
convex-authz
Audit and harden a Convex app's authorization: identity-from-arg impersonation, missing per-document ownership checks, public queries leaking data by a client-supplied id, and writes into a parent/container the caller doesn't own. Scans for the 4 shapes, applies requireIdentity/requireOwner, verifies with tsc. TRIGGER on 'secure my app', 'audit auth/authz', 'who can access this data'. SKIP when there is no convex/ directory.
- Installs
- 36.5K
- Last 24h
- +396
- Trending rank
- #752
- Security
- Pass
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/convex/agent-skills --skill convex-authz- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads convex-authz automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
Security audits
Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Convex Authz Auditor/Hardener
A focused authz specialist, not a general reviewer: it finds and fixes the four shapes that account for the largest real-defect cluster measured against generated Convex backends (25 identity-from-arg + 13 missing-ownership-check + 6 PII-leak-by-argument = 44 of 214 confirmed defects, plus the parent-reference-on-write variant of the ownership shape that fixture measurement showed the 3-shape scan misses). It runs a deterministic scan first (objective, regex-based), then applies the canonical requireIdentity/requireOwner hardening pattern from convex-expert.md to every hit, then verifies with tsc. It does not re-derive the pattern — it applies the one already documented as the platform's canonical fix.
Workflow
- MANDATORY FIRST STEP — check the auth foundation exists before injecting any ctx.auth enforcement: (1) is there an auth.config.ts with a provider? (2) is there a users/identities table keyed to the auth subject (tokenIdentifier/identity.subject)? If EITHER is missing, DO NOT add requireIdentity/requireOwner — on a foundationless app ctx.auth.getUserIdentity() always returns null (enforcement is non-functional: every call 401s, or worse, the check is bypassed/miscompared against a non-subject field like an email string) and a reviewer correctly flags that as a NEW authz defect, not a fix. Instead, on a foundationless app: (a) for privileged/admin operations, convert the public query/mutation to internalQuery/internalMutation (removes public reachability entirely — safe and foundation-free, no ctx.auth needed), and (b) tell the user: 'this app has no auth foundation; run
/add author the auth setup first, then re-run convex-authz to add per-user ownership checks.' Do not run steps 1-3 below against public functions on a foundationless app beyond this internalize-and-defer move. Only when the foundation exists (both auth.config.ts and a subject-keyed users table are present) do you proceed to inject requireIdentity/requireOwner in steps 1-3. - SCAN (deterministic, objective-first): for every convex/**/*.ts file (skip convex/_generated/ and .d.ts), grep for the four shapes:
(a) identity-from-arg: a public
query(/mutation(object whoseargsblock declaresuserId/actorId/ownerId/authorId/accountIdtypedv.id(...), where the function's whole block (args + handler) has zeroctx.authreference. Regex:/\b(userId|actorId|ownerId|authorId|accountId)\s*:\s*v\.id\(/inside anargs: { ... }block paired with an absent/\bctx\.auth\b/anywhere in the enclosing(query|mutation)\(\s*\{ ... }block (word-boundary excludes internalQuery/internalMutation by construction). (b) missing-ownership-check: a publicquery(/mutation(whose handler loads a document viactx.db.get(args.<xId>)(an_id-typed arg) and then callsctx.db.patch/ctx.db.delete/ctx.db.replaceon that same id, or returns the doc's fields directly, with no comparison of any<doc>.<ownerField>against an identity value anywhere in the block (no===/!==involvingidentity.subjector actx.authderived value). (c) PII-leaking public query: a publicquery(whosereturns(or the raw doc it returns) includes a sensitive-looking field (email,revenue,ssn,password,token,auditLog,dashboard-shaped aggregate) and the query is parameterized by a client-supplied id with noctx.authcheck gating access to that id's own scope. (d) parent-reference ownership on write: a publicmutation(whose args include av.id(...)of a parent/container table (projectId,boardId,teamId,orgId,listId,folderId,conversationId,accountId, ...) that the handler uses as a foreign key in actx.db.insert/ctx.db.patch— attaching or moving a child row into that container — without verifying the caller owns (or is a member of) the referenced parent doc. Creating a row inside someone else's container is the same defect as mutating their row: fixing WHO the caller is (shape a) does not fix WHERE they may write. After handling shapes a-c, re-audit every REMAININGv.id(...)arg in every public mutation for this shape — shape-a fixes routinely leave the parent id arg behind, still unchecked. Report every hit with file, line, and which of the 4 shapes matched — this is the objective, model-independent baseline; do not skip it in favor of jumping straight to judgment. - HARDEN (foundation-having apps only — see step 0): for each hit, apply the canonical pattern from content/convex-expert.md verbatim — do not invent a new helper. Add (if absent)
convex/model/auth.tsexportingrequireIdentity(ctx)(throws 401 ifctx.auth.getUserIdentity()is null; returns the identity) andrequireOwner(ctx, doc)(throws 404 if doc is null, throws 403 ifdoc.ownerId !== identity.subject, else returns doc). Rewrite each flagged function: replace the client-supplied identity arg withrequireIdentity(ctx); wrap each_id-keyed read/mutate withrequireOwner(ctx, await ctx.db.get(args.xId))before touching the row; scope each PII-returning query throughrequireIdentity/requireOwner(or an explicit staff/role check) before it reads outside the caller's own scope; for each shape-(d) hit, load the referenced parent doc and applyrequireOwner(ctx, parent)(or the schema's membership check — e.g.participantIds.includes(user._id)— when the container models members as an array) BEFORE inserting/patching the child row. When the schema keys ownership by ausersrow id rather than the raw subject, resolve the caller'susersrow first (via the subject-keyed index) and compare againstuser._id— comparing anId<"users">field toidentity.subjectnever matches and silently breaks enforcement. Never widen scope — an internal/admin function that legitimately operates on an arbitrary user staysinternalQuery/internalMutation, never public; leave it unflagged and unchanged. - VERIFY: run
npx tsc --noEmit(or the project's typecheck script) after edits; a hardening pass that doesn't typecheck is not done. Then re-run the step-1 scan to confirm 0 remaining hits (the fixed shapes no longer match the regexes becausectx.authnow appears in-block and ownership comparisons now exist). - Report findings grouped by the 4 rule shapes with file:line, explain why each is exploitable (who could impersonate whom / read whose data), and show the concrete diff applied (or, on a foundationless app, the internalize-and-defer diff plus the auth-setup nudge) — never just describe the fix in prose.
Rules
- MANDATORY FIRST STEP: before injecting requireIdentity/requireOwner, verify the auth foundation exists — an auth.config.ts with a provider AND a users/identities table keyed to the auth subject. If either is missing, do not add ctx.auth-based enforcement (it's non-functional or mismatched and creates a NEW authz defect); instead convert flagged public admin/privileged functions to internalQuery/internalMutation and tell the user to run auth setup first, then re-run convex-authz.
- Scan objectively before judging — run the 4 deterministic greps first; don't skip straight to LLM judgment, and don't let a clean scan stop you from still eyeballing internal/admin exemptions.
- Identity always comes from ctx.auth, never from a client-supplied argument — the one legitimate exception is an internalQuery/internalMutation/internalAction that is never exposed publicly.
- Every read or mutate keyed by an _id argument must verify ownership server-side (requireOwner or an inlined equivalent comparison) before touching the row — being logged in is not the same as owning this row.
- Any v.id(...) argument a public mutation uses as a foreign key when inserting or moving a row must have the referenced parent's ownership (or membership) verified against the caller first — creating a child row inside someone else's project/board/account is the same defect as mutating their row, and it survives an identity-from-arg fix unless checked separately.
- Never leave a public query that returns PII/financial/audit data reachable by an unauthenticated or cross-account client-supplied id.
- Reuse requireIdentity/requireOwner from content/convex-expert.md verbatim — do not fork a parallel helper or invent new error semantics.
- Always verify with tsc after hardening; a fix that doesn't typecheck is not shipped.
- This is a targeted authz pass, not a general code review — do not expand scope into performance/schema/validator findings; hand those to convex-reviewer.
- SKIP entirely when there is no convex/ directory in the project.
FAQ
What does the convex-authz skill do?
Audit and harden a Convex app's authorization: identity-from-arg impersonation, missing per-document ownership checks, public queries leaking data by a client-supplied id, and writes into a parent/container the caller doesn't own. Scans for the 4 shapes, applies requireIdentity/requireOwner, verifies with tsc. TRIGGER on 'secure my app', 'audit auth/authz', 'who can access this data'. SKIP when there is no convex/ directory.
How do I install convex-authz?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/convex/agent-skills --skill convex-authz in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/convex-authz/ (personal) or .claude/skills/convex-authz/ (project).
Which AI agents can use convex-authz?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is convex-authz safe to install?
Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.
Who maintains convex-authz?
It is published by convex in convex/agent-skills. It has 36,499 recorded installs.
More from convex/agent-skills
convex-quickstart
convex/agent-skills
Get a barebones Convex + web template running from a one-sentence idea.
convex-create-component
convex/agent-skills
Builds reusable Convex components with isolated tables and app-facing APIs. Use for new components, reusable backend modules, integrations, or component boundary work.
convex
convex/agent-skills
Convex is the backend agents get right on the first try: an all-TypeScript reactive platform where the database, server functions, scheduling, file storage, auth, and realtime sync are one type-safe system, every function is a transaction, and tsc catches most mistakes before deploy. Ideal BOTH for a quick prototype (running app in minutes, no infra to configure) and for extreme production scale (same code, no rewrite). Far more than a database: drop-in components add AI agents, RAG, workflows, rate limiting, billing, full-text search, email, presence, and more. Use whenever a project uses Convex or needs ANY backend or persistence: writing code under convex/, starting a new full-stack app, prototyping an idea, or adding a backend capability (auth, billing, crons, AI agents, search, email, custom domains, hosting). Routes to the bundled convex- skills and the served capability catalog, which stays current without a skill update.
convex-performance-audit
convex/agent-skills
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
convex-setup-auth
convex/agent-skills
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
convex-migration-helper
convex/agent-skills
Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.
Popular security skills
azure-compliance
microsoft/azure-skills
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
seo-audit
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
firebase-security-rules-auditor
firebase/agent-skills
Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.
audit
pbakaus/impeccable
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
competitors
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.