
n8n-code-javascript
Write, review, or debug JavaScript in an n8n Code node. Use when a Code node is already in the workflow (editing it, fixing an error, choosing its mode, making it faster), or when a new one is justified: no native node fits (check the job-to-node table in using-n8n-mcp-skills first) and the job is on the closed list — loops or recursion no node expresses, state across runs, parsing no node handles, an allowlisted library, heavy all-items work, or one short node replacing 4+ glue nodes. Covers $input/$json/$node in code, this.helpers, Luxon, SplitInBatches loops, cross-iteration data, pairedItem, per-item performance, and the "Why Code:" note. Filtering, totals, dedupe, sorting, joins, file formats and API paging have native nodes (Filter, Summarize, Remove Duplicates, Sort, Merge, Extract From File, HTTP Request): see n8n-node-configuration. EXCEPTION — for the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode), use n8n-code-tool; it has a different runtime contract
- Installs
- 7.2K
- Last 24h
- +30
- Trending rank
- #4365
- Security
- Pass
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-code-javascript- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads n8n-code-javascript automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
Security audits
Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
JavaScript Code Node
Expert guidance for writing JavaScript code in n8n Code nodes.
Before you write a Code node
A new Code node has to pass this gate first:
- Is there a native node for the job? Check the job-to-node table in
using-n8n-mcp-skills: Filter, IF / Switch, Summarize, Aggregate, Split Out, Merge, Compare Datasets, Remove Duplicates, Sort + Limit, Date & Time, XML / HTML / Extract From File / Convert To File, HTTP Request (pagination, batching) and Crypto cover most reaches for Code. Their configs are inn8n-node-configuration→ NATIVE_NODES.md. - Would a short expression in that node do? One expression, no function body — the helper methods (
.pluck(),.sum(),.unique(),$ifEmpty(),.diffTo()) are inn8n-expression-syntaxand, on n8n-mcp 2.97.0+, intools_documentation({topic: "expression_helpers"}). Several statements inside{{ }}count as code, so they belong here rather than in an Edit Fields field. - Is the job on the closed list? Loops or recursion no node expresses, state across runs
(
$getWorkflowStaticData), parsing no node handles, an allowlisted library, heavy all-items work (thousands of items, stated or measured), or one short Code node (~15 lines) replacing 4+ glue nodes that only reshape data.
If it passes, write the Code node and give it a note, so the next reader (and the review hooks) can see why:
{ "name": "Flatten category tree", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.code", "notes": "Why Code: Split Out considered — the tree has arbitrary depth (recursion)", "notesInFlow": true }
Editing or debugging a Code node that is already there doesn't need the gate, but if the node does a native-node job, say so and offer the native replacement.
Quick Start
// Basic template for Code nodes
const items = $input.all();
// Process data
const processed = items.map(item => ({
json: {
...item.json,
processed: true,
timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
}
}));
return processed;
Essential Rules
- Choose "Run Once for All Items" mode (recommended for most use cases)
- Access data:
$input.all(),$input.first(), or$input.item - Return
[{json: {...}}]— the canonical, mode-portable form. In Run Once for All Items mode n8n also auto-wraps a barereturn {…}object, so that runs too; what genuinely fails is returning a primitive (string/number) ornull. - CRITICAL: Webhook data is under
$json.body(not$jsondirectly) - Built-ins available:
this.helpers.httpRequest()(no auth — the bare$helpersglobal is undefined in the task-runner sandbox, so$helpers.httpRequest()throwsReferenceError: $helpers is not defined), DateTime (Luxon), $jmespath(). Not available:this.helpers.httpRequestWithAuthentication(deny-listed), $env (when N8N_BLOCK_ENV_ACCESS_IN_NODE=true), require() (unless allowlisted). For anything beyond a trivial unauthenticated GET (auth, pagination, retries), prefer the HTTP Request node and keep Code nodes for pure logic. - Instance-allowlisted libraries: Self-hosted instances can allowlist modules via
N8N_RUNNERS_ALLOWED_BUILT_IN_MODULESandN8N_RUNNERS_ALLOWED_EXTERNAL_MODULES(legacy:NODE_FUNCTION_ALLOW_BUILTIN/NODE_FUNCTION_ALLOW_EXTERNAL). If the user says their instance allows specific modules (e.g.axios,lodash,crypto), use them viarequire()— don't refuse. If unsure, ask or default to built-ins only. - Wrong skill? If you're writing code for a Custom Code Tool attached to an AI Agent (
@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode), stop — that node has a different contract (input viaquery, must return a string, no$input/$helpers). Use the n8n-code-tool skill.
Mode Selection Guide
The Code node offers two execution modes. Choose based on your use case:
Run Once for All Items (Recommended - Default)
Use this mode for: 95% of use cases
- How it works: Code executes once regardless of input count
- Data access:
$input.all()oritemsarray - Best for: logic that needs every item at once and passed the gate above
- Performance: Faster for multiple items (single execution)
// Example: running balance — each item depends on the ones before it,
// which no native node expresses (Summarize gives one total per group, not a running one)
let balance = 0;
return $input.all().map(item => {
balance += item.json.amount || 0;
return { json: { ...item.json, balance } };
});
When to use:
- ✅ Each item depends on earlier items (running totals, sessionizing events, gap detection)
- ✅ Multi-pass algorithms or recursion over nested data of unknown depth
- ✅ Heavy transforms over thousands of items where one node beats a long chain (measured)
Native first: totals, averages and counts → Summarize; sorting or ranking → Sort + Limit; deduplication → Remove Duplicates; items into one array → Aggregate; joining two lists → Merge.
Run Once for Each Item
Use this mode for: Specialized cases only
- How it works: Code executes separately for each input item
- Data access:
$input.itemor$item - Best for: Item-specific logic, independent operations, per-item validation
- Performance: Slower for large datasets (multiple executions)
// Example: Add processing timestamp to each item
const item = $input.item;
return [{
json: {
...item.json,
processed: true,
processedAt: new Date().toISOString()
}
}];
When to use:
- ✅ Each item needs independent API call
- ✅ Per-item validation with different error handling
- ✅ Item-specific transformations based on item properties
- ✅ When items must be processed separately for business logic
Decision Shortcut:
- Need to look at multiple items? → Use "All Items" mode
- Each item completely independent? → Use "Each Item" mode
- Not sure? → Use "All Items" mode (you can always loop inside)
Why "All Items" is faster — the per-item boundary
Mode choice is the single biggest performance lever in a Code node. Each per-item execution context costs a setup tax (measured on n8n 2.x, small records):
| What runs per item | Approx. cost |
|---|---|
| Code All Items (one run for the whole set) | ~0.02 ms/item |
| Expression in any node (IF / Set / etc.) | ~0.2 ms/item |
| Code Each Item (a full sandbox per item) | ~0.6 ms/item — ~25–30× All Items |
So Run Once for Each Item over 10k items is ~6 s of pure overhead vs ~0.2 s in Run Once for All Items. Use Each Item only when an item genuinely needs isolating (independent error handling, or a per-item API call you can't batch); otherwise loop inside one All Items node. Expression complexity itself is essentially free (~90% of the cost is the per-item context, not your code) and every node→node hop re-copies all items — so reduce the number of per-item boundaries, don't micro-optimize each one.
On top of the per-item cost, every Code node run pays a fixed hand-off to the task runner. In the default internal mode the runner stops after 15 s idle (N8N_RUNNERS_AUTO_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT), so a workflow that runs now and then pays a cold start of hundreds of milliseconds on most runs. Native transform nodes process all items in one in-process call and skip that hand-off.
What this means for node choice. Most workflows are I/O-bound, and below a few hundred items none of these costs matter: choose by readability, which means native nodes first. Performance becomes the deciding argument only for heavy all-items work — thousands of items per run, transform work rather than I/O dominating, stated by the user or measured. Then one All Items Code node can beat a long chain of nodes, and the reason goes in its Why Code: note. These figures are the pack's one measured reference; the other skills point here instead of repeating them.
See: DATA_ACCESS.md → "Mode Performance" for the corollaries, hop costs, and scale check.
Data Access Patterns
Four ways to pull data from upstream nodes. Note $node["Name"] and $('Name') need .first().json or .all() — never .json directly.
const allItems = $input.all(); // 1. All items — batch ops, aggregation (most common)
const data = $input.first().json; // 2. First item — single objects, API responses
const item = $input.item; // 3. Current item — "Each Item" mode ONLY (undefined otherwise)
const other = $node["Webhook"].json; // 4. Named node — combine data across nodes
Always access fields via .json (e.g. item.json.name, not item.name), and prefer the explicit $input.first().json.field over a bare $json.field.
See: DATA_ACCESS.md for the full guide — every pattern with examples, a decision tree, and the common mistakes (mutating originals, missing length checks, $input.item in the wrong mode).
Critical: Webhook Data Structure
MOST COMMON MISTAKE: Webhook data is nested under .body
// ❌ WRONG - Will return undefined
const name = $json.name;
const email = $json.email;
// ✅ CORRECT - Webhook data is under .body
const name = $json.body.name;
const email = $json.body.email;
// Or with $input
const webhookData = $input.first().json.body;
const name = webhookData.name;
Why: Webhook node wraps all request data under body property. This includes POST data, query parameters, and JSON payloads.
See: DATA_ACCESS.md for full webhook structure details
Return Format Requirements
Canonical form: [{json: {...}}] — an array of objects each with a json property. It is unambiguous and works identically in both execution modes, so make it your default.
In Run Once for All Items mode n8n auto-normalizes looser shapes on the way out: a single bare object, or an array of bare objects, gets wrapped under json for you. So return {foo: 1} runs. What has nothing to wrap — and therefore genuinely fails at runtime with "Code doesn't return items properly" — is a primitive (string/number/boolean) or null/undefined. (n8n-mcp ≥ 2.63.0 no longer flags a bare-object return as an error; it reflects this auto-wrap behavior.)
Correct Return Formats
// ✅ Single result
return [{
json: {
field1: value1,
field2: value2
}
}];
// ✅ Multiple results
return [
{json: {id: 1, data: 'first'}},
{json: {id: 2, data: 'second'}}
];
// ✅ Transformed array
const transformed = $input.all()
.filter(item => item.json.valid)
.map(item => ({
json: {
id: item.json.id,
processed: true
}
}));
return transformed;
// ✅ Empty result (when no data to return)
return [];
// ✅ Conditional return
if (shouldProcess) {
return [{json: processedData}];
} else {
return [];
}
Non-Canonical Returns (auto-wrapped — prefer the canonical form)
// ⚠️ Auto-wrapped in All Items mode → [{json: {field: value}}]. Runs, but prefer the array form.
return {
json: {field: value}
};
// ⚠️ Auto-wrapped → [{json: {field: value}}]. Runs, but add the json wrapper for clarity.
return [{field: value}];
// ✅ Fine — input items already carry a json property, so returning them unchanged is a valid passthrough
return $input.all();
Genuinely Broken Returns
// ❌ FAILS: primitive — n8n errors "Code doesn't return items properly"
return "processed";
// ❌ FAILS: null / undefined — nothing to pass to the next node
return null;
Why it matters: The canonical [{json: {...}}] is unambiguous and behaves the same in both modes. n8n auto-normalizes bare objects and arrays-of-objects in All Items mode, but a primitive or null return has nothing to wrap and stops execution.
See: ERROR_PATTERNS.md #3 for detailed error solutions
Common Patterns Overview
The most useful Code node shapes from production workflows, for when Code passed the gate. Several of them have a native equivalent (totals → Summarize, top-N → Sort + Limit, JSON comparison → Compare Datasets, string aggregation → Aggregate or Summarize concatenate); each pattern in the library opens with its native alternative. The full library covers 10 patterns: multi-source aggregation, regex filtering, markdown/structured-text parsing, JSON comparison, CRM/form transformation, release processing, array transformation with computed fields, Slack Block Kit formatting, top-N ranking, and string-aggregation reporting — each with variations.
See: COMMON_PATTERNS.md for the 10 detailed production patterns (and the Best Practices section: validate input, try-catch, filter-early, array methods over loops, console.log debugging).
Error Prevention - Top Mistakes
The recurring Code node failures, in rough frequency order:
- Empty code / missing return — always end with
return [...], and make sure every branch returns. - Expression syntax as code — don't write
{{ }}where JavaScript belongs (return {{ $json.x }}is a syntax error). Use`${$json.field}`or$input.first().json.field.{{ }}inside a string literal is fine — it's just literal text n8n won't evaluate. - Return shape — prefer
return [{json:{...}}]. A barereturn {…}auto-wraps in All Items mode, but returning a primitive (string/number) ornullis what actually fails. - Missing null checks — use optional chaining:
item.json?.user?.email || 'fallback'. - Webhook body nesting —
$json.emailis undefined; use$json.body.email. - Auth helpers blocked (
httpRequestWithAuthentication) and$envblocked — route secrets through credentials/HTTP Request node, not the Code node sandbox.
See: ERROR_PATTERNS.md for the comprehensive guide — each error with wrong/right code, escaping rules, the sandbox restrictions (Errors #6–#7), a prevention checklist, and a quick error-message lookup table.
Built-in Functions & Helpers
// HTTP requests (no auth — see sandbox note below)
const res = await this.helpers.httpRequest({ method: 'GET', url: 'https://api.example.com/data' });
// DateTime (Luxon): now, formatting, arithmetic
const now = DateTime.now();
const formatted = now.toFormat('yyyy-MM-dd');
const tomorrow = now.plus({ days: 1 });
// $jmespath() — query JSON structures
const adults = $jmespath($input.first().json, 'users[?age >= `18`]');
// $getWorkflowStaticData() — data that persists across executions
Sandbox (since n8n v2.0, JsTaskRunnerSandbox): the accessor is this.helpers.httpRequest() — the bare $helpers global is undefined here ($helpers.httpRequest() throws ReferenceError). Inside a nested async function where this is lost, call it as await fn.call(this, ...). this.helpers.httpRequestWithAuthentication and this.helpers.requestWithAuthenticationPaginated are deny-listed (→ UnsupportedFunctionError); for authenticated calls use an HTTP Request node with the credential (preferred), a sub-workflow, or a manual Authorization: Bearer ${token} header on this.helpers.httpRequest() only when the token already flows through the workflow as data. $env is blocked when N8N_BLOCK_ENV_ACCESS_IN_NODE=true; require() works only for allowlisted modules. Buffer, URL, and standard JS globals (Math, JSON, Object, Array) always work.
See: BUILTIN_FUNCTIONS.md for the complete reference — full httpRequest options, all DateTime/Luxon operations, JMESPath patterns, static-data use cases, and the sandbox-restriction details.
Best Practices
- Validate input first — guard for empty arrays / missing
.jsonbefore processing. - Try-catch risky work (HTTP calls) and return an error object instead of crashing.
- Prefer array methods (
filter/map/reduce) over manual loops. - Filter early, transform late — shrink the dataset before expensive work.
- Descriptive names and
console.log()for debugging (output goes to the browser console).
See: COMMON_PATTERNS.md → "Best Practices" for code examples of each.
Production Gotchas
Hard-won lessons from real deployments — summarized here, with code in DATA_ACCESS.md → "Production Gotchas":
- SplitInBatches outputs are counterintuitive:
main[0]= done (fires once, after all batches),main[1]= each batch (the loop body). Add a Limit 1 node after the done output as a safety. - Iteration count is the cost: each loop iteration re-runs the whole body through the engine (~0.8 ms overhead each).
batchSize: 1is the loop equivalent of Each Item — use the largest batch your real constraint (rate limit, page size, memory) allows, or don't loop at all. - Cross-iteration accumulation (CRITICAL): after the loop,
$('Node Inside Loop').all()returns ONLY the last iteration's items. Accumulate via$getWorkflowStaticData('global')(reset before, push inside, read after). - pairedItem: when emitting items that don't map 1:1 to input, set
pairedItem: { item: i }or downstream Set nodes fail withpaired_item_no_info. - Node reference syntax:
$('Node').first().jsonor$('Node').all()— never.jsondirectly on the reference. - Float precision: compare currency at the cent level —
Math.round(a*100) !== Math.round(b*100)— to avoid false positives from float noise.
When to Use Code Node
Code is the last rung, after the service's own node, a native node for the job, and a short expression inside that node. The gate at the top of this skill is the test; this is the closed list it checks against:
| Code is right for | Example | Not Code |
|---|---|---|
| Loops or recursion no node expresses | flatten a tree of unknown depth; multi-pass matching | one level of nesting → Split Out |
| State across runs | counters or cursors in $getWorkflowStaticData | "only new items" → Remove Duplicates across executions |
| Parsing no node handles | fixed-width records, a custom log format | CSV / XLSX / PDF / XML / HTML → Extract From File, XML, HTML |
| An allowlisted library | require('some-lib') the instance allows | hashing / HMAC / UUID → Crypto |
| Heavy all-items work | thousands of items, transform-bound, stated or measured | a few hundred items → native nodes |
| One short node replacing 4+ glue nodes | ~15 lines that would otherwise be a Set → Split Out → Set → Aggregate chain that only reshapes data | a chain with real routing or I/O in it |
Not on the list, so not Code: filtering (Filter), routing (IF / Switch), totals and counts (Summarize), top-N (Sort + Limit), dedupe (Remove Duplicates), joins (Merge), diffs (Compare Datasets), dates (Date & Time or a Luxon expression), API calls and paging (HTTP Request), crypto and XML (Crypto, XML).
Every Code node that stays carries the note Why Code: <native node considered> — <reason> (set notes, and
notesInFlow: true to show it on the canvas). The create/update hooks remind you when a Code node has no such note.
Integration with Other Skills
Works With:
n8n Expression Syntax:
- Expressions use
{{ }}syntax in other nodes - Code nodes use JavaScript directly (no
{{ }}) - When to use expressions vs code
n8n MCP Tools Expert:
- How to find Code node:
search_nodes({query: "code"}) - Get configuration help:
get_node({nodeType: "nodes-base.code"}) - Validate code:
validate_node({nodeType: "nodes-base.code", config: {...}})
n8n Node Configuration:
- Mode selection (All Items vs Each Item)
- Language selection (JavaScript vs Python)
- Understanding property dependencies
n8n Workflow Patterns:
- Code nodes in transformation step
- Webhook → Code → API pattern
- Error handling in workflows
n8n Validation Expert:
- Validate Code node configuration
- Handle validation errors
- Auto-fix common issues
Quick Reference Checklist
Before deploying Code nodes, verify:
- Passed the gate - No native node fits;
notesstarts withWhy Code: - Code is not empty - Must have meaningful logic
- Return statement exists - Returns items, not a primitive/
null - Canonical return format - Each item:
{json: {...}}(bare objects auto-wrap, but be explicit) - Data access correct - Using
$input.all(),$input.first(), or$input.item - No
{{ }}written as code - Use JavaScript template literals:`${value}` - Error handling - Guard clauses for null/undefined inputs
- Webhook data - Access via
.bodyif from webhook - Mode selection - "All Items" for most cases
- Performance - Prefer map/filter over manual loops
- Output consistent - All code paths return same structure
Additional Resources
Related Files
- DATA_ACCESS.md - Comprehensive data access patterns
- COMMON_PATTERNS.md - 10 production-tested patterns
- ERROR_PATTERNS.md - Top 5 errors and solutions
- BUILTIN_FUNCTIONS.md - Complete built-in reference
n8n Documentation
- Code Node Guide: https://docs.n8n.io/code/code-node/
- Built-in Methods: https://docs.n8n.io/code-examples/methods-variables-reference/
- Luxon Documentation: https://moment.github.io/luxon/
Ready to write JavaScript in n8n Code nodes! Start with simple transformations, use the error patterns guide to avoid common mistakes, and reference the pattern library for production-ready examples.
FAQ
What does the n8n-code-javascript skill do?
Write, review, or debug JavaScript in an n8n Code node. Use when a Code node is already in the workflow (editing it, fixing an error, choosing its mode, making it faster), or when a new one is justified: no native node fits (check the job-to-node table in using-n8n-mcp-skills first) and the job is on the closed list — loops or recursion no node expresses, state across runs, parsing no node handles, an allowlisted library, heavy all-items work, or one short node replacing 4+ glue nodes. Covers $input/$json/$node in code, this.helpers, Luxon, SplitInBatches loops, cross-iteration data, pairedItem, per-item performance, and the "Why Code:" note. Filtering, totals, dedupe, sorting, joins, file formats and API paging have native nodes (Filter, Summarize, Remove Duplicates, Sort, Merge, Extract From File, HTTP Request): see n8n-node-configuration. EXCEPTION — for the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode), use n8n-code-tool; it has a different runtime contract
How do I install n8n-code-javascript?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-code-javascript in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/n8n-code-javascript/ (personal) or .claude/skills/n8n-code-javascript/ (project).
Which AI agents can use n8n-code-javascript?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is n8n-code-javascript safe to install?
Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed; Runlayer passed; ZeroLeaks passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.
Who maintains n8n-code-javascript?
It is published by czlonkowski in czlonkowski/n8n-skills. It has 7,199 recorded installs.
More from czlonkowski/n8n-skills
n8n-workflow-patterns
czlonkowski/n8n-skills
Proven workflow architectural patterns from real n8n workflows. Use when building new workflows, designing workflow structure, choosing workflow patterns, planning workflow architecture, or asking about webhook processing, HTTP API integration, database operations, AI agent workflows, batch processing, or scheduled tasks. Always consult this skill when the user asks to create, build, or design an n8n workflow, automate a process, or connect services — even if they don't explicitly mention 'patterns'. Covers webhook, API, database, AI, batch processing, and scheduled automation architectures. Also use when optimizing a slow workflow or speeding up large-item-count processing (node count, batchSize, all-items vs per-item).
n8n-mcp-tools-expert
czlonkowski/n8n-skills
Expert guide for using n8n-mcp MCP tools effectively. Use when searching for nodes, validating configurations, accessing templates, managing workflows, organizing workflows into folders, managing credentials, auditing instance security, or using any n8n-mcp tool. Provides tool selection guidance, parameter formats, and common patterns. IMPORTANT — Always consult this skill before calling any n8n-mcp tool — it prevents common mistakes like wrong nodeType formats, incorrect parameter structures, and inefficient tool usage. If the user mentions n8n, workflows, nodes, or automation and you have n8n MCP tools available, use this skill first.
n8n-node-configuration
czlonkowski/n8n-skills
Operation-aware node configuration guidance. Use when configuring nodes, understanding property dependencies, determining required fields, choosing between getnode detail levels, or learning common configuration patterns by node type — including the native nodes that replace Code (Summarize, Aggregate, Split Out, Merge, Compare Datasets, Remove Duplicates, Sort, Limit, Date & Time, HTTP Request pagination, Crypto). Always use this skill when setting up node parameters — it explains which fields are required for each operation, how displayOptions control field visibility, and when to use patchNodeField for surgical edits vs full node updates.
n8n-validation-expert
czlonkowski/n8n-skills
Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, the validation loop process, or auto-fix capabilities. Consult this skill whenever a validatenode or validateworkflow call returns errors or warnings — it knows which warnings are false positives and which errors need real fixes.
n8n-expression-syntax
czlonkowski/n8n-skills
Validate n8n expression syntax and fix common errors. Use when writing n8n expressions, using {{}} syntax, accessing $json/$node variables, troubleshooting expression errors, mapping data between nodes, or referencing webhook data in workflows. Use this skill whenever configuring node fields that reference data from previous nodes — expressions are how n8n passes data between nodes, and getting the syntax wrong is the most common source of workflow errors. Also use when asked whether a complex expression hurts performance.
n8n-code-python
czlonkowski/n8n-skills
Write Python in n8n Code nodes (native Python, language pythonNative, n8n 2.x). Use when the user explicitly wants Python in a Code node, when migrating old Pyodide/"Python (Beta)" code that used input/json/node/now, or when a Python Code node fails with NameError, "Security violations detected", "Import of standard library module … is disallowed", "buildclass not found", "A 'json' property isn't a dictionary", or "Python runner unavailable". Covers the only two variables (items/item), dict-only access, imports blocked by default, the sandbox's denied builtins, accepted return shapes, and how errors interact with onError. JavaScript is the default for Code nodes — native Python has no n8n helpers and, by default, no imports. EXCEPTION — for Python in the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode), use the n8n-code-tool skill instead (input is query, return must be a string).
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.