
migrating-dagster-to-airflow
Guide for migrating Dagster projects to Apache Airflow 3 on Astro. Use when the user mentions migrating, converting, or porting Dagster (or Dagster+) code to Airflow or Astro, wants to plan or assess such a migration, or asks what a Dagster construct maps to in Airflow. Covers assets, partitions, schedules, sensors, declarative automation, resources, IO managers, ops/jobs, dbt, Pipes, Components, and Dagster+ platform config. Always load this skill as the first step for any Dagster-to-Airflow request.
- Installs
- 166
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/astronomer/agents --skill migrating-dagster-to-airflow- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads migrating-dagster-to-airflow automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Dagster → Airflow 3 (Astro) migration
Migrate a Dagster project to Airflow 3 on Astro Runtime, honestly. The migration is asset-first (Dagster asset graphs translate to Airflow assets and asset-aware schedules, not flattened DAGs), incremental (domain by domain, Dagster stays authoritative until parity), and honest (every definition gets an explicit disposition; semantic deltas are documented, never papered over).
First time driving this? Read reference/quickstart.md first: hour-one commands, the glossary, and what can and cannot break.
Migration at a glance
- Baseline the source project's tests, then inventory it read-only (
scripts/inventory.py→ manifest). - Review classifications (MECH/JUDG/REDESIGN/NONE per
reference/mapping.md); make the go/no-go call (three outcomes; migrate-with-conditions is the common case, stay is the narrow one); plan DAG boundaries, per-edge IO decisions, and Gate 3 expectations into the manifest. - Trial-migrate 2-3 representative units end-to-end through every validation gate.
- Migrate domain by domain through the six-gate ladder (
reference/validation.md), tracking per-unit state (scripts/status.py); fix failure classes viareference/troubleshooting.md, never stub. - Map the platform layer (secrets, alerts, CI/CD, Deployments) per
reference/astro-deployment.md. - Run side by side, then cut over per domain (consumers unpause first; see the checklist), keeping rollback one step away.
- Deliver the migration report: every definition dispositioned, an equivalence row per trigger, losses stated plainly.
Version drift
Verified against Airflow 3.3.0 / Astro Runtime 3.3-2 / astronomer-cosmos 1.15 / Dagster 1.13 (2026-07). Version-sensitive rows in the references carry their floor (notably the 3.2-vs-3.3 partition surface). Before relying on a version-gated claim: check the target (airflow version, astro deployment inspect), probe imports for sdk surface (python3 -c "from airflow.sdk import X"), and prefer --help / API spec discovery over assuming verbatim CLI/REST contracts on newer versions. Playbook entries are version-scoped per entry.
Requirements
- Target Astro Runtime 3.3+ (Airflow 3.3+); the native asset-partition surface requires it. Below 3.2 the mapping degrades badly; say so and recommend upgrading before migrating.
- The Dagster repo, and ideally a running Dagster instance (its materialization metadata provides parity-test fixtures).
astroCLI for the target project.
Hard rules
- Never stub. A translated unit either works through its validation gate or is deferred with a written reason. Fake-success bodies and workaround code with long justifying comments are failures.
- No silent omissions. Every record in the inventory manifest ends
completeordeferred (reason).scripts/status.py summaryexits nonzero otherwise; run it before claiming done. - Equivalence rows for every trigger. Each schedule/sensor/automation condition gets a report row: source spelling, target spelling, delta in one sentence. Semantic deltas exist (catchup, on_cron inversion, eager guarantees); the sin is not the delta, it is the undocumented delta.
- Fix classes, not instances. When a translation pattern fails validation, fix the pattern (and record it in
reference/troubleshooting.md), then re-apply; do not hand-patch one unit. - Do not invent APIs. The references contain verified names only. Anything not covered there gets verified against official docs before use.
Workflow
Phase 0: Preflight
Confirm target Runtime version, astro CLI presence, and repo access. Detect the project layout: classic (@repository/workspace.yaml), modern (Definitions), or Components (pyproject.toml [tool.dg], defs.yaml files); all three occur, sometimes together. Baseline the source project's test suite now: pre-existing failures are recorded and excluded from migration blame.
Phase 1: Inventory (read-only)
python3 scripts/inventory.py <dagster_repo> --out manifest.json # static scan
python3 scripts/inventory.py <dagster_repo> --runtime --out manifest.json # + runtime introspection when the project imports
The manifest lists every definition with file:line, captured params, current-vs-deprecated spelling, and dependency edges with their IO manager; every record starts classification: "pending". Classifying is YOUR first judgment task: assign each record MECH / JUDG / REDESIGN / NONE from its row in reference/mapping.md and write it into the manifest. The scanner enumerates (deterministic completeness); the agent classifies (judgment). A record you cannot map to a mapping.md row is itself a finding: record it, do not guess. Also grep for DAGSTER_CLOUD_ and EnvVar( (platform layer, Phase 5).
Manifest conventions: the canonical manifest lives in the migration run directory. Once the Astro project exists (Phase 2 scaffold), copy the manifest to its include/inventory/manifest.json so the Gate 3 pytest and status.py defaults find it; until then it just stays in the run dir (keep the two in sync afterward, the run-dir copy wins). Static records are the canonical migration units; runtime-mode enrichment merges into them, and only genuinely runtime-only definitions (factory-generated) become new units.
Emit the migration report skeleton now: one section per manifest record, plus the secrets/env naming map from reference/astro-deployment.md. Scale the skeleton to the project: a secretless local project gets a one-line "no secrets/platform layer" note, not empty boilerplate sections.
Phase 1.5: Go/no-go (the honest gate)
Before translating anything, answer the project-level question the inventory makes answerable: what does this team give up by migrating, and does each loss have an acceptable answer? Assess the NONE and REDESIGN rows against what is load-bearing for THIS team, evaluating the mitigation, not just the loss:
| If load-bearing | The Airflow-world answer | Stay-signal only if |
|---|---|---|
dbt rebuild-on-code-change (code_version_changed()) | State-aware dbt builds on a cron (Fusion / dbt State skip unchanged models per run, so the post-deploy tick rebuilds exactly what changed), and/or CI-triggered dbt build on merge (PR-gated, often an upgrade) | The team can neither run a state-aware dbt stack nor dbt from CI |
| Freshness driving materialization | Astro Observe freshness SLAs / Timeliness alerts + scheduled runs sized to the SLA | Freshness-triggered compute is genuinely irreplaceable by schedule+alerting |
| Per-asset cost accounting (Insights) | Astro Observe pipeline-level warehouse cost management; per-asset granularity is lost | Per-ASSET chargeback is a contractual/organizational requirement |
| Asset catalog / column-level lineage as daily tools | Airflow 3 asset views + OpenLineage/Astro lineage (asset-level) | Column-level lineage is embedded in daily workflows with no external catalog |
Deep AutomationCondition compositions, can_subset, selective per-partition materialization | Most decompose to cron/asset schedules (see reference/automation.md); the residue is redesigned per domain | Multiple domains depend on compositions that decompose to nothing |
| Sensor cursor transactionality, run-scoped teardown | Idempotent consumers + max_active_runs; context managers in task bodies | Exactly-once event coalescing is a correctness requirement that idempotency cannot absorb |
One rule the table implies, stated plainly: no dbt-only condition reaches "stay." Between Cosmos, state-aware dbt builds, and CI-triggered builds, every dbt-workflow loss has an accepted-practice mitigation (execution-proven in this skill's eval program, including on a real warehouse); dbt items are conditions to record, never blockers. The observability rows (per-asset cost, column-level lineage) are separate conditions and are evaluated on their own, even for dbt-heavy teams.
The gate's outcome is three-valued, and the middle one is the common case:
- Migrate: no stay-signals; proceed to Phase 2.
- Migrate with conditions (most real projects): losses exist, mitigations are named and accepted in writing in the report's first section, specific domains may carry REDESIGN work; proceed to Phase 2 with those conditions recorded.
- Stay on Dagster, today: reserved for the case where MULTIPLE stay-signal conditions in the right column genuinely hold at once and the migration is not externally mandated. Then the honest deliverable is that recommendation, in writing, with the specific unmitigated losses named, and the run stops there. A migration guide that cannot say "don't" cannot be trusted when it says "do", but "don't" is earned by unmitigatable losses, not by the mere existence of deltas.
Phase 2: Plan
- DAG boundaries: decide which asset-dependency edges become asset-aware schedules (cross-DAG) vs task ordering (intra-DAG). Group by domain/schedule cadence/team ownership;
define_asset_jobselections usually name the natural domains. - Per-edge IO decisions via the tree in
reference/io-and-data-passing.md(fuse / explicit storage / XCom). - Order: leaf domains first, dependency order after; the platform layer last.
- Fill each planned unit's target expectations into the manifest:
dag_id,task_count,edges,schedule,asset_outletsper unit. Gate 3 asserts against exactly these fields; a unit without them is skipped by validation, so an unenriched manifest means Gate 3 checks nothing (validate_dag reports skipped counts loudly, do not ignore them). - Scaffold the target:
astro dev init, shared helpers underinclude/. House conventions the scaffold imposes (e.g. a test demandingretries >= 2) do NOT override source fidelity: source behavior wins; convention adoption is a post-cutover improvement listed in the report, and the scaffold test gets skipped with an explicit reason.
Phase 3: Trial
Migrate 2-3 representative units end-to-end through every gate before fanning out. Pick one MECH asset, one partitioned asset, one JUDG case, or the nearest available mix (small projects may have no partitioned or no MECH assets; pick one full path through a real DAG instead). What the trial teaches goes into reference/troubleshooting.md before scaling; if the trial fails structurally, stop and rework the plan, not the units.
Phase 4: Migrate, domain by domain
Per unit, the state machine (tracked in the manifest):
pending → translate → fix-import → fix-lint → fix-tests → verify-parity → complete
↘ deferred (reason required)
- Translate using the reference file for the construct (routing table below). Rich context beats cleverness: read the source unit, its mapping rows, and a nearby already-migrated example.
- Validate through the gates:
python3 scripts/validate_dag.py <astro_project> --manifest manifest.json(gates 1-3), then execution and parity perreference/validation.md. - On gate failure, retry with the latest validator output in context (cap ~10 attempts, then defer with the failure class).
- Advance state only on gate pass:
python3 scripts/status.py advance <unit-id> .... A wrong disposition is corrected withstatus.py reopen <unit-id> --reason .... The no-hand-editing rule applies to the STATE field (status) only; the PLAN fields (dag_id,task_count,edges,schedule,asset_outlets,target) are the planner's to write in Phase 2. - Units that deliberately translate to NO DAG of their own (helpers absorbed into tasks, policies that became alerts, resources that became connections) are dispositioned
completewithtarget: "none"and evidence naming where they went; Gate 3 skips them by design. - Commit per unit, atomically.
Phase 5: Platform layer
reference/astro-deployment.md: Deployments topology, secrets/connection naming map, CI/CD and preview Deployments, alert-policy mapping, Observe/lineage expectations, the DAGSTER_CLOUD_* in-code rewrite checklist.
Phase 6: Side-by-side and cutover
Dagster remains authoritative. Run migrated DAGs shadowed/paused; compare outputs over the same logical window (row counts + checksums; recompute expected values from the Dagster-produced output itself, using recorded materialization metadata only opportunistically, per reference/validation.md Gate 5). Flip schedules one domain per change window: pause the Dagster schedule, unpause the Airflow DAG; rollback is the reverse. Keep Dagster readable after cutover (run history does not migrate).
Phase 7: Final report
scripts/status.py summary must pass. The report contains: the go/no-go assessment (Phase 1.5) and its rationale, disposition table for every definition, all equivalence rows, the NONE/REDESIGN losses stated plainly (lineage depth, code_version triggers, Insights cost accounting, sensor cursor transactionality), the secrets map, and the deferred list with reasons. Spot-check ten complete claims before delivering it.
Reference routing
| Construct encountered | Read |
|---|---|
| First hour, glossary, what can break | reference/quickstart.md |
| Anything (first stop: one row per construct) | reference/mapping.md |
| Asset-key → URI convention, translation granularity, external/observable assets | reference/assets.md |
| Asset deps, IO managers, XCom, storage decisions | reference/io-and-data-passing.md |
Any partitions_def, partition mappings, backfills | reference/partitions.md |
| Schedules, sensors, AutomationCondition, freshness | reference/automation.md |
@dbt_assets, translators, dbt Cloud | reference/dbt.md |
| Components (defs.yaml), custom Component subclasses, dynamic generation | reference/components.md |
| dagster_cloud.yaml, secrets, alerts, CI/CD, cutover | reference/astro-deployment.md |
| Gates, parity testing, state machine | reference/validation.md |
| Failure classes seen before | reference/troubleshooting.md |
Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
scripts/inventory.py | Scan the Dagster repo → JSON manifest (static + optional runtime mode) |
scripts/validate_dag.py | Gates 1-3 against the generated Astro project |
scripts/status.py | Per-unit state machine + completeness gate |
FAQ
What does the migrating-dagster-to-airflow skill do?
Guide for migrating Dagster projects to Apache Airflow 3 on Astro. Use when the user mentions migrating, converting, or porting Dagster (or Dagster+) code to Airflow or Astro, wants to plan or assess such a migration, or asks what a Dagster construct maps to in Airflow. Covers assets, partitions, schedules, sensors, declarative automation, resources, IO managers, ops/jobs, dbt, Pipes, Components, and Dagster+ platform config. Always load this skill as the first step for any Dagster-to-Airflow request.
How do I install migrating-dagster-to-airflow?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/astronomer/agents --skill migrating-dagster-to-airflow in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/migrating-dagster-to-airflow/ (personal) or .claude/skills/migrating-dagster-to-airflow/ (project).
Which AI agents can use migrating-dagster-to-airflow?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is migrating-dagster-to-airflow safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains migrating-dagster-to-airflow?
It is published by astronomer in astronomer/agents. It has 166 recorded installs.
More from astronomer/agents
airflow
astronomer/agents
Queries, manages, and troubleshoots Apache Airflow using the af CLI. Use when working with anything related to Airflow - a DAG, a DAG run, a task log, an import or parse error, a broken DAG, or any Airflow operation. Covers listing and triggering DAGs, retrying runs, reading task logs, diagnosing failures, debugging import and parse errors, checking connections, variables and pools, exploring the REST API, and monitoring health (for example "trigger a pipeline", "retry a run", "list connections", "check Airflow health", "why did my DAG fail"). This is the entrypoint that routes to sibling skills for authoring, testing, deploying, and migrating Airflow 2 to 3. Not for warehouse/SQL analytics on Airflow metadata tables (use analyzing-data); for deep root-cause reports use debugging-dags or airflow-investigation.
managing-astro-local-env
astronomer/agents
Manage local Airflow environment with Astro CLI (Docker and standalone modes). Use when the user wants to start, stop, or restart Airflow, view logs, query the Airflow API, troubleshoot, or fix environment issues. For project setup, see setting-up-astro-project.
analyzing-data
astronomer/agents
Queries the data warehouse with SQL and answers business questions about data. Use when answering anything that needs warehouse data - counts, metrics, trends, aggregations, joins across tables, data lookups, or ad-hoc SQL analysis (for example "who uses X", "how many Y", "show me Z", "find customers", "what is the count").
authoring-dags
astronomer/agents
Workflow and best practices for writing Apache Airflow DAGs. Use when creating a new DAG, write pipeline code, handling questions about DAG patterns and conventions or extending an existing DAG with a follow-up/downstream task. ANY request shaped like 'add a DAG named X', 'write a pipeline', 'add a task that runs after Y', or 'extend the DAG'. For testing and debugging DAGs, see the testing-dags skill.
debugging-dags
astronomer/agents
Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root-cause analysis with structured investigation and prevention recommendations. Use when deep failure investigation is needed, a DAG fails to import/parse or 'airflow dags list' errors on a file; a task or run is failing and must be diagnosed and fixed; requests like 'why did X fail', 'my dag keeps failing — find and fix it', or fixing a broken DAG so it loads cleanly. For simple 'why did it fail / show logs', the airflow skill handles it directly.
testing-dags
astronomer/agents
Complex DAG testing workflows with debugging and fixing cycles. Use for multi-step testing requests like "test this dag and fix it if it fails", "test and debug", "run the pipeline and troubleshoot issues". For simple test requests ("test dag", "run dag"), the airflow entrypoint skill handles it directly. This skill is for iterative test-debug-fix cycles.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.