
scaffold-dotnet-test-project
MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero", exact solution wiring, xUnit/NUnit/MSTest, and central packages. DO NOT USE to only author tests in an already-wired project (code-testing), run tests, migrate, or correct MSTest syntax/configuration without changing project or CI files (writing-mstest-tests).
- Installs
- 2.6K
- Last 24h
- +62
- Trending rank
- #2866
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/skills --skill scaffold-dotnet-test-project- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads scaffold-dotnet-test-project automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Scaffold or Repair a .NET Test Project
Create the smallest missing test container or repair only the missing wiring. The goal is test discovery through the repository's real build entry point, not a preferred solution layout.
Repository overlay
For every repository-scoped task where read-only file inspection is allowed,
check .agents/skill-overlays/dotnet-test/scaffold-dotnet-test-project.md at
the repository root before any other discovery. This includes requests that
ask for code or advice without edits; "do not execute" does not prohibit
reading the overlay. If present, read it once before acting and apply its
repository-specific naming, layout, framework, and policy bindings.
Before applying it, require its frontmatter to declare
core: dotnet-test/scaffold-dotnet-test-project, binding-revision: "1", and
mode: extend. If any value is missing or different, report the mismatch and
continue using this skill's portable guidance without applying the overlay.
Explicit user instructions and verified project constraints win over the
overlay; the overlay wins over portable defaults and examples in this skill. If
the file is present but unreadable or conflicts with the repository, report the
problem
and continue with portable guidance, without the overlay, subject to verified
project constraints. If it is absent, continue normally. Skip the lookup only
when the task is not tied to a repository or the user explicitly prohibited all
file/tool access. An overlay cannot expand tool permissions or the task's scope.
Route the Request
Inspect the repository before editing, then choose exactly one path:
| Repository state | Action | Do not do |
|---|---|---|
| No suitable test project | Create one bounded project, reference the production project, and register it | Create a project per source project |
Test project exists but lacks the required ProjectReference | Add only that reference and verify direct plus entry-point execution | Scaffold another project or rewrite tests |
Test project passes directly but is absent from .sln, .slnx, or .slnf | Register the existing project in the exact entry point CI uses | Recreate the project or switch solution formats |
| Suitable project, reference, and requested entry point are already correct | Leave the workspace unchanged; use code-testing if test methods are requested | Normalize or replace working files |
An existing project is suitable when its target framework can reference the production project and its purpose matches the requested layer. A different preferred name is not a reason to create a duplicate.
No-op is a required outcome. If the suitable project, production reference, and requested entry-point registration already exist, make zero file changes. Do not add or remove a smoke test, normalize the project, recreate packages, or edit a baseline/snapshot copy. Report the existing paths and stop.
Workflow
1. Establish the repository contract
Start from the task's current working directory. The skill context's Base directory is where these instructions live, not the user's repository. Never
search parent temporary directories or treat the skill installation as the
workspace. If the expected files are not visible, confirm the current directory
before concluding that a project is absent.
Anchor every edit and validation command to the repository path named by the user or established from the current directory. If similarly named fixtures, solutions, or copied trees exist, do not edit or validate one as a substitute for the requested tree. Before changing a solution artifact, record its exact path; after changing it, list that same artifact immediately and require the test project to appear before proceeding.
Read only enough to determine:
- the production project and requested test scope;
- the command and
.sln,.slnx,.slnf, or project graph used by CI; - whether a suitable test project exists, what it references, and where it is registered;
- the neighboring test framework, runner, target framework, nullable and implicit-usings conventions; and
- whether package or SDK versions come from
Directory.Packages.props,Directory.Build.props,global.json, or an MSBuild SDK declaration.
If the user reports that a test project passes directly but solution-level discovery finds nothing, treat that as registration evidence. Inspect the entry point before considering project creation.
2. Create only when the project is absent
Choose one test project for the narrowest requested production project. Follow, in order, the user's explicit framework choice, neighboring test projects, repository-wide package/SDK conventions, then a standard SDK template.
Use a dotnet new template only when its generated framework generation and
package style match the repository contract. Inspect template availability
before creation. In particular, generic dotnet new xunit commonly emits xUnit
2 packages; for a centrally managed xunit.v3 repository, use a repository or
installed xUnit v3 template, or create the minimal SDK project directly. Never
generate versioned xUnit 2 references and then rewrite them into xUnit v3.
Then:
- align target framework, nullable, implicit usings, runner, and package style;
- use
dotnet add <test-project> reference <production-project>for only the production projects exercised by the requested tests; - delete template sample files such as
UnitTest1.cs, then create a behavior-named test file rather than repurposing the template filename; and - omit package versions when central package management supplies them.
For xUnit v3 projects using MTP, preserve or add the executable output and runner selection (or the equivalent supplied by the resolved package):
<OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
<UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner>true</UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner>
Add TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport=true only for the VSTest-command-mode
bridge to MTP. It is not required for SDK 10+ native MTP mode selected by
global.json test.runner: Microsoft.Testing.Platform. Use
platform-detection to distinguish command mode from the executed runner;
neither SDK version nor OutputType=Exe alone proves harness discovery.
3. Repair only the missing edge when the project exists
- Missing production reference: use
dotnet add <test-project> reference <production-project>, inspect the resulting project, and leave every other project element plus all test source files unchanged. Compare the project before and after so the addedProjectReferenceis the only semantic change. - Missing
.slnor.slnxregistration: rundotnet sln <entry-point> add <test-project>, then immediately rundotnet sln <entry-point> listagainst that exact path. If the project is absent, the repair has not happened; do not validate a sibling solution or report success. - Missing
.slnfregistration: add the existing project to its underlying solution if necessary, then include that same project path in the filter. If the underlying solution already contains it, edit only the filter. - Multiple solution artifacts: modify only the one named by the user or invoked by CI. Do not substitute an easier format.
- No solution artifact: preserve the existing project-oriented workflow. Do not create a solution for aesthetics.
4. Add only the requested smoke behavior
For a newly created project, replace template examples with the smallest smoke suite the user requested. Each test must invoke a real production symbol and assert a concrete deterministic result without network, wall-clock, process, or real-filesystem dependencies.
For an existing-project wiring repair, do not add, rewrite, rename, or expand tests unless the user explicitly asks for test behavior changes. Registration and test authoring are separate operations.
5. Verify the repaired path
Run the narrowest commands that prove the chosen route:
Choose command forms from the actual repository mode: native MTP uses
dotnet test --project <test-project> and dotnet test --solution <entry-point>;
VSTest command mode uses positional project/solution paths, including when it
bridges to MTP. Apply this distinction to every direct-project and entry-point
test below. Preserve the exact CI command and its supported .slnf invocation;
do not substitute a solution or invent unsupported switches.
For classic non-SDK projects, use the repository's documented MSBuild and
native test-runner commands instead of any dotnet test example below.
If that toolchain is unavailable, report the blocker without migrating the
project or claiming successful discovery.
| Route | Required evidence |
|---|---|
| Newly created project | Mode-aware direct-project test, the exact entry-point command CI uses, and registration listing. If the entry point is a .slnf/.slnx containing tests, run the repository's test command on that artifact rather than proving only that it builds. |
| Missing reference | Targeted project test plus the exact solution/root test command requested |
Missing .sln/.slnx registration | Listing and dotnet test for that exact artifact; never use another solution as a fallback |
Missing .slnf entry | Inspect the filter entry and run the exact CI filter build command; do not prepend a deliberately failing alternate command |
| Already correct/no-op | Structural inspection of the existing reference and registration. Unless execution was requested, do not run tests merely to prove a no-op because that creates bin/obj and weakens byte-for-byte cleanliness evidence. |
Inspect the repository's command before adding switches. Do not prepend a
speculative --no-restore attempt or hide alternatives in command-a || command-b; run the configured entry-point command whose clean exit is the
evidence.
For every wiring repair, invoke the exact validation command directly and preserve its exit status. Reading generated files, a grader script, or a later build is not a substitute for observing that command complete successfully.
Before reporting completion, inspect the final changed-file set. Remove only
bin/obj or equivalent build artifacts created by this task when they were
absent beforehand and are not intentionally tracked; never remove pre-existing
artifacts. Preserve the passing command's complete result so the handoff can
state the exact entry point and discovered test count.
For a no-op, inspect rather than rewrite and report the existing paths. A green
dotnet build is not test-discovery evidence. If validation is blocked, report
the exact failing command and first actionable error; never describe an unrun or
failed command as successful.
Output
Keep the handoff proportional to the change:
| Requirement | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Project created, reused, or repaired | Test project path and chosen route |
| Production reference | Referenced .csproj, or why no change was needed |
| Build registration | Exact .sln/.slnx/.slnf entry or project workflow |
| Test discovery | Passing harness-level command and discovered test |
Completion Checks
- Existing projects were checked before creation.
- Only the requested production scope is referenced and tested.
- Framework, runner, target framework, and central package conventions remain intact.
- Template samples are removed from a newly created project.
- Existing test code is untouched for a wiring-only repair.
- The exact repository entry point discovers and runs the test project.
FAQ
What does the scaffold-dotnet-test-project skill do?
MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero", exact solution wiring, xUnit/NUnit/MSTest, and central packages. DO NOT USE to only author tests in an already-wired project (code-testing), run tests, migrate, or correct MSTest syntax/configuration without changing project or CI files (writing-mstest-tests).
How do I install scaffold-dotnet-test-project?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/skills --skill scaffold-dotnet-test-project in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/scaffold-dotnet-test-project/ (personal) or .claude/skills/scaffold-dotnet-test-project/ (project).
Which AI agents can use scaffold-dotnet-test-project?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is scaffold-dotnet-test-project safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains scaffold-dotnet-test-project?
It is published by dotnet in dotnet/skills. It has 2,629 recorded installs.
More from dotnet/skills
optimizing-ef-core-queries
dotnet/skills
Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query construction, result-graph tracking, bulk writes, DbContext lifetime or overlapping operations, search semantics, paging, raw SQL, and model/index coverage. Use whether or not EF Core owns the schema. For EF Core, not Dapper or raw ADO.NET.
run-tests
dotnet/skills
ALWAYS USE before running .NET tests or answering with a test command or flags. Trigger on "run the tests", "exact dotnet test command", one test/class/category/trait/target framework, combined filters, --filter-query, --no-build, --diag, diagnostic logs, TRX, coverage collection, crash/hang dumps, filter errors, or unrecognized options. Chooses repository-compatible classic, VSTest, bridged MTP, or native MTP syntax for MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit. DO NOT USE for platform identification alone (platform-detection), writing or debugging test code, interpreting an existing coverage report, CI investigation, migration, or a persistent hot reload/watch loop.
analyzing-dotnet-performance
dotnet/skills
Scans .NET code for 50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.
test-anti-patterns
dotnet/skills
Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).
filter-syntax
dotnet/skills
Reference-only filter syntax for VSTest and MTP with MSTest, NUnit, xUnit v3, and TUnit. Load only after the platform/framework is known and a consumer needs to create or translate a filter. Do not load for unfiltered runs or platform detection. Used by run-tests and mtp-hot-reload; never invoke directly.
dotnet-webapi
dotnet/skills
Guides creation and modification of ASP.NET Core Web API endpoints with correct HTTP semantics, OpenAPI metadata, and error handling. USE FOR: adding new API endpoints (controllers or minimal APIs), wiring up OpenAPI/Swagger, creating .http test files, setting up global error handling middleware. DO NOT USE FOR: general C coding style, EF Core data access or query optimization (use optimizing-ef-core-queries), frontend/Blazor work, gRPC services, or SignalR hubs.
Popular testing & qa skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
grilling
mattpocock/skills
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
migrate-to-shoehorn
mattpocock/skills
Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.
run-train
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.
test-driven-development
obra/superpowers
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
finishing-a-development-branch
obra/superpowers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work