MCPInstall

agentforce-d360-analyze

Data Cloud 360° view of a single Agentforce session. TRIGGER when user asks to trace, inspect, summarize, or describe a specific Agentforce session by session id (Agent Session UUID 019d… or MessagingSession id 0Mw…). Also triggers on session discovery — find/list/search sessions by time, agent, channel, outcome, or conversation text — when the user has no session id yet. DO NOT TRIGGER for design-time architecture questions (use agentforce-architecture-analyze instead) or for runtime perf/latency/SLO questions that require platform telemetry beyond Data Cloud.

Installs
5.3K
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Pass

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/sf-skills --skill agentforce-d360-analyze
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads agentforce-d360-analyze automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

Security audits

Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.

Gen Agent Trust Hub PassSAFE ·The skill is a legitimate analysis utility designed to provide a 360-degree view of Agentforce sessions by querying Salesforce Data Cloud. It follows security best practices, including robust input validation, secure handling of credentials via the official Salesforce CLI, and proper sanitization of log data before display.
Socket PassNo alerts
Snyk PassLOW ·Risk: LOW · No issues

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

agentforce-d360-analyze — Data Cloud 360° session view

Hierarchical session reconstruction from Data Cloud STDM + GenAI DMOs for one Agentforce session. Three stages — fetch → assemble → render. Typical wall-clock: ~10–30s for a ~15-turn session.

The pipeline is DC-only: it reads runtime audit rows that Data Cloud has materialized. It is not a runtime-availability tool — see "DC-only blind spot" below for what this skill cannot answer.

If the user hasn't given enough to proceed

When invoked with no session id AND no discovery criteria, print this block verbatim — do not paraphrase, do not pre-run any script. Trigger condition: the input is empty OR contains no session-id shape (neither a UUID nor a 0Mw… messaging id) AND no discovery expression (no time phrase / --agent / --channel / --outcome / --grep / verbs like "find" / "list").

Which session should I pull from Data Cloud, and in which org?

I need:

  • Session id — either an Agent Session UUID (019db7f6-…) or a MessagingSession id (0Mw…, 15/18 chars).
    • No session id? — Tell me what you remember and I'll find it: how recent (e.g. "last 2 hours", "today", a date), which agent, which channel (Messaging / Builder / Voice), how it ended (escalated, user ended, transferred, timed out), or a phrase from the conversation. I'll show matching sessions as a numbered list — you pick one, I pull it.
  • Org alias — for sf CLI auth (the alias you configured with sf org login).

Artifacts land in ~/.vibe/data/agentforce-d360-analyze/<org_id15>/<agent>__<ver>/<session_id>/ (override per-script with --data-dir <path>).

Session id forms — UUID or MessagingSession id

Both forms are accepted on --session:

FormExampleResolution
Agent Session UUID019dface-0000-7000-8000-000000000002Pass-through
MessagingSession id (0Mw prefix)0MwTESTMSG12345AAAResolved via resolve_session.py — live DC lookup on first fetch, disk-first thereafter

Multi-match is real. One MessagingSession id can map to multiple Agent Session UUIDs. On multi-match the resolver prints every candidate and exits non-zero; the user re-invokes with a specific UUID.

Artifacts always land under ~/.vibe/data/agentforce-d360-analyze/<org_id15>/<agent>__<ver>/<session_id>/ (default; overridable per-script with --data-dir <path>) — the messaging id is a lookup key only, never a directory name. The dominant agent (first in sorted(agents_observed)) names the <agent>__<ver>/ segment.

Resolving the script prefix

<SKILL_DIR> = the absolute path to this skill's own directory (the folder holding this SKILL.md); resolve it from the skill path in context and substitute it below. Runtimes install skills in different places (~/.claude/skills/, ~/.vibe/skills/, a plugin cache, a project .claude/skills/), so the block also probes the known install roots at runtime and uses the first that actually contains this skill's scripts. An exported SKILL_ROOT wins.

_skill=agentforce-d360-analyze
for _c in "${SKILL_ROOT:-}" "<SKILL_DIR>" \
          "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:+$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/$_skill}" \
          "${VIBES_SKILLS_DIR:+$VIBES_SKILLS_DIR/$_skill}" \
          "$HOME/.claude/skills/$_skill" "$PWD/.claude/skills/$_skill" \
          "${PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.vibe/skills}/$_skill"; do
  [ -n "$_c" ] || continue
  # Some stagers (ADK eval) nest the bundled files under <skill>/artifacts/.
  for _r in "$_c" "$_c/artifacts"; do
    [ -f "$_r/scripts/fetch_dc.py" ] && { SKILL_ROOT="$_r"; break 2; }
  done
done
[ -f "${SKILL_ROOT:-}/scripts/fetch_dc.py" ] || { echo "$_skill: scripts not found — set SKILL_ROOT to this skill's directory" >&2; exit 1; }
prefix="$SKILL_ROOT/scripts"

Every subsequent invocation in this doc uses "$prefix/...".

Session discovery (no id yet)

When the user doesn't have a session id, run discover_sessions.py against the STDM session DMO. Prints a numbered picker; user picks one; proceed with the chosen UUID.

python3 "$prefix/discover_sessions.py" [--org <alias>] [filters...]

--org is optional. "My org", "our org", or no alias at all means the sf CLI default target org — omit --org and the script uses sf config get target-org. Pass --org <alias> only when the user names an alias. If no default is set the script exits with "no --org given and no default target org set"; relay its sf config set target-org <alias> hint and ask the user for an alias.

Filters (all optional): --since <expr> (default last 24h; accepts "last 2 hours", "today", ISO dates), --agent <api-name>, --channel <Messaging|Builder|Voice>, --outcome <USER_ENDED|ESCALATED|TRANSFERRED|TIMEOUT|NOT_SET>, --grep <substring> (conversation text), --tz <IANA>, --limit <N> (default 20).

Output: markdown table with #, UUID, Start (UTC), Agent, Channel, Duration, Outcome. User replies with a number; proceed with that UUID.

Pipeline — three stages

fetch_dc.py     →  24 dc.<name>.json + dc._session_manifest.json     (DC Query REST waterfall, 5 waves)
assemble_dc.py  →  dc._session_tree.json                             (pure in-memory hierarchical join)
render_dc.py    →  dc._session_summary.md                            (human summary, multi-section)

Each stage is independently runnable. fetch_dc.py --session <sid> [--org <alias>] chains all three by default.

Invocation

python3 "$prefix/fetch_dc.py" --session <session-id-or-messaging-id> [--org <alias>]

--org is optional here too: without it (the user said "my org" or named no alias) the CLI default target org is used. With no default set, fetch_dc.py reports DC_ACCESS_DENIED with reason no_org (exit 10 when headless) — ask the user for an alias and re-run with --org <alias>.

Flags: --verbose for per-DMO row counts; --no-assemble / --no-render to stop early. All entry scripts (fetch_dc.py, assemble_dc.py, render_dc.py, resolve_session.py, discover_sessions.py) accept --data-dir <path> and --cache-dir <path> to override the default ~/.vibe/{data,cache}/agentforce-d360-analyze/ roots — pass these when the host runtime needs artifacts under a different distribution layout.

Output artifacts

Everything lands under ~/.vibe/data/agentforce-d360-analyze/<org_id15>/<agent>__<ver>/<session_id>/ (default; override with --data-dir <path>):

dc.sessions.json              dc.steps.json                dc.gateway_requests.json
dc.interactions.json          dc.messages.json             dc.gateway_responses.json
dc.participants.json          dc.generations.json          dc.gateway_request_llm.json
dc.content_quality.json       dc.content_category.json     dc.gateway_request_metadata.json
dc.tags.json                  dc.tag_definitions.json      dc.gateway_request_tags.json
dc.tag_associations.json      dc.tag_definition_associations.json
dc.feedback.json              dc.feedback_details.json     dc.gateway_records.json
dc.moments.json               dc.moment_interactions.json
dc.telemetry_spans.json       dc.app_generation.json

dc._session_manifest.json     (per-DMO row counts + empties)
dc._session_tree.json         (hierarchical join — session → interactions → steps → messages → generations → gateway)
dc._session_summary.md        (rendered human summary)

Zero-row queries are recorded in the manifest with status: empty; no file is written. assemble_dc tolerates missing files. See references/artifacts.md for the full read order.

The DC-only blind spot — read before committing to a root cause

DC alone answers what happened — steps that ran, generations that fired, gateway requests that were logged. It does NOT answer what could have happened but didn't:

  • Which topics were eligible for the classifier on a given turn (this lives in runtime planner telemetry, not DC).
  • Which actions were declared on a topic vs. which survived rule expressions and were actually offered to the LLM.
  • Why the LLM picked one topic/action over another (the full prompt + response text only lives in the planner runtime telemetry).

If the user's question is about why a particular topic or action was or wasn't used, DC-only is almost never sufficient. Tell the user: "Availability questions need the runtime planner trace for that turn — which is outside this skill's Data Cloud surface. Check the platform telemetry that mirrors the planner's logged decisions." Don't fabricate a root cause from runtime-only evidence.

What DC IS good at

  • What ran — every step, every LLM call, every gateway request + response, in order, with timestamps and durations. Good for "walk me through the session".
  • What the user saw — full message transcript (user + agent), ordered.
  • What the LLM produced — generations, token counts, trust scores (toxicity, instruction adherence, content-category breakdown from content_quality + content_category).
  • Tool invocations — action calls, inputs, outputs, errors (from gateway_request_metadata + gateway_records).
  • Feedback + flags — user feedback, escalation markers, session-end type.
  • Audit integrity — the 1:1 invariant between GatewayRequest and GatewayResponse is checked; drift is flagged in counts.audit_chain_1to1_ok.

Prerequisites

ToolRequired
sf CLI (authenticated against the target org)yes — sf org login web --alias <alias>, and the CLI must provide sf org auth show-access-token (startup preflight enforces this)
Data Cloud enabled on the target orgyes — the STDM + GenAI DMOs must have materialized for the session
Python 3.10+yes — pipeline scripts

Typical prompts — what they map to

User saysSkill does
"Trace session <uuid> in my-org"fetch_dc.py --session <uuid> --org my-org → assemble → render
"Summarize what happened in 0Mw…"Resolve 0Mw… → UUID, then full DC pipeline
"Find escalated sessions today in my-org on Messaging"Run discover_sessions.py --since today --outcome ESCALATED --channel Messaging, print picker, user picks, then DC pipeline
"Walk me through this session"Same as trace — read the rendered summary top to bottom

What comes back to the user

After the pipeline completes, the rendered dc._session_summary.md carries these top-level sections:

  1. Session identity — UUID, start/end, duration, agent, channel, end type, participant counts
  2. Session bootstrap — channel mode + bootstrap variables (identity.mode, identity.bootstrap_variables)
  3. ID reference — full UUIDs for everything truncated in the hierarchical trace
  4. Transcript — USER ↔ AGENT narrative per TURN interaction
  5. Complete hierarchical trace — Interaction → Step → Generation → GatewayRequest, with +start + duration = +end math
  6. Per-turn summary — one row per interaction
  7. Planner LLM calls (full prompts + responses) — opt-in via --show-prompts; suppressed by default
  8. Visual analysis — gantt + LLM-call overlay
  9. Session counts — engineer-facing table of manifest counts
  10. Empties diagnostics — one row per DMO with rows == 0 and a populated _unavailable_reason
  11. Catalog (session-filtered) — TagDefinitions / TagDefinitionAssociations / Tags filtered to agents observed in the session

For deep-dive, open dc._session_tree.json — the single source of truth the summary was rendered from. See references/dc_pipeline_contract.md for the full pipeline contract and references/dc_dmo_fields.md for per-DMO field reference.

Caveats

  • gateway_requests_dropped_by_stdm — when DC reports zero gateway_requests rows but runtime telemetry would show LLM calls did fire, this skill cannot definitively distinguish "STDM exporter dropped writes" from "logging genuinely disabled at the source". The session is reported as planner_ran_no_gateway_logs; the operator can check platform telemetry to disambiguate. See references/dc_pipeline_contract.md §2.8.
  • Latency — Generation and GatewayRequest carry single-write timestamps, not start/end pairs. The renderer does not compute "latencies" between them — that delta reflects DC's serialization order, not how long the LLM call took.
  • Data Cloud materialization lag — fresh sessions may show interactions_not_materialized_yet if STDM hasn't caught up. Re-run after a minute or two.

FAQ

What does the agentforce-d360-analyze skill do?

Data Cloud 360° view of a single Agentforce session. TRIGGER when user asks to trace, inspect, summarize, or describe a specific Agentforce session by session id (Agent Session UUID 019d… or MessagingSession id 0Mw…). Also triggers on session discovery — find/list/search sessions by time, agent, channel, outcome, or conversation text — when the user has no session id yet. DO NOT TRIGGER for design-time architecture questions (use agentforce-architecture-analyze instead) or for runtime perf/latency/SLO questions that require platform telemetry beyond Data Cloud.

How do I install agentforce-d360-analyze?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/sf-skills --skill agentforce-d360-analyze in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/agentforce-d360-analyze/ (personal) or .claude/skills/agentforce-d360-analyze/ (project).

Which AI agents can use agentforce-d360-analyze?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is agentforce-d360-analyze safe to install?

Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.

Who maintains agentforce-d360-analyze?

It is published by forcedotcom in forcedotcom/sf-skills. It has 5,343 recorded installs.

More from forcedotcom/sf-skills

View all →

platform-apex-generate

forcedotcom/sf-skills

Primary Apex authoring skill for class generation, refactoring, and review. ALWAYS ACTIVATE when the user mentions Apex, .cls, triggers, or asks to create/refactor a class (service, selector, domain, batch, queueable, schedulable, invocable, DTO, utility, interface, abstract, exception, REST resource). Use this skill for requests involving SObject CRUD, mapping collections, fetching related records, scheduled jobs, batch jobs, trigger design, @AuraEnabled controllers, @RestResource endpoints, custom REST APIs, or code review of existing Apex.

platform-apex-test-generate

forcedotcom/sf-skills

Use to generate and validate Apex test classes with TestDataFactory patterns, bulk testing (251+ records), mocking, assertions, and disciplined test-fix loops. Use when creating Apex test classes (for triggers, services, controllers, batch jobs, queueables, and callouts), improving coverage, debugging or fixing failing Apex tests, or running test/coverage analysis. Triggers on Test.cls files, sf apex run test, coverage reports. Do NOT trigger for production Apex (use platform-apex-generate) or Jest/LWC tests.

Testing & QA7.1K installs

platform-apex-test-run

forcedotcom/sf-skills

Apex test execution, coverage analysis, and test-fix loops with 120-point scoring. Use when the user runs Apex tests, checks code coverage, fixes failing tests, or touches Test.cls / Test.cls files. DO NOT TRIGGER when writing Apex production code (use platform-apex-generate), Agentforce agent testing (use agentforce-test), or Jest/LWC tests (use experience-lwc-generate).

Testing & QA7K installs

platform-apex-logs-debug

forcedotcom/sf-skills

Salesforce debug log analysis and troubleshooting with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user analyzes debug logs, hits governor limits, reads stack traces, or touches .log files from Salesforce orgs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: running Apex tests (use platform-apex-test-run), generating or fixing Apex code (use platform-apex-generate), or Agentforce session tracing (use agentforce-observe).

platform-soql-query

forcedotcom/sf-skills

Use when the user needs SOQL/SOSL authoring or optimization: natural-language-to-query generation, relationship queries, aggregates, query-plan/selectivity analysis, and performance or safety improvements. TRIGGER when the user writes, optimizes, or debugs SOQL/SOSL, touches .soql files, or asks about relationship queries, aggregates, or query performance. DO NOT TRIGGER for bulk data operations (use platform-data-manage), Apex DML logic (use platform-apex-generate), or report/dashboard queries.

platform-metadata-deploy

forcedotcom/sf-skills

Salesforce DevOps automation using sf CLI v2. TRIGGER when: user deploys metadata, validates a deploy or does a dry-run, deploys to a Production org, quick-deploys a validated job ID, ships/promotes to prod, creates/manages scratch orgs or sandboxes, sets up CI/CD pipelines, or troubleshoots deployment errors with sf project deploy. DO NOT TRIGGER when: writing Apex code, building LWC components (use experience-lwc-generate), creating metadata definitions (use platform-custom-object-generate), deleting metadata from an org (use platform-destructive-deploy), or querying org data (use platform-data-manage).

DevOps & Cloud6.8K installs

Popular code quality & workflow skills

View category →

grill-me

mattpocock/skills

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

handoff

mattpocock/skills

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

domain-modeling

mattpocock/skills

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

codebase-design

mattpocock/skills

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

diagnosing-bugs

mattpocock/skills

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.