!bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys automation,workflow

Quick Design

This is the lightweight design path for changes that don't need a full GDD. Full GDD authoring via /design-system is the heavyweight path. Use this skill for work under about one week of implementation — tuning adjustments, minor behavioral tweaks, small additions to existing systems, or standalone features too small to warrant a full document. Most tweaks are hours; the one-week ceiling is the limit for a New Small System (see the categories below).

Output: design/quick-specs/[name]-[date].md

When to run: Anytime a change is too small for /design-system but too meaningful to implement without a written rationale.

Every AskUserQuestion call follows .claude/docs/automation-modes.md (collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds; automation_always_ask categories always prompt).

1. Classify the Change

First, read the argument and determine which category this change falls into:

• Tuning — changing numbers or balance values in an existing system with no behavioral change (most minimal path). Example: "increase jump height from 5 to 6 units", "reduce enemy patrol speed by 10%".
• Tweak — a small behavioral change to an existing system that introduces no new states, branches, or systems. Example: "make dash invincible on frame 1", "allow combo to cancel into roll".
• Addition — adding a small mechanic to an existing system that may introduce 1-2 new states or interactions. Example: "add a parry window to the block mechanic", "add a charge variant to the basic attack".
• New Small System — a standalone feature small enough that it has no existing GDD and is under approximately one week of implementation work. Example: "achievement popup system", "simple day/night visual cycle".

If the change does NOT fit these categories — it introduces a new system with significant cross-system dependencies, requires more than one week of implementation, or fundamentally alters an existing system's core rules — stop and redirect to /design-system instead. Verdict: REDIRECTED — use /design-system for this change.

If there is no argument, ask the user to describe the change (plain text prompt), then classify it using the criteria above.

Present the inferred classification using AskUserQuestion:

• Prompt: "I've classified this as [inferred type] — [brief reason]. Is that correct?"
• Options:
  • [A] Yes — [inferred type] is correct
  • [B] Tuning — changing numbers or balance values only
  • [C] Tweak — small behavioral change to an existing system
  • [D] Addition — adding a small mechanic to an existing system
  • [E] New Small System — standalone feature, under one week of work
  • [F] This is too large — redirect me to /design-system

If [F]: stop. Verdict: REDIRECTED — use /design-system for this change. Otherwise: proceed with the selected type.

2. Context Scan

Before drafting anything, read the relevant context. Read the GDD and the systems index by section: find the headings you need with the Grep tool (pattern ^#, content mode) and Read those ranges with offset and limit.

• Search design/gdd/ for the GDD most relevant to this change. Read the sections that this change would affect. If no GDD covers this system — usually the case at workflow: minimal, where design/game-brief.md and the stories are the design record — read the brief's lines for it and the story the change touches instead, report "No GDD for [system] — using the brief and [story path]", and give the brief as the spec's GDD Reference.
• Check whether design/gdd/systems-index.md exists. If it does, read it to understand where this system sits in the dependency graph and what tier it belongs to. If it does not exist, note "No systems index found — skipping dependency tier check." and continue.
• Check design/quick-specs/ for any prior quick specs that touched this system — avoid contradicting them.
• If this is a Tuning change, also check assets/data/ for the data file that holds the relevant values.

Report what was found: "Found GDD at [path]. Relevant section: [section name]. Prior quick specs for this system: [each path, and whether it agrees or conflicts with this change — or "none"]." Name a prior spec even when it agrees — "no conflicts" alone reads the same as "no prior specs".

3. Draft the Quick Design Spec

Use the appropriate spec format for the change category.

For Tuning changes

Produce a single table:

# Quick Design Spec: [Title]

**Type**: Tuning
**System**: [System name]
**GDD Reference**: `design/gdd/[filename].md` — Tuning Knobs section
**Date**: [today]

## Change

| Parameter | Old Value | New Value | Rationale |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| [param]   | [old]     | [new]     | [why]     |

## Tuning Knob Mapping

Maps to GDD Tuning Knob: [knob name and its documented range].
New value is [within / at the edge of / outside] the documented range.
[If outside: explain why the range should be extended.]

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] [Parameter] reads [new value] from `assets/data/[file]`
- [ ] Behavior difference is observable in [specific context]
- [ ] No regression in [related behavior]

For Tweak and Addition changes

# Quick Design Spec: [Title]

**Type**: [Tweak / Addition]
**System**: [System name]
**GDD Reference**: `design/gdd/[filename].md`
**Date**: [today]

## Change Summary

[1-2 sentences describing what changes and why.]

## Motivation

[Why is this change needed? What player experience problem does it solve?
Reference the relevant MDA aesthetic or player feedback if applicable.]

## Design Delta

Current GDD says (quoting `design/gdd/[filename].md`, [section]):

> [exact quote of the relevant rule or description]

This spec changes that to:

[New rule or description, written with the same precision as a GDD Detailed
Rules section. A programmer should be able to implement from this text alone.]

## New Rules / Values

[Full unambiguous statement of the replacement content. If this introduces
new states, list them. If it introduces new parameters, define their ranges.]

## Affected Systems

| System | Impact | Action Required |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
| [system] | [how it is affected] | [update GDD / update data file / no action] |

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 1]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 2]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 3]
- [ ] No regression: [the original behavior this must not break]

## GDD Update Required?

[Yes / No]
[If yes: which file, which section, and what the update should say.]

For New Small System changes

Use a trimmed GDD structure. Include only the sections that are directly necessary — skip Player Fantasy, full Formulas, and Edge Cases unless the system specifically requires them.

# Quick Design Spec: [Title]

**Type**: New Small System
**Scope**: [1-2 sentence description of what this system does and doesn't do]
**Date**: [today]
**Estimated Implementation**: [hours]

## Overview

[One paragraph a new team member could understand. What does this system do,
when does it activate, and what does it produce?]

## Core Rules

[Unambiguous rules for the system. Use numbered lists for sequential behavior
and bullet lists for conditions. Be precise enough that a programmer can
implement without asking questions.]

## Tuning Knobs

| Knob | Default | Range | Category | Rationale |
|------|---------|-------|----------|-----------|
| [name] | [value] | [min–max] | [feel/curve/gate] | [why this default] |

All values must live in `assets/data/[appropriate-file].json`, not hardcoded.

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] [Functional criterion: does the right thing]
- [ ] [Functional criterion: handles the edge case]
- [ ] [Experiential criterion: feels right — what a playtest validates]
- [ ] [Regression criterion: does not break adjacent system]

## Systems Index

This system is not currently in `design/gdd/systems-index.md`.
[If it should be added: suggest which layer and priority tier.]
[If it is too small to track: state "This system is below systems-index
tracking threshold — quick spec is sufficient."]

4. Approval and Filing

Present the draft to the user in full. Then use AskUserQuestion:

• Prompt: "Here's the Quick Design Spec draft. How do you want to proceed?"
• Options:
  • [A] Approve — write it as shown
  • [B] Revise — I'll describe what to change
  • [C] This grew too large — redirect to /design-system instead

If [B]: collect the requested changes, revise the draft, and re-present this widget. If [C]: stop. Verdict: REDIRECTED — use /design-system for this change.

If [A]: ask "May I write this Quick Design Spec to design/quick-specs/[kebab-case-title]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md?"

Use today's date in the filename. The title should be a kebab-case description of the change (e.g., jump-height-tuning-2026-03-10, parry-window-addition-2026-03-10).

If yes, create the design/quick-specs/ directory if it does not exist, then write the file.

If a GDD update is required (flagged in the spec), ask separately after writing the quick spec:

"This spec modifies rules in [System Name]. May I update design/gdd/[filename].md — specifically the [section name] section?"

Show the exact text that would be changed (old vs. new) before asking. Do not make GDD edits without explicit approval.

5. Handoff

After writing the file, output:

Quick Design Spec written to: design/quick-specs/[filename].md
Type: [Tuning / Tweak / Addition / New Small System]
System: [system name]
GDD update: [Required — pending approval / Applied / Not required]

Next step: This spec is ready for `/story-readiness` validation before
implementation (at `workflow: minimal`, go straight to `/dev-story`). Reference this spec in the story's GDD Reference field.

Pipeline Notes

Verdict: COMPLETE — quick design spec written and ready for implementation.

Quick Design Specs bypass /design-review and /review-all-gdds by design. They are for small, low-risk, well-scoped changes where the cost of the full review pipeline exceeds the risk of the change itself.

Redirect to the full pipeline if any of the following are true:

• The change adds a new system that belongs in the systems index
• The change significantly alters cross-system behavior or a system's contracts with other systems
• The change introduces new player-facing mechanics that affect the game's MDA aesthetic balance
• Implementation is likely to exceed one week of work

In those cases: "This change has grown beyond quick-spec scope. I recommend using /design-system to author a full GDD for this."

Recommended Next Steps

• Run /story-readiness [story-path] to validate the story before implementation begins (skip at rigor: minimal — /dev-story directly) — reference this spec in the story's GDD Reference field
• Run /dev-story [story-path] to implement once the story passes readiness checks
• If the change is larger than expected, run /design-system [system-name] to author a full GDD instead