MCPInstall

gds-test-automate

Generate automated game tests for gameplay systems. Use when the user says "automate tests" or "generate tests"

Installs
43
Last 24h
—
Trending rank
—
Security
Not audited

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio --skill gds-test-automate
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads gds-test-automate automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Game Test Automation Workflow

Goal: Generate automated test code for game projects based on test design scenarios or by analyzing existing game code. Creates engine-appropriate tests for Unity, Unreal, or Godot with proper patterns, fixtures, and cleanup.

Your Role: You are a senior game QA engineer and test automation specialist. Work autonomously to analyze the game codebase, detect the engine in use, and generate well-structured unit, integration, and smoke tests. You bring structured testing knowledge and engine-specific patterns, while the user brings domain context about the game's systems.


Conventions

  • Bare paths (e.g. template.md) resolve from the skill root.
  • {skill-root} resolves to this skill's installed directory (where customize.toml lives).
  • {project-root} is the nearest folder containing _bmad/, starting at the project working directory and moving up through its parents.
  • {skill-name} resolves to the skill directory's basename.

On Activation

Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block

Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow

If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:

  1. {skill-root}/customize.toml — defaults
  2. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml — team overrides
  3. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml — personal overrides

Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.

Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.

Step 3: Load Persistent Facts

Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.

Step 4: Load Config

Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/gds/config.yaml and resolve:

  • user_name
  • communication_language
  • output_folder
  • date as the system-generated current datetime

Step 5: Greet the User

Greet {user_name}, speaking in {communication_language}.

Step 6: Execute Append Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.

Activation is complete. If activation_steps_prepend or activation_steps_append were non-empty, confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding. Do not begin the main workflow until all activation steps have been completed.

WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE

This uses an inline workflow pattern for autonomous execution:

  • Steps execute sequentially with full autonomy
  • Engine detection drives all subsequent decisions
  • All test files are written to disk as they are generated
  • A final summary report is produced at completion

Preflight Requirements

Before proceeding, verify:

  • Test framework already initialized (run framework workflow first)
  • Test scenarios defined (from test-design workflow or ad-hoc)
  • Game code accessible for analysis

If any preflight requirement is not met, HALT and guide the user.

Paths

  • installed_path = {skill_root}
  • validation = {installed_path}/checklist.md
  • test_dir = {project-root}/tests
  • source_dir = {project-root}/src

Variables

  • coverage_target = critical-paths (options: critical-paths, comprehensive, selective)
  • game_engine = auto (options: auto, unity, unreal, godot)
  • default_output_file = {output_folder}/automation-summary.md

Knowledge Fragments

Load the engine-specific knowledge fragment after engine detection in Step 1:

  • Unity: {installed_path}/knowledge/unity-testing.md
  • Unreal: {installed_path}/knowledge/unreal-testing.md
  • Godot: {installed_path}/knowledge/godot-testing.md
  • E2E patterns: {installed_path}/knowledge/e2e-testing.md

EXECUTION

<workflow> <step n="1" goal="Analyze Codebase"> <action>Detect Game Engine by checking for engine-specific project files: - Unity: `Assets/`, `ProjectSettings/`, `*.unity` scenes - Unreal: `*.uproject`, `Source/`, `Config/DefaultEngine.ini` - Godot: `project.godot`, `*.tscn`, `*.gd` files </action> <action>Load the appropriate engine-specific knowledge fragment</action> <action>Identify testable systems in the codebase: - Pure logic classes (calculators, managers) - State machines (AI, gameplay) - Data structures (inventory, save data) </action> <action>Locate existing tests: - Find test directory structure - Identify test patterns already in use - Check for test helpers/fixtures </action> </step> <step n="2" goal="Generate Unit Tests"> <action>For each identified testable system, generate a test file using the appropriate engine template below</action> <!-- Unity (C#) --> <check if="engine == 'unity'"> <action>Generate NUnit test fixtures following this pattern: ```csharp using NUnit.Framework;

[TestFixture] public class {ClassName}Tests { private {ClassName} _sut;

[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
    _sut = new {ClassName}();
}

[Test]
public void {MethodName}_When{Condition}_Should{Expectation}()
{
    // Arrange
    {setup_code}
    // Act
    var result = _sut.{MethodName}({parameters});
    // Assert
    Assert.AreEqual({expected}, result);
}

[TestCase({input1}, {expected1})]
[TestCase({input2}, {expected2})]
public void {MethodName}_Parameterized({inputType} input, {outputType} expected)
{
    var result = _sut.{MethodName}(input);
    Assert.AreEqual(expected, result);
}

}

    </action>
  </check>

  <!-- Unreal (C++) -->
  <check if="engine == 'unreal'">
    <action>Generate Automation Test macros following this pattern:
```cpp
#include "Misc/AutomationTest.h"

IMPLEMENT_SIMPLE_AUTOMATION_TEST(
    F{ClassName}{MethodName}Test,
    "{ProjectName}.{Category}.{TestName}",
    EAutomationTestFlags::ApplicationContextMask |
    EAutomationTestFlags::ProductFilter
)

bool F{ClassName}{MethodName}Test::RunTest(const FString& Parameters)
{
    // Arrange
    {setup_code}
    // Act
    auto Result = {ClassName}::{MethodName}({parameters});
    // Assert
    TestEqual("{assertion_message}", Result, {expected});
    return true;
}
</action>
</check> <!-- Godot (GDScript) --> <check if="engine == 'godot'"> <action>Generate GUT test files following this pattern: ```gdscript extends GutTest

var _sut: {ClassName}

func before_each(): _sut = {ClassName}.new()

func after_each(): _sut.free()

func test_{method_name}when{condition}should{expectation}(): # Arrange {setup_code} # Act var result = _sut.{method_name}({parameters}) # Assert assert_eq(result, {expected}, "{assertion_message}")

func test_{method_name}_parameterized(): var test_cases = [ {"input": {input1}, "expected": {expected1}}, {"input": {input2}, "expected": {expected2}} ] for tc in test_cases: var result = _sut.{method_name}(tc.input) assert_eq(result, tc.expected)

    </action>
  </check>

  <action>Write each generated unit test file to the appropriate location under `{test_dir}/unit/`</action>
</step>

<step n="3" goal="Generate Integration Tests">
  <action>Generate scene/level integration tests using the appropriate engine template</action>

  <check if="engine == 'unity'">
    <action>Generate Unity Play Mode integration tests:
```csharp
[UnityTest]
public IEnumerator {SceneName}_Loads_WithoutErrors()
{
    SceneManager.LoadScene("{scene_name}");
    yield return new WaitForSeconds(2f);
    var errors = GameObject.FindObjectsOfType<ErrorHandler>()
        .Where(e => e.HasErrors);
    Assert.IsEmpty(errors, "Scene should load without errors");
}
</action>
</check> <check if="engine == 'unreal'"> <action>Generate Unreal Functional Test actors: ```cpp void A{TestName}::StartTest() { Super::StartTest(); {setup} if ({condition}) FinishTest(EFunctionalTestResult::Succeeded, "{message}"); else FinishTest(EFunctionalTestResult::Failed, "{failure_message}"); } ``` </action> </check> <check if="engine == 'godot'"> <action>Generate Godot integration tests: ```gdscript func test_{feature}_integration(): var scene = load("res://scenes/{scene}.tscn").instantiate() add_child(scene) await get_tree().process_frame {test_code} scene.queue_free() ``` </action> </check>

<action>Write each generated integration test file to {test_dir}/integration/</action> </step>

<step n="3.5" goal="Generate E2E Infrastructure"> <action>Before generating E2E tests, scaffold the required infrastructure components: 1. Test Fixture Base Class — scene loading/unloading, game ready state waiting, common service access, cleanup guarantees 2. Scenario Builder — fluent API for game state configuration, domain-specific methods, yields for state propagation 3. Input Simulator — click/drag abstractions, button press simulation, keyboard input queuing 4. Async Assertions — WaitUntil with timeout and message, WaitForEvent for event-driven flows, WaitForState for state machine transitions </action> <action>Generate the GameE2ETestFixture base class using this template: ```csharp public abstract class GameE2ETestFixture { protected {GameStateClass} GameState; protected {InputSimulatorClass} Input; protected {ScenarioBuilderClass} Scenario;
[UnitySetUp]
public IEnumerator BaseSetUp()
{
    yield return LoadScene("{main_scene}");
    GameState = Object.FindFirstObjectByType<{GameStateClass}>();
    Input = new {InputSimulatorClass}();
    Scenario = new {ScenarioBuilderClass}(GameState);
    yield return WaitForReady();
}

}

  </action>
  <action>Write infrastructure files to `{test_dir}/e2e/infrastructure/` or the engine-appropriate equivalent</action>
  <action>After scaffolding infrastructure, proceed to generate actual E2E tests</action>
</step>

<step n="4" goal="Generate Smoke Tests">
  <action>Create critical path tests that run on every build, covering:
    1. Game launches without crash
    2. Main menu is navigable
    3. New game starts successfully
    4. Core gameplay loop executes
    5. Save/load works
  </action>
  <action>Generate engine-appropriate smoke tests, for example (Unity):
```csharp
[UnityTest, Timeout(60000)]
public IEnumerator Smoke_NewGame_StartsSuccessfully()
{
    SceneManager.LoadScene("MainMenu");
    yield return new WaitForSeconds(2f);
    var newGameButton = GameObject.Find("NewGameButton");
    newGameButton.GetComponent<Button>().onClick.Invoke();
    yield return new WaitForSeconds(5f);
    var player = GameObject.FindWithTag("Player");
    Assert.IsNotNull(player, "Player should exist after new game");
}
</action> <action>Write smoke tests to `{test_dir}/smoke/`</action> <!-- Anti-patterns to actively avoid -->

<action>Ensure generated tests do NOT: - Test engine functionality (not game logic) - Use hard-coded waits as primary sync (use signals/events) - Depend on execution order - Lack cleanup in teardown </action> </step>

<step n="5" goal="Generate Test Report"> <action>After all test files have been written, create an automation summary at `{default_output_file}` using this structure:
## Automation Summary

**Engine**: {Unity | Unreal | Godot}
**Tests Generated**: {count}
**Date**: {date}

### Test Distribution

| Type        | Count | Coverage      |
| ----------- | ----- | ------------- |
| Unit Tests  | {n}   | {systems}     |
| Integration | {n}   | {features}    |
| Smoke Tests | {n}   | Critical path |

### Files Created

- `tests/unit/{file1}.{ext}`
- `tests/integration/{file2}.{ext}`
- `tests/smoke/{file3}.{ext}`

### Next Steps

1. Review generated tests
2. Fill in test-specific logic where placeholders remain
3. Run tests to verify they pass
4. Add to CI pipeline
</action> <action>Load and apply `{validation}` checklist to verify all deliverables are complete</action> <action>Present the automation summary to the user</action> <action>Run: `uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow.on_complete` — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.</action> </step> </workflow>

FAQ

What does the gds-test-automate skill do?

Generate automated game tests for gameplay systems. Use when the user says "automate tests" or "generate tests"

How do I install gds-test-automate?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio --skill gds-test-automate in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/gds-test-automate/ (personal) or .claude/skills/gds-test-automate/ (project).

Which AI agents can use gds-test-automate?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is gds-test-automate safe to install?

No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.

Who maintains gds-test-automate?

It is published by bmad-code-org in bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio. It has 43 recorded installs.

More from bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

View all →

gds-gdd

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

Create, update, or validate a game's Game Design Document. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a GDD — the primary design artifact covering pillars, mechanics, progression, levels, art, audio, and development epics.

Media & Creative55 installs

gds-create-narrative

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

Create comprehensive narrative documentation with story structure and world-building. Use when the user says "narrative design" or "create narrative"

Docs & Writing51 installs

gds-brainstorm-game

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.

Media & Creative51 installs

gds-agent-game-designer

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

Open the skill to read its SKILL.md instructions.

Media & Creative49 installs

gds-create-game-brief

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

Create, update, or validate a game brief. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a game brief before detailed design.

Media & Creative49 installs

gds-ux

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio

Plan game UX, UI, and HUD design specifications. Use when the user says "lets create game UX", "design the HUD", "create UI specifications", or "help me plan the game UX"

Popular testing & qa skills

View category →

tdd

mattpocock/skills

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

Testing & QA1.2M installs

grilling

mattpocock/skills

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Testing & QA996.2K installs

migrate-to-shoehorn

mattpocock/skills

Migrate test files from as type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace as in tests, or needs partial test data.

Testing & QA484.1K installs

run-train

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized trainoutputs/. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.

Testing & QA337.8K installs

test-driven-development

obra/superpowers

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Testing & QA261.8K installs

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

Testing & QA216.8K installs