
codex-delegate
Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Installs
- 7.8K
- Last 24h
- +53
- Trending rank
- #3209
- Security
- Pass
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/amelnagdy/delegate-skills --skill codex-delegate- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads codex-delegate automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
Security audits
Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Codex Delegate
You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer — the OpenAI Codex CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; Codex does the typing in its own sandbox; you verify and commit.
Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators as designed-for, not yet proven.)
When NOT to use this
- The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
- The
codexCLI is not installed or not authenticated (runcodex login). - You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review (use Codex's own
reviewcommand).
Prerequisites (check once)
codex --versionsucceeds. If not, install (npm i -g @openai/codex) andcodex login.- Confirm which
codexis on PATH. Multiple installs are common (e.g. a current npm/nvm copy and a stale Homebrew one).command -v codexshows the active one andcodex --versionits version — an old binary predates flags this skill relies on (codex exec --json,-o,exec resume). The relay also records the version it ran intoresult.json, so a stale binary is visible after the fact. - You are in (or will point
--cdat) the target git repository.
The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
1. Write the brief
Codex sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context. Everything the task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile — do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Codex it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per brief. Full guidance and a template: references/writing-the-brief.md.
This skill selects Codex as the implementer. Codex as the orchestrator is a separate role: background waiting requires codex-background and its configured MCP server. Installing codex-delegate does not automatically install or configure that support utility. See the codex-background setup guide.
2. Dispatch
For Codex orchestration of background work, install and configure the separate
codex-background support utility first. If its MCP tools or registry are missing, stop and
report the setup requirement; do not silently fall back to model-driven polling. Then invoke its
registered delegate_run MCP tool once in place of the shell example below.
Follow that skill for structured common arguments, unchanged provider flags and reattachment by
runId. Keep the request pending until completion, then continue this skill's review and landing
steps. Other orchestrators keep the shell workflow below.
Send the brief to Codex with the bundled helper. It wraps codex exec, captures the run, and writes a
structured result.json — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." (<skill-dir> below is
this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md, i.e. the directory you loaded
the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other
orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run
find ~ -name relay.mjs -path '*codex-delegate*' and substitute the directory above it.)
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis, no edits): add --read-only
# isolated review (skip ambient MCP/user config): add --ignore-user-config
# subagent defaults: add --subagent-model <name> --subagent-effort <level> (again on every resume)
# web search mode (disabled|cached|indexed|live): add --web-search live (again on every resume)
# network inside the sandbox (gh, curl, installs): add --network-access (on resume: --sandbox workspace-write --network-access)
# continue the exact Codex session: add --session <threadId> (from result.json; send only the delta brief)
# fallback when no thread id is available: add --resume-last
# hard time limit (watchdog): add --timeout 2h (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options: node .../relay.mjs --help
The helper defaults to a write-capable (workspace-write) sandbox and writes its artifacts to a temp
dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the
result.json shape: references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
3. Wait for completion
Codex using codex-background keeps the original MCP request pending: no model-driven sleep,
status or log polling. Use delegate_wait only to reattach after an interrupted request.
The helper blocks until Codex finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume when it returns:
- Claude Code: run the Bash call with
run_in_background: true; you are notified on completion. - Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll
the result file —
… &in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL), or your shell's equivalent (Start-Jobin PowerShell,start /bin cmd). The run is done whenresult.jsonexists with astatus. (A pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missingcodexbinary exits 127 but does write aresult.jsonwith statuscodex_unavailable.)
Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the
process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is
the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
4. Review — do not trust the self-report
Codex's result.json includes its own summary and gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:
- Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take "gates passed" on faith.
- Read the diff against the brief: did Codex do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and
nothing less?
touchedFilesin the result is your starting point. - Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard,
test-guard, etc. from
guard-skills) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it. - For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.
Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.
5. Land it
Because Codex's sandbox cannot reliably write .git (it varies by version, OS, and path), the
orchestrator commits. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:
- Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
- If it needs changes, send a delta brief with
--session <threadId>from the priorresult.json(use--resume-lastonly when no thread id is available), and review again.
Read-only second opinions
The relay doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk: dispatch
--read-only with a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both
positions, and ask Codex to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no
files. Any delegation skill whose implementer offers a read-only mode supports the same use, but
check how hard that mode's guarantee is first: Codex's sandbox enforces it, while Grok's is
best-effort and only flagged after the fact (readOnlyViolation) — for those implementers,
verify touchedFiles came back empty instead of assuming no edits.
Authorization model
Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Codex's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment is in references/review-and-land.md.
If you have the openai-codex plugin
The official openai-codex Claude Code plugin is excellent and complementary — codex-delegate
builds on the same codex CLI, it doesn't replace the plugin. They point in different directions:
- The plugin's
codex:codex-rescueagent is a forwarder: it hands one task to Codex and returns the output. It deliberately does not poll, review, or commit. - The plugin's review command and stop-review gate run the inverse direction: Codex reviews your work.
codex-delegateis the orchestration loop in the other direction: you drive Codex to implement across one task or a queue, and you review and land each result. That loop — brief → dispatch → poll → review → commit, with the orchestrator owning the commit — is what the plugin leaves to you, and what this skill encodes.
If you have the plugin installed, its companion CLI is an optional alternative dispatch backend; the
bundled relay.mjs is the default because it adds no install of its own beyond the codex binary
(Node and git, which the relay also needs, are prerequisites for every skill here).
References
- references/writing-the-brief.md — how to write a brief Codex can execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, embedding the real gate commands.
- references/dispatch-and-poll.md —
relay.mjsflags, theresult.jsoncontract, backgrounding per orchestrator, and recovery when a run misbehaves. - references/review-and-land.md — the review checklist, the commit boundary, and the exact-session rework cycle.
- references/multi-task-queues.md — running a sequential queue: carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end-of-run coherence check.
FAQ
What does the codex-delegate skill do?
Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
How do I install codex-delegate?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/amelnagdy/delegate-skills --skill codex-delegate in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/codex-delegate/ (personal) or .claude/skills/codex-delegate/ (project).
Which AI agents can use codex-delegate?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is codex-delegate safe to install?
Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.
Who maintains codex-delegate?
It is published by amelnagdy in amelnagdy/delegate-skills. It has 7,809 recorded installs.
More from amelnagdy/delegate-skills
opencode-delegate
amelnagdy/delegate-skills
Delegate a coding task to the OpenCode CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to OpenCode — phrasings like "have OpenCode do X", "delegate this to OpenCode", "run it through OpenCode", or "use OpenCode to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through OpenCode while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
claude-delegate
amelnagdy/delegate-skills
Delegate a coding task to a separate Claude Code CLI process or another Claude session as an implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use only when the user explicitly asks to delegate implementation to Claude Code, another Claude session, or the claude CLI — for example, "have another Claude implement this", "delegate this to Claude Code", or "run this queue through a separate Claude session." Do not trigger merely because the current orchestrator is Claude, and do not use when the user asks the current Claude to implement directly without delegation.
agy-delegate
amelnagdy/delegate-skills
Delegate a coding task to the Google Antigravity CLI (agy) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Antigravity or agy - phrasings like "have Antigravity do X", "delegate this to agy", "run it through agy", or "use Antigravity to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through agy while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
delegate-setup
amelnagdy/delegate-skills
Configure delegation fleet lanes: which implementer CLI handles which kind of work, with optional model and effort (or variant) dials. Discovers installed CLIs, proposes a lane map for user approval, and writes global or project config only after explicit yes. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, or reconfigure delegation lanes, a fleet of lanes, or which implementer handles feature/tests/ui work — not for dispatching a coding task to an implementer.
kimi-delegate
amelnagdy/delegate-skills
Delegate a coding task to the Kimi Code CLI (kimi) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Kimi - phrasings like "have Kimi implement X", "delegate this to Kimi", "run it through Kimi Code", or "use Kimi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Kimi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
grok-delegate
amelnagdy/delegate-skills
Delegate a coding task to the Grok Build CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Grok — phrasings like "have Grok do X", "delegate this to Grok", "run it through Grok", "use Grok Build to implement/fix/refactor", or "have grok CLI do this" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Grok while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
Popular code quality & workflow skills
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock/skills
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
mattpocock/skills
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
domain-modeling
mattpocock/skills
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
codebase-design
mattpocock/skills
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.