MCPInstall

web-quality-audit

Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".

Installs
33.1K
Last 24h
+224
Trending rank
#1192
Security
Pass

Install

Works with every agent the skills CLI supports.

npx skills add https://github.com/addyosmani/web-quality-skills --skill web-quality-audit
  1. 01

    Install

    Run the command in your project. The CLI asks which agents to install for.

  2. 02

    Describe the task

    Ask your agent for something this skill covers. It loads web-quality-audit automatically when relevant.

  3. 03

    Review the result

    The agent follows the SKILL.md steps, scripts and references bundled with the skill.

Security audits

Independent scans of the skill's instructions and bundled files.

Gen Agent Trust Hub PassSAFE ·The skill is a safe utility for performing web quality audits on local HTML content. It provides documentation for manual audits alongside a bash script that performs local static analysis of HTML files to check for standard tags and attributes. The script operates entirely offline, performs no file modifications, and properly quotes variables to prevent command injection.
Socket PassNo alerts
Snyk PassLOW ·Risk: LOW · No issues
Runlayer PassNONE ·2 files scanned · No issues
ZeroLeaks PassNONE ·Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

SKILL.md

The instructions your agent reads when the skill is triggered.

Web quality audit

Comprehensive quality review that combines live browser evidence with source inspection. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, and Agentic Browsing without treating an aggregate score as proof of quality.

Lighthouse 13+. The Performance category now uses shared Performance Insights across Lighthouse and the DevTools Performance panel (announcement). Follow current insight names and evidence. Do not require removed audit IDs or automatically recreate their recommendations; some were retired because they were noisy, inactionable, or easy to over-recommend.

How it works

  1. Establish the audit target: representative URLs, important states and journeys, public versus authenticated access, and mobile/desktop scope.
  2. If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.
  3. Use runtime failures to localize source inspection. Keep measured findings separate from hypotheses found only in code.
  4. Categorize by user impact and confidence, then make or recommend specific fixes.
  5. Re-run equivalent automated checks and the affected manual flows. Report what is verified and what still needs field or human validation.

Tool routing

Use the best capability already available; do not block the audit on optional setup.

NeedPreferred routeFallback
Performance and Core Web VitalsRecord a browser performance trace and analyze focused insights; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use performance_start_trace then performance_analyze_insightLighthouse CLI or PageSpeed Insights lab data
Real-user performanceCrUX values included in current DevTools trace summariesPageSpeed Insights/CrUX Vis; direct CrUX API only when a key is already available or automation is requested
Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, Agentic BrowsingRun a live Lighthouse audit; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use lighthouse_auditCategory-specific Lighthouse CLI audits plus manual checks
Rendered semantics and interactionInspect the accessibility tree and exercise the UI; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use take_snapshot and focused evaluate_scriptBrowser/manual testing
Source smoke testscripts/analyze.sh <path>Direct source inspection

Chrome DevTools MCP's lighthouse_audit intentionally excludes performance. Its navigation mode reloads the page; use snapshot mode when preserving the current authenticated or user-created state matters. The static analyzer is a fast smoke test, not a substitute for a rendered-page audit.

Audit categories

Performance

Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.

Resource Optimization:

  • Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via srcset.
  • Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
  • Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid @import.
  • Efficient fonts. Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.

Loading Strategy:

  • Preconnect to origins. Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.
  • Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
  • Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
  • Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.

Accessibility

Perceivable:

  • Text alternatives. Every <img> has meaningful alt text. Decorative images use alt="".
  • Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
  • Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
  • Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.

Operable:

  • Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
  • Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
  • Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
  • Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.

Understandable:

  • Page language. Set lang attribute on <html>.
  • Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
  • Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
  • Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.

Robust:

  • Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
  • ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
  • Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.

SEO

Crawlability:

  • Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
  • XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
  • Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
  • No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.

On-Page SEO:

  • Unique title tags. Make each title descriptive and concise; display truncation varies by device and result type.
  • Meta descriptions. Write useful, page-specific summaries; search engines may choose a different snippet.
  • Heading hierarchy. The primary heading is descriptive and the structure is logical; do not fail valid HTML solely for using more than one <h1>.
  • Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".

Technical SEO:

  • Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
  • HTTPS. Secure connection required.
  • Page experience signals. Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.
  • Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).

Best practices

Security:

  • HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
  • No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
  • CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
  • No exposed source maps. In production builds.

Modern Standards:

  • No deprecated APIs. Replace document.write, synchronous XHR, etc.
  • Valid doctype. Use <!DOCTYPE html>.
  • Charset declared. <meta charset="UTF-8"> as first element in <head>.
  • No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.

UX Patterns:

  • No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
  • Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
  • No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.

Agentic browsing

Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.

  • Accessible interaction surface. Semantic HTML, labels, names, roles, and states must expose meaningful controls in the accessibility tree.
  • WebMCP integrations are valid when present. Review registered tools, schemas, and form coverage; do not add WebMCP solely to raise an audit score.
  • llms.txt is optional. A valid file may help compatible tools discover curated content, but a Lighthouse pass does not prove that search or AI products will ingest, rank, or cite it.
  • Keep this category separate from SEO claims. Agentic browsability is not evidence of search ranking or AI visibility.

Severity levels

LevelDescriptionAction
CriticalSecurity vulnerabilities, complete failuresFix immediately
HighCore Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriersFix before launch
MediumPerformance opportunities, SEO improvementsFix within sprint
LowMinor optimizations, code qualityFix when convenient

Audit output format

When performing an audit, structure findings as:

## Audit results

### Evidence
| Signal | Scope/conditions | Result | Source |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|
| LCP | URL, phone, p75/28 days | 3.1s (needs improvement) | CrUX |
| Accessibility | URL, mobile navigation | 92 | Lighthouse |

### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
  - **Impact:** Why this matters
  - **Evidence:** Measured failure, runtime observation, or source hypothesis
  - **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation

### High priority (X found)
...

### Summary
- Performance: measured status and X findings
- Accessibility: automated status, X findings, manual checks pending/passed
- SEO: X findings
- Best Practices: X findings
- Agentic Browsing: X findings or not available

### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...

### Verification
- Re-run results under the same conditions
- Manual checks completed
- Field validation still pending

Quick checklist

Before every deploy

  • Core Web Vitals passing
  • No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
  • No console errors
  • HTTPS working
  • Meta tags present

Weekly review

  • Check Search Console for issues
  • Review Core Web Vitals trends
  • Update dependencies
  • Test with screen reader

Monthly deep dive

  • Full Lighthouse audit
  • Performance profiling
  • Accessibility audit with real users
  • SEO keyword review

References

For detailed guidelines on specific areas:

  • Performance Optimization
  • Core Web Vitals
  • Accessibility
  • SEO
  • Best Practices

FAQ

What does the web-quality-audit skill do?

Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".

How do I install web-quality-audit?

Run npx skills add https://github.com/addyosmani/web-quality-skills --skill web-quality-audit in your project. The skills CLI detects the agents you use and copies the skill into the right folder. For Claude Code you can also place the skill folder at ~/.claude/skills/web-quality-audit/ (personal) or .claude/skills/web-quality-audit/ (project).

Which AI agents can use web-quality-audit?

Any agent that supports the open Agent Skills format (a folder with a SKILL.md file), including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Cline, OpenCode and more.

Is web-quality-audit safe to install?

Security partners have reviewed it: Gen Agent Trust Hub passed; Socket passed; Snyk passed; Runlayer passed; ZeroLeaks passed. As with any skill, read the SKILL.md and bundled scripts before installing.

Who maintains web-quality-audit?

It is published by addyosmani in addyosmani/web-quality-skills. It has 33,108 recorded installs.

More from addyosmani/web-quality-skills

View all →

accessibility

addyosmani/web-quality-skills

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

Frontend & Design64.4K installs

seo

addyosmani/web-quality-skills

Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".

Marketing & SEO52.4K installs

performance

addyosmani/web-quality-skills

Optimize web performance for faster loading and better user experience. Use when asked to "speed up my site", "optimize performance", "reduce load time", "fix slow loading", "improve page speed", or "performance audit".

core-web-vitals

addyosmani/web-quality-skills

Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better page experience using field and lab evidence. Use when asked to "improve Core Web Vitals", "fix LCP", "reduce CLS", "optimize INP", "page experience optimization", or "fix layout shifts".

Frontend & Design32.2K installs

best-practices

addyosmani/web-quality-skills

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".

Popular security skills

View category →

azure-compliance

microsoft/azure-skills

Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.

OfficialSecurity567K installs

minimal-run-and-audit

lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills

Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized reprooutputs/ files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.

Security477.4K installs

seo-audit

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

Security238.7K installs

firebase-security-rules-auditor

firebase/agent-skills

Audits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.

OfficialSecurity139.1K installs

audit

pbakaus/impeccable

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

Security81.9K installs

competitors

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

Security79.3K installs