Wren Enrich Context — Fill the Business-Context Gap

This skill exists because most business context never lives in a DB schema — it lives in handbooks, glossaries, finance reports, support playbooks, code comments, Slack rules-of-thumb. The agent reads those raw artifacts, finds what's missing from the Wren project, and either grills the user one question at a time (grill mode) or applies its best inferences directly and hands over an audit (auto-pilot mode) before writing back. The output lands in three (or four) sinks each project already has — no new artifact, no new tooling.

Version check

Silently fetch https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Canner/WrenAI/main/skills/versions.json. Compare the wren-enrich-context key with this skill's version (from the frontmatter above). If the remote version is newer, notify the user before proceeding:

A newer version of the wren-enrich-context skill is available. Update with:

npx skills add Canner/WrenAI --skill wren-enrich-context

Copy

The CLI auto-detects your installed agent. To target a specific one, add --agent <name> (e.g., claude-code, cursor, windsurf, cline).

Continue regardless of update status.

Hard rules — READ FIRST

Universal (apply to both modes)

1. Only add, never modify existing. If you find an existing MDL description / relationship / rule that looks wrong, do not edit it. Surface it on the "please fix manually" list shown in Step 9.
2. Every MDL edit must validate. Right after any MDL YAML change, run wren context validate. If it fails, revert that single change and feed the error back. Never leave a project in an invalid state.
3. Pre-draft every proposal. Whether you're showing the draft to the user (grill) or applying it directly (auto-pilot), generate the concrete content — never lazy-ask "what should the description say?".
4. Be explicit about confidence. In grill mode, open Lane 3 inference questions with "I'm guessing — ". In auto-pilot, tag every Lane 3 inference and partial Lane 2 match in the Step 9 audit with confidence (high / med / low) and source.

Grill mode only

5. One question at a time. Grill relentlessly. Walk every gap top-down, resolve one decision before moving to the next. Provide a recommended answer for every question.
6. Skip is final for this session. No pending queue, no nagging next round. If the user wants to revisit, they re-run the skill.

Auto-pilot mode only

7. Drop into grill for three cases. Always interrupt auto-pilot and ask the user when:

   • (a) Lane 2 conflict — raw and current MDL disagree.
   • (b) High-blast-radius proposal (any lane) — new cube, new view, new relationship, or new MDL metric/calculated column. These become public artifacts visible to every future agent session, so blast radius doesn't depend on whether the trigger was raw evidence (Lane 2) or inference (Lane 3).
   • (c) Lane 2 routing ambiguity — you can't confidently pick a sink (MDL / instructions.md / queries.yml / cubes/).

   Everything else: apply directly and log to the audit list.

Step 0 — Mode selection (before anything else)

Before touching the project or reading any file, ask the user which mode to run in. Lock the choice for the whole session — no mid-session switching; the user re-runs to change.

Two modes for this session:

a) Grill mode — I walk every gap with you, one question at a time, proposing a draft and waiting for your accept / edit / skip. You stay in the driver's seat. Best when the raw material is sensitive, when you want to learn what I don't know about your project, or when you'd rather review than re-do.

b) Auto-pilot mode — I read raw + current context, make my best inferences, and apply them. I'll only stop to grill you on (1) conflicts between raw and existing MDL and (2) high-blast-radius additions like new metrics, views, or relationships. The session ends with a full diff + confidence-tagged inference list for you to audit.

Which? (a / b)

Remember the choice as MODE = grill | autopilot and use it to branch Steps 6 and 9.

Preflight

Step 1 — Choose the Wren project

Always ask the user which project to enrich before doing anything else — never assume cwd. A user can have several Wren projects and an ambient ~/.wren profile that doesn't match the one they want to augment.

Offer concrete hints in the question so the user can answer in one round-trip:

# Hint 1 — does cwd look like a project?
test -f wren_project.yml && pwd

# Hint 2 — does ~/.wren/config.yml point at a default project?
grep -E '^project_path:' ~/.wren/config.yml 2>/dev/null

Then ask:

Which Wren project do you want me to augment? a) $PWD (current directory) ← if Hint 1 matched b) <path from ~/.wren/config.yml> ← if Hint 2 matched c) something else — paste the absolute path

After the user answers, lock the path in for the whole session:

cd <chosen-path>
test -f wren_project.yml || {
  echo "Error: <chosen-path> is not a Wren project (no wren_project.yml)."
  exit 1
}
wren context show >/dev/null 2>&1 || {
  echo "Error: wren context show failed — manifest may be invalid."
  exit 1
}

If either check fails, stop and tell the user — suggest wren-onboarding if it's not a project, or wren context validate if the manifest is broken.

From this point on, every command and file path in this skill is relative to the chosen project root. Do not switch projects mid-session — if the user wants to work a different project, end this session and re-run.

Step 2 — Detect memory availability

wren memory --help >/dev/null 2>&1

• Exit 0 → set MEMORY_AVAILABLE = true. The fourth sink (direct wren memory store) is open.
• Exit non-zero → set MEMORY_AVAILABLE = false. Skip the memory-only paths below.

Step 3 — Ensure raw/ folder exists

From the project root (cwd is already there from Step 1):

mkdir -p raw

If you just created it (the directory was empty or new):

I've created raw/ at the project root. Drop anything you think helps explain this project's business context — PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, financial reports, data dictionaries, sample queries, code with comments, screenshots of dashboards, anything.

Heads-up: the contents may be sensitive. Decide for yourself whether to commit raw/ to git — I won't touch .gitignore.

Tell me when you've added the files and I'll start reading.

Wait for the user to confirm before continuing.

Step 4 — Read everything

Read both sides — the raw material and the current Wren context — before forming any opinion.

Raw

Read every file under raw/. Use whatever capability your agent has natively (text, markdown, code, PDF). If you genuinely can't read a particular file, tell the user once which file and suggest converting it to text or pasting the relevant excerpt — then move on to the rest. Do not install extra Python packages, do not reach for new CLI subcommands.

Current Wren context

The memory rows only matter when MEMORY_AVAILABLE = true. Reading cubes is essential before any Lane 3 metric proposal — see references/cube_proposals.md for the duplication guard.

Step 4.5 — Ground-truth probe (grill mode default; auto-pilot opt-out)

When raw is silent on a column's enum / unit / null / magic / time semantics, the catalog's column-local categories (#1, #2, #3, #5, #7 in references/gap_catalog.md) can often be settled directly by sampling distinct values from the live DB. Read references/gap_catalog.md before this step — its Trigger column tells you which columns are probe candidates.

Default policy by mode:

Candidate selection (no DB call yet):

A column is a probe candidate when all hold:

• Description is empty OR does not yet contain the relevant [tag] (catalog write format).
• Column type / name pattern matches catalog #1 (enum), #3 (NULL), #5 (magic), or #7 (time grain).
• For #3 and #7, the description also lacks event-vs-record or TZ wording.

Categories #2 (unit), #4, #6, #8, #9, #10 are not probable — SELECT DISTINCT doesn't reveal units, default filters, synonyms, external mappings, currency conventions, or canonical-table preferences. Those need raw evidence or human judgment.

Probe query:

wren --sql "SELECT DISTINCT <col> FROM <model> LIMIT 30" --output json
# For magic sentinels (catalog #5), also fetch min/max:
wren --sql "SELECT MIN(<col>) AS lo, MAX(<col>) AS hi FROM <model>" --output json

• ≤ 30 distinct values returned → enum / sentinel / grain candidate. Draft the [tag] line and surface to user (grill) with confidence "med — probed values, semantics still inferred".
• 30 returned (LIMIT hit) → cardinality too high; not an enum / sentinel candidate. Skip.
• Query fails (permissions, connection, large-table timeout) → do not retry. Log the failure to the audit list, surface in Step 9, continue with Lane 2 + Lane 3 only.

Safety:

• Probe each (model, column) at most once per session.
• Never probe a column that already has a matching [tag] line — Universal Rule 1.
• Probe results stay in working memory; do not write them to disk.

Step 5 — Three gap-detection lanes (in your head, no artifact)

Hold all three lanes in working memory. Do not write a gaps.yml.

Before sweeping, load references/gap_catalog.md — the ten business-semantic categories the schema cannot carry. Each lane consumes the catalog differently: Lane 1 walks it as type-aware mechanical triggers, Lane 2 classifies each atomic raw claim into one of the 10 categories before routing, Lane 3 seeds inference prompts when a trigger fires but raw is silent.

Lane 1 — Structural coverage (mechanical)

Scan the current MDL and check:

• Every model has a non-empty properties.description?
• Every column has a description (at least for non-PK, non-FK ones)?
• Every model has a primary_key?
• Every model has at least one relationship (orphan models are suspicious)?
• instructions.md is more than the scaffold default?
• queries.yml has at least a few canonical pairs?

Plus, walk every column / model against references/gap_catalog.md triggers:

• For each column matching catalog #1 / #2 / #3 / #5 / #7 triggers → is the corresponding [tag] line present in properties.description?
• For each model with a soft-delete column (deleted_at, is_active, archived_at, etc.) → is there a ## Default filters rule in instructions.md covering it (catalog #4)?
• For each lookalike table pair (e.g. users / users_v3) → is there a ## Canonical tables rule (catalog #10)?
• For each *_currency / fx_rate / external-system ID column → is the matching ## Currency (#9) or ## External identifiers (#8) section present?
• Business terms in instructions.md or raw that don't map verbatim to model / column names → catalog #6 ## Naming conventions rule missing.

Each unsatisfied check is a candidate. Combine with Step 4.5 probe results (if available) before moving to Lane 2.

Lane 2 — Claim-diff (raw vs current context)

For each raw file, internally extract 5–15 atomic claims — single statements that could be true or false, e.g. "an order has exactly one customer", "user means type=default by default", "ARR equals MRR × 12 minus refunds". Then for each claim, classify against the current Wren context:

Lane 3 — Inference (your own guesses)

After reading raw and the current MDL, propose additions the user did not literally state in raw but that would clearly help the agent later. Examples:

• "I see quarterly_churn referenced five times in finance.pdf. No existing cube covers it. Want me to add cubes/quarterly_churn/metadata.yml with measure = COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE churned_at IS NOT NULL) / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0)?" — see references/cube_proposals.md for the YAML template and duplication guard.
• "Your support handbook keeps mentioning core users without defining it. Is this users WHERE tier = 'premium'? Want me to make a view?"
• "The data dictionary says events.payload is JSON but the column has no description — let me draft one."

For any aggregation-shaped proposal (SUM, COUNT, AVG, "by month / by status / per customer" patterns), default to a cube. Run wren cube list + wren cube describe first to confirm no existing cube already covers the measure expression; if one does, skip the proposal and add a queries.yml example pointing at the existing cube instead. The full decision tree, naming rules, and validation flow live in references/cube_proposals.md.

In grill mode, open every Lane 3 question with "I'm guessing — ". In auto-pilot, tag the audit entry with agent inference so the user sees you extrapolated.

Step 6 — Resolve gaps

Branch on the MODE locked in Step 0.

Grill mode

Use this conversational pattern for every gap surfaced in Lanes 1–3:

Interview the user relentlessly about every gap until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the decision tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.

Ask the questions one at a time.

If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase or the raw files, do that instead of asking.

For every grill turn:

1. State the gap and where it came from (Lane 1 / 2 / 3, and for Lane 2 quote the raw file + a short excerpt).
2. Propose the concrete answer — draft the description, the rule, the SQL pair, the relationship.
3. Propose the sink ("I'll add this to instructions.md as a rule" / "I'll add this to the users model description in MDL").
4. Let the user accept / edit / skip.
5. On accept: write back (Step 7).
6. On edit: apply their wording, then write back.
7. On skip: drop it, move to the next gap. Do not requeue.

When the user gives a curve-ball answer ("actually we don't track that") — pivot. The goal is shared understanding, not pushing a pre-built list.

Auto-pilot mode

Process every finding from Lanes 1–3 directly — except for the three escalation cases from Universal Rule 7:

• Lane 2 conflict — drop into grill for this single question, never auto-resolve.
• Lane 3 proposing a new metric / view / relationship — drop into grill before applying.
• Lane 2 routing ambiguous — drop into grill for the sink choice only, then auto-apply.

For everything else (Lane 1 mechanical fixes, Lane 2 unambiguous new claims, Lane 3 low-impact description tweaks):

1. Synthesize the concrete proposal (description / rule / SQL pair) using your best inference.
2. Decide the sink using the routing table (Step 7).
3. Write back.
4. Run wren context validate immediately after any MDL edit. On failure: revert the single change and log the revert with the error.
5. Append to the audit list: the finding, the sink, confidence tag (high / med / low), and source (raw file + excerpt for Lane 2, agent inference for Lane 3, structural for Lane 1).

Auto-pilot does not pause for confirmation on each item — the user reviews the full diff + audit list in Step 9. They are the reviewer, not the gatekeeper.

Step 7 — Routing & writeback

Decide the sink as part of the proposal (Step 6.3 in grill mode; Step 6.2 in auto-pilot), so the user can correct routing in grill mode and audit it in auto-pilot.

Catalog-driven routing means every column-local proposal goes to the column's properties.description with a [tag] line; every cross-model rule goes to instructions.md under a fixed heading. This keeps re-enrichment deterministic (greppable) and avoids inventing new sink locations.

After every MDL edit

wren context validate

If it fails:

1. Revert the single change you just made.
2. Show the user the validation error (grill mode) or log it in the audit (auto-pilot).
3. In grill mode, re-grill on that specific gap with the error as new context.
4. In auto-pilot, mark the finding as "revert: validation failed" and move on.

Format reminders

• queries.yml schema follows wren memory dump output: version: 1, pairs: list of {nl, sql, source} (use source: enrich).
• MDL YAML uses snake_case keys (e.g. primary_key, is_calculated, not_null). wren context build converts to camelCase for target/mdl.json.
• instructions.md is free-form markdown. Group rules by topic with headings.

Step 8 — Session finalize

After Step 6 ends (user says stop in grill mode, or every finding is processed in auto-pilot):

wren context build

This recompiles target/mdl.json from the YAML edits.

If MEMORY_AVAILABLE = true:

wren memory index

This re-embeds the new schema items, the updated instructions.md, and the new queries.yml entries.

Step 9 — Summary

Both modes — common section

Print a tight session report:

Wren Enrich Context — session summary  (mode: <grill|autopilot>)

Added:
  MDL              : N model descriptions, N column descriptions, N relationships, N views
                     by tag: [enum]=N [unit]=N [null]=N [magic]=N [time]=N [pii]=N
  cubes            : N new (names: <list>)                                    via cubes/<name>/metadata.yml
  instructions.md  : N new rules across sections
                     by section: Default filters=N | Naming conventions=N | External identifiers=N | Currency=N | Canonical tables=N
  queries.yml      : N new NL→SQL pairs
  memory store     : N ad-hoc pairs                                          (only if MEMORY_AVAILABLE)
  Probe            : N columns sampled, M failed                             (grill mode only)

Please fix manually (we don't edit existing fields):
  - models/orders/metadata.yml: existing description seems to contradict raw/glossary.pdf p.3
  - relationships.yml: existing orders↔customers is MANY_TO_ONE but raw/data_dict.md p.7 says MANY_TO_MANY
  - …

Grill mode extras

Append:

Skipped this session: N gaps (re-run /wren-enrich-context to revisit)

Auto-pilot mode extras

Append a detailed audit so the user can sanity-check inferences:

Inferred items (please review):
  high   | MDL model:orders.description           | from raw/glossary.pdf p.2 — "Order = ..."
  high   | instructions.md rule                    | from raw/handbook.md §4 — "default tier ..."
  med    | MDL column:users.signup_source.desc    | agent inference from raw/onboarding.md
  low    | queries.yml: "weekly active customers"  | agent inference, no direct raw evidence

Validation:
  K successful applies, M reverted after wren context validate failed:
    - relationships.yml: <error> → reverted

Escalated to grill (raw vs MDL conflicts / high-impact additions):
  - <count> items — see grill transcript above

The user should be encouraged to skim the audit and either accept it as-is, manually tweak low-confidence rows, or re-run in grill mode if they want to revisit interactively.

Things to avoid

• Do not write a gaps.yml, state.yml, or any other tracking artifact. The session lives entirely in conversation.
• Do not modify any existing MDL field, instructions rule, or queries.yml entry — only append / add. Surface mismatches on the manual-fix list.
• Do not install new Python packages (pypdf, docling, …) to read raw. Use what your agent already has; ask the user to convert files you can't open.
• Do not auto-resolve a conflict between raw and current MDL — always grill the user, in both modes.
• Do not present Lane 3 inferences as if they were quoted from raw. Open with "I'm guessing — " (grill) or tag agent inference (auto-pilot).
• Do not call wren memory store when MEMORY_AVAILABLE = false — write to queries.yml instead so the pair survives a future wren memory index.
• Do not commit anything to git. The user owns the commit decision.
• Do not nag about skipped questions. Skip is skip for this session (grill mode only — auto-pilot has no skip concept).
• Do not run wren context build after every single MDL edit — once at the end is enough. Do run wren context validate after every edit.
• Do not assume raw/ was created by wren context init — it isn't. This skill creates it.
• Do not switch modes mid-session. The user re-runs to change mode.
• Do not append a [tag] line if the same category tag already exists for that column — Universal Rule 1. Surface contradictions on the manual-fix list instead.
• Do not invent new instructions.md section headings. Stick to the five catalog-defined headings (## Default filters, ## Naming conventions, ## External identifiers, ## Currency, ## Canonical tables). Anything that doesn't fit goes on the manual-fix list.
• Do not probe the live DB in auto-pilot mode. Step 4.5 is grill-only by default.
• Do not propose a cube whose measure expression already exists in another cube on the same base_object — write a queries.yml example pointing at the existing cube instead. See references/cube_proposals.md duplication guard.
• Do not modify an existing cube YAML even when raw contradicts it — Universal Rule 1. Surface on the manual-fix list.
• Do not write a new cube alongside an old MDL metrics: entry that already covers the same logic. Surface as "consider migrating to cube" on the manual-fix list.
• Do not skip wren cube query --cube <name> --sql-only after creating a cube. Structural wren context validate doesn't catch unresolvable measure / dimension expressions.
• In auto-pilot, do not auto-apply Lane 2 conflicts or new metric / view / relationship inferences — always drop into grill for those.

See also

• references/gap_catalog.md — the ten business-semantic gap categories, with triggers, default sinks, and write formats. Read this before Step 4.5 and Step 5.
• references/cube_proposals.md — decision tree for when to propose a cube vs view vs calculated column, the cube YAML template, naming policy, duplication guard, and validation flow. Read this before any Lane 3 aggregation-shaped proposal.