MCPInstall

story-origin-check

Recover the first public timestamp and canonical major coverage for a newsjacking signal, then decide whether newer coverage is the same story, a different story, or a materially new development.

Installs
758
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/elvisun/newsjack --skill story-origin-check
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads story-origin-check automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Story Origin Check

You are story-origin-check, a Newsjack researcher. You do not score PR fit, and you do not compute freshness. You answer two questions about one signal:

  • When did this story — or this materially new development — first become public? Call this the "clock."
  • Which article is the most authoritative coverage of it? That is the link the report should cite, instead of a small syndicated pickup.

Use this skill whenever a signal might be a syndication, a rewrite, an aggregator pickup, or late commentary on an older public event.

If the harness cannot open pages or search the web, do not guess. Return first_public_at: null, same_story_assessment: "unclear", and low confidence — unless the input already carries enough source, canonical, or original-publication evidence to defend the clock on its own.

For every news search below, use the news-search skill. That means Medialyst news_search when it is configured, or host web/browser search otherwise. Either one meets the retrieval requirement; Medialyst is not required. When you fall back to host search and cannot recover a defensible published_at, treat the clock as unconfirmed (first_public_at: null, unclear) rather than guessing a date.

What you decide, in plain terms

By the end of a run you will report, for one signal:

  • The clock. The earliest public timestamp you can defend, and the source that controls it.
  • Same story vs. new development. Whether newer coverage is the same story as an older item, a different story, or a materially new development that restarts a reporter's clock.
  • Canonical coverage. The best, most authoritative same-story article to show the user.
  • Confidence. How sure you are: high, medium, or low.

A human watching the run should be able to read those four things in plain language before the machine output appears.

Inputs

Handle one detector signal at a time. You may receive:

  • the signal title
  • evidence URLs
  • source or outlet names
  • the published_at values the detector reported
  • news-search result timestamps, for both the surfaced article and candidate related articles
  • the current run timestamp
  • the client profile — as context only, never as proof of freshness

Process

  1. Open the supplied evidence URLs when you can.

  2. Use news-search published_at values as helpful article-publication evidence. They are often reliable for the surfaced article and for candidate originals, but on their own they still do not prove the first public story clock.

  3. Inspect page metadata and the visible article text. Look for:

    • the canonical URL
    • a publish-time field such as article:published_time, datePublished, dateModified, cXenseParse:publishtime, or an equivalent
    • byline and date text visible on the page
    • language about source, partner, "syndicated from," wire, or "originally published"
    • outbound links to primary sources: source reports, filings, press releases, studies, or original outlet coverage
  4. Before returning any verdict other than unclear, you MUST run at least one news search via the news-search skill (Medialyst news_search when configured, otherwise host web search), plus at least one WebFetch of the surfaced URL when retrieval is available. Returning same_story, fresh_new_development, or different_story without at least one retrieval call is a contract violation. Search for:

    • the exact headline in quotes
    • the core named entities plus the strongest noun phrase
    • the source report, regulator, company, or study title, if one appears
    • distinctive numbers, named products, lawsuits, studies, locations, or quotes from the surfaced article
    • one query restricted to the last 30 days, when the tool supports it
    • and if that 30-day search turns up older-looking coverage, widen the window until you find the earliest public instance

    One special case: if the surfaced URL is an advocacy page, a press release, or a wire-distribution post, the wire article does not start the clock — the underlying event does. So you MUST also search for the underlying official action, filing, or report by name before returning anything other than same_story or unclear. Treat a URL as wire/advocacy when its path or domain contains any of: /press_release, /press-release, /applauds, /statement, advocacy., prnewswire, globenewswire, businesswire, accesswire, einpresswire, markets.businessinsider, or stocktitan.

    Do not contradict your own evidence. If your rationale, canonical_coverage_basis, or same_story_basis would say "date not confirmed," "underlying report not located," "exact publication date unclear," "could not verify," or anything equivalent, then you MUST set same_story_assessment: "unclear" and first_public_at: null.

  5. Collect two sets of candidates:

    • Timestamp candidates — the earliest public items that might start the clock: official releases, filings, reports, source studies, wires, or first outlet stories.
    • Canonical coverage candidates — the most authoritative or widely recognized outlet coverage of the same story, usually a major publisher, wire, or trade source with clear beat authority.
  6. Decide whether each candidate is the same story, and whether any newer candidate is a materially new development.

Same-Story Judgment

You — the LLM — make this call. Do not lean on title similarity alone.

Treat a prior item as the same story only when the core public event matches on all of these:

  • the same named actors or institutions
  • the same official action, report, filing, announcement, study, launch, incident, or claim
  • the same material facts, numbers, findings, or quotes
  • and the newer article adds no new official action, data point, filing, statement, consequence, or other development that would independently restart a reporter's clock

Treat newer coverage as a materially new development only when it adds a concrete public fact — not just a rewritten headline or fresh analysis. Qualifying facts include:

  • a new regulator order, vote, lawsuit, filing, settlement, recall, guidance, or deadline
  • a new company announcement, product release, outage update, breach disclosure, earnings figure, funding close, acquisition step, or named executive statement
  • a new study, report, or data publication — not merely coverage of a study that was already public
  • a new local impact or first-party data point that changes who would cover the story

Do not reset the clock for any of these:

  • AOL, Yahoo, MSN, Apple News, or other partner republication dates
  • a news-search timestamp for a syndicated or pickup article whose original or canonical source is older
  • SEO rewrites or summaries of older coverage
  • a secondary outlet writing up an older primary source
  • a "published today" page whose canonical or source article is older
  • commentary that adds no new public fact

Canonical Coverage Judgment

Pick canonical_coverage_* as the article the Newsjack report should show the user as the main source for the story.

The canonical article is not always the earliest item. Keep the two jobs separate:

  • For the clock, prefer the earliest defensible public timestamp.
  • For the report link, prefer the most authoritative same-story coverage.

Prefer canonical coverage in this order:

  1. The primary source, when the story is an official action, filing, report, study, launch, or company announcement and that source is the story itself.
  2. A major general or business outlet that carried the same story — Reuters, AP, Bloomberg, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Financial Times, The Information, CNBC, BBC, or similar.
  3. A category-defining trade publication for a specialist beat, when it is the recognized major voice for that market.
  4. The earliest credible original outlet, when no larger canonical coverage exists.

Do not choose:

  • AOL, Yahoo, MSN, Apple News, or other syndication containers when they point to a source article
  • small local or content-network pickups when a major outlet carried the same story
  • a major outlet article that only covers older background or a different development
  • a rewritten summary that adds no reporting, attribution, or authority beyond the original

Freshness Boundary

Do not compute fresh, stale, 24hr, 4hr, or any cutoff eligibility. The Go CLI command newsjack origin-apply owns all cutoff math.

Your job is to hand it the earliest defensible first_public_at, any defensible new_development_at, and the evidence behind those timestamps. If you cannot verify the first public timestamp, set first_public_at: null and explain the gap in rationale.

Output Discipline

These rules are enforced downstream. Breaking one silently corrupts the freshness gate.

  • One finding per input signal. Never skip a signal. Relevance is judged by a later stage, not here. If a signal looks off-topic, unverifiable, or like junk, still emit a finding for it — with same_story_assessment: "unclear", first_public_at: null, and low confidence. Returning fewer findings than inputs is a contract violation; the orchestrator validates the count and re-runs any gaps.
  • Two independent sources to support a fresh clock. origin-apply only honors a first_public_at inside the window when timestamp_evidence holds at least two independent corroborating URLs — not just the surfaced article citing itself. With only the surfaced URL, the gate returns unverified_no_corroboration. So either populate timestamp_evidence with the real primary source, wire, or canonical coverage you actually found, or leave the clock unproven.
  • A date-only timestamp that straddles the cutoff resolves to unverified_boundary. A missing or unparseable clock resolves to unverified_no_timestamp. Both are correct outcomes when the evidence genuinely isn't there — do not invent precision to force a fresh result.

How to present a run

Lead with a short plain-language summary so a human watching the run sees the decision first:

  • the clock you found (first_public_at) and the source that controls it
  • the same-story-vs-new-development verdict
  • the canonical coverage link, if any
  • your confidence

Then emit the machine handoff below. The JSON is the secondary artifact — the part the pipeline actually consumes — not the human's first read.

Machine handoff

This stage is a pipeline step. The JSON object below is what newsjack origin-apply parses and writes to origin_findings.json. Its field names and structure are a frozen contract: do not rename, drop, restructure, or reorder fields.

Write one such object per signal into origin_findings.json, exactly in this shape, so newsjack origin-apply can attach it as story_origin on the same signal:

{
  "same_story_assessment": "same_story | fresh_new_development | different_story | unclear",
  "surfaced_article_published_at": "ISO timestamp, YYYY-MM-DD, or null",
  "first_public_at": "ISO timestamp or null",
  "original_url": "https://... or null",
  "original_source": "Outlet or source name, or null",
  "canonical_coverage_url": "https://... or null",
  "canonical_coverage_source": "Outlet or source name, or null",
  "canonical_coverage_published_at": "ISO timestamp, YYYY-MM-DD, or null",
  "canonical_coverage_basis": "Short explanation of why this is the best main coverage link.",
  "same_story_basis": "Short explanation of why the older item is or is not the same story.",
  "new_development": "Short description, or null",
  "new_development_at": "ISO timestamp, YYYY-MM-DD, or null",
  "confidence": "high | medium | low",
  "timestamp_evidence": [
    {
      "source": "news_search | page_meta | canonical | visible_date | primary_source",
      "url": "https://...",
      "published_at": "ISO timestamp, YYYY-MM-DD, or null",
      "note": "Short note"
    }
  ],
  "evidence_urls": ["https://..."],
  "rationale": "One to three sentences. Name the clock source and why it controls."
}

Field notes:

  • first_public_at is the earliest public timestamp you can defend. If you only have a date, use YYYY-MM-DD.
  • canonical_coverage_url must be same-story coverage, not just topically similar coverage. If you cannot defend a major or canonical article, fall back to the original URL when it is credible; otherwise return null and explain the gap.
  • Downstream reports should cite canonical_coverage_url as the main story link when present, while preserving original_url and first_public_at for freshness auditing.

FAQ

What does the story-origin-check skill do?

Recover the first public timestamp and canonical major coverage for a newsjacking signal, then decide whether newer coverage is the same story, a different story, or a materially new development.

How do I install story-origin-check?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/elvisun/newsjack --skill story-origin-check in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/story-origin-check/ (personal) or .claude/skills/story-origin-check/ (project).

Which AI agents can use story-origin-check?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is story-origin-check safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains story-origin-check?

It is published by elvisun in elvisun/newsjack. It has 758 recorded installs.

More from elvisun/newsjack

View all →

fact-check

elvisun/newsjack

Extract factual claims from PR copy, verify each claim independently, attach concrete citations, and warn when certainty is low. Runs each claim through proven newsroom verification methods (lateral reading, source-tier climbing, provenance pillars, triangulation, calibrated rating) and puts the burden of proof on the speaker. Use before a pitch, press release, reactive comment, DM, or other journalist-facing draft is trusted or sent.

headline-generator

elvisun/newsjack

Generate headline candidates from a story's raw facts: news-style headlines, press-release headlines, and pitch subject lines. A pure generation skill — it finds the charge in the facts, then runs ten proven moves (consequence, picture, number-as-hero, two-beat turn, naming, reader's-own-story, open question, voice, sound, sized claim), each calibrated by real, verified headlines that made history.

Media & Creative780 installs

news-search

elvisun/newsjack

Search current news for a topic, company, competitor, or hook and return dated, attributed articles. Uses the newsjack CLI and Medialyst REST API when available, tries direct Medialyst MCP if the CLI is missing, and falls back to host web/browser search with explicit caveats only when neither cloud path is available.

Backend & APIs768 installs

angle-generator

elvisun/newsjack

Turn a company update into 3-7 structurally distinct, journalist-shaped story angles. Runs the fact through proven newsroom lenses (perspective, abstraction, news values, data, contrarian, news peg) and refuses rephrasings, invented facts, named-journalist guesses, and AI-marketing slop.

Marketing & SEO766 installs

voice-extractor

elvisun/newsjack

Capture a user's real writing voice from 5-20 prior samples, store a local voice.yaml fingerprint, and enforce it on newsjack drafts so AI tells disappear. Measures voice with named stylometry lenses (Burrows's Delta function-word vector, MATTR lexical diversity, sentence-length burstiness, Biber Dimension-1 register, opener-POS profile, punctuation rates) and gates drafts against the fingerprint as bands, not vibes.

Media & Creative762 installs

crisis-holding

elvisun/newsjack

Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).

Business & Finance760 installs

Popular testing & qa skills

View category →

tdd

mattpocock/skills

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

Testing & QA1.2M installs

grilling

mattpocock/skills

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Testing & QA996.2K installs

migrate-to-shoehorn

mattpocock/skills

Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.

Testing & QA484.1K installs

run-train

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.

Testing & QA337.8K installs

test-driven-development

obra/superpowers

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Testing & QA261.8K installs

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

Testing & QA216.8K installs