai/gpt-image-2/edit to produce a canonical Codex Pet pose, then assembles all 9 animation rows programmatically with ImageMagick micro-transforms — no Codex Pro, no $imagegen, no OPENAIAPIKEY required, only RUNCOMFYTOKEN. Triggers on "codex pet", "create codex pet", "make codex pet", "hatch codex pet", "/hatch image", "desktop pet codex", "codex pets", "spritesheet.webp", or any explicit ask to build a custom pet for OpenAI Codex.
full-output-enforcement
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
executing-plans
obra/superpowers
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available