
quality-manager-qms-iso13485
ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.
- Installs
- 786
- Last 24h
- —
- Trending rank
- —
- Security
- Not audited
Install
Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill quality-manager-qms-iso13485- 01
Install
Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.
- 02
Describe the task
Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads quality-manager-qms-iso13485 automatically when relevant.
- 03
Review the result
The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.
SKILL.md
The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.
Quality Manager - QMS ISO 13485 Specialist
ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.
Table of Contents
- QMS Implementation Workflow
- Document Control Workflow
- Internal Audit Workflow
- Process Validation Workflow
- Supplier Qualification Workflow
- QMS Process Reference
- Decision Frameworks
- Tools and References
QMS Implementation Workflow
Implement ISO 13485:2016 compliant quality management system from gap analysis through certification.
Workflow: Initial QMS Implementation
- Conduct gap analysis against ISO 13485:2016 requirements
- Document current state vs. required state for each clause
- Prioritize gaps by:
- Regulatory criticality
- Risk to product safety
- Resource requirements
- Develop implementation roadmap with milestones
- Establish Quality Manual per Clause 4.2.2:
- QMS scope with justified exclusions
- Process interactions
- Procedure references
- Create required documented procedures — see Mandatory Documented Procedures for the full list
- Deploy processes with training
- Validation: Gap analysis complete; Quality Manual approved; all required procedures documented and trained
Use the Gap Analysis Matrix template in qms-process-templates.md to document clause-by-clause current state, gaps, priority, and actions.
QMS Structure
| Level | Document Type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quality Manual | QM-001 |
| 2 | Procedures | SOP-02-001 |
| 3 | Work Instructions | WI-06-012 |
| 4 | Records | Training records |
Document Control Workflow
Establish and maintain document control per ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.3.
Workflow: Document Creation and Approval
- Identify need for new document or revision
- Assign document number per numbering convention:
- Format:
[TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV] - Example:
SOP-02-001-01
- Format:
- Draft document using approved template
- Route for review to subject matter experts
- Collect and address review comments
- Obtain required approvals based on document type
- Update Document Master List
- Validation: Document numbered correctly; all reviewers signed; Master List updated
Document Numbering Convention
| Prefix | Document Type | Approval Authority |
|---|---|---|
| QM | Quality Manual | Management Rep + CEO |
| POL | Policy | Department Head + QA |
| SOP | Procedure | Process Owner + QA |
| WI | Work Instruction | Supervisor + QA |
| TF | Template/Form | Process Owner |
| SPEC | Specification | Engineering + QA |
Area Codes
| Code | Area | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Quality Management | Quality Manual, policy |
| 02 | Document Control | This procedure |
| 03 | Training | Competency procedures |
| 04 | Design | Design control |
| 05 | Purchasing | Supplier management |
| 06 | Production | Manufacturing |
| 07 | Quality Control | Inspection, testing |
| 08 | CAPA | Corrective actions |
Document Change Control
| Change Type | Approval Level | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative | Document Control | Typos, formatting |
| Minor | Process Owner + QA | Clarifications |
| Major | Full review cycle | Process changes |
| Emergency | Expedited + retrospective | Safety issues |
Document Review Schedule
| Document Type | Review Period | Trigger for Unscheduled Review |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Manual | Annual | Organizational change |
| Procedures | Annual | Audit finding, regulation change |
| Work Instructions | 2 years | Process change |
| Forms | 2 years | User feedback |
Internal Audit Workflow
Plan and execute internal audits per ISO 13485 Clause 8.2.4.
Workflow: Annual Audit Program
- Identify processes and areas requiring audit coverage
- Assess risk factors for audit frequency:
- Previous audit findings
- Regulatory changes
- Process changes
- Complaint trends
- Assign qualified auditors (independent of area audited)
- Develop annual audit schedule
- Obtain management approval
- Communicate schedule to process owners
- Track completion and reschedule as needed
- Validation: All processes covered; auditors qualified and independent; schedule approved
Use the Audit Program Template in qms-process-templates.md to schedule audits by clause and quarter across processes such as Document Control (4.2.3/4.2.4), Management Review (5.6), Design Control (7.3), Production (7.5), and CAPA (8.5.2/8.5.3).
Workflow: Individual Audit Execution
- Prepare audit plan with scope, criteria, and schedule
- Notify auditee minimum 1 week prior
- Review procedures and previous audit results
- Prepare audit checklist
- Conduct opening meeting
- Collect evidence through:
- Document review
- Record sampling
- Process observation
- Personnel interviews
- Classify findings:
- Major NC: Absence or breakdown of system
- Minor NC: Single lapse or deviation
- Observation: Risk of future NC
- Conduct closing meeting
- Issue audit report within 5 business days
- Validation: All checklist items addressed; findings supported by evidence; report distributed
Auditor Qualification Requirements
| Criterion | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Training | ISO 13485 awareness + auditor training |
| Experience | Minimum 1 audit as observer |
| Independence | Not auditing own work area |
| Competence | Understanding of audited process |
Finding Classification Guide
| Classification | Criteria | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| Major NC | System absence, total breakdown, regulatory violation | 30 days for CAPA |
| Minor NC | Single instance, partial compliance | 60 days for CAPA |
| Observation | Potential risk, improvement opportunity | Track in next audit |
Process Validation Workflow
Validate special processes per ISO 13485 Clause 7.5.6.
Workflow: Process Validation Protocol
- Identify processes requiring validation:
- Output cannot be verified by inspection
- Deficiencies appear only in use
- Sterilization, welding, sealing, software
- Form validation team with subject matter experts
- Write validation protocol including:
- Process description and parameters
- Equipment and materials
- Acceptance criteria
- Statistical approach
- Execute IQ: verify equipment installed correctly and document specifications
- Execute OQ: test parameter ranges and verify process control
- Execute PQ: run production conditions and verify output meets requirements
- Write validation report with conclusions
- Validation: IQ/OQ/PQ complete; acceptance criteria met; validation report approved
Validation Documentation Requirements
| Phase | Content | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol | Objectives, methods, criteria | Approved protocol |
| IQ | Equipment verification | Installation records |
| OQ | Parameter verification | Test results |
| PQ | Performance verification | Production data |
| Report | Summary, conclusions | Approval signatures |
Revalidation Triggers
| Trigger | Action Required |
|---|---|
| Equipment change | Assess impact, revalidate affected phases |
| Parameter change | OQ and PQ minimum |
| Material change | Assess impact, PQ minimum |
| Process failure | Full revalidation |
| Periodic | Per validation schedule (typically 3 years) |
Special Process Examples
| Process | Validation Standard | Critical Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| EO Sterilization | ISO 11135 | Temperature, humidity, EO concentration, time |
| Steam Sterilization | ISO 17665 | Temperature, pressure, time |
| Radiation Sterilization | ISO 11137 | Dose, dose uniformity |
| Sealing | Internal | Temperature, pressure, dwell time |
| Welding | ISO 11607 | Heat, pressure, speed |
Supplier Qualification Workflow
Evaluate and approve suppliers per ISO 13485 Clause 7.4.
Workflow: New Supplier Qualification
- Identify supplier category:
- Category A: Critical (affects safety/performance)
- Category B: Major (affects quality)
- Category C: Minor (indirect impact)
- Request supplier information:
- Quality certifications
- Product specifications
- Quality history
- Evaluate supplier based on:
- Quality system (ISO certification)
- Technical capability
- Quality history
- Financial stability
- For Category A suppliers:
- Conduct on-site audit
- Require quality agreement
- Calculate qualification score
- Make approval decision:
-
80: Approved
- 60-80: Conditional approval
- <60: Not approved
-
- Add to Approved Supplier List
- Validation: Evaluation criteria scored; qualification records complete; supplier categorized
Supplier Evaluation Criteria
| Criterion | Weight | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Quality System | 30% | ISO 13485=30, ISO 9001=20, Documented=10, None=0 |
| Quality History | 25% | Reject rate: <1%=25, 1-3%=15, >3%=0 |
| Delivery | 20% | On-time: >95%=20, 90-95%=10, <90%=0 |
| Technical Capability | 15% | Exceeds=15, Meets=10, Marginal=5 |
| Financial Stability | 10% | Strong=10, Adequate=5, Questionable=0 |
Supplier Category Requirements
| Category | Qualification | Monitoring | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A - Critical | On-site audit | Annual review | Quality agreement |
| B - Major | Questionnaire | Semi-annual review | Quality requirements |
| C - Minor | Assessment | Issue-based | Standard terms |
Supplier Performance Metrics
| Metric | Target | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Accept Rate | >98% | (Accepted lots / Total lots) × 100 |
| On-Time Delivery | >95% | (On-time / Total orders) × 100 |
| Response Time | <5 days | Average days to resolve issues |
| Documentation | 100% | (Complete CoCs / Required CoCs) × 100 |
QMS Process Reference
For detailed requirements and audit questions for each ISO 13485:2016 clause, see iso13485-clause-requirements.md.
Management Review Required Inputs (Clause 5.6.2)
| Input | Source | Prepared By |
|---|---|---|
| Audit results | Internal and external audits | QA Manager |
| Customer feedback | Complaints, surveys | Customer Quality |
| Process performance | Process metrics | Process Owners |
| Product conformity | Inspection data, NCs | QC Manager |
| CAPA status | CAPA system | CAPA Officer |
| Previous actions | Prior review records | QMR |
| Changes affecting QMS | Regulatory, organizational | RA Manager |
| Recommendations | All sources | All Managers |
Record Retention Requirements
⚠️ STATUS — QMSR transition (effective 2026-02-02): FDA's Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) final rule (89 FR 7496) amended 21 CFR Part 820 to incorporate ISO 13485:2016 by reference and removed the legacy QSR subsection structure. The section numbers below (820.30/.181/.184/.198) no longer exist in the CFR — they are retained only as a familiar index. The current authority for record retention is ISO 13485:2016 §4.2.5 (retain "for at least the lifetime of the medical device as defined by the organization, but not less than two years"), with records additions in retained 21 CFR 820.35. Cite the ISO 13485 clauses — not the 820.x numbers — in current compliance documentation.
| Record Type | Minimum Retention | Current authority under QMSR (legacy QSR shown for index) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Master Record | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §4.2.3 (medical device file)/§4.2.5 (legacy QSR 820.181, historical) |
| Device History Record | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §4.2.5 + 21 CFR 820.35 (legacy QSR 820.184, historical) |
| Design History File | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §7.3.10/§4.2.5 (legacy QSR 820.30, historical) |
| Complaint Records | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §8.2.2/§4.2.5 + 21 CFR 820.35(b) (legacy QSR 820.198, historical) |
| Training Records | Employment + 3 years | Best practice |
| Audit Records | 7 years | Best practice |
| CAPA Records | 7 years | Best practice |
| Calibration Records | Equipment life + 2 years | Best practice |
Decision discipline: This skill's checklists and tools structure QMS conformity assessment — they do not certify ISO 13485 / QMSR compliance. Final compliance determinations and record-retention decisions are yours to make and must be reviewed and signed off by the named QMR; route FDA-specific regulatory-classification questions to Regulatory Affairs and confirm current 21 CFR 820 / ISO 13485:2016 text at fda.gov before relying on any citation here.
Decision Frameworks
Exclusion Justification (Clause 4.2.2)
| Clause | Permissible Exclusion | Justification Required |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4.2 | Contamination control | Product not affected by contamination |
| 7.3 | Design and development | Organization does not design products |
| 7.5.2 | Product cleanliness | No cleanliness requirements |
| 7.5.3 | Installation | No installation activities |
| 7.5.4 | Servicing | No servicing activities |
| 7.5.5 | Sterile products | No sterile products |
Nonconformity Disposition Decision Tree
Nonconforming Product Identified
│
▼
Can it be reworked?
│
Yes──┴──No
│ │
▼ ▼
Is rework Can it be used
procedure as is?
available? │
│ Yes──┴──No
Yes─┴─No │ │
│ │ ▼ ▼
▼ ▼ Concession Scrap or
Rework Create approval return to
per SOP rework needed? supplier
procedure │
Yes─┴─No
│ │
▼ ▼
Customer Use as is
approval with MRB
approval
CAPA Initiation Criteria
| Source | Automatic CAPA | Evaluate for CAPA |
|---|---|---|
| Customer complaint | Safety-related | All others |
| External audit | Major NC | Minor NC |
| Internal audit | Major NC | Repeat minor NC |
| Product NC | Field failure | Trend exceeds threshold |
| Process deviation | Safety impact | Repeated deviations |
Tools and References
Scripts
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| qms_audit_checklist.py | Generate audit checklists by clause or process | python qms_audit_checklist.py --help |
Audit Checklist Generator Features:
- Generate clause-specific checklists (e.g.,
--clause 7.3) - Generate process-based checklists (e.g.,
--process design-control) - Full system audit checklist (
--audit-type system) - Text or JSON output formats
- Interactive mode for guided selection
References
| Document | Content |
|---|---|
| iso13485-clause-requirements.md | Detailed requirements for each ISO 13485:2016 clause with audit questions |
| qms-process-templates.md | Ready-to-use templates for gap analysis, audit program, document control, CAPA, supplier, training |
Quick Reference: Mandatory Documented Procedures
| Procedure | Clause | Key Elements |
|---|---|---|
| Document Control | 4.2.3 | Approval, distribution, obsolete control |
| Record Control | 4.2.4 | Identification, retention, disposal |
| Internal Audit | 8.2.4 | Program, auditor qualification, reporting |
| NC Product Control | 8.3 | Identification, segregation, disposition |
| Corrective Action | 8.5.2 | Root cause, implementation, verification |
| Preventive Action | 8.5.3 | Risk identification, implementation |
Related Skills
| Skill | Integration Point |
|---|---|
| quality-manager-qmr | Management review, quality policy |
| capa-officer | CAPA system management |
| qms-audit-expert | Advanced audit techniques |
| quality-documentation-manager | DHF, DMR, DHR management |
| risk-management-specialist | ISO 14971 integration |
FAQ
What does the quality-manager-qms-iso13485 skill do?
ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.
How do I install quality-manager-qms-iso13485?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill quality-manager-qms-iso13485 in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/ (personal) or .claude/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/ (project).
Which AI agents can use quality-manager-qms-iso13485?
Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.
Is quality-manager-qms-iso13485 safe to install?
No partner security audit is available yet. Skills can run commands and scripts, so read the SKILL.md and any bundled files before installing.
Who maintains quality-manager-qms-iso13485?
It is published by alirezarezvani in alirezarezvani/claude-skills. It has 786 recorded installs.
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
engineering-skills
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Index of the engineering-team skills bundle for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw, and 6 more tools. Architecture, frontend, backend, QA, DevOps, security, AI/ML, data engineering, Playwright, Stripe, AWS, MS365 (stdlib-only Python tools). Use when browsing or choosing among engineering-team role skills — load only the one specialist SKILL.md you need, never bulk-load the bundle.
finance-skills
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Router/index for the finance skills bundled in this plugin: financial-analyst (ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance, rolling forecasts), saas-metrics-coach (ARR/MRR, churn, CAC/LTV, NRR, quick ratio) and month-end-close (close calendar, reconciliations, flux review). Use when a finance request doesn't obviously match one skill and you need to pick the right one (e.g., 'analyze these financials', 'how healthy are my SaaS metrics').
marketing-skills
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Directory and router for the marketing skills library. Use when you need to find the right marketing skill for a task, see what marketing capabilities exist, or get oriented in this plugin. 44 specialist skills across 8 pods (content, SEO + AEO, CRO, channels, growth, intelligence, sales enablement, ops), 59 stdlib Python tools. Routes to one skill — it does not execute marketing work itself.
business-growth-skills
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Router/index for the 4 business & growth skills bundled in this plugin: customer-success-manager (health scoring, churn risk, expansion), sales-engineer (RFP analysis, competitive matrices, PoC planning), revenue-operations (pipeline, forecast accuracy, GTM efficiency), and contract-and-proposal-writer. Use when a growth/revenue request doesn't obviously match one skill and you need to pick the right one (e.g., 'which accounts are at risk', 'should we bid on this RFP').
engineering-advanced-skills
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Index of 37 advanced engineering agent skills for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Use when browsing or choosing among the POWERFUL-tier engineering skills: agent design, RAG, MCP servers, CI/CD, database design, observability, security auditing, changelog/release automation, reliability (SLO/chaos/flags/operators), platform ops.
product-skills
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Use when coordinating product work across the 12 bundled product sub-skills (RICE, OKRs, UX research, design tokens, competitive teardown, analytics, experiments, discovery, roadmaps, spec-to-repo, landing pages, SaaS scaffolding) or the 4 standalone product-team plugins (user stories, Apple HIG, code-to-PRD, research summarizer). Triggers on 'help me prioritize', 'plan a product experiment', 'we ship features nobody uses', 'run the discovery loop', 'is our OST sound'. Forks context to route to one sub-skill via a deterministic signal router and returns a digest; can also drive a continuous-discovery loop (Torres cadence tracker + OST linter as machine gates) or a full goal→plan→execute→verify→close run through the repo-wide agent-harness. Distinct from project-management (how to deliver vs what to build), marketing/landing (from-scratch pages), and engineering/agent-harness (the generic loop engine this orchestrator plugs into).
Popular security skills
azure-compliance
microsoft/azure-skills
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
seo-audit
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
firebase-security-rules-auditor
firebase/agent-skills
Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.
audit
pbakaus/impeccable
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
competitors
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.